Military Review

If you have nothing to answer, do not let the interlocutor to the negotiating table

25
I do not know about you, but sometimes it seems to me that modern America is already close to "closing." How are they fed up with their petty, unworthy of the huge and rich country of filth! Then the consulates are closed, the Russian flag "with respect to the country" is removed. That terrorists pass through their bases. I mean, they don’t notice how they cross the border and start fighting already in Syria.




Yesterday's "solo number" of the US administration from the same series. It only concerns now not only Russia, but the entire world community. My hands itch from the upcoming debates at the UN. Why? One showman from Washington sent all UN diplomats to ... And the thing is that a delegation of our Defense Ministry led by Lieutenant-General, First Deputy Secretary of Defense was to arrive in the debate on the deployment of American missile defense to the UN General Assembly First Committee. Russia Andrei Tretyak.

The US authorities decided not to risk it and simply did not issue entry visas to our representatives. If we are talking about the American missile defense, the Americans did with the Russian military in the style of their own doctrine. "Shot down at takeoff" to secure their territory.

In principle, there is nothing “revolutionary” in such events. Debates, briefings, discussions within the UN are ongoing. This is one of the principles of this organization. Agree to submit a controversial issue for discussion of a committee or Security Council meeting. In this case, the meeting will turn into a "talker". But the text agreed upon at least with several members of the Security Council will not cause a delay in time and will be discussed on the merits.

There is nothing extraordinary in such events. Except for parts that may emerge supposedly by chance. But they are very painful to hit the entire system in question. Agree, to hide or chat the information that would have sounded on the margins of the first committee of the UN General Assembly, it would be difficult.

On Thursday, a Russian-Chinese briefing on the deployment of US missile defense systems took place just on the margins of this committee. This is also a common practice in order to draw attention to the upcoming discussions. On our side, a representative of the Ministry of Defense Alexander Emelyanov participated in the briefing.

The key points of this talk are worth noting. Although people interested in all these facts have long been known. So, the main idea of ​​the speech comes down to a simple conclusion. The United States Global Missile Defense System will lead to an arms race. I will quote the TASS report: "A dangerous mistake is to consider the missile defense system as an exclusively defensive system that does not threaten anyone, but only strengthens international and regional security." "The Russian Federation is confident that the unlimited deployment of the American missile defense system is a serious challenge to global security, an incentive for an arms race and a threat to all of humanity."

What is the matter? With the "good ends" declared by the Americans, the result is exactly the opposite? I have repeatedly written about the universality of American PU. And many times I read in discussions that this can not be. The arguments were rather weak and easily broken by the logical reasoning of opponents. Finally, already on the margins of the UN, I saw the same arguments from our military.

“Yemelyanov noted that today the US missile defense system includes more than 30 anti-missiles GBI, 130 anti-missiles" Standard-3 "and 150 anti-missile complexes. .

Moreover, the Americans have already blocked all possible flight paths with their radar. And this calls into question a retaliatory strike in the event of an attack on Russia. Especially given the time required to make a decision and receive an order connections.

Our representative touched upon another important issue that Western experts prefer to remain silent today. This is the problem of placing weapons systems in space. Today, American satellites are quantitatively superior to all other countries. Many missile defense and air defense systems are tied to them. And one cannot exclude the fact that some of the "asleep" satellites are actually just waiting for a team to begin combat operations against spacecraft from other countries.

"The US missile defense system threatens the security of international space activities, hampers the achievement of non-deployment arrangements weapons in space. "

I deliberately focused readers on the subject of the upcoming debate. Anyway, these topics are extremely “unpleasant” for Washington. The questions raised, especially when experts would raise them, raised with facts and examples, would be a great revelation for many countries. And in the camp of "fighters against Russian aggression" there would appear another "crack."

The Americans chose to violate the UN Charter and simply refuse to Russian specialists in obtaining an entry visa. Reception effective. Showing the attitude of the United States to international agreements and other "nonsense", showing the US attitude to the world in general. The classic "what I want, then I roll."

From the speech of Alexander Emelyanov: “A delegation of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation under the leadership of Advisor to the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Russia, First Deputy Minister of Defense Lieutenant General [Andrei] Tretiak was planned to participate in this briefing. However, the local side of the whole delegation of the General Staff of the Armed Forces Russian Federation, including Lieutenant-General Tretyak, did not issue an entry visa to the United States "

For a while it will work. But for whom? The Chinese are not in vain so actively involved in such discussions. They are well aware that their country is the second, if not the first, goal of a US nuclear strike. And the figures that Alexander Emelyanov cited by the number of antimissiles in the regions of the world, just show it.

I think the question of the American missile defense system was raised today for a reason. And will be discussed soon in other venues. China and Russia, especially in the light of strained relations between India and Pakistan, will simply be forced to create a reciprocal system. And this is nothing but another round of the arms race. Again, the policy of blackmail military escalation? "Wide strides" Mr. Trump and his country. As if the pants are not torn.

By the way, yesterday’s US declaration of withdrawal from UNESCO very much resembles the times of the collapse of the League of Nations. While reminding, but to be continued ...
Author:
25 comments
Ad

Our projects are looking for authors in the news and analytical departments. Requirements for applicants: literacy, responsibility, efficiency, inexhaustible creative energy, experience in copywriting or journalism, the ability to quickly analyze text and check facts, write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. The work is paid. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Same lech
    Same lech 13 October 2017 07: 08 New
    +4
    By the way, yesterday’s US declaration of withdrawal from UNESCO very much resembles the times of the collapse of the League of Nations. While reminding, but to be continued ...


    Do not go to the grandmother ... next in line is the exit from the UN ...
    The United States imagines itself to be the navel of the earth in the wake of claims of its exclusivity.
    1. rotmistr60
      rotmistr60 13 October 2017 10: 03 New
      +4
      The United States imagines itself to be the navel of the earth in the wake of claims of its exclusivity.

      And for this they have reason and we are contributing to this in some way (slurred body movements of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs). Let's hope that at the same time they will earn an umbilical hernia, with which the rest of their lives will toil.
    2. Antianglosax
      Antianglosax 13 October 2017 11: 03 New
      +5
      Quote: The same Lech
      The United States imagines itself to be the navel of the earth in the wake of claims of its exclusivity.

      So the authorities of many countries, and especially our Russia, with great enthusiasm help the descendants of thieves and prostitutes in this error. Our bosses are doing everything possible to ensure that these geeks continue to think so, and this can end badly.
  2. Kenxnumx
    Kenxnumx 13 October 2017 07: 23 New
    +3
    Nothing to chat. Yars riveting and laying new submarines.
    1. Sharansky
      Sharansky 13 October 2017 11: 33 New
      +3
      to rivet something, you must first revive the economy
      1. Kenxnumx
        Kenxnumx 13 October 2017 12: 12 New
        0
        A wish list is attached.
      2. bandabas
        bandabas 13 October 2017 22: 13 New
        0
        So the country's leadership constantly declares that the economy is more alive than all living things. The dead don't sweat.
  3. alex-cn
    alex-cn 13 October 2017 07: 29 New
    +2
    It seems necessary to say "and let yourself fall apart." Now few people consider it. It seems that only the right of the strong is working in the world now ... I think that our military will have its own bolt on the most cunning.
    1. Sharansky
      Sharansky 13 October 2017 22: 48 New
      0
      Quote: alex-cn
      It seems that only the right of the strong is working in the world ...

      It always has been. The open secret is also Mlyn.
  4. parusnik
    parusnik 13 October 2017 07: 44 New
    +3
    I don’t know about you, but sometimes it seems to me that modern America is already close to "closure".
    ... But it will still be closed for a long time ...
  5. Snail N9
    Snail N9 13 October 2017 09: 01 New
    +1
    The United States wanted to spit on the UN and other international organizations, they clearly spoke out- "in matters of security for the United States, we (Americans) will not look back at any regulatory or limiting documents or organizations .... we will do what we see fit. ... "What is there to discuss? They wanted to create a missile defense system, it will be with them, there is no doubt. That's just what our answer will be. I’ll remember recently our "eminent" generals and "experts" publicly stated that the "global" missile defense is something from the realm of fantasy and if the Americans start to do it, their economy will be fast " will fly into the pipe. " The economy has already “fallen into the chimney” only now, just not the American one, but someone else ... But the Americans inevitably and without looking back at anyone, create their own “global” missile defense.
    1. domokl
      13 October 2017 10: 23 New
      +1
      Quote: Snail N9
      The economy "into the pipe" has already "flown out" only now, just not the American one, but someone else's ..

      I whose economy flew into the pipe in connection with the deployment of missile defense elements in Europe? Just interesting.
  6. Skay
    Skay 13 October 2017 09: 30 New
    0
    Throwing a boomerang of actions, think in advance how you will catch a boomerang of consequences.
  7. Nitarius
    Nitarius 13 October 2017 09: 42 New
    0
    sorry .. but the suspicion IS THAT WE WILL NOT MAKE A NEW WAR .. HAVE TO HAVE Piled up the guys behind the OCEAN too .. IT WAS BEING AND THOSE SNAKEHEAD WHO WHO IS FOR them!
  8. kunstkammer
    kunstkammer 13 October 2017 10: 52 New
    0
    The Chinese are not in vain so actively involved in such discussions. They are well aware that their country is the second, if not the first, target of the US nuclear strike.

    But is it possible to try to use the Chinese "understanding" for our purposes? They have nowhere to put money. So let them take more part in defending their country. Will fork out on our air defense systems.
    And they are protected and our income!
  9. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 13 October 2017 11: 28 New
    0
    This technique is not used for the first time. I don’t understand at all - the UN should be extraterritorial - you never know in whose territory it is located. A delegation to the UN travels, not to the United States; she is interested in the United States only as the goal of a retaliatory strike.
    1. Sharansky
      Sharansky 13 October 2017 11: 34 New
      0
      The US is a major investor in the Russian economy, so it’s not so simple
      1. Golovan Jack
        Golovan Jack 13 October 2017 11: 41 New
        +7
        Yes, and you will find a digital, something even confirmed?

        So far, raving on the dart, call ...
        Quote: Sharansky
        The US is a major investor in the Russian economy, so it’s not so simple
        1. Sharansky
          Sharansky 13 October 2017 12: 00 New
          0
          Bullshit is so bullshit. If it’s easier for you to live, I don’t mind, fantasize.
          NEW YORK CITY, October 12. / TASS /. More than 50% of the funds of American investors are invested in Russian assets, said the chairman of the Moscow Exchange at the MOEX Forum in New York.
          More on TASS:
          http://tass.ru/ekonomika/4641380


          In 2016, for the first time in three years, Russia returned to the foreign borrowing market as a sovereign, and in the framework of two issues last year, the majority of investors came to the United States - this indicates that, despite formal and informal sanctions, the Americans did not lose interest to invest in Russia. As RBC previously reported, when placed in 2017, the Americans also bought most of the Russian government securities bought by foreign investors.
          1. misti1973
            misti1973 13 October 2017 22: 25 New
            0
            Well yes. And the outflow of capital this year has more than doubled! And what can they invest in if everything is bent? Less than these dodiks need to listen! Look, Ulyukaev’s economy has broken its bottom five times. Now it’s gone to the bottom :) You wait: at the end of this year, Russia must make large payments on public debt and debts of state-owned companies. Follow the changes.
          2. Golovan Jack
            Golovan Jack 14 October 2017 15: 54 New
            +7
            Quote: Sharansky
            Bullshit is so bullshit. If it’s easier for you to live, I don’t mind, fantasize.
            NEW YORK CITY, October 12. / TASS /. More than 50% of the funds of American investors are invested in Russian assets, said the chairman of the Moscow Exchange at the MOEX Forum in New York.
            More on TASS:
            http://tass.ru/ekonomika/4641380


            In 2016, for the first time in three years, Russia returned to the foreign borrowing market as a sovereign, and in the framework of two issues last year, the majority of investors came to the United States - this indicates that, despite formal and informal sanctions, the Americans did not lose interest to invest in Russia. As RBC previously reported, when placed in 2017, the Americans also bought most of the Russian government securities bought by foreign investors.

            Explain to you, right now, the difference between investment and government borrowing?
            Sharansky, do not harness ... not worth it ...
      2. Setrac
        Setrac 14 October 2017 00: 24 New
        0
        Bullshit is utter, giving money against state guarantees is not an investment.
  10. Golovan Jack
    Golovan Jack 13 October 2017 14: 56 New
    +6
    Quote: Sharansky
    In 2016, for the first time in three years, Russia returned to the foreign borrowing market as a sovereign, and in the framework of two issues last year, the majority of investors came to the United States - this indicates that, despite formal and informal sanctions, the Americans did not lose interest to invest in Russia. As RBC previously reported, when placed in 2017, the Americans also bought most of the Russian government securities bought by foreign investors.

    Cool, funny ... nothing seriously, by the way, is not confirmed, yeah ...

    And why did you decide that this is bad, I don’t understand in any way?
  11. misti1973
    misti1973 13 October 2017 22: 15 New
    0
    Yes, why did they stick to them with this missile defense? Not so cool.
  12. grandson of Perun
    grandson of Perun 17 October 2017 16: 32 New
    0
    Quote: Sharansky
    to rivet something, you must first revive the economy

    Here are riveting plants and revitalize the economy wink
  13. grandson of Perun
    grandson of Perun 17 October 2017 16: 38 New
    0
    Quote: misti1973
    Yes, why did they stick to them with this missile defense? Not so cool.

    There would be no sense - the Yankees would not have deployed the third and fourth missile defense positions near us.
    In addition, in the universal Mk41 launcher, instead of the Proshny SM-3, you can easily and quietly load something offensive with nuclear charges. With a flying time of several minutes. So much for "not so cool" ...
  14. vearey
    vearey 17 October 2017 23: 35 New
    0
    simply refuse entry visa to Russian specialists
    Well, duck, they don’t have enough labor at the embassy, ​​or in other words, for which they fought for it and ran into it.