Military Review

Stavridis: Russia is preparing for a new annexation in the Black Sea region

123
The former commander-in-chief of the united NATO contingent in Europe, James Stavridis, decided to act as a military observer and published on the pages of the publication Bloomberg View your article. In the article, Stavridis considers the issue of Russia's gaining on the Black Sea and criticizes such actions of the Russian Federation.


According to a retired NATO official, "Russia's ambitions on the Black Sea do not end with the Crimea alone." According to Stavridis, reinforcement on the Black Sea is an attempt by Vladimir Putin “to take advantage of the situation in the south, while NATO stands guard over the borders of Eastern Europe.”

Stavridis:
The Kremlin is thinking of a new annexation after the annexation of the Crimea. They are going to cut through the land corridor to the peninsula.

Further, Stavridis announced that he was "extremely worried" about the situation in northern Turkey. It turns out that, according to the logic of the retired NATO commander in Europe, "Russia has a significant pressure on the Black Sea on the Turkish state."

Stavridis: Russia is preparing for a new annexation in the Black Sea region


The reason for "strengthening of Russia on the Black Sea" Stavridis sees "the desire to achieve a de facto monopoly on the extraction of resources in this region", and also to solve the problem of new gas pipelines.

If we consider the article of Stavridis separately, then questions may arise why this publication was needed by the former NATO official. And if we consider the material in the context of NATO’s policy of creating a unified Black Sea flotilla NATO, then all questions by themselves disappear. Now, in NATO, Russia must also be represented as the “main Black Sea aggressor” in order to try to change the letter of international law and create the aforementioned flotilla on the basis of Bulgarian and Romanian ports.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
123 comments
Ad

Our projects are looking for authors in the news and analytical departments. Requirements for applicants: literacy, responsibility, efficiency, inexhaustible creative energy, experience in copywriting or journalism, the ability to quickly analyze text and check facts, write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. The work is paid. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. cniza
    cniza 12 October 2017 15: 48 New
    25
    Another worried strategist ...
    1. Komsomol
      Komsomol 12 October 2017 15: 50 New
      +7
      good Took off the tongue. hi
      1. Anarchist
        Anarchist 12 October 2017 15: 53 New
        21
        You need, as in the movie Three plus two:
        -and what are you doing?
        - I break the horse mackerel ...
        Stavridis, also an Analyst.
        1. vlad66
          vlad66 12 October 2017 16: 13 New
          13
          Quote: Anarchist
          You need, as in the movie Three plus two:

          Is it possible, as in "Ivan Vasilievich" fellow
          1. Speak out
            Speak out 12 October 2017 16: 44 New
            +2
            Lavrov at the beginning of a career fellow
            1. zak167
              zak167 13 October 2017 10: 12 New
              +4
              An idiotic comparison. And here Lavrov.
            2. Nikolay Fedorov
              Nikolay Fedorov 18 October 2017 18: 21 New
              0
              Quote: Speak out
              Lavrov at the beginning of a career fellow

              Lavrov and in his youth was smart. And this one with the fish name was both a young fool and passed smoothly into the category of old fools.
    2. KAV
      KAV 12 October 2017 15: 54 New
      +4
      Another one who cries out for Russia to take them? Do she need them? )))
      1. iConst
        iConst 12 October 2017 16: 03 New
        +7
        Quote: Anarchist
        Stavridis, also an Analyst.

        Stavridis said - sprats picked up ... laughing
        1. Paranoid50
          Paranoid50 13 October 2017 00: 42 New
          +5
          Quote: iConst
          Stavridis said

          Damn it, inspired by:
          On the sea, on the stars carries a scow
          Three Greeks smuggled into Odessa
          On the starboard side that rose over the abyss
          Inaki, Stavraki and Papasatyros ...
          E. Bagritsky
    3. Blombir
      Blombir 12 October 2017 16: 09 New
      12
      The surname is fish, the eyes are also fish. Unpleasant type. No other scoundrel!
      1. Pirogov
        Pirogov 12 October 2017 16: 18 New
        +6
        Quote: Blombir
        The surname is fish, the eyes are also fish. Unpleasant type. No other scoundrel!

        In NATO, it is customary for freaks and defectives to be promoted to key posts; they are easier to manage.
      2. weksha50
        weksha50 12 October 2017 17: 04 New
        +2
        Quote: Blombir
        The surname is fish, the eyes are also fish. Unpleasant type. No other scoundrel!



        Classics - indestructible and eternal ... hi
    4. pvv113
      pvv113 12 October 2017 16: 11 New
      12
      The retiree, whom everyone had forgotten, wanted attention. It’s about like Gorbachev - only you start to forget about him, and he just pops up crying
      1. cniza
        cniza 12 October 2017 16: 15 New
        +4
        Greetings Vladimir! hi , it seems he received a command, so he’s clever.
        1. pvv113
          pvv113 12 October 2017 16: 18 New
          +7
          Hello, Victor!
          I agree half: I got the command, but clever - it doesn’t work wink
          1. cniza
            cniza 12 October 2017 16: 24 New
            +3
            We regretted the speechwriter, as always ...
            1. pvv113
              pvv113 12 October 2017 16: 28 New
              +6
              By the way, earlier the speeches of all politicians with the prefix "ex" differed in a more adequate approach and less Russophobia. The same - up to the "opposite"
              1. cniza
                cniza 12 October 2017 16: 39 New
                +5
                Means engaged and promise to return to service.
                1. pvv113
                  pvv113 12 October 2017 16: 57 New
                  +4
                  It is likely - it’s painfully trying
                  1. cniza
                    cniza 12 October 2017 17: 07 New
                    +3
                    A look running not even photos ...
                    1. pvv113
                      pvv113 12 October 2017 17: 35 New
                      +3
                      So it will definitely return to duty wink
      2. Partyzan
        Partyzan 12 October 2017 17: 18 New
        +6
        only you start to forget about him, and he just pops up
        so - it does not sink request
        1. pvv113
          pvv113 12 October 2017 20: 51 New
          +3
          Not the right word - unsinkable!
      3. Hyppopotut
        Hyppopotut 12 October 2017 20: 49 New
        +1
        And it is known that ...
        1. pvv113
          pvv113 12 October 2017 20: 51 New
          +2
          Think right - that’s it wink
      4. free_flier
        free_flier 13 October 2017 08: 06 New
        +2
        not "he," but "it."
        But it does not sink, only sometimes it brings it to the side, then vice versa, brings it to the public.
        1. pvv113
          pvv113 13 October 2017 08: 31 New
          +1
          In accordance with the rules of the Russian language in this sentence - "he". And the fact that he is it is - no doubt laughing
      5. Nikolay Fedorov
        Nikolay Fedorov 18 October 2017 18: 24 New
        0
        Quote: pvv113
        ... and he just pops up crying

        not he, it.
    5. To be or not to be
      To be or not to be 12 October 2017 16: 26 New
      0
      A wise Greek distracts from the problems of Europe itself and the creation of an Arab caliphate in its place! laughing laughing
    6. antivirus
      antivirus 12 October 2017 16: 43 New
      0
      finally, their intelligence, earned as it should.
      waiting for the next annexation
    7. Lelek
      Lelek 12 October 2017 16: 56 New
      +3
      Quote: cniza
      Another worried strategist ...


      Well yes. "And he climbed so thoughtful, and tears so mysterious ...". N`ATO is a bunch of "strategists" -gardenists, scare themselves to green diarrhea and - forward to consolidate positions, and then to the cashier for a fee.
    8. Slovak
      Slovak 12 October 2017 18: 00 New
      0
      in the ward number 6 replenishment, another Napoleon registered?
      1. notingem
        notingem 12 October 2017 19: 12 New
        0
        Which Napoleon? A whole jamb of Stavrida. Orderlies are hung up
    9. iouris
      iouris 13 October 2017 21: 11 New
      0
      This had to be done in 2014 instead of recognizing the Kolomoisky-Poroshenko regime.
  2. reservist
    reservist 12 October 2017 15: 51 New
    +2
    if we consider the material in the context of NATO’s policy of creating a united NATO flotilla in the Black Sea

    And for the United States, no pretexts are needed at all.
    The flotilla will enter the Black Sea and the law is not written to them.
    They removed the Russian flag from the diplomatic property of Russia and neglected the rest of the laws.
    1. cniza
      cniza 12 October 2017 15: 57 New
      +4
      The flotilla will enter the Black Sea and the law is not written to them.


      And what can they do there?
      1. iConst
        iConst 12 October 2017 16: 05 New
        +3
        Quote: cniza
        The flotilla will enter the Black Sea and the law is not written to them.


        And what can they do there?

        Turks will be very, very opposed (to put it mildly) ...

        And then - Cook already came in somehow. laughing
        1. reservist
          reservist 12 October 2017 16: 08 New
          +7
          Once the Ukrainian militias were simple men with hunting rifles. Armored personnel carriers were sent against them - armored personnel carriers appeared. They sent tanks, tanks appeared. Then the planes. Now the United States will introduce ships into the Black Sea.
          In vain they are it. am laughing
          1. free_flier
            free_flier 13 October 2017 08: 09 New
            +1
            ... well then, it will be in Odessa that my new fleet will have to go to LDNR, like you and I, we also have a little navy.
      2. Egorovich
        Egorovich 12 October 2017 16: 06 New
        +8
        The Black Sea dolphins will scare them so that they would not swim to the Crimean bridge.
        1. Xnumx vis
          Xnumx vis 12 October 2017 18: 49 New
          +3
          Do not offend the Black Sea dolphins! They guard the Sevastopol Bay. The service is for the benefit of Russia. Yes, they love Stavridis very much .. Pardon Stavridis! To eat!
      3. notingem
        notingem 12 October 2017 19: 13 New
        +1
        Catch horse mackerel
    2. weksha50
      weksha50 12 October 2017 17: 08 New
      +4
      Quote: reservist
      The flotilla will enter the Black Sea and the law is not written to them.


      Stop by ...
      Yes, that's just it, it may turn out that the input is a penny, the output is the ruble ...
      Crimea is Crimea ... Not only Artek and its beaches are famous ...
  3. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 12 October 2017 15: 51 New
    +1
    NATO will strengthen on the Black Sea, on its own and attracting Ukraine and Georgia. And given that they control the straits, this is definitely not a forced defense, but a well-planned attack on our security.
    1. cniza
      cniza 12 October 2017 15: 55 New
      +2
      Naturally, this is their desire, but as for the straits, there are questions there, after the appearance of our group in Syria and all their control to zero.
      1. weksha50
        weksha50 12 October 2017 17: 11 New
        +1
        Quote: cniza
        about the straits, there are questions after the appearance of our group in Syria and all their control to zero.


        Well ... With all due respect to you ... After the appearance of our group in Syria, on the contrary, OUR dependence on THEIR (NATO) control over the straits increased ...
        The age-old "sore" of Russia-Russia ... hi
        1. cniza
          cniza 12 October 2017 17: 17 New
          +2
          With modern weapons everything is no longer so, and then the question is who and how controls these straits - legally this is one thing, and military-political it is something else.
          1. weksha50
            weksha50 12 October 2017 19: 48 New
            0
            Quote: cniza
            another question is who and how controls these straits - legally this is one thing, and politically - politically it is something else.


            Anyway, I’m sorry, the issue of control over the straits is still a complete ... ass ... for Russia ... We can’t influence this business in any way ... Well, perhaps, having conquered the territory of Turkey, at least ... lol
            1. cniza
              cniza 12 October 2017 21: 03 New
              +1
              Everything is much simpler - just taking aim ...
        2. free_flier
          free_flier 13 October 2017 08: 12 New
          +1
          why not remember Gromyko at a cocktail party in the White (for the time being) house ... there will be "raz" and several straits.
    2. PFT
      PFT 12 October 2017 16: 06 New
      +1
      Teach the geography and doctrine of Montreux, the blockade of the straits by Turkey is WAR on a global scale.
      1. Thunderbolt
        Thunderbolt 12 October 2017 17: 20 New
        0
        Well, NATO will close shipping in the person of Turkey, and what .... here, specifically, which NATO cities will undergo bombing? Or gathered to break through?
  4. bagr69
    bagr69 12 October 2017 15: 55 New
    0
    Next year, in any case, we will have a "land corridor" - a bridge.
    Guys just don’t know ... All the tales of the current Ukrainian authorities believe.
    1. weksha50
      weksha50 12 October 2017 17: 12 New
      0
      Quote: bagr69
      Next year, in any case, we will have a "land corridor" - a bridge.


      Do you mean Kerch?
  5. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 12 October 2017 15: 56 New
    0
    After retirement, they continue to draw arrows on the map.
  6. Vagarkov13 Agarkov
    Vagarkov13 Agarkov 12 October 2017 15: 56 New
    0
    and also the Greek bastard!
    1. Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 12 October 2017 16: 02 New
      +3
      Quote: Vagarkov13 Agarkov
      and also the Greek bastard!

      He is such a. Let’s give the Pindules, that would not have arisen. soldier
  7. san4es
    san4es 12 October 2017 15: 59 New
    +3
    Quote: cniza
    Another worried strategist ...

    ... got out of naphthalene.
    According to a retired NATO official
    1. Partyzan
      Partyzan 12 October 2017 17: 21 New
      +5
      .. got out of naphthalene.
      he is in it constantly lol
      1. san4es
        san4es 12 October 2017 17: 52 New
        +3
        Quote: Partyzan
        .. got out of naphthalene.
        he is in it constantly lol

        belay
        wink
        1. Partyzan
          Partyzan 12 October 2017 18: 02 New
          +7
          and today in battle laughing
  8. PFT
    PFT 12 October 2017 16: 00 New
    +1
    Mariupol, and so soon will be part of the LDNR, will surrender themselves, like Kharkov and everyone else.
    1. LAWNER
      LAWNER 12 October 2017 16: 14 New
      0
      Yes .... Mariupol is really needed !!!! But Ukraine must attack. Only then ... and only as self-defense can such a gift be accepted.
  9. yuliatreb
    yuliatreb 12 October 2017 16: 08 New
    0
    I would annex myself, somewhere in the zahashnik, quietly, there is no need to curry favor with the owners, I must bark, so that other mongrel barking would support.
  10. finmax
    finmax 12 October 2017 16: 11 New
    0
    On the Black Sea there is no stronger player at the moment than Russia, and all these statements are nothing more than political PR.
  11. assa67
    assa67 12 October 2017 16: 13 New
    +3
    but the mummy didn’t say who were we going to annex there? Turks? .... for me, it's better for the states
    1. assa67
      assa67 12 October 2017 16: 16 New
      +3
      we’ll hold a referendum and there will be a Merikos region. We’ll put a drummer as a janitor in the white house soldier
    2. finmax
      finmax 12 October 2017 16: 17 New
      0
      NOT SUCH *** *** we don’t need it, IT'S EASY TO IMMEDIATELY BURN
      1. assa67
        assa67 12 October 2017 16: 19 New
        +3
        they, along the way, are not so badly burned in California ... why take sin into our hearts
        1. finmax
          finmax 12 October 2017 16: 48 New
          0
          the fact that they themselves will burn and so it is clear, the question is, why should the reasons of burning their priests be shifted to others? :)
  12. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 12 October 2017 16: 18 New
    0
    Quote: finmax
    On the Black Sea there is no stronger player at the moment than Russia, and all these statements are nothing more than political PR.

    This retired Greek analyst seems to have a small pension. So I decided to fulfill the Pentagon order with stories about aggressive Russia. wassat
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. grandfather Mih
    grandfather Mih 12 October 2017 16: 47 New
    0
    Ex-most importantly. In thoughts, this one is confused with ambition. Put it this way: lying on the sofa is a thinker. I got up a pensioner and all. Dialectics with paradigms will not pester. I guess that this one accidentally combined Euler’s circles, saw something, and began to inflate it something. This, it seems, the "gap" Overton is obtained? Inflate and stick out in the foreground. Himself in shock from his ingenuity. I tried to imagine something that would frighten me scared and raise a howl about the "Black Sea achressor." Okromya oak and chains on it - nothing. Not terrible. What kind of tablets do they feed there?
  15. 1536
    1536 12 October 2017 16: 55 New
    +1
    It is time for this Kambalaidis to know that our country has access to the Black Sea. This is our house and it is quite clear that we are free to manage it as we want, within a reasonable framework, of course. And we will not tolerate violently mad neighbors. But these NATO countries have completely slipped back. They look at someone else’s, strive all the time to steal something where it’s bad, they live at someone else’s expense and swing the rights all the time. Is it time to shut up these gentlemen, whose countries are thousands of kilometers from the shores of the Black Sea?
  16. weksha50
    weksha50 12 October 2017 17: 03 New
    0
    "They're going to cut through there a land corridor on the peninsula.".

    Dumb all the same ... The land corridor is needed, of course ...
    But if you look at the map? Well, you are Nikolayevshchina, Odessa region missed, unfinished strategist ???
  17. Lena Petrova
    Lena Petrova 12 October 2017 17: 05 New
    +3
    “The Kremlin is thinking of a new annexation after the annexation of Crimea. They are going to cut through there a land corridor on the peninsula. "
    ..and builds a bridge for this. Annexes water.
  18. K-50
    K-50 12 October 2017 17: 05 New
    +2
    Why didn’t they resent when the Russian Black Sea Fleet degraded under EBN?
    And now, when the fleet is being updated and modernized, is everyone yelling about the strengthening and growth of imperial ambitions?
    Something about the impudent behavior of NATO ships, which, in theory, have nothing to do in the Black Sea?
    Impudent so that our sailors had to push them out of our waters by heaping. Yes, and others, "unfriendly", how many events.
    As always, they don’t see logs in their eyes, but they found a mote in their neighbor’s.
    Vile little people. negative
  19. Humpty
    Humpty 12 October 2017 17: 10 New
    +1
    Sleep. From Kaliningrad to Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk. From Norilsk to Kushka It’s not for you to decide where our is.
  20. Langf
    Langf 12 October 2017 17: 31 New
    0
    Horse mackerel, this is the same chicken in the cockerel: they use it as they want and do not ask for opinions. Tomorrow, from hopelessness about space, it will pop, where it will go.
  21. Nikolai Petrov
    Nikolai Petrov 12 October 2017 17: 32 New
    +1
    These stavridis, herring, sprats are completely crazy in their geyropa. "Russia wants to annex ...". And what can be annexed in the Black Sea region? Romania, Bulgaria? Sorry, and the gift of this camp is not necessary.
  22. Ivan Ivanov
    Ivan Ivanov 12 October 2017 17: 45 New
    +1
    Who (and how much) woke you up Stavridis?
    1. notingem
      notingem 12 October 2017 19: 27 New
      0
      Said NKVDeshnik showing a stool
  23. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 12 October 2017 17: 52 New
    0
    Now, in NATO, Russia must also be represented as the “main Black Sea aggressor” in order to try to change the letter of international law and create the aforementioned flotilla on the basis of Bulgarian and Romanian ports.
    So that’s why the Turkish horse began to rock. What to do? He has no horns to break off. The stallion is indulged in, so that the stall would not forget.
  24. aries2200
    aries2200 12 October 2017 18: 01 New
    0
    So that such "gurus" do not rattle ... it is time in the Caribbean to indicate the presence of Russian troops ... so that the "gurus" piss boiling water ...
  25. faterdom
    faterdom 12 October 2017 18: 49 New
    0
    Quote: Blombir
    The surname is fish, the eyes are also fish. Unpleasant type. No other scoundrel!

    Probably a relative of Skumbrievich from the Golden Calf.
  26. Kerensky
    Kerensky 12 October 2017 18: 52 New
    0
    Uncle says business. There is, there is still something to annex in the Black Sea. We simply did not decide whom we simply annexed, and whom we hybridized, and more than once. There Turks sensed something!
  27. Berkut24
    Berkut24 12 October 2017 19: 23 New
    0
    Stavridis: Russia is preparing for a new annexation in the Black Sea region

    What, Paltusidze has a jerk after 2008? Decided to share your concerns?
  28. The comment was deleted.
  29. da Vinci
    da Vinci 12 October 2017 19: 33 New
    +1
    I think that is suitable
  30. rocket757
    rocket757 12 October 2017 20: 21 New
    +4
    Do we need it? Can we do it? Will they give us?
    In short - a patient on his head.
  31. Vasyan1971
    Vasyan1971 12 October 2017 20: 35 New
    +1
    "... Stavridis sees" a desire to achieve virtually a monopoly on the extraction of resources in this region "..."
    It is strange and funny to hear this from a representative of a state whose Wishlist extends much further.
  32. evil partisan
    evil partisan 12 October 2017 20: 42 New
    +1
    They are going to cut through there a land corridor to the peninsula.
    Throw someone this fool pictures of the Crimean bridge.
  33. APASUS
    APASUS 12 October 2017 20: 58 New
    0
    The Kremlin is thinking of a new annexation after the annexation of the Crimea. They are going to cut through the land corridor to the peninsula.

    Again the injection in the media. Stavridis isn’t in the know or is playing hopak again, but Russia didn’t need to build a bridge for this. Yes, and punching the land corridor is also not a problem in preparing the APU. The problem is not even in winning corridors, but in who will feed the Ukrainian population when it all falls from air strikes.
    It is bad when ministers with the prefix ex become experts ............
  34. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 12 October 2017 21: 01 New
    +3
    Great !!! Smoked horse mackerel broadcasts that Russia will cut through the land corridor to the Crimea through Turkey, Bulgaria and other cheap stuff.
  35. Romanenko
    Romanenko 12 October 2017 21: 10 New
    +1
    My dear, how are you, Seledkis, that you sleep there and see something grabbing from someone. We have a little different. We have returned our. We don’t need an inch of a foreign land, but we won’t give up our tip.
    In the Black Sea region, so far we have everything at home, worry about Kamalis for Alaska!
  36. faterdom
    faterdom 12 October 2017 21: 36 New
    0
    Well, yes, we are now completing a bridge to the Crimea and will expand its shores to Romania, Bulgaria and Turkey. Who will flood - we are not to blame!
  37. razved
    razved 12 October 2017 23: 12 New
    0
    Senile delirium of a pensioner. Grandfather earns pension.
  38. Anchonsha
    Anchonsha 13 October 2017 01: 20 New
    0
    It’s necessary to catch and scum this bastard so that the population doesn’t scare
  39. Oleg Salov
    Oleg Salov 13 October 2017 01: 32 New
    +1
    Looking at this "wise guy" I immediately remember the film "On the poor hussar, put in the word" -You are some kind of Merzlyaev.
  40. Nemesis
    Nemesis 13 October 2017 01: 41 New
    +1
    Well, God forbid that the Russian Federation does not stop in the Crimea ... Donbass needs to be taken into the Russian Federation .... and this had to be done back in 2014 ....
  41. Mikhail Zubkov
    Mikhail Zubkov 13 October 2017 01: 42 New
    0
    But the old man guesses correctly! But it was they under the USSR, so on their maps arrows on the seas drew when we had no problems with the Bulgarians, Romanians, Ukrainians, Georgians - but didn’t we bomb them? And for some reason they bombed Yugoslavia! Our bases were not there ... And only in order to get into Kosovo and Albania with cannibals and put up our base. But now on the Black Sea they are in our palm in any way, and they don’t like it! Will have to endure, amerinatsiki!
  42. Geisenberg
    Geisenberg 13 October 2017 01: 46 New
    +2
    Annexation of Turkey ??? This is how to annex hemorrhoids to your rectum)))
  43. LeonidL
    LeonidL 13 October 2017 02: 04 New
    +1
    Mass craziness in Eastern Europe! Is this an epidemic?
  44. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 13 October 2017 05: 02 New
    0
    And if we consider the Baltic Sea, the Pacific Ocean, etc., in the cotext, the Russians are everywhere. Who is the loudest shouting "guard" !!! ???
  45. intuzazist
    intuzazist 13 October 2017 05: 38 New
    +1
    quote = pvv113] The retiree, whom everyone forgot, wanted attention. It’s about like Gorbachev - only you start to forget about him, and he just pops up crying[/ Quote]
    Duck it never sinks ................ [
    1. pvv113
      pvv113 13 October 2017 08: 33 New
      +1
      Unfortunately
  46. Alex ros
    Alex ros 13 October 2017 05: 42 New
    0
    Quote: Lena Petrova
    Annexes water.

    Why annex it? Kerch against and so ours.
  47. B.V.G
    B.V.G 13 October 2017 08: 11 New
    0
    Why do we need a Turkish coast? For me, Odessa Nikolaev and Kherson are so much better, there are half of the Russian-speaking population
  48. qwests
    qwests 13 October 2017 08: 14 New
    0
    if we deceive them, it will be dishonest on our part. you should always do as they write and say, next time they will think before they ..
  49. sgr291158
    sgr291158 13 October 2017 09: 47 New
    0
    Another storyteller.
  50. zak167
    zak167 13 October 2017 10: 11 New
    0
    This moron decided to pump up the ball of the Russian threat in this way. Imagine, but this one with his eyes wide was the commander in Europe.
    1. Abel
      Abel 14 October 2017 17: 48 New
      0
      Why do you think he has such eyes? Apparently, very scared