Military Review

Trump boasted the ability of the US to shoot down enemy missiles in 97% of cases

78
United States have weaponsable to hit enemy missiles in 97% of cases. This was stated by US President Donald Trump in an interview with Fox News, fragments of which were published on Wednesday.


You should only take a closer look at what we buy for the Armed Forces. We buy fighters and military equipment, we built the best military equipment in the world. We have missiles that can knock missiles in the air in 97% of cases. If two missiles are fired, then we will shoot down
- said the US president, answering questions about the nuclear-missile program of the DPRK.

Trump boasted the ability of the US to shoot down enemy missiles in 97% of cases


He did not directly answer the question of whether the head of state is ready to use this arsenal in the event of hostile actions by Pyongyang.

We are very strong. I strengthen the Armed Forces [US], like no one before, we are close to $ 800 billion
- Trump said, referring to funds allocated to the US Department of Defense for the 2018 fiscal year.

In September, the Senate passed a bill on the directions of the country's ministry of defense, allocating about $ 2018 billion to the 700 fiscal year. The Pentagon released $ 640 billion to purchase weapons, pay wages to the military and maintain combat readiness of troops. Another $ 60 billion are intended to continue operations abroad, including in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and other countries.

The Congress took into account the worsening of the situation on the Korean Peninsula, as well as the incessant missile launches of the DPRK. The Senate supported the allocation of $ 8,5 billion to strengthen the country's missile defense, which is $ 630 million more than the amount requested for the same purpose by the Donald Trump administration. According to the text of the bill, the Secretary of Defense will be obliged to "increase the number of ground-based interceptor missiles in the United States to 28." Of these, 14 will be placed at Fort Greely base in Alaska, reports TASS.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
78 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. CentDo
    CentDo 12 October 2017 14: 17 New
    +7
    That is, a hundred warheads will reach the same. Well, already bread.
    1. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 12 October 2017 14: 20 New
      16
      The Senate supported the allocation of $ 8,5 billion to strengthen the country's missile defense, which is $ 630 million more than the amount requested for the same purpose by the Donald Trump administration.

      And this is already called Indexation! wassat
      1. d ^ Amir
        d ^ Amir 12 October 2017 14: 22 New
        12
        Dear colleague !!!! Sorry ... spelling a little tweak .... more correct in my opinion will be Un-dexation ... that is, through a hyphen ....
        1. Shurik70
          Shurik70 12 October 2017 18: 13 New
          12
          The US has weapons capable of hitting enemy missiles in 97% of cases

          And we will send only the remaining 3% soldier
          1. Arzoo
            Arzoo 13 October 2017 00: 53 New
            +1
            Yes, it scratches. They will bring down a maximum of half, this is ultra-optimism.
          2. reminin
            reminin 13 October 2017 18: 29 New
            0
            This is not about Russian missiles, but about DPRK missiles that can only fly along a ballistic trajectory.
            The vaunted American short-range missile defense system has shown its low effectiveness in Israel against domestic gas cylinders. And 2 more missiles were not enough to destroy the drone.
        2. Slovak
          Slovak 12 October 2017 18: 18 New
          +1
          Eun will appreciate and pat Donya by the forelock, scratch him by the ear
        3. evil partisan
          evil partisan 12 October 2017 20: 45 New
          +1
          Quote: d ^ Amir
          Eun-dexation

          laughing good
          Why !! yes
          1. d ^ Amir
            d ^ Amir 13 October 2017 09: 34 New
            +3
            I apologize .... Laurels are not for me !!!!! the idea belongs entirely to a colleague of the SRC P-15 !!!!! my idea is only a little more highlight the name of the leader Sev. Korea .... to more clearly capture the reasons for the increase in the military budget ...
      2. cniza
        cniza 12 October 2017 14: 24 New
        +7
        Or someone distorted his words, or really he thinks that this is a computer game.
        1. iliitchitch
          iliitchitch 12 October 2017 14: 41 New
          +4
          Quote: cniza
          Or someone distorted his words, or really he thinks that this is a computer game.


          Yes, he is a bot. Nonsense smacks. 97%, gee wassat
        2. askort154
          askort154 12 October 2017 14: 52 New
          +8
          cniza ..... Or someone distorted his words, or really he thinks that this is a computer game.

          Chel spent his whole life in business (construction and show programs, such as "Miss World"). In politics and the military sphere - the full "0". He completed a study for half a year. As a result, there are no real professional advisers in his circle. Therefore, he behaves as usual, showman-president. It doesn’t matter what I carry, the whole world speaks about me. hi
          1. Nikolai Grek
            Nikolai Grek 12 October 2017 20: 56 New
            +4
            Quote: askort154
            cniza ..... Or someone distorted his words, or really he thinks that this is a computer game.

            Chel spent his whole life in business (construction and show programs, such as "Miss World"). In politics and the military sphere - the full "0". He completed a study for half a year. As a result, there are no real professional advisers in his circle. Therefore, he behaves as usual, showman-president. It doesn’t matter what I carry, the whole world speaks about me. hi

            firstly, smoked was also not a great military genius, like many leaders of America ... secondly, Trump did not form a team for six months .... apparently, he is gaining the first comers !!! lol lol lol certainly members of his team do not meet the goals that he stated in the election race !!! most likely after landing in the chair of the president of the country, which is the first war criminal on Earth, Trump has lost his subjectivity and now he himself does not solve anything !!! good good good
        3. Kent0001
          Kent0001 12 October 2017 15: 21 New
          +3
          they all think this is a computer game. He boasts of what is not. The probability of 97 percent I think causes real questions for specialists.
          1. KAV
            KAV 12 October 2017 15: 53 New
            +1
            If two missiles are fired, then we will also bring down
            What an achievement, eh! And if they launch 102 missiles? And if 1002? Balabol he!
          2. japs
            japs 12 October 2017 20: 45 New
            +5
            With such a probability of reflection of a nuclear missile strike. I would certainly have pressed the red button.
        4. Lelek
          Lelek 12 October 2017 18: 28 New
          +1
          Quote: cniza
          Or someone distorted his words, or really he thinks that this is a computer game.


          Victor, Mr. Trump generally loves mines of significance (this is from his past life in show business). Pronounces phrases with a grim "a la Duce" in context - understand how you want. Given that this is the clowning of the president of the country, nothing good can be expected (the states are not lucky: slack - Bush, savage - Obama, now the red-headed comedian-trump - Trump, get fucked up.).
      3. Thrall
        Thrall 12 October 2017 14: 28 New
        +1
        We have rockets capable of shooting down rockets in the air in 97% of cases.

        Those. the higher the rocket flies, the lower the air density and the chance to bring it down smile
    2. d ^ Amir
      d ^ Amir 12 October 2017 14: 27 New
      +5
      no need for hundreds of warheads !!!! do not!!! and
      If two missiles are fired, then we will also bring down
      - said the President of the United States, answering questions related to the nuclear missile program of the DPRK

      the same is all for nothing ..
      they will declare a diplomatic flight ... they will load a bomb there more powerfully and will rush over Washington .... and considering that the whole American political bombond will eat up for "surrender" of Un !!!! the effect of the application will be excellent ... at once 80% of the conflicts in the world will end ...
    3. krops777
      krops777 12 October 2017 16: 16 New
      +6
      The United States has weapons capable of hitting enemy missiles in 97% of cases.


      Hmm, it’s like an advertisement from a telemarket that usually sells bullshit.
  2. NEXUS
    NEXUS 12 October 2017 14: 17 New
    +6
    We have missiles that can shoot down missiles in the air in 97% of cases. If two missiles are fired, then we will also bring down

    And if a couple of hundred warheads from ICBMs? Why then, 97% of which missiles are being shot down?
    1. Grandfather
      Grandfather 12 October 2017 14: 19 New
      +5
      Trump boasted the ability of the US to shoot down enemy missiles in 97% of cases
      yes he beguiled ... 3% actually ...
    2. Tusv
      Tusv 12 October 2017 18: 46 New
      +2
      Quote: NEXUS
      And if a couple of hundred warheads from ICBMs? Why then, 97% of which missiles are being shot down?

      Andrei. Good evening. Then, as Trump was told, he voiced it. Indeed, according to tests of the missile defense system, Americans have 97% success. But, there is a huge BUT. It is 2-2.5 times lower in height than the North Korean nova and 1,5 times slower in speed. In general, Trump did not watch Operation Y and does not know what it means to train on cats blindly and how it ends
  3. assa67
    assa67 12 October 2017 14: 18 New
    +7
    maybe he made a reservation? with the 97th missiles to shoot down the enemy’s missiles, so probably .... something new missiles quietly flew past all missile defense systems .... and they sprayed with saliva that the fly won’t fly
  4. Eurodav
    Eurodav 12 October 2017 14: 19 New
    +1
    Yes, we believe! Again, you see, Ivanka whispered, now Twitter is uplifting ...
    1. Grandfather
      Grandfather 12 October 2017 14: 23 New
      +3
      Quote: Evrodav
      Yes, we believe! Again, you see, Ivanka whispered, now Twitter is uplifting ...

      Ohhhh! Ivanka !!! II ... das ist fiction !!! oh, oh, oh .... zer gut ...! fellow
      1. weksha50
        weksha50 12 October 2017 17: 21 New
        0
        Quote: Dead Day
        Ohhhh! Ivanka !!! II ... das ist fiction !!! oh, oh, oh .... zer gut ...!


        Ugh !!! An old pervert ... Here the fate of the world is decided, and he is all about his ... [b] [/ b] laughing
  5. NEXUS
    NEXUS 12 October 2017 14: 22 New
    +6
    It will be interesting to listen to the “Red” when Sarmat, Rubezh, BARZ Barguzin will be on duty ... and all the more fun it will be to listen to this screamer if, in fact, they develop and put on duty Status-6. wassat
    1. jjj
      jjj 12 October 2017 14: 35 New
      +1
      He will not understand
    2. Kent0001
      Kent0001 12 October 2017 15: 24 New
      +1
      Status will provide Amers with loose stools and complete freedom from constipation. Are they working on it interestingly, or is it already there?
    3. cedar
      cedar 12 October 2017 15: 32 New
      +1
      They are already sitting on a super volcano, called Yellowstone. You can’t bomb .., detonates the caput. Electricity is turned off in this spiritual leper colony. Not right away, but better.
    4. weksha50
      weksha50 12 October 2017 17: 23 New
      +3
      Quote: NEXUS
      It will be interesting to listen to the “Red” when Sarmat, Boundary, BZHRD Barguzin will take on duty ...


      Andrei, there, at the top, in the comments, the guys correctly pointed out that Trump is zero in THESE cases, and his team ... um ... not quite benign ...
      So why be offended (or mock) at the statements of the wretched?
      1. Lelek
        Lelek 12 October 2017 18: 33 New
        +3
        Quote: weksha50
        weksha50


        Hey. And here is the last step of this corps de ballet:
        1. albert
          albert 12 October 2017 19: 52 New
          +2
          Quote: Lelek
          Hey. And here is the last step of this corps de ballet:

          America has nothing to do at UNESCO. Where have you seen their culture?
        2. Nikolai Grek
          Nikolai Grek 12 October 2017 21: 01 New
          +6
          Quote: Lelek
          Quote: weksha50
          weksha50


          Hey. And here is the last step of this corps de ballet:

          that's even more fun !!! good good good laughing laughing laughing

          Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu instructed the Foreign Ministry to prepare the country's withdrawal from UNESCO following the United States.
          1. Lelek
            Lelek 13 October 2017 11: 16 New
            +3
            Quote: Nikolai Grek
            Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu instructed the Foreign Ministry to prepare the country's withdrawal from UNESCO following the United States.


            Hi, Nikolai.
            And good riddance. There is one consideration about this (IMHO). According to UNESCO rules, the artifacts of the countries in which they are stolen are subject to return to their place. Who today has become the owner of the looted artifacts of Libya, the Maghreb, Iraq, Syria? Right. To return the stolen zapadlo is one of the reasons for leaving UNESCO. How do you like this?
            1. Nikolai Grek
              Nikolai Grek 13 October 2017 14: 10 New
              +5
              Quote: Lelek
              Quote: Nikolai Grek
              Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu instructed the Foreign Ministry to prepare the country's withdrawal from UNESCO following the United States.


              Hi, Nikolai.
              And good riddance. There is one consideration about this (IMHO). According to UNESCO rules, the artifacts of the countries in which they are stolen are subject to return to their place. Who today has become the owner of the looted artifacts of Libya, the Maghreb, Iraq, Syria? Right. To return the stolen zapadlo is one of the reasons for leaving UNESCO. How do you like this?

              DaroFF !! drinks effective version !!! good good lol
            2. weksha50
              weksha50 13 October 2017 22: 21 New
              +1
              Quote: Lelek
              Who today has become the owner of the looted artifacts of Libya, the Maghreb, Iraq, Syria? Right. To return the stolen zapadlo is one of the reasons for leaving UNESCO.


              An interesting version ... I somehow didn’t think about it ... I thought it was just that Trump, as a businessman, calculates finances, saves and forces others to pay on time ...
  6. Livonetc
    Livonetc 12 October 2017 14: 24 New
    +2
    Trumpych is cunning.
    He removed the comma ..
  7. Strashila
    Strashila 12 October 2017 14: 26 New
    +6
    Trump has discovered America’s worst secret ... it can only be attacked with two or more missiles ... otherwise 800 tankers will have fewer budgets ... and if North Korea has three missiles ready, it will require a budget of 000 000 000 bakers and no less.
  8. Dimachrus
    Dimachrus 12 October 2017 14: 32 New
    +1
    We purchase fighters and military equipment, we built the best military equipment in the world. We have missiles that can shoot down missiles in the air in 97% of cases. If two missiles are fired, then we will also bring down
    good
    Yeah, we believe and tremble))) GollYwood proved / will prove if that))))
  9. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 12 October 2017 14: 39 New
    0
    Bouncer. Why shake the air? You can - show wassat
    1. Nikolai Grek
      Nikolai Grek 12 October 2017 21: 02 New
      +4
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Bouncer. Why shake the air? You can - show wassat

      if it starts to show, then they won’t hit !!! lol lol lol
  10. groks
    groks 12 October 2017 14: 40 New
    +3
    "If two missiles are fired, then we will also hit them." Damn - what if three ?! He needs to filter the bazaar, like our Nedimon.
  11. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 12 October 2017 14: 46 New
    +1
    Target missiles, which the anti-missiles themselves induce themselves, maybe. laughing
  12. CAT BAIYUN
    CAT BAIYUN 12 October 2017 14: 57 New
    +9
    The US has weapons capable of hitting enemy missiles in 97% of cases

    Let me ask: where are the statistics from? A lot of stuffing? laughing
  13. Nikolai Petrov
    Nikolai Petrov 12 October 2017 14: 59 New
    +2
    Interestingly, the North Korean missile flying over Japan at what percentage hit?
  14. Lena Petrova
    Lena Petrova 12 October 2017 15: 00 New
    +3
    One economy has already been torn to shreds. With such a military budget, the next in line.
  15. Humpty
    Humpty 12 October 2017 15: 04 New
    +2
    Congratulations to all the American people, President Trump, and the administration. I admire the success, I wish you more similar achievements, and most importantly health.
  16. saturn.mmm
    saturn.mmm 12 October 2017 15: 06 New
    +3
    For the United States, the worst thing is that the world will abandon the dollar as the world's main reserve currency, in the last month and a half they drew half a trillion, they will buy oil for these dollars and these dollars will turn into empty material from empty paper, which in turn will increase their GDP It turns out that they are the main parasites in the world. So the military budget of 800 billion is not particularly burden the United States ..
  17. faterdom
    faterdom 12 October 2017 15: 11 New
    +1
    If two missiles are fired, then we will also bring down

    Cool! And if not TWO?
  18. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 12 October 2017 15: 27 New
    0
    Showman, and only ......... war is not only missiles that still really need to be shot down, and not just declare this .........
  19. Evgenijus
    Evgenijus 12 October 2017 15: 35 New
    +1
    Who knows, maybe a wooden container from the DPRK has already crossed the border of the States? Or two containers ... Three ... Four ...
    They stand in a rusty garage on the outskirts of Washington, New York ... And that there is ticking like a metronome.
  20. Pacifist
    Pacifist 12 October 2017 15: 43 New
    +2
    But can any of the economists calculate the equivalent budget?
    For example:
    toilet seat in the US Army - $ 2000 (in the 90s and early 2000s such a funny fact surfaced, there was noise ...)
    toilet seat in the Russian army - 300 rub
    drugs to enhance potency per soldier in the US Army - $ 500
    drugs to enhance potency per soldier in the Russian army - 0r
    etc. etc.
    PS it is clear that the cant with the toilet seat was corrected, well, so they will recoup on the toilet paper. lol I’m joking, but still it would be interesting to look at the results ... laughing
    1. Nikolai Grek
      Nikolai Grek 12 October 2017 21: 05 New
      +4
      Quote: Pacifist
      But can any of the economists calculate the equivalent budget?
      For example:
      toilet seat in the US Army - $ 2000 (in the 90s and early 2000s such a funny fact surfaced, there was noise ...)
      toilet seat in the Russian army - 300 rub
      drugs to enhance potency per soldier in the US Army - $ 500
      drugs to enhance potency per soldier in the Russian army - 0r
      etc. etc.
      PS it is clear that the cant with the toilet seat was corrected, well, so they will recoup on the toilet paper. lol I’m joking, but still it would be interesting to look at the results ... laughing

      it’s difficult to calculate ... firstly, they have a dubious ratio of efficiency to money spent, and secondly, they don’t know the scale of dough in the military department ... it may turn out that out of 800 lard they saw somewhere around 500 !! ! wassat wassat wassat laughing laughing laughing
  21. Egorovich
    Egorovich 12 October 2017 15: 50 New
    +5
    Trump's boast, more than that, looks like a mattresses flight to the moon, shot in a film studio.
  22. SPACE
    SPACE 12 October 2017 15: 59 New
    +1
    Trump's rhetoric has become similar to Poroshenko, one has the strongest army in Europe, the other in America. And people say, barking dogs do not bite.
  23. yuliatreb
    yuliatreb 12 October 2017 16: 31 New
    +2
    Well done Trump Pen ... oVich Mocked the people, and in mathematics is strong beyond his years.
  24. Ace Tambourine
    Ace Tambourine 12 October 2017 16: 34 New
    +1
    I think that in reality it is possible to intercept 20 percent of missiles, and this will be a great result, but the reality is that 10 will be for happiness .. If ICBMs go, then panic and chaos will begin, this can not be avoided ... I would rather from the asylum rose to sinful earth ... it’s better to burn out in seconds than then for years, or even centuries, to fight for a piece of food or a woman ...
  25. weksha50
    weksha50 12 October 2017 17: 17 New
    0
    "Trump boasted the ability of the United States to shoot down enemy missiles in 97% of cases.".

    That is, ready to fight with Russia?
    And then what? "If two missiles are fired, then we will also hit them.".
    This is about someone ... Ahhh ... About Eun ..... Duc ... According to the theory of probability, 97% can turn into 50 by 50, and one of the two will suddenly fly ... laughing
  26. Vadmir
    Vadmir 12 October 2017 17: 55 New
    +1
    We have missiles that can shoot down missiles in the air in 97% of cases. If two missiles are fired, then we will also bring down
    3% probability of a nuclear explosion is, for any reasonable person - an unjustifiably high risk.
  27. afrikanez
    afrikanez 12 October 2017 19: 22 New
    +1
    It seems that the remaining 3% is more than enough for all of America! lol
    1. Nikolai Grek
      Nikolai Grek 12 October 2017 21: 07 New
      +4
      there, it seems, according to estimates, it is necessary to hit only three places in the USA, where either 40 or 60% of their GDP is concentrated !!! lol lol lol soldier soldier soldier good good good
  28. Abracadabrus
    Abracadabrus 12 October 2017 19: 27 New
    0
    We have missiles capable of shooting missiles in the air in 97% of cases

    Ah, how it should be insulting to the penguins that the DPRK missiles belong to the remaining three percent, which the penguins are not able to shoot down. repeat
  29. polev66
    polev66 12 October 2017 19: 51 New
    +1
    and if 10 missiles with a variable trajectory?))))
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 12 October 2017 20: 55 New
      0
      Well, against the DPRK missiles, a sea-based missile defense system will be effective, since a dozen anti-missile ships will be driven as close to the coast of the DPRK as possible, and there all the missiles can be shot down at the take-off stage.
      1. Nikolai Grek
        Nikolai Grek 12 October 2017 21: 08 New
        +4
        Quote: Vadim237
        Well, against the DPRK missiles, a sea-based missile defense system will be effective, since a dozen anti-missile ships will be driven as close to the coast of the DPRK as possible, and there all the missiles can be shot down at the take-off stage.

        what what what doubtful !! laughing laughing
  30. Cananecat
    Cananecat 12 October 2017 20: 00 New
    0
    As I understand it, the percentage is given based on the probability of war with one of the countries ... where 97% falls on Korea and the remaining 3% on the Russian Federation laughing
  31. Old26
    Old26 12 October 2017 20: 42 New
    +1
    Quote: iliitch
    Yes, he is a bot. Nonsense smacks. 97%, gee

    In fact, he does not eat rubbish. Americans are even more likely to hit targets. The question is somewhat different. It all depends on the number of goals. If 10 targets are launched, the missile defense system will be able to bring them down even more likely than 97%. If twenty - too, but if 25 or 30 the probability begins to fall rapidly.

    Quote: Kent0001
    they all think this is a computer game. He boasts of what is not. The probability of 97 percent I think causes real questions for specialists.

    Do not call. For this, it is necessary that each rocket have a probability of hitting a target of 0,8-0,85. Then with two missiles the probability of defeat will be 0,96-0,977. Given that the Standard SM-3 and the GBI have a probability of hitting the target of approximately 0,85 - then the probability of 0,97 is nothing more than unusual. That is to achieve a probability of 0,9987-0,9999 - yes, a single probability of the order of 0,95 is needed there, which the Americans do not have yet (and the others too)

    Quote: d ^ Amir
    will declare a diplomatic flight

    And such exist ???? Even the sending of diplomatic mail is on the line of commercial flights. . Leaders with the rank of Minister of Foreign Affairs can fly on planes of a special squadron. But this is by no means a diplomatic flight. As for the DPRK diplomatic mission, it made a laugh. Is there diplomatic relations between the United States and the DPRK or are other countries representing DPRK's interests?

    Quote: NEXUS
    And if a couple of hundred warheads from ICBMs? Why then, 97% of which missiles are being shot down?

    Does the DPRK have that amount? Or do you think he boasted about Russian missiles? This is all now exclusively in the "direction of the DPRK"

    Quote: Tusv
    But, there is a huge BUT. It is 2-2.5 times lower in height than the North Korean nova and 1,5 times slower in speed.

    In fact, GBI interceptors (for intercepting ICBMs) have a range of 5500 km, a strike height of about 2000 km, and an interceptor speed of 7,8 to 8,5 km / s. And which North Korean missile has such parameters?
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 12 October 2017 21: 01 New
      +1
      "But if 25 or 30 the probability begins to fall rapidly." It depends on the number of ships, with missile defense systems that will participate in the operation and the number of missile defense, on each ship. Considering how quickly they develop radars, kinetic interceptors and missiles in a few years they will be able to hit with almost 100% probability and ICBMs, with a complex trajectory of warheads.
      1. ZVO
        ZVO 12 October 2017 21: 17 New
        0
        Quote: Vadim237
        "But if 25 or 30 the probability begins to fall rapidly." It depends on the number of ships, with missile defense systems that will participate in the operation and the number of missile defense, on each ship. Considering how quickly they develop radars, kinetic interceptors and missiles in a few years they will be able to hit with almost 100% probability and ICBMs, with a complex trajectory of warheads.


        I agree to all 100%.

        And I’m looking, but over the past 5-6 years they have some kind of hyper-passage in the field of data analysis.
        And apparently - this is just a quality process.
        Apparently this is the very 4 technical and technological revolution that some publications write about.
        Notice.
        All. absolutely all students are written with happiness when their projects get into the student section of DARPA.
        Because it is fame, financing. money, fame - and the opportunity to do what you love.
        And do not care. that you are 15 years old.
        You will receive millions of dollars to develop your idea - if it has at least some kind of distant or direct relation to the military industry.
        What about us? We have Chubais ... I just want to take it and .... buy napalm ... for Skolkovo ...
    2. Nikolai Grek
      Nikolai Grek 12 October 2017 21: 10 New
      +4
      Quote: Old26
      In fact, he does not eat rubbish. Americans are even more likely to hit targets. The question is somewhat different. It all depends on the number of goals. If 10 targets are launched, the missile defense system will be able to bring them down even more likely than 97%. If twenty - too, but if 25 or 30 the probability begins to fall rapidly.

      here it’s the most relish that you have the word “probability”, but you reason, as if not probability, but reality !!! laughing laughing laughing
  32. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 12 October 2017 20: 53 New
    0
    With 97% percent, he got excited, of course. Missile defense has not yet achieved such results.
  33. Old26
    Old26 12 October 2017 21: 13 New
    0
    Quote: Vadim237
    "But if 25 or 30 the probability begins to fall rapidly." It depends on the number of ships, with missile defense systems that will participate in the operation and the number of missile defense, on each ship. Considering how quickly they develop radars, kinetic interceptors and missiles in a few years they will be able to hit with almost 100% probability and ICBMs, with a complex trajectory of warheads.

    In any case, the probability of hitting a single missile is unlikely to reach 0,98 or higher. And this means that in order to defeat one target, it will still be necessary 2 missiles. 100% is an unattainable value.

    Quote: voyaka uh
    With 97% percent, he got excited, of course. Missile defense has not yet achieved such results.

    It all depends on the number of goals. Two missiles are quite acceptable. Three or more interceptor missiles are out of the question
    There, the value can be achieved with a smaller unit probability
  34. APASUS
    APASUS 12 October 2017 21: 23 New
    0
    The US has weapons capable of hitting enemy missiles in 97% of cases

    Something with the logic of the Americans, the ability to analyze lags behind? Although 97% is a fantastic result, but still.
    In fact, only two planes that fell into skyscrapers on September 11 into buildings made America discouraged, what would happen if 100 out of 3 nuclear warheads break through?
  35. rocket757
    rocket757 12 October 2017 22: 08 New
    +4
    Statistics, analytics is an interesting thing. but in principle, the main thing is how to consider, present the facts ... in short, if someone had to watch real KSHI (team staff games) comes the realization that no one will win this war !!!
    These 800 billion and even many more do not give a guarantee of survival !!!
    This is not a computer game ... even a downed rocket, lounging, kills everything around its crash site !!! and if there will be thousands !!!
    theory of limited nuclear war at ... I can not imagine what it can be called !!!
    Everyone will rest !!! I don’t presume to predict cockroaches.
  36. Nemesis
    Nemesis 13 October 2017 01: 43 New
    +1
    The USA, even the antediluvian missiles of Iraq could not be shot down 100%, they fell on Israel ... What can we say about new missiles ...
  37. Alexander Abdrakhmanov
    Alexander Abdrakhmanov 13 October 2017 03: 46 New
    0
    Trump is like a little child - that the military will not tell him, he believes in everything. In North Korea, the missile reaches the target with 98%, while Trump does not have enough percent. to be exceptional. Soon, the DPRK rocket will appear "Hoe - 2", America will break all plans .. Wakes Trump to walk like a crest, with a pan on his head.
  38. Sars
    Sars 13 October 2017 06: 04 New
    0
    Ahhhh! It’s clear why the Americans didn’t shoot down two North Korean missiles over Japan - they kept statistics!
    Another missile will be missed, then shot down 97!
  39. Fkjydjckfrgh
    Fkjydjckfrgh 14 October 2017 01: 17 New
    0
    Panyana. All exhale. It’s just that by the end of his first term, Trump will become a “trillionaire” and he saw this presidency on TV.
    We are very strong. I strengthen the Armed Forces [US], like no one before, we are close to $ 800 billion