Military Review

T-90 with "red eyes" on the position of the Syrian troops

63
On the Internet there was a photograph of a Syrian fighting position tank T-90 with a working anti-missile system "Blind", writes Messenger of Mordovia.


T-90 with "red eyes" on the position of the Syrian troops


This photo, according to the author of the material Lev Romanov, can be considered one of the most spectacular images of combat vehicles of this model in Syria.

"Another interesting fact is that we face the very first modification of the T-90 - the 1992 model of the year," the author notes.

These machines also have cast towers, and not welded, as in modern versions. “They have the same tracks as the 70-80 machines. If T-90А has B-92C2 engines installed in 1000 hp, here B-84MS have 840 hp power, ”he adds.

On the Nizhny Tagil tanks installed infrared sights "Buran PA", which are inferior to thermal imaging systems.

At present, such tanks are used in the Russian army, mainly as training ones or they are waiting at the bases for their modernization.
Photos used:
twitter.com/oryxspioenkop
63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Thrall
    Thrall 12 October 2017 12: 08 New
    34
    Here is a more successful photo:
    1. The_lancet
      The_lancet 12 October 2017 12: 18 New
      0
      It looks beautiful. Do you use filters in the photo or is it really glowing?
      1. Gray brother
        Gray brother 12 October 2017 12: 41 New
        15
        Quote: The_Lancet
        .Do you use filters in the photo or does it really glow?

        The camera uses IR filters (like all but special ones) that cut off the infrared spectrum, but they can’t cope.
        If you just look with your eyes, then nothing will be visible.
        smile
        1. Skay
          Skay 12 October 2017 13: 14 New
          +5
          I like this "weevil" more.
        2. MoJloT
          MoJloT 12 October 2017 13: 16 New
          +4
          Hunting predator
          1. Grandfather
            Grandfather 12 October 2017 13: 25 New
            17
            [quote = Gray brother]
    2. Warnoob
      Warnoob 12 October 2017 23: 24 New
      0
      Tired, apparently, but how else - all day on his feet, and still some interfere with sleep.
  2. Mwg
    Mwg 12 October 2017 12: 14 New
    +6
    Real shaitan machines - with red eyes))))
  3. Dezinto
    Dezinto 12 October 2017 12: 17 New
    +1
    Are we there for long? Here is what interests you.

    As if all this is clear, the fight against bearded men, our borders, are better. But is this a simple question for a long time?
    1. Thrall
      Thrall 12 October 2017 12: 18 New
      12
      Quote: DEZINTO
      Are we there for long? Here is what interests you.

      We are forever. And you?
      1. RL
        RL 12 October 2017 13: 56 New
        +3
        "WE", who is this, the Bolsheviks? "FOREVER", how many years?
        And then there are already examples. After 1945, they remained forever in North Korea, Vietnam, Eastern Europe, Cuba, Angola, Nicaragua, Algeria, Yemen, Libya, Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Moldova, Ukraine. Do not count how many citizens The USSR, and now, Russia, remains there forever.
        But do not stay in Syria? Forever
        1. Mordvin 3
          Mordvin 3 12 October 2017 14: 03 New
          +6
          Quote: RL
          in Yugoslavia

          This is where Russia remained there? Remind please. And then I, except as the airport, do not remember anything.
    2. Rakti-kali
      Rakti-kali 12 October 2017 12: 19 New
      +5
      Quote: DEZINTO
      Are we there for long?

      Are you there?
      1. Thrall
        Thrall 12 October 2017 12: 32 New
        +7
        Yes, and, moreover, for a long time smile
    3. polev66
      polev66 12 October 2017 12: 28 New
      +4
      8 (495) 696-88-00 call, ask a question directly to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, maybe there deign the child to answer from the couch
      1. Dezinto
        Dezinto 12 October 2017 12: 32 New
        +6
        Well, straight pricked, podkoloool. Aren’t you a wise guy off the couch?
        Humor here. In my insults to the interlocutor, this is the lowest degree of discussion.

        Nothing more to answer. ?

        I'm actually here on the case, and your question is slightly incorrect. .... thanks for the phone of course.
        1. polev66
          polev66 12 October 2017 12: 46 New
          +4
          textbook of the Russian language does not throw? and judging how it bombed you, I didn’t write the truth convenient for you, and I didn’t ask you any questions ... by the way, your question is not at all at the address, people from the presidential administration and general staff are unlikely to be seated, and even if so, they probably won’t open it the timing of the operation in Syria, especially the presence
          1. Dezinto
            Dezinto 12 October 2017 12: 51 New
            +5
            All this is funny of course, but no, they don’t bomb me, I kind of read silently and .... I’ll go ...... I’ll smoke.
            And you think you’re brains or what’s like there, don’t know what to boast about right now.
          2. Sharansky
            Sharansky 12 October 2017 12: 53 New
            +3
            Quote: polev66
            certainly will not open the terms of the operation in Syria, especially the presence

            Of course they won’t open it. For they themselves do not know. When they got stuck in Afghanistan, no one could name them either. Thanks to Gorbachev for stopping the senseless war.
            1. Michael newage
              Michael newage 12 October 2017 15: 50 New
              +5
              Lord, trolls, don’t be fooled, you are so laughing . Any normal person in Russia hates a hunchback ... and you are so angry laughing . I understand that we do not have 40N6E missiles for S-400 either, and in Afghanistan all the polymers are ... about. But, here, you’ve already gone too far, Lord Sharansky laughing .
              1. Sharansky
                Sharansky 12 October 2017 16: 34 New
                +1
                Quote: Michael Newage
                Any normal person in Russia hates a hunchback ...

                Putin then abnormal in your opinion?

                Russian President Vladimir Putin congratulated Mikhail Gorbachev on his birthday. The ex-president of the USSR today turned 86 years old.
                In a congratulatory telegram posted on the Kremlin’s website, the head of the Russian Federation noted Gorbachev’s contribution to strengthening international cooperation and significant public and research activities of the politician.
                “For many years you have been engaged in significant public, research activities, participate in expert discussions on ways to develop the world community, strengthen international cooperation,” the letter says.
                In addition, Vladimir Putin wished the birthday man health and all the best.
                1. Michael newage
                  Michael newage 12 October 2017 16: 39 New
                  +5
                  I am not responsible for Putin. What does he think of humpbacked on actuallyonly he knows. One can guess, given that he is a former KGB officer and a hunchback surrendered his country to the Omerians.
                  1. Sharansky
                    Sharansky 12 October 2017 16: 49 New
                    +4
                    Quote: Michael Newage
                    I am not responsible for Putin.

                    oh, break the pattern, huh? wink
                    1. Michael newage
                      Michael newage 12 October 2017 16: 53 New
                      +3
                      What is the gap? The fact that you do not know how to read what they write to you?
                      1. Sharansky
                        Sharansky 12 October 2017 16: 54 New
                        +4
                        The fact that your illusions have nothing to do with objective reality.
                2. Andrey Skokovsky
                  Andrey Skokovsky 12 October 2017 20: 54 New
                  +3
                  Putin is the president and official, not the emotional college girl.
                  I, too, am ready to wish the labeled one many long years, let him live to see the trial, let him see how the Union destroyed by him will be revived, let him hear alive the wishes from fellow citizens for what he did.
                  the inanimate does not need him, for many years Judas.
                3. White and fluffy
                  White and fluffy 14 October 2017 05: 34 New
                  0
                  Somewhat unexpected! Or maybe Putin should congratulate everyone !? I wanted to write harsher, but there is such a thing as "presumption of innocence"
          3. reservist
            reservist 12 October 2017 13: 00 New
            +2
            here hardly

            If we talk about the Russian language textbook,
            then "hardly" is written separately.
        2. reservist
          reservist 12 October 2017 12: 50 New
          +2
          insults to the interlocutor this is the lowest degree of discussion

          There are some here - they try to humiliate them with malicious words and emoticons.
          Perhaps the trolls ...
        3. Flatter
          Flatter 12 October 2017 13: 04 New
          +1
          The war with the Basmachi in Asia lasted 20 years: 1918-1938, it was along the border with neighboring states and weakened after the 1st World West. Winning is easy, try to hold on to victory, some of the great ones seem to have noticed so.
  4. Dezinto
    Dezinto 12 October 2017 12: 22 New
    +3
    Got it. There will be no answers.
    Solid - "and you, and you, and you."
    Well, ok, that is, there are no other thoughts.
  5. Livonetc
    Livonetc 12 October 2017 12: 25 New
    +3
    Quote: DEZINTO
    Got it. There will be no answers.
    Solid - "and you, and you, and you."
    Well ok, that is, there are no other thoughts.

    You are strangely raising a question.
    Contract, if I am mistaken, correct, on the lease of bases for 49 years
    Clarified.
    Naval baht of Tartus for 49 years.
    Hmeimim indefinitely.
    And notice both for free.
    1. karabas-barabas
      karabas-barabas 12 October 2017 21: 34 New
      0
      Yes, Lanna, 49 years old, yes at least 499, who is this, Assad promised that they will never be supported under 100% by the Sunnis, Kurds, which is generally 90% ?? It’s okay, the Kurds, whose territories in Iraq border Syrian, will take their own piece and Assad will not do anything, but they will just send it and scatter .., but what about the Sunnis, who are under 80, or more than% of all Syrian citizens the bouts and which Assad hate and want to judge him at least, which are the most dead, hundreds of thousands, they will never agree on something with Assad, where to put them? I’m afraid that in the future it’s not so far away that I’ll have to come to an agreement again, but without Assad.
      1. Rakti-kali
        Rakti-kali 12 October 2017 23: 23 New
        +1
        Quote: karabas-barabas
        Yes, Lanna, 49 years old, yes at least 499, who is this, Assad promised that they will never be supported under 100% by the Sunnis, Kurds, which is generally 90% ??

        So what?
        Quote: karabas-barabas
        It’s okay, the Kurds, whose territories in Iraq border Syrian, will take their own piece and Assad will not do anything, but they will just send it and scatter ..

        "He will eat, but only who will give him ..." (c) The people about the elephant.
        So with the Kurds, as long as there is Turkey, there will be no Kurdistan as an independent state.
        Quote: karabas-barabas
        but what about the Sunnis, who, under 80, or more than% of all Syrian citizens, have hated and who hate Assad and want to judge him at least, which are the most dead, hundreds of thousands, they will never agree on something with Assad, where to put them?

        So ... ghm ... there in the SAA of these same Sunnis are three-quarters, and all kinds of tribal militias from the center and from the east of Syria fighting for Assad are generally almost completely sunni.
        Quote: karabas-barabas
        I’m afraid that in the future it’s not so far away that I’ll have to come to an agreement again, but without Assad.

        No matter how much you scream halva, your mouth will not be sweeter. Although ... I will not interfere with your wet fantasies.
        1. karabas-barabas
          karabas-barabas 16 October 2017 19: 35 New
          0
          3/4 of the Sunnis in Assad’s troops?))) Yes, there the Syrian Shiites and Alawites are almost over, they are fighting for Assad Hisbol and Iran, with the support of the Russian Federation and the fact that Assad does not shine, only such dreamers do not know about this.
  6. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 12 October 2017 12: 25 New
    0
    Quote: Rakti-Kali
    Quote: DEZINTO
    Are we there for long?

    Are you there?

    We are there for a long time - in Syria, our VB, MTO. But interests have remained since the days of the USSR. And the west’s noose must be unclenched - the bastards crawled too close! soldier
    1. Rakti-kali
      Rakti-kali 12 October 2017 23: 27 New
      +2
      Quote: Vlad5307
      We are there for a long time - in Syria, our VB, MTO. But interests have remained since the days of the USSR. And the west’s noose must be unclenched - the bastards crawled too close!

      I do not dispute the presence of Russian bases in Syria, ITO points and interests, I am simply surprised at the questions of some people like: "Are we there for a long time?" Russia is there for a long time, and the people asking such questions are not there in Syria, but at home on the couch.
  7. armourer
    armourer 12 October 2017 12: 29 New
    0
    The terminator also needs to put such eyes))) from one kind of fear will catch
    1. Don
      Don 12 October 2017 12: 49 New
      0
      Quote: armourer
      The terminator also needs to put such eyes))) from one kind of fear will catch

      kindergarten, by golly wassat
      1. Dezinto
        Dezinto 12 October 2017 12: 59 New
        +3
        Well, of course it’s very funny when the “tank support combat vehicle” is showing you.

        Well, really very funny.

        1. Don
          Don 12 October 2017 13: 05 New
          0
          [quote = DEZINTO] Well, of course it’s very funny when the “tank support combat vehicle” is shown to you.

          Well, really very funny.

          And a lot of stuff? wassat
          1. Dezinto
            Dezinto 12 October 2017 13: 06 New
            0
            And a lot of stuff?

            Ah ha ha. Not yet a bit, we find nafigachim.
            1. Don
              Don 12 October 2017 13: 08 New
              +2
              Quote: DEZINTO
              And a lot of stuff?

              Ah ha ha. Not yet a bit, we find nafigachim.

              Good luck! The main thing is not to overdo it with the dose lol
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. The comment was deleted.
      2. _umka_
        _umka_ 13 October 2017 07: 03 New
        +1
        Here is another handsome
    2. The comment was deleted.
  8. armourer
    armourer 12 October 2017 13: 01 New
    0
    Quote: Donskoy
    kindergarten, by golly

    Scary cars they not only shoot but also create a panic. And this is also a kind of weapon.
    1. Skay
      Skay 12 October 2017 13: 19 New
      +1
      I would say formidable cars. Scary cars neo-Ukrainians do.
  9. _TANKIST_
    _TANKIST_ 12 October 2017 13: 33 New
    0
    So focusing on these red eyes, the Americans on the Abrams shot the tanks of Saddam Hussein in the dark. Turning on this system was tantamount to writing a sentence, which actually happened.
    1. Gray brother
      Gray brother 12 October 2017 14: 24 New
      +2
      Quote: _TANKIST_
      So focusing on these red eyes,

      I'm calling a cat with a lamp.
    2. Svarog51
      Svarog51 12 October 2017 15: 52 New
      10
      Turning on this system was tantamount to writing a sentence, which actually happened.

      And from the air Abramsa was supported by the flying Dok Brown steam engine, and those tanks of Hussein that did not turn on the “red eyes” were highlighted by their own.
      wink
      1. _TANKIST_
        _TANKIST_ 12 October 2017 16: 35 New
        0
        EASY TO EVERYONE CAN IF ON THE TOPIC REPORT ANYTHING BETTER SILENT.
        1. Svarog51
          Svarog51 12 October 2017 19: 14 New
          14
          EASY TO EVERYONE CAN IF ON THE TOPIC REPORT ANYTHING BETTER SILENT.

          Wow! I agree, everyone can joke. Can you remind me that I am illiterate when it was the T-90 with the ShtoE KEPP that was delivered to Saddam Hussein? What year? Maybe there is information? Share it. I will only be glad to apologize. Otherwise, you understand. Here you are not Picabu, here such pearls do not pass unproven. laughing
          1. _TANKIST_
            _TANKIST_ 12 October 2017 21: 13 New
            0
            Who are you at all, that I would prove something to you ...., you have paused over my message, while you yourself are asking me for data on this topic, i.e. it turns out that it was an idle chatter on your part, because you, not owning the facts (I draw this conclusion from your previous message), began to joke, and when I reproached you with this, they asked me for clarification on this topic, interesting .....)))))
            1. Svarog51
              Svarog51 12 October 2017 23: 54 New
              10
              Who are you anyway that I would prove something to you

              And no one needs proof from you, but you have nothing to confirm your allegation from the word "completely". There was no T-90 in the troops of Saddam Hussein with the ShtoR KEPP, but there were T-72S in a small number. They couldn’t shoot Abrams in the “red eyes” in principle - they weren’t there and couldn’t be. Hence the banter, because you are carrying utter nonsense. WOT outplayed? Is this your statement?
              So focusing on these red eyes, the Americans on the Abrams shot the tanks of Saddam Hussein in the dark.
              After asking to confirm this info, you only answered
              it was an empty chatter on your part, because you were not owning the facts (I draw this conclusion from your previous message)
              Well, and share, why are you complaining about banter. And if there is nothing to provide except complaints, then - bye.
              1. _TANKIST_
                _TANKIST_ 13 October 2017 00: 19 New
                +1
                Those. you want to say that the Americans could not see through I.K. filters (well, there are not quite filters))))) red eyes on the "Iraqi" tanks? yes do not tell ....)
                1. Svarog51
                  Svarog51 13 October 2017 00: 51 New
                  12
                  I repeat once again, in Iraq there was no T-90 with the CEP "Shtora" (this is precisely the "red eyes"). The Americans used NVD and thermal imagers, which are sources of information about the environment, in other words, observation devices. A "Blind" - a system for protecting the tank from anti-tank systems operating using infrared guidance. I hope this is clear. The curtain can also be used against surveillance devices operating in the infrared range; it simply blinds them. Where can I get if there is a hefty bright spot on the screen? When you stand behind a spotlight, you can see what is happening in its beam. If you are against him, you will not see anything. So probably more intelligible? The Germans at the end of the Second World War used NVDs operating in the IR range, and also used an IR illuminator to illuminate targets and increase the range of NVD operation. But if you look at the IR projector through the NVD, you will not see anything - the device is illuminated. The curtain also works.
  10. Michael newage
    Michael newage 12 October 2017 15: 54 New
    +1
    "Currently, such tanks are used in the Russian army, mainly as training tanks or are waiting at the bases of their modernization reserve."
    Just yesterday, there was an article on how to practice new techniques at the exercises and there the tankmen rode 72B as usual with contact 1. But here you see the first T-90s “expecting at bases” or just “training”.
    1. Svarog51
      Svarog51 12 October 2017 19: 24 New
      +9
      Michael, hi Well, "Contact 1" is not a "Curtain" at all, these are different protection systems. Contact is active armor, and Curtain is an optoelectronic suppression system. The T-90s of the first releases are awaiting modernization and this is in the order of things. Many T-72s also expect upgrades to B3 level and will again enter the troops. Everything seems to be logical, nothing surprising. request They will bring the T-90 to the right level and return it to operation or will not upgrade and put it in Syria, I don’t know this.
      1. Michael newage
        Michael newage 12 October 2017 19: 39 New
        +1
        Yes, I'm talking about the fact that the article says that the T-90 of the first series is already old, which is not relevant. But in fact, in our army, in reg. parts still serve as T-72B. About contact 1, he simply clarified that this is not a modernized T-72B3, namely the old 72B with the first contact ..
        1. Svarog51
          Svarog51 12 October 2017 19: 51 New
          +8
          Michael, but not any claims on my part. drinks I understand everything, it takes time to modernize. The T-90s of the first episodes of the “run-in” are going to Syria, and rightly so. You yourself know that a pair of these tanks were in the hands of the barmaley. I would not risk the most modern either. Is it not enough? hi
          1. Michael newage
            Michael newage 12 October 2017 20: 09 New
            +2
            Yes, Syria is now generally a broad-based training ground. There and the T-62M show itself well according to rumors. And the T-90, even the first series, for this war in general, the car was removed.
            1. Svarog51
              Svarog51 12 October 2017 20: 16 New
              +8
              I agree. Both that and other car "lit up" in YouTube. There is something to proceed from and conclusions to be drawn. Experience is being gained.
  11. Michael newage
    Michael newage 12 October 2017 16: 57 New
    +2
    Quote: Sharansky
    The fact that your illusions have nothing to do with objective reality.

    Your objective reality is to troll and write your vysers without a fawn and beyond. Sorry for breaking it.
  12. Savignon
    Savignon 13 October 2017 02: 41 New
    +1
    Barmaleev grind and this is enough for the eyes. laughing
  13. mixobat
    mixobat 13 October 2017 05: 27 New
    0
    History as a science is really history, if there are sources, i.e. eyewitness accounts are documented, and these sources are there and everyone can see and see! And so I can also say that my grandfather George Zhukov, there is no evidence! What to bring to the empty shell ... Asoda was shot in the tank eyes, don’t tell
  14. dDYHA
    dDYHA 14 October 2017 07: 21 New
    0
    We even have tanks fighting a hangover.
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. dimann271
    dimann271 17 October 2017 21: 44 New
    0
    I tried to read the "comments", thanks, for a long time, I didn’t laugh like that! Full respect! Joke remembered: Hello! How are you? Like an old tank! This, yet, how? And, so, the trunk sticks out, and there’s no one to fight with!