Military Review

BDK "Ivan Gren" completes factory running tests

36
Specialists of the manufacturer began the final stage of the factory running tests of a large landing ship (BDK) "Ivan Gren." BDK made the transition to the transfer base in Baltiysk and is preparing to sail. The remaining factory trials will include work with weapons, a communications complex, as well as solving a number of issues on the bow and stern landing devices. сообщает Department of Information and Mass Communications of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.


BDK "Ivan Gren" completes factory running tests


The armament of the 11711 BDK will be the AK-176М and AK-630М universal naval artillery mounts. Also, to hit coastal targets and support the landing force, the ship is equipped with two shipboard installations of the A-215 Grad-M multiple launch rocket system with a range of about 20 km On the deck of the BDK, a single Ka-27 search and rescue helicopter or a Ka-29 transport and combat helicopter is based.

Project 11711 ships will be able to take on board up to 13 units of heavy equipment (tanks) or up to 36 infantry fighting vehicles or armored personnel carriers, as well as the personnel of the air assault units.
- said in a statement
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. aszzz888
    aszzz888 12 October 2017 10: 34 New
    +3
    ... with a creak, but units arrive in the fleet ...
    1. Titsen
      Titsen 12 October 2017 10: 37 New
      +9
      Quote: aszzz888
      ... with a creak, but units arrive in the fleet ...


      Oh, there is no one to add lubricants to certain places for manufacturers and developers ...

      Then, you see, and without a creak everything would pass ...

      I'm talking about the rearmament of our aircraft!
      1. Don
        Don 12 October 2017 12: 56 New
        +1
        Quote: Titsen
        Oh, there is no one to add lubricants to certain places for manufacturers and developers ...

        There, managers should be punished rather and preferably without lubrication, and not shipbuilders. There is nothing complicated in the construction of this BDK project; in China or in the USSR it would be built in half a year.
        1. 73bor
          73bor 12 October 2017 15: 18 New
          +2
          The facts will not agree with you, in my opinion, Grena has such sophisticated systems that during its testing four corvettes and four frigates plus six diesel-electric submarines and two nuclear submarines were built and tested! fool
          1. Don
            Don 12 October 2017 18: 25 New
            0
            Do you mean your feelings when you sit on the toilet, push and all the same? Are you at least a little bit in the subject at all? What such complex systems can stand on the BDK ??? There is not even a more or less normal air defense system, not to mention a PLO like Pack.
            1. Dart2027
              Dart2027 13 October 2017 18: 56 New
              0
              Quote: Donskoy
              What such complex systems can stand on the BDK ???

              It was read that during the construction process they changed the structure several times at the request of the military, and they reworked this year.
            2. 73bor
              73bor 14 October 2017 17: 18 New
              0
              The joke-mumor of fuel oil is land!
              1. Don
                Don 14 October 2017 20: 23 New
                0
                Quote: 73bor
                The joke-mumor of fuel oil is land!

                1:0 laughing
      2. Shura Sailors
        Shura Sailors 12 October 2017 13: 45 New
        +3
        Otozh and it. And they were also planning to build an atomic carrier, and funds were being cut for repairs to the Kuzi.
    2. antivirus
      antivirus 12 October 2017 10: 52 New
      0
      which fleet to send it to?
      1. St Petrov
        St Petrov 12 October 2017 10: 53 New
        +2
        I think the most relevant right now is the Black Sea Fleet and there xs
      2. Aleksandr_2
        Aleksandr_2 12 October 2017 11: 40 New
        +3
        it has been on the crew for 2 years with the SF, where it is intended ......
    3. donavi49
      donavi49 12 October 2017 11: 12 New
      +7
      In total for the foreseeable future (5-7 years) the Navy will receive 2 landing craft. They will write it off - and here is the question. Already, a large half of the 40 + fleet. Some to 50 (BDK Saratov 51 hit in August).
    4. g1v2
      g1v2 12 October 2017 13: 48 New
      +2
      It’s still far from receipt. It just means that the demagnetization problems are fixed. Now only the last stage of factory sea trials. That is, there will still be state tests. Will they manage to take it even under the Christmas tree? HZ. request
  2. Titsen
    Titsen 12 October 2017 10: 34 New
    +1
    Long time ago!
  3. reservist
    reservist 12 October 2017 10: 45 New
    +2
    Specific landing ship. It can stand up for itself. am
    Not like Mistral. It is still necessary to protect him.
    1. kapitan92
      kapitan92 12 October 2017 10: 59 New
      15
      Quote: reservist
      Specific landing ship. It can stand up for itself.
      Not like Mistral. It’s still necessary to protect him

      Not quite correct comparison!
      The purpose of the Mistral ship is to drop military units, provide helicopter flights, a command center for the operation of diverse forces, and a hospital ship.

      It should be noted that on board ships of the Mistral type a command center (control center) with an area of ​​850 m2 is equipped to control various types and scale of operations, including carried out offline. It can accommodate up to 200 specialists, is well equipped and allows you to use the Mistral as a control ship for a squadron, flotilla or fleet, as well as during operations by interspecific groupings of troops and forces. In addition, the ship has a hospital with 69 beds, with the possibility of slight increase, there are two operating rooms and an X-ray room.


      Self-defense equipment is represented by two 30-mm Brenda Mauser artillery mounts and two VSRAD air defense systems. The ship’s three-coordinate radar is used as a target designation, and direct weapon control is carried out using an optoelectronic weapon control system. There are also several sites for the installation of 12,7 mm heavy machine guns and two sites with turret mounts for Sindbad MANPADS (Mistral missile launchers of the MBDA company with a strike zone in height from 5 to 3000 m and in range from 0,5 to 6 km).


      As a result of the operation of the Mistral helicopter carriers, a number of senior representatives of the French Navy put forward a proposal to strengthen the air defense system of the ship, in particular, by replacing two Sinbad MANPADs with manual guidance on the Tetral automatic eight-charge SAMs with the same SAM
      hi
    2. Burbon
      Burbon 12 October 2017 11: 06 New
      15
      Quote: reservist
      Specific landing ship. Can stand up for himself

      laughing how and what ??
      Quote: reservist
      Not like Mistral

      fool but didn’t try to think?
      Quote: reservist
      It is still necessary to protect him.

      Well, everything is clear .... the main thing is to blurt out something, and where it will carry fool
    3. donavi49
      donavi49 12 October 2017 11: 10 New
      13
      What can he stand for?

      He has 1 Duet in the bow and 2 630М in the stern.

      Mistral would have 2 Bending and 2 630M / Duet.

      At the same time, Mistral disembarks for 15-40 km from the coast. And this ha 500m-2 km from the coast.

      That is, crazy Hailstones and shells (it’s clear as if they were pointed by Allah) and RCC (and this is already an escort task) will fly to Mistral.

      Everything that has not been crushed will fly to Gren. That is, which ATGM, which T-55 revived, which howitzer for direct fire.

      I would bet on the naked UDC / DKVD - than on the BDK classic in the matter of survival.

      For crushing the anti-ship missiles will be easier than crushing every cannon, every anti-tank system, every tank disguised on the shore. And yes, RCC, artillery, gradients will also fly to the BDK, as well as to the DKVD / UDC.
      1. ID90
        ID90 12 October 2017 11: 25 New
        +9
        Quote: donavi49
        What can he stand for?

        on the bow and stern there are hat stores. 500 pieces each.
        hold on to the adversaries.
        1. antivirus
          antivirus 12 October 2017 11: 42 New
          +1
          no one really has any caps !!!
      2. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 12 October 2017 11: 53 New
        +4
        Quote: donavi49
        Everything that has not been crushed will fly to Gren. That is, which ATGM, which T-55 revived, which howitzer for direct fire.

        If they fire directly, this is still good. The problem with all our BDKs and KFORs is that during the landing they either stand or crawl the smallest - so even shooting mortars with PDOs on them is not so difficult. sad
    4. Dart2027
      Dart2027 13 October 2017 18: 58 New
      0
      Quote: reservist
      It can stand up for itself.

      Than? 76 mm cannon? Any recreation center needs protection.
  4. Egorovich
    Egorovich 12 October 2017 10: 49 New
    13
    "Ivan Gren" is like a parable. A floating joke.
  5. wot
    wot 12 October 2017 11: 13 New
    +4
    Quote: Egorovich
    "Ivan Gren" is like a parable. A floating joke.

    soon it’s time to write off it will come, but it will not be accepted as weapons ....
    1. assa67
      assa67 12 October 2017 11: 35 New
      +5
      well, compared to the tug news, this one is really nothing yes
  6. Aleksandr_2
    Aleksandr_2 12 October 2017 11: 42 New
    0
    in November maybe the state tests will start?
  7. faiver
    faiver 12 October 2017 11: 59 New
    +3
    Oh really? you look a couple of years and will be adopted ..., a circus and nothing more, but why don’t they say that it is "newest"? bully
    1. ID90
      ID90 12 October 2017 12: 23 New
      +1
      Quote: faiver
      Oh really? you look a couple of years and will be adopted ..., a circus and nothing more, but why don’t they say that it is "newest"? bully

      and having no analogues !!!! laughing
    2. 73bor
      73bor 12 October 2017 15: 23 New
      0
      In the spring before May they wrote that in the summer they would be adopted, but to see "a stone flower does not come out ..."!
  8. kaschey
    kaschey 12 October 2017 12: 04 New
    0
    another client of Turkish cattle trucks
  9. Bronevick
    Bronevick 12 October 2017 12: 35 New
    +2
    Really, 15 (fifteen) years * have been built. And the aircraft carrier was going to build. There, raptors do 4 pieces a year and that's enough, nothing to meddle with. No wonder the saying is popular: you can’t, do not torment your ass.
  10. Veteran
    Veteran 12 October 2017 13: 05 New
    +8
    This BDK has already broken the long-term construction record of warships of both the imperial and Soviet (Russian) fleets - 13 years in construction and no end in sight. In the imperial fleet, the record of long-term construction was the Minin frigate cruiser (of the same displacement - 6 thousand tons) - 12 years of construction, in the Soviet (Russian) - Peter the Great TARKR - also 12 years, but it has a displacement of 26 thousand tons , with nuclear power and is stuffed with almost the entire nomenclature of Soviet naval weapons for the NK.
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 12 October 2017 15: 41 New
      +4
      Quote: Veteran
      This BDK has already broken the record for the long-term construction of warships of both the imperial and Soviet (Russian) fleets - 13 years in construction and no end in sight.

      Avotfig. smile
      In the RKKF, for example, there was the KR "Red Caucasus": it was laid down in 1913, surrendered to the fleet in 1932.
      And the "Red Crimea" was built from 1913 to 1928.

      And in the Russian Navy there are the leading ones, Ash (1993-2014) and Borey (1996-2013). And Amur corvettes ... smile
      1. Veteran
        Veteran 12 October 2017 17: 15 New
        +8
        Avotfigbek. yes
        It was only about NK and periods of their actual construction.
        1) The construction of the Red Caucasus (Adm. Lazarev), laid down in 1913, was discontinued in January 1918 by the German and Ukrainian authorities (CR) when 55% was ready, and was resumed only in 1927, when the Republic has accumulated strength; as a result, we subtract 9 years of inactivity for external reasons and get 10 years of actual construction of this Kr;
        2) the construction of the "Red Crimea" ("Svetlana") was also interrupted by the war, in 1918 the construction was finally stopped, and Kr spent 7 years in conservation at the ready 75-81%; construction was resumed in 1924, subtracting these 7 years, we obtain 8 years of actual construction;
        3) the most "long-built" (to date) Krv "Perfect" at the NEA was built for 11 years, which also does not exceed the records I have mentioned above.
        1. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 12 October 2017 19: 15 New
          0
          Quote: Veteran
          It was only about NK and periods of their actual construction.

          Then from the construction period of "Grena" you also need to throw out several years, during which the construction was frozen.
          1. Veteran
            Veteran 12 October 2017 21: 50 New
            +3
            The construction of Grena was not frozen, and there were no external reasons for this. The deadlines for its delivery were postponed several times due to redesign, funding problems, due to serious design flaws identified during the construction process that required regular cutting of the hull, due to a shortage of documentation and counterparty equipment, the 3 project was adjusted several times in terms of changing the composition of weapons, RES and changes in performance characteristics, etc., etc., etc. Bardak in one word.
  11. Nemesis
    Nemesis 13 October 2017 02: 01 New
    +1
    Long fuss, too long ...