Military Review

Defense Ministry: the United States launched a whole division near the Russian borders

62
An entire division of the US Armed Forces has actually deployed near the Russian borders, said Defense Ministry spokesman Major General Igor Konashenkov.


According to him, the past Russian-Belarusian exercises Zapad-2017 were accompanied by unprecedented media hysteria in Europe about their “non-transparency”, “hybrid” operations of the Armed Forces, “hordes” of the military, which had already received an order to “invade”, and also about that Russia left its "strike force" in Belarus.

But they were especially different in their "exposures" and Russophobia was missed by NATO and EU representatives represented by the leadership of the Baltic countries and Poland. Polish Defense Minister Anthony Matserevich even managed to declare the need to deploy at least two US divisions in his country for "protection against external threats."
- stressed Konashenkov.

Defense Ministry: the United States launched a whole division near the Russian borders


Meanwhile, in Poland and the Baltic countries, against the background of the West-2017 exercise, there was a “rotation” of the 3rd armored brigade of the US Armed Forces deployed according to the plan of Operation Atlantic Decision. All equipment of this brigade (87 tanks M1A1 Abrams, heavy self-propelled howitzers M109 Paladin, 144 BMD Bradley, and about a hundred more units of vehicles) should have remained. And the personnel of the 3rd Armored Brigade, in order not to violate the NATO-RF Founding Act, signed with Russia in 1997, were to be replaced by servicemen of the 2nd Armored Brigade of the US Armed Forces
- declared Konashenkov.

He added that against the background of hysteria about the planned military invasion of Russia, the 2017-I armored brigade of the USA arrived in Poland "quietly" directly from Poland and deployed there (Boleslawiec, Dravsko-Pomorsk, Torun, Skvjovina and Zagan) also with his armored vehicles.

At the same time, in Poland and the Baltic republics, the abandoned military equipment of the 3 of the American armored brigade did not disappear, the Defense Ministry spokesman said.

Thus, contrary to all statements by NATO and the United States about the "insignificance" of troops being pushed to the Russian borders, the brigade is now de facto deployed, but a mechanized division of the US military, where you can transfer trained personnel from the nearest American base in Europe in two hours Ramstein, West Germany)
- stressed Konashenkov.

All the hysteria about the "Russian threat" from the "West-2017" - fraudulently played the information curtain of the operation of the Pentagon. So who is preparing the aggression? "
- leads RIA News general words
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Puss in Boots
    Puss in Boots 12 October 2017 10: 27 New
    17
    become more crowded, more crowded laughing
    1. d ^ Amir
      d ^ Amir 12 October 2017 11: 07 New
      +6
      Unfortunately, the radiation safety belt is expanding to the territory of the Baltic states, Poland, Bulgaria, Romania, the Czech Republic ... etc ...
    2. Orel
      Orel 12 October 2017 11: 46 New
      +9
      Quote: Cat Racecourse
      become more crowded, more crowded laughing


      One division is not a threat. Even 20 is not a threat, and if Konashenkov thinks otherwise, then let him explain why a million-strong army is deployed at China on the Russian-Chinese border ??? Why are they afraid that we will attack them or something ??? It bothers me a lot more. Stand to grab a piece on occasion. Do not go to a fortuneteller. And here is Poland. This is far, and few of them. Very little.
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 12 October 2017 10: 28 New
    +6
    ... the general is well done, he shaves the meerkat both in the tail and in the mane ... if these statements were politically supported - then it would be much more significant ... angry
    1. Gray brother
      Gray brother 12 October 2017 10: 45 New
      11
      Quote: aszzz888
      . still politically supported these statements - then it would be much more significant ...

      These are not statements, but a statement of fact. For several years they have been saying in plain text that NATO, led by the United States, will create advanced deployment bases near the western borders of Russia, concentrating equipment and weapons on them so that only troops will be dispatched at hour X.
      It can be done so that this staff, upon arrival, felt like a Holodran. But this is only possible if a preventive strike is inflicted on these bases, however, to inflict it is the same as putting the label of the aggressor on yourself. So everything is complicated here.
      I don’t understand what kind of “political support” you are writing about - the enemy is preparing for war, so you need to prepare for defense and not tryndet.
    2. Lelek
      Lelek 12 October 2017 11: 53 New
      +9
      Quote: aszzz888
      well done general, shaving the meerkat both in the tail and mane ... if these statements were politically supported - then it would have been much more weighty ..


      Hey. Unfortunately, these are just our words of protest, and the United States is preparing for a war with us seriously 1 in 1 as Hitler Germany, which, under impudent pretentious pretexts, was pulling its troops to our borders, and then the “BAH” - 22.07.1941/XNUMX/XNUMX, whose echo we hear today.
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 12 October 2017 12: 37 New
        +1
        Half a million of their ground forces in all.
        1. Lelek
          Lelek 12 October 2017 12: 43 New
          +2
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Half a million of their ground forces in all.


          Where the tentacle popped in, wait for the whole octopus. According to open sources, 50000 Wehrmacht fighters were concentrated on the USSR border before the start of the Second World War. fool
          1. Mordvin 3
            Mordvin 3 12 October 2017 12: 54 New
            +8
            Quote: Lelek
            According to open sources, 50000 Wehrmacht fighters were concentrated on the USSR border before the start of the Second World War.

            This is what it’s called today. laughing Then Napoleon introduced 350 thousand militants to Russia. angry
            1. Lelek
              Lelek 12 October 2017 13: 06 New
              +1
              Quote: mordvin xnumx
              Then Napoleon introduced 350 thousand militants to Russia


              Hey. I talked about "open source" information. In fact, along the entire border of the USSR there were just half a million enemy troops (Germans, Romanians, Italians, Hungarians, Bulgarians, Czech Slovaks and a little Spaniards - almost, as now, half of the European Union). Only then did we have the so-called "allies" who are now enemies (NATO).
              1. Mordvin 3
                Mordvin 3 12 October 2017 13: 11 New
                +3
                Quote: Lelek
                In fact, along the entire border of the USSR there were just half a million enemy troops

                I read one historian. He claims that Stalin wanted to attack Britain, while Hitler wanted to attack Iran. Only the bastard Rudy Hess spoiled the whole idea. Ktsati, evidence was given in the form of one hundred thousand greenhouses ordered by the Red Army for the 41st year.
                1. Lelek
                  Lelek 12 October 2017 13: 14 New
                  +1
                  Quote: mordvin xnumx
                  Mordvin 3


                  Get less involved in such a reading and your stomach will work like a walking clock.
                  1. Mordvin 3
                    Mordvin 3 12 October 2017 13: 19 New
                    +3
                    Quote: Lelek
                    Get less involved in such reading

                    Why 100 thousand. have you ordered the teplushok? This is about 4 million people. Why were the cowards given to the fighters? And the medallions? There are many questions.
                    1. Doliva63
                      Doliva63 12 October 2017 18: 17 New
                      +4
                      Quote: mordvin xnumx
                      Why were the cowards given to the fighters?

                      And now what - thongs, or what? I haven’t had so much fun for a long time! tongue drinks
                      1. Mordvin 3
                        Mordvin 3 12 October 2017 21: 43 New
                        +3
                        Quote: Doliva63
                        Quote: mordvin xnumx
                        Why were the cowards given to the fighters?

                        And now what - thongs, or what? I haven’t had so much fun for a long time! tongue drinks

                        No, they gave out pants and T-shirts. In the 40th year.
                    2. raw174
                      raw174 13 October 2017 07: 08 New
                      +3
                      Quote: mordvin xnumx
                      Why were the cowards given to the fighters?

                      Your data is old! According to new information, cowards were not given out to everyone, but only to those with a length of more than 20 cm, so that they wouldn’t knock off their legs when walking! Read only trusted sources!
                      PS I could not resist, joking)))
              2. 73bor
                73bor 15 October 2017 09: 58 New
                0
                And who were the allies, well, recall? Before the war, there were still no allies, even as soon as our Germans pushed the Germans on the head against Moscow, only then they began to negotiate Lend-Lease!
        2. aszzz888
          aszzz888 12 October 2017 12: 44 New
          0
          voyaka uh Today, 12:37 ↑ New
          Half a million of their ground forces in all.

          ... well, so some will be on the side of these "half million" ...
      2. aszzz888
        aszzz888 12 October 2017 12: 42 New
        +2
        Lelek Today, 11: 53 ↑ New

        Hello! ... I thought about this more than once, but apparently not only you and I think about it ... annoying a little ...
        1. Lelek
          Lelek 12 October 2017 13: 39 New
          +2
          Quote: aszzz888
          yes apparently not only you and I think about it ... annoying a little ...


          Annoying and not a bit. I remember the war (age allows), I remember how my father with a pale face entered the room and hoarsely: "war", and then he urgently packed a suitcase with his mother, kissed us and flew away on his PE-2P for eternity. And strained "before" was the same as now. yes
          1. raw174
            raw174 13 October 2017 07: 11 New
            +3
            Quote: Lelek
            I remember the war (age allows), I remember how my father with a pale face entered the room

            Not often on forums you will meet people over the age of 85 good
            1. Lelek
              Lelek 13 October 2017 11: 02 New
              +1
              Quote: raw174
              Not often on forums you will meet people over the age of 85 le


              A little mistake. It was 5 years old at the beginning of the war, but memory fails, I remember myself from the age of 2, which I wish for everyone. yes
  3. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 12 October 2017 10: 29 New
    +8
    This is only the beginning. A significant grouping has also been deployed on the southern flank in Romania. In the north, the bulk will move to the Baltic states when the apartments are ready. Guess where the backbone of the southern strike group will move.
    1. Berber
      Berber 12 October 2017 10: 41 New
      +7
      They have no offensive capabilities against us, even if there are 5 divisions. Yes, and 25, too. American politics is like a poker game. Without good cards, they bluff in black. Only this bluff will cost them dearly. In essence, this is an arms race. They spend money on it exorbitantly.
      1. Topotun
        Topotun 12 October 2017 10: 48 New
        10
        It depends on what goals to pursue. In fact, the Americans just need a big war in Europe, and it is absolutely important who wins. They will make good money on this and will be able to overcome the coming financial crisis. So it was in the First World War, so it was in the Second World War. Will Russia be defeated? It doesn’t matter, she will be weakened enough so that she can talk with her from a position of strength. Many people will die in Europe? As they say - incidental damage. They don’t care.
        1. Thunderbolt
          Thunderbolt 12 October 2017 11: 47 New
          +4
          Quote: BerBer
          They have no offensive capabilities against us, even if there are 5 divisions. Yes, and 25, too.

          You imagine their military aggression as a classic military company --- they appointed D-Day and threw tanks into battle. But it’s much more complicated. They managed to draw us into the war in the BV and even judging by the latest events there --- the main events are ahead .
          The situation in our Far East is also stable, only at first glance stable, but meanwhile, without the transfer of troops from our European part, there is clearly not enough strength there even to successfully conduct a small regional war. With China, too, everything is muddled, a lot of articles on how we will “bring down” dollar and drive the Yankees, but China is more connected with America, and their whole conflict lies in the fact that they can’t share the world’s resources. The deal between them promises us a war on 2 fronts. And not according to the canons of the Second World War by will, we broke the backbone of all opponents), but rather in a situation of several wars of varying degrees of intensity on our borders, which can lead to a very serious internal political crisis in terms of the sum of factors: the economy, the interests of the elites, and the nationalism of our Federation.
          Therefore, conventionally, “NATO tanks” are going to start engines not before, but at the final stage of the modern big war of the 21st century, where Twitter and Facebook are equated with the power of several armies or a group of fronts.
          1. Berber
            Berber 13 October 2017 09: 02 New
            +1
            In Soviet times, there was such a science of Political Economy. We do not participate in conflicts as in the USSR. At the end of the conflict, Russia will have bonuses in Syria. Already have a return. Arms contracts for 20 billion for example.
            When the United States planned various sanctions against us, the oil swing, etc., it did not take into account a very important factor. This factor is the structure of the economy. If we had a pre-perestroika market structure, we would have been much harder. And since we have a market structure, the economy damped some of the consequences.
            What am I doing? You just don’t have to calculate the conflict statically. The fact is that the sets of answers are varied and the answer is sure to follow. Again, the doctrine has changed, we can use nuclear weapons in any scenario threatening us
      2. Viktor.12.71
        Viktor.12.71 12 October 2017 13: 17 New
        +2
        Quote: BerBer
        They have no offensive capabilities against us, even if there are 5 divisions.

        Forgot how Baghdad fell? The invasion of Baghdad was carried out by the forces of the 1st Division of the US Marine Corps and the 3rd Infantry Division, equipped with M1 Abrams tanks, Bradley combat vehicles and M113 armored personnel carriers. They were opposed by 36 Iraqi Republican Guard soldiers, who had established themselves in a circle of bunkers 000 miles from Baghdad, with the support of Asad Babil tanks and heavy artillery. Given that the invasion of Iraq began on March 30, 19, Baghdad was surrounded on April 2003, and Baghdad fell on April 3. Saddam also underestimated the Americans.
        1. Berber
          Berber 13 October 2017 09: 08 New
          +1
          Unfortunately we Americans are not Arabs. Nast has a different set of weapons. And the trump card is the nuclear triad.
          1. Viktor.12.71
            Viktor.12.71 13 October 2017 09: 45 New
            0
            Quote: BerBer
            And the trump card is the nuclear triad.

            This trump card will become irrelevant in 10 years when the Americans deploy the entire missile defense system around the world, thereby taking Russia into the ring, the Americans two years preparing for the war against Iraq. They minimize risks and maximize the chances of victory. You do not believe in fairy tales that missile defense against Iran and North Korea?
  4. samoletil18
    samoletil18 12 October 2017 10: 33 New
    0
    We must begin to develop a single-engine IS, similar to the Su-17. But at a new technological level. To the heap OTRK is easier. Americans always consider EVERYTHING, incl. and our own losses, we should organize another war.
  5. Moore
    Moore 12 October 2017 10: 34 New
    +5

    It seems like the more and more obvious everything becomes ...
  6. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 12 October 2017 10: 49 New
    +2
    Europe is already stuffed with NATO troops, and now the filling of the European "pie" is increasing and seasoned with acute Russophobia. Who will bury them?
    1. Lelek
      Lelek 12 October 2017 12: 52 New
      +2
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Who will bury them?


      Today the slogan is appropriate: "If you want peace, get ready for war." The game of "hide and seek" continues, but its goals are all the more contrasting. The tank is not a tractor, and the Patriot is not a mowing machine. Their purpose is to bring death, but to whom - and the hedgehog is understandable. And do not bother with the funeral, the crematorium blazes all over the ball.
    2. Socialism 2.0
      Socialism 2.0 12 October 2017 12: 56 New
      0
      nobody will bury them. utilize carcasses in the crematorium.
  7. Oleg Monarchist
    Oleg Monarchist 12 October 2017 10: 51 New
    0
    And why not deploy it in Iraq .... Although in Iraq it will be quickly torn to pieces, and in Europe it’s safe, no one will attack the division, the tanks will not burn.
  8. Topotun
    Topotun 12 October 2017 11: 00 New
    +6
    Almost a division near the borders of Russia. Is it a lot or a little? The US mechanized division is about 16000 people, about 240 tanks, about 160 gun mounts of various calibers. More than 150 ATGM systems, for 700 units of armored vehicles ... etc. If five thousand barmaley Syria nightmares .... And add here the Armed Forces of Poland, Romania? It seems that the Shtatovs decided to seriously organize a war in Europe.
  9. Kerensky
    Kerensky 12 October 2017 11: 01 New
    +2
    Bluff. The USA needs a big war in Europe, but .... without the USA. That is, in the case of a sheher they will pull the personnel to Rammstein and further, and leave the equipment "because of eternal Jewish generosity" (C)
  10. basmach
    basmach 12 October 2017 11: 06 New
    +3
    Here the calculation is not only for Europe (although the whole arrangement of troops is very similar to 41, and now it’s not 500 versts to Peter, but 150, and it’s much closer to Moscow). But to do what Hitler did not succeed in — to strike from two sides — west and east — this will be the calculation. At the same time, it doesn’t matter what happens in the east, the main thing is to link the troops there and destroy the production capacities (and goodbye to Sushka and Kashka). And there is only one hope for China - that they will not want to snatch something out of the blue.
    1. SCHWERIN
      SCHWERIN 12 October 2017 12: 16 New
      +4
      Ms humpback merged Germany and the Baltic states. Our Soviet Supreme Council condemned the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact on the basis of COPIES !!!! copies of Karl !!! The original was not found. And we still say something about ukrov !! Is it ... and we continue to do this about the Soviet-Finnish war of 39 years! Without defeating the Finns (and essentially the Germans there), Leningrad would have fallen under the blows of the Germans from Finland. and with SZ. They joined the Baltic states, which made it possible to keep the Germans in the eastern theater. One must not understand this. The Baltic states, after a coup in RI and a gift to the pro-Western "elites" of these independence territories, became a spy hub for Western intelligence services against Russia. Gorbachev generally finished school, after all, it wasn't 500 years ago?
      Grandson of Bismarck, infantry officer fought in Russia in the II MV. Captured. Already living in West Germany, he gave an interview to our newspaper. When asked about the Pact, he said that if there hadn’t been a Pact, Germany would have easily captured Leningrad, but the Baltic countries slowed down the Wehrmacht. Here is an assessment of a military man.
      Snot about human rights, this is a screen. They were not in Korea, Vietnam and further. There, people have no rights, and most importantly, life. Now Syria and DLNR. There are no people there. And hybrid warfare is not the invention of our General Staff, but the Pentagon.
  11. NKT
    NKT 12 October 2017 11: 07 New
    +3
    In response, we will deploy two new Iskander brigades.

    I don’t know if we will have time, within five minutes, to bring our Iskanders to positions and strike at the places where NATO forces are concentrated, as well as their infrastructure? Would an increase in the number of missile brigades be an adequate solution to the threat that NATO poses for us?
  12. ronnon
    ronnon 12 October 2017 11: 13 New
    +4
    “At about 10 o’clock the Russians in this sector of the front opened strong artillery-mortar fire, which was so effective and accurate that at the very first hour regiment control and communication with the division headquarters were lost. The fire was directed mainly at observation and command posts and headquarters. I was amazed at how exactly the Russians knew the location of our headquarters, command and observation posts. My regiment was completely paralyzed. "
    (Commander of the 575th Regiment of the 304th Infantry Division)

    Wisla Oder Strategic Offensive

    The history of these gentlemen does not teach what.
  13. grandfather Mih
    grandfather Mih 12 October 2017 11: 16 New
    +2
    They deployed a whole division. Prepare for the election? Waiting for the "wizard in a blue helicopter"? The "blue dream" equivalent will arrive to the waiters. I like our Army.
  14. Maki Avellevich
    Maki Avellevich 12 October 2017 11: 33 New
    0
    Defense Ministry: the United States launched a whole division near the Russian borders


    "whole division" is serious, it is tsila. The Kremlin has come to think about surrender however.
  15. TsUS-Air Force
    TsUS-Air Force 12 October 2017 11: 34 New
    +1
    urgently send missiles to Cuba !!
  16. Romario_Argo
    Romario_Argo 12 October 2017 12: 04 New
    0
    I don’t see anything wrong with that
    this is a reaction to our deployment of the 1-th tank and 8-th armies
    and for the next exercises, we will answer with the exercises, we have many units of district subordination, enough for the 2 army
    1. Gray brother
      Gray brother 12 October 2017 12: 21 New
      0
      Quote: Romario_Argo
      this is a reaction to our deployment of the 1-th tank and 8-th armies

      No.
      In January 2015, Alliance Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg confirmed plans to create command posts and quick reaction forces in six countries of Eastern Europe - Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Poland and Bulgaria. They will become the link between the national forces and NATO forces. In April, General Ben Hodges, commander of the US ground forces in Europe, said that NATO countries in Europe needed an accelerated troop transfer regime, a kind of "military Schengen"
      1. Romario_Argo
        Romario_Argo 12 October 2017 12: 28 New
        0
        In January 2015, Alliance Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg confirmed plans to create command posts and quick reaction forces in six countries of Eastern Europe - Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Poland and Bulgaria. They will become the link between the national forces and NATO forces. In April, General Ben Hodges, commander of the US ground forces in Europe, said that NATO countries in Europe needed an accelerated troop transfer regime, a kind of "military Schengen"

        and where does it? and why without analysis - for what purpose do these forces
        By the way, I replied that to counter our potential (!)
        1. Gray brother
          Gray brother 12 October 2017 12: 34 New
          0
          Quote: Romario_Argo
          I replied that to counter our potential (!)

          You wrote that this is a reaction to the deployment of our forces, in fact, the opposite is true.
          These are tank armies, formed (and not deployed, please note), in response to the actual implementation of NATO plans.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  17. pvv113
    pvv113 12 October 2017 12: 35 New
    +1
    Russian-Belarusian exercises "West-2017" were accompanied by an unprecedented hysteria of the media in Europe about their "opacity"

    What more transparency do they need?
  18. Zomanus
    Zomanus 12 October 2017 12: 41 New
    0
    I won’t be surprised if this presentation will be an explanation of
    what Russia will soon do.
    And I won’t be surprised if it turns out that there is already a dispersal of some of our troops
    in order to avoid one-time destruction.
    Such things are not said in passing and in vain ...
  19. Franciscan
    Franciscan 12 October 2017 17: 33 New
    +1
    Urgently express concern and hold a flash mob.
  20. Slam
    Slam 12 October 2017 17: 37 New
    0
    Quote: Topotun
    It depends on what goals to pursue. In fact, the Americans just need a big war in Europe, and it is absolutely important who wins. They will make good money on this and will be able to overcome the coming financial crisis. So it was in the First World War, so it was in the Second World War. Will Russia be defeated? It doesn’t matter, she will be weakened enough so that she can talk with her from a position of strength. Many people will die in Europe? As they say - incidental damage. They don’t care.

    There will be no war. America doesn’t need war because they print money, but your elite doesn’t need it because the elite loses trillions of greenery brought to the west. These are all show-offs.
    1. Moore
      Moore 12 October 2017 19: 09 New
      +1
      Quote: Slam
      There will be no war. America doesn’t need war because they print money, but your elite doesn’t need it because the elite loses trillions of greenery brought to the west. These are all show-offs.

      To read out here a difficult course of political economy in order to prove that printing money alone does not save from the crisis (especially when other power points are formed with their own currencies like the renminbi) I don’t see the point.
      But to rekindle a war in Europe with a kindling from pan-legged and “unique” tribal tigers - this is easy. So get ready for the earth slowly.
    2. raw174
      raw174 13 October 2017 07: 38 New
      +2
      Quote: Slam
      America doesn’t need war because they print money,

      The US economy rests on wars, they need a war! Without their participation, of course. They will untie, take the side of the likely winner and milk it, and upon completion they will land on the territory of the defeated in order to share the trophies (according to the principle described in the movie "Wedding in the Robin") and establish its own order.
  21. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 12 October 2017 19: 56 New
    0
    One battalion in three Baltic countries and one brigade in Poland.
    NATO in 2017 completed the implementation of decisions made in 2014 after Russia's annexation of Crimea. It took three years. Now there will be annual contingent rotations and regular exercises.
    Russia, in turn, created a tank army in its western part, deployed BR
    Iskander in the Kaliningrad region.
    A completely predictable round of an arms race has taken place.
    1. Gransasso
      Gransasso 12 October 2017 20: 05 New
      +1
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Russia, in turn, created a tank army in its western part,


      I created, in the sense of released a thousand new tanks, trained crews for them, created all the related military units for this tank army ... or simply created an army bureaucratic-headquarters structure based on the units there? ...
  22. Krasnyiy komissar
    Krasnyiy komissar 12 October 2017 20: 00 New
    0
    June 22 should never happen again. There will be only one answer to aggression - the massive use of nuclear weapons in the largest cities of the enemy, dams, nuclear power plants and ports.
  23. Slam
    Slam 12 October 2017 22: 05 New
    0
    Quote: Moore
    Quote: Slam
    There will be no war. America doesn’t need war because they print money, but your elite doesn’t need it because the elite loses trillions of greenery brought to the west. These are all show-offs.

    To read out here a difficult course of political economy in order to prove that printing money alone does not save from the crisis (especially when other power points are formed with their own currencies like the renminbi) I don’t see the point.
    But to rekindle a war in Europe with a kindling from pan-legged and “unique” tribal tigers - this is easy. So get ready for the earth slowly.

    You are right, but in my words, it seems to me that there is some truth, you have a summer residence, and there is a goat in the neighbors and you buy milk into it, you pay with a simple piece of paper, writing the sum in rubles on it. stores. And it will be very long. Will you have a desire to pick up a goat from a man? You keep a nest egg by your neighbor. Apart from you and your neighbor, no one knows about her, will you have a desire to roll a barrel on him? Moreover, he is five times stronger from you.
    1. Moore
      Moore 14 October 2017 09: 54 New
      0
      Respected
      Slam
      The allegory is somewhat simplified.
      In addition to this neighbor, nearby (even much closer) there is another neighbor (and not one, in general), who (who) are happy to buy my carrots for real money.
      And the neighbor with the goat is behaving more and more aggressive every day - it’s shitting at the threshold, or striving to rearrange the fence ... I’m already thinking, maybe hell with her, with a stash ... Yes, go clean his snout ...
  24. Nemesis
    Nemesis 13 October 2017 02: 09 New
    +1
    This once again suggests that it is time for Russia to deploy Caliber missiles on a wheeled chassis, with a nuclear charge, so that there is enough range to the NATO divisions ...
  25. Blondy
    Blondy 13 October 2017 06: 56 New
    0
    Strange guys, do they think that in the event of an attack ours will fight with this division, but they will not strike at America?
  26. raw174
    raw174 13 October 2017 07: 45 New
    +2
    As for me, you don’t need to shout and resent, you need to conduct Strategic Missile Forces exercises, using all types of media, including railway and through closed channels to convincingly bring to the White House that in case of confrontation with any of the countries, NATO members and partners will be massed the blow will be struck in the United States. You can land some kind of communication satellite (target), for clarity. Demonstration of real power will cool hotheads.
  27. Mentat
    Mentat 13 October 2017 17: 45 New
    0
    Quote: Viktor.12.71
    Forgot how Baghdad fell? Saddam also underestimated the Americans.

    Are you specifically trying to hack? Even if we exclude nuclear weapons from the calculations, the United States is not able to conduct a successful land attack on the European theater of operations. These weapons are accumulating, rather, under the flag of “confronting Russian aggression” to control Europe.