In Kiev, presented the anti-sniper complex "Sych"

21
During the specialized exhibition "Weapon and security-2017 ”, taking place in the Ukrainian capital, was presented the so-called anti-sniper complex. It is reported that it was created by Ukrainian developers. During the presentation, it was stated that the complex, called the “Sych”, conducts a constant video monitoring of the area and allows you to set the location of the sniper “enemy”.

Sych is a reconnaissance and detection complex for optical devices, as stated, capable of monitoring both day and night by using infrared cameras. It can be used to identify masked optical devices used for aiming.



The production manager of this complex is Maxim Volkov, who told the media that the complex is capable of detecting optical sights, cameras and other lenses for aiming.

In Kiev, presented the anti-sniper complex "Sych"


From the report:
"Brains" inside consider the coordinates of this goal. Further, these coordinates can lead the sniper to defeat this object.



About that, when the "Sych" will begin to enter the Ukrainian troops and whether it will start at all, not reported. It is not reported about the interest of the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the acquisition of these complexes.
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. mad
    +5
    12 October 2017 06: 37
    His IR headlight and four lens eyes will be great to unmask in the eyes of our anti-sniper complex) he would have his own weapons and hello war of robots))
    1. +7
      12 October 2017 06: 40
      Inieresno ... If he is active and he has an IR emitter, he will not make himself a target?
      1. mad
        +3
        12 October 2017 06: 45
        Well, I’m talking about this, on any passive night light this thing will look like a bright lighthouse, how can you not cover it with mortars ?!
        1. 0
          12 October 2017 18: 58
          And how is he looking for optics?
          On American Abrams, for example, the automatic complex simply constantly everything around the laser runs around and tracks glare. But glare is caught only if the lens is aimed exactly at the tank. So they banged some American reporter in Iraq, he took a photo of the tank for a couple of kilometers from the hotel window. they fired a cannon at the window from him.
          This system has a significant drawback - a lot of false positives. For any convex glass (for example a bottle splinter) it can work. And in the battle zone, I think there is a lot of garbage.
      2. 0
        12 October 2017 06: 46
        If memory serves me right, we already have similar systems.
        1. BAI
          0
          12 October 2017 09: 06
          The production of Transcript, Agatha, NELK, MVTU laboratories, the FSB - this is what is in advertising and at public exhibitions (dual-use products) and a number of closed defense enterprises.
        2. +2
          12 October 2017 09: 59
          Quote: Alexander 3
          If memory serves me right, we already have similar systems.

          There is. "Raven" is called. At times less. Does not use active IR illumination.
  2. +1
    12 October 2017 06: 52
    If Volkov is an intelligent engineer, lure to Russia. Let it work.
    1. +9
      12 October 2017 07: 03
      Quote: 30 vis
      If Volkov is an intelligent engineer, lure to Russia. Let it work.

      do not. we have enough of our own. and this "infected." the sugs virus is incurable. and sensible and adequate have long since fled from there themselves
  3. +4
    12 October 2017 07: 06
    This model is “OWL”, then “SKUNS” is expected, further “BZDUNS” ... what else is therewinked
    1. +7
      12 October 2017 07: 28
      Quote: viktor_ui
      This model is “OWL”, then “SKUNS” is expected, further “BZDUNS” ... what else is there

      but this "model" is simpler and cheaper laughing
      1. +1
        12 October 2017 09: 06
        Just saving on bipod. They are very expensive there.
        1. +5
          12 October 2017 09: 23
          not at all . costly sniper cover up with a cheap soldier
        2. 0
          14 October 2017 18: 18
          Quote: samoletil18
          Just saving on bipod. They are very expensive there.

          Iron bipod themselves do not go. This member is not only self-propelled, but also self-propelled. Unless, of course, load it well.
  4. +1
    12 October 2017 07: 21
    ... another “miracle weapon” of ukrokakakl ... I remember in history some of them also wanted a “miracle of weapons”, we also remember the result ... bully
  5. +1
    12 October 2017 08: 10
    Quote: viktor_ui
    This model is “OWL”, then “SKUNS” is expected, further “BZDUNS” ... what else is therewinked

    Not at all.
    Further Ssych, even further Ssych.
  6. BAI
    0
    12 October 2017 09: 02
    If you see, then they see you. Any detection system for optoelectronic surveillance tools is detected in the same way by a similar system. Means have long been known, laser means of detecting and destroying optics even managed to fall under the ban for inhumanity in relation to the sniper.
  7. +4
    12 October 2017 09: 25
    and if you stupidly throw empty bottles? cheating?
  8. +3
    12 October 2017 09: 34
    Report Analysis:
    1. Composition: Thermal imager, video camera, laser range finder, 2 laser emitters.
    2. Judging by the picture on the monitor, the effective range of the complex is 2 km.
    3. This complex will detect optical and night sights, binoculars, cameras, reflectors, road signs, car headlights (their reflectors). The thermal imager will not let you deceive.
    4. In the night vision system, you can see the operation of this complex (3 for sure, 2+ not a fact), but only a spot of reflected laser radiation from the scanned area.
    5. The operator is located at a distance from the complex (protect people).
    6. The price is expensive.
    Conclusion is a serious thing
    1. 0
      12 October 2017 10: 04
      Quote: papanin
      4. In the night vision system, you can see the operation of this complex (3 for sure, 2+ not a fact), but only a spot of reflected laser radiation from the scanned area.

      Not only in the NVD, but also in the PSO-1 IR illumination will be visible. So the answer can be obtained almost instantly.
  9. 0
    12 October 2017 09: 47
    Well, I’ve never seen what - an open secret. The technology for the production of infrared devices has long been known, but it is not such a simple matter to produce them, and even more so, on a massive scale .. Even in Russia, industrial production was not successful for a long time. Krajina has no means to produce these devices, and it is not necessary. If their curators consider it necessary, they will provide them.
  10. +1
    12 October 2017 12: 34
    During illumination, radiation with a large divergence is formed, and this complex should continuously scan the scene with a narrow beam. You will clearly see a spot of laser radiation running through the scene you are viewing. In the case of oncoming observation, you may not even notice that they were looking at you (a narrow beam, continuously scanning), but you were discovered with a thermal imager, they confirmed the presence of optics with a laser, examined into the camera, measured the distance to you, and received the coordinates. With all this, the operator of this complex can be far away. The complex discovers, POSSIBLE, at a distance of up to 2km! PSO-1 does not see IR, but only spurious radiation in the red region, formed by a laser diode together with the main IR - it can easily be cut off with a band-pass filter. In general, it is a pity to watch how much effort is spent on the killing of their own kind.
  11. 0
    29 December 2019 15: 29
    Guys, I realized that only one person here knows what it is about. This is Uv.papanin.
    I explain to those who are not in the subject. This is a very serious device! I won’t wonder if they will be able to put him on stream and put him into the troops, this is not the point.
    1. Such devices do not react to empty bottles (... and even full ones), they do not react to glasses or simple lenses. They detect the observer (sniper) through the sighting channel, i.e. on the optical system of binoculars (sight). Any devices with focus will be detected by this device. I must say right away that no blends will help, even a “tube” or honeycomb blend. He can easily detect such an observation device, unless the detection angle is not much smaller. But the observer (sniper) will have less.
    2. You do not have any illumination on the surface
    see, except that in the NVD. The scanning channel operates in an invisible spectrum.
    3. Indeed, such a device can be detected
    in NVD for obvious reasons.
    4. The declared range of detection of ECO in 2km. -
    very decent parameter. I must say right away that this is real, but in fact most likely it is more ..., it all depends on the parameters of the camera, the screen of which displays a signal about the detection of an ECO.
    5. The presence of a thermal imager, range finder, geolocation and other things is a good addition.
    Conclusion: this device is very good! If they are equipped with sniper and anti-sniper groups ... of course, everyone does not need ..., then this will be a big disaster for the warring party.