Hodges noted the effectiveness of Russian EW funds

32
The Russian army effectively uses electronic warfare, actively uses Drones and missile weapons, transmits RIA News Statement by US Commander of Ground Forces Ben Hodges in Europe.





They (RF) have shown that they still have really effective means of electronic warfare. They demonstrated a lot of action with the participation of drones,
Hodges said in an interview with Defense News, commenting on the teachings of "West-2017."

They confirmed that we assumed that their conduct of hostilities was still based on long-range missiles and rocket artillery,
he noted.

According to the general, also during the exercise, Russia "tested a new system of command and control and troop control, which the United States intends to analyze in order to understand how effective it is."

Recall, the strategic exercise “Zapad-2017” was held in Belarus and Russia from 14 to 20 September. More than 12 thousand soldiers were involved in the training, about 680 units of equipment were involved.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    11 October 2017 12: 42
    But this is what we have! And good!
    Let them slowly write off to the shore there.
    I liked it, two planes flew by, and a whole orly-burke, nafig failed. good
    1. +4
      11 October 2017 12: 51
      Quote: DEZINTO
      two planes flew by, and the whole Orly-burke, nafig failed

      right so out of order ......? .... EM decommissioned?
      1. 0
        11 October 2017 12: 53
        straight so out of order

        Well, of course not written off. But in tactical terms, he left the course of the battle. (Theoretical battle) This is awesome.
        1. +6
          11 October 2017 12: 55
          The Khibiny-Kuk sect has not yet been covered ??
          1. +5
            11 October 2017 12: 57
            The Khibiny-Kuk sect has not yet been covered ??


            Oh well, otherwise they came up with it out of the blue.

            Maybe they exaggerated something, but the computers on the ship were turned off. This is even the Americans themselves have confirmed. So do not.
            1. +4
              11 October 2017 13: 30
              Ben Hodges ... The same general who was sent to Pakistan as the "representative of the United States." He long persuaded and persuaded the Pakistanis to release all captured terrorists into Afghanistan, according to the official wording "due to the fact that in 2014 the United States will leave Afghanistan, and the locals will need someone to control. And these released ones will enter to local law enforcement, the US will train them. "
              http://www.easttime.ru/news/afganistan/pakistan-s
              oglasilsya-osvobodit-plenennykh-talibov

              In general, it is certainly necessary to listen to him. But after that, act as if you did not hear him. Dangerous demagogue.
              1. +1
                11 October 2017 13: 51
                He again asks for money for the military-industrial complex.
              2. +2
                11 October 2017 14: 03
                Quote: Shurik70
                Ben Hodges ... The same general,

                The one who successfully completed a three-week acting course, and before that, clowning. Now taking pantomime lessons. Star of German talk shows ...
            2. SOF
              +1
              11 October 2017 16: 06
              Quote: DEZINTO
              Oh come on, otherwise they came up with it out of the blue

              ... and it seems to me that Cook didn’t run away from Romania at full speed to Bastion, as described in our official version. Missiles would certainly scare them, but not so ...
            3. 0
              11 October 2017 17: 00
              Quote: DEZINTO
              Maybe they exaggerated something, but the computers on the ship were turned off. This is even the Americans themselves have confirmed.

              Maybe they themselves forgot to turn on their much-praised Aegis, and then they shout that the Russians were turned off? laughing
          2. +1
            11 October 2017 15: 04
            Quote: Dangerous
            The Khibiny-Kuk sect has not yet been covered ??

            Okay, still newcomers would write. When the old people are still doing this, it becomes clear that the light of the new teaching will illuminate us forever.
            1. Don
              +1
              11 October 2017 16: 56
              Quote: Manul
              Okay, still newcomers would write. When the old people are still doing this, it becomes clear that the light of the new teaching will illuminate us forever.

              There is no escape from this, people will always believe in miracles hi
        2. +1
          11 October 2017 12: 58
          Quote: DEZINTO
          But in tactical terms, he got out of the battle. (Theoretical battle)

          yes ..... if (theoretical battle), it would be unlikely that our drying flew to him ....
          1. 0
            11 October 2017 13: 02
            it is unlikely that our drying flew to him ....


            Drying if something happens when you have the right missiles and you don’t have to get close to it.
        3. +1
          11 October 2017 14: 59
          Are you sure? And if there was a Russian crew? Are you sure that ALL systems have failed and they cannot be restored with the help of some mother or forced to work, albeit limitedly? And was there a hardware failure? It seems that the second version was also broadcast on TV - at the same time they took the coastal missile complex to escort them (in fact, the guidance mode) .... But catching a rocket is not the same as catching interference from the enemy ...
          1. SOF
            +1
            11 October 2017 16: 49
            Quote: Topotun
            And catching a rocket is not the same as catching interference from a submarine.

            ... everything is exactly the opposite ...
            In their place, it would be filapetovo whether the coastal missile complex is looking at me or not, since to consciously slap a missile into the side of the US destroyer - you need to have a terribly frostbitten head or at least the fact of war. But fear and dump, churning water, it is possible only from what is not clear and unpredictable.
            1. +1
              11 October 2017 17: 25
              Here is a rocket - this is not predictable. For the effect of electronic warfare on a foreign ship is the same. Declaration of war in fact. And not at all deadly. The ship does not lose speed. And the galley does not stop working .... But a gift from warheads per ton ..... And who knows these terrible Russians ..... laughing
              1. SOF
                +1
                11 October 2017 21: 16
                Quote: Topotun
                Here's a rocket - it's not predictable

                What is unpredictable in a rocket, especially if you already have radar? Especially if you are 50 percent sure that you are able to intercept it. Especially if you know that the rocket will not fly, because otherwise it will be all the same to all. Especially if you, in principle, did nothing terrible, and the commander of the red button on the rocket is not an officer, but a president who has never proved himself inadequate. So what's wrong with a rocket? Attention to the question: will hegemony be scary if it sailed onto a super duper with a modern destroyer, stuffed with not the latest electronics, and a lonely and relatively ancient unarmed plane, having flown up to the model of excellence in military science, will simply take and turn off the weapon? Let us recall the statement of the GDP on this issue in "Crimea, the way to the homeland": "... it was they who went too big ...". And now the second question: what is hooliganism? In flapping wings on the deck of a heavily armed Cook? If it was Blackjack or Backfire, then yes it would be scary, and the Su-24 ... yes empty ..... That would be Americans laughing. But no. And there’s nothing to blame for the Russians: well, Spy died, well, after all, not for good. But what was that all about? The Russians are silent, they only grin cunningly, they say about hooligans. So - there was nothing! It seemed. But feet in Romania are better to carry away. The faster the better.
                The tale is a lie, but a hint in it ... Or is it better this way: there is no smoke without fire. Especially in such matters.
      2. +1
        11 October 2017 17: 23
        Quote: Burbon
        right so out of order ......? .... EM decommissioned?

        =======
        NOT!!! NOT written off ... HE is simply "Extinct" ....
        1. +1
          11 October 2017 17: 49
          Quote: venik
          NOT!!! NOT written off ... HE is simply "Extinct" ....

          keep believing in fairy tales ... good night kids .. lol
    2. +4
      11 October 2017 13: 15
      Calm down the general, the exercises are over, no one is going to occupy the labuses and sprat eaters. laughing
      Hodges noted the effectiveness of Russian EW funds

      If the enemy praises, oh for good reason it what
      1. +3
        11 October 2017 17: 57
        Quote: vovanpain
        If the enemy praises, oh for good reason it

        Yes, let these people say what they want, we always believe in our weapons, since our weapons are like giving birth to a baby .... drinks
  2. +7
    11 October 2017 12: 43
    According to the general, also during the exercise, Russia "tested a new system of command and control and troop control, which the United States intends to analyze in order to understand how effective it is."
    this is called bench press point am
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +6
        11 October 2017 15: 27
        on a new military program! "
        for cut, most likely
        The report of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense sounds devastating: as much as 6,5 trillion dollars (that is, 6500 billion!) Disappeared from the general fund of the US Army, leaving no documentary trace. No one can (at least officially) say where and what this money went to.
  3. 0
    11 October 2017 12: 52
    Has the means and you have periodically in one place that would not relax. =)
  4. +2
    11 October 2017 12: 54
    Either asking for money, or some answer prepared.
  5. +7
    11 October 2017 12: 56
    Learn, study mattresses, no one has won so many wars as the Russian state. You lose anyway.
  6. +1
    11 October 2017 13: 14
    According to the general, also during the exercise, Russia "tested a new system of command and control and troop control, which the United States intends to analyze in order to understand how effective it is."
    What meticulous, just at least in Siberia conduct exercises of the Belarusian Military District, so as not to sniff out).
  7. +3
    11 October 2017 15: 10
    Quote: vovanpain
    Hodges noted the effectiveness of Russian EW funds

    and it’s necessary to develop them as quickly as possible so that no technology of natoids equipped with electronics can move at all .... or work on self-detonation
  8. 0
    11 October 2017 19: 36
    Black envy defeated Ben Hodges! lol It seems that Russia still has a bunch of pleasant surprises for the states.
  9. 0
    11 October 2017 19: 45
    Judging by his words, the effectiveness of Russian electronic warfare is really great, they counted 16 thousand fighters, and received 100 thousand
  10. 0
    12 October 2017 14: 24
    Quote: DEZINTO
    But this is what we have! And good!
    Let them slowly write off to the shore there.
    I liked it, two planes flew by, and a whole orly-burke, nafig failed. good

    Are you talking about the destroyer entering the Black Sea? ("Cook" seems to be) .. so no matter how I am there. Not the "hibina" calmed him down .... but the missile complex "bastion" (irradiated) .. so they fled back home .. about this to a hundred and Putin says in the film about Crimea (if you are of course about this case?)