Culture is a cult. And without knowing the cults of one’s own people, one’s own race, or one’s own country, without knowing it storieshow can one be called a cultured person? So I dare to say that Russian citizens do not know the history of the Russian state, Russia!
The countdown of our national culture is, at best, with the adoption of Christianity, and at worst, with the Great October ... And what was there five and a half thousand years before this continuous calendar? Even Pushkin signed the old calendar: the year is five thousand six hundred and so ...
And what happened in these five thousand six hundred years? Where are they? Where can we find out about them? What is this great Vedic culture that has given and spawned many religious, linguistic and state entities? Why can we read about Tartary, the greatest empire, in some of the “British Encyclopedia”? And the fact that its capital, Moscow, we don’t know at all? Why? Because nobody told us about it. Never anywhere else.
For example, about our greatest heroes. Let's say about Prince Svyatoslav. Alexander the Great in comparison with him is just a puppy. The greatest heroes of the world who were great not only in our territory, but also in the whole world. But, for the sake of a particular concept, ideology, religion, all this was withdrawn, corresponded, burned, destroyed ...
What can I say, in the first 20 years of the Russian Academy of Sciences, there was not a single Russian - only Germans! And none of these Germans spoke Russian! And they copied all the books! The first Russian at the Academy was Mikhail Lomonosov.
"For such" scientific "work it is necessary to disrupt" epaulets "immediately"
Traditionally, the legendary vocation of the Varyag Rurik and his reigning brothers is considered the starting point of Russian statehood. This is how a part of this phrase really sounds, and not in a distorted version of the savage Normanists: “Our land is large and rich, but there is no outfit in it. Come to reign ... ". Note: not “order”, as translated, but “attire”! So in the chronicles of the Ipatiev list.
Attire - this is statehood, flags, banners, emblems, centralized control of the prince, the dressmaker. It remains close to the modern understanding of the word - "contractor" (the organizer of a number). And “order”, another word and another meaning, is the opposite of the chaos that, according to the ideology of the Normanists, was allegedly in Russia, until the cultural Germans-Swedes came to rule it. Here is a substitute.
Scientists who cite these lines did not read the original source, but relied on the authorities of their teachers, who also did not bother to go to the library, unfold the original source and make sure with their own eyes that the word “order” is missing, but there is an outfit and a dressmaker (prince). And there is direct evidence of this: in the Russian National Library in St. Petersburg, where the original source is stored (the Laurentian collection of chronicles), none of the modern scholars have ordered this source ever again! Preserved forms of the frequency of the demand of exhibits. This fact is very well beaten in the film M. Zadornov “Rurik. Lost profits.
And after all the scientific titles are necessary! Yes, for such an error, and even its repetition from the "scientific" work to the "scientific" work, it is necessary to disrupt the epaulettes immediately. This is not just a mistake, but a diversion! In scientific activity, this mistake is equal to the complete disqualification of the title "scientist", because a person relies on hearing and authoritative opinion, and does not conduct research, does not recheck data using facts established by experience.
And who can guarantee that the rest, allegedly "scientific statements", are not obtained in the same way? Who can say with confidence that everything that is written in our textbooks is true, if lies at the heart of a lie that is so easily verified? And it lasted for centuries! Note that no eminent historian has denied this lie. No one! This means that the word “science” is not applicable to what these people were and are doing, under the banner - “Russian historical science”.
“Why does Tutankhamen have a steel dagger from his belt and there are scenes of royal psovian hunting in oak woods on it?”
Here you have learned only one fact of substitution, and I know dozens of them, because I love to read the original sources. By the way, my familiar historians also do this, not wanting to rewrite and repeat someone's fiction, generated by unknown reasons. Once you come across a similar fact and immediately begin to recheck even the seemingly obvious things. And I assure you, along the way you will make a lot of discoveries.
So I can say with absolute certainty: there is no historical science as a science in the classical sense in Russia, it is only in its infancy. Instead, there is a legend, woven from a lie generated by political motives of different eras.
Take, for example, the famous Chinese wall. Naturally, the first question arises: why the loopholes on the wall are directed to the south side, toward China, and the entrances to the wall are also located on the outer, north side? Is that an architect’s fault or what? This means that it was not China that protected this wall from those who lived north of this wall, but they were from China. And who lived north of the Chinese wall? Our ancestors.
Or, for example, how much can we talk about such absolute nonsense as the Mongol-Tatar yoke? "Mogul" is a Greek word meaning "powerful" or "great", and only one country was great at that time - Tartaria. That is how our empire used to be called. Open the British Encyclopedia - to this day it says that Tartary is the largest empire, which included the whole of Ecumene. Or take the old card and read it.
I do, say, Egypt. That is why Tutankhamun has a steel dagger from his belt, and on it there are scenes of the royal canine hunting in oak forests? This is a simple question! This has been lying here for hundreds of years! And in the storerooms are steel swords with Arabica, which were in the hands of the pharaohs. And removed them only because it is impossible to explain it. So they need to hide.
Or I have another question: why the ancient Slavic exposition has never been exhibited in the main museums of the country? Why are Japanese, Flemish, German, Italian exhibited, and the exposure of our ancient culture is not? Guide museums silently points up. But it’s not Putin who bans them, it’s the ROC, which by no means wants us to think differently than suggest we think that we, say, lived in the forest and prayed to the wheel.
"The Slavs at all times put the chambers and mansions ..."
By the way, about the life in the forest. I studied wooden architecture throughout Russia. And my questions were found simple answers. We called bets a hut or a dwelling in which it was necessary to outbid, wait out dangerous times (for example, a war or a foray of enemies). Her hut hid where? In the trees, in the woods. So there were villages. There, in the forests, stood these huts, like temporary dwellings - with moss on the roof, with turf, and so on. And the Slavs at all times put the chamber and the mansion. And this has nothing to do with material well-being.
You bring down a tree, and now in order for you to put it in a crown, you make two cups in it. That in a big tree you cut down two cups, that in a small one - why cut it in half and make the same cups? Now, when the crowns are rolled over each other, a stove is placed in the middle, which heats the entire large room. Why do you need a small room? There is no point. Even on labor costs.
We have a mighty, ancient, great story. Since we started talking about the "Mongol-Tatar yoke", here are some more examples. Alexander Nevsky with his team defeated the best army in the world - professional Teutonic knights. What did we have at that time? "Mongol-Tatar yoke". After that, the “Tatars” came to us on their bow-legged horses, and what are we, again to them, then, paying tribute? Well, isn't it funny?
This is - time. But two: if we paid them tribute for three hundred years, then where is this tribute? Well, find me at least one of our items somewhere in Mongolia or China! Third: not a single horse will come from there to here or from here to there. Any horseman knows this. And there are a huge number of such inconsistencies.
Next: if you start to get acquainted with the documents, you find endless complaints of Tatars against the Russians attacking them. Monthly. And on the robberies that the Russians arranged for them. And the Tatars wrote complaints to Moscow, Novgorod: “Appeal them! How much more will we suffer? How long will we be charged? ” And so on.
“Arab, arap is not a curly black, but a scholar”
The Tatars are our closest brothers, our light cavalry actually. Because you can’t find a single Slavic saddle or a sword with us throughout Russia. You will have Viking swords and Turk saddles. And on all shields and helmets will be Arabic tie. Only this, supporters of the official history should be overwritten or hidden.
(Russian soldiers of that era perfectly understood what was written on their weapons. Because in Russia until the XVII century several alphabets and languages were used, including the so-called Arabic (that is, scientific, scientific or secret for people of illiterate or foreigners) ligature. Arabic script was a special language of Russian soldiers, knights: words were written not from left to right, but from right to left, without capital letters, with a sufficient amount of distortion. Today, many Arabic words are easily guessed by sound or even read in Russian, if you read them the other way around. For example: The Qur'an is a narok (this is a Russian covenant - see the Dahl dictionary) or ashval is a left-handed person, etc. Alexander Pushkin was one of those who noticed the amazing similarity between the Russian and Arabic languages: “We are exactly a double nut under a single shell” (A. Pushkin, “Imitation of the Arabic”).)
If you understand that in the Middle Ages all scientists were called Arabs, then you understand who the Arabs are. Because then there was no ethnography, and there were no nationalities. The same Arab, “arap” of Peter the Great, is not a curly-headed Negro, but a scientist who was under Peter I. And the Jews were called all priests, since there was no such nationality. They were the guardians of the treasure, and they were the priests. And so the treasures that they guarded, this was the first starting capital, which was simply no one to give in the collapse of the Empire.
Or take the so-called "philosopher's stone." If you know that in the Middle Ages any science was called philosophy, then you understand that the philosopher's stone is a scientific stone. Once scientific, it means not natural, but artificial. What is an artificial stone? Concrete. And when you read the sources, it says: “I will return the secret of the philosopher's stone. We will be able to erect indestructible walls and hailstones ”. Of what? From the concrete of it. From the "philosophical", that is, scientific stone. And here gold and mercury in general? What sick imagination did it come up with?