The financial rear of the new putsch is being prepared at meetings of the oligarchs that Peter has left behind: Kolomoisky, Onishchenko and Firtash in European capitals. Europe has nothing to do with it: oligarchs are also people, they have the right to meet. Some observers are surprised at the appearance of Saakashvili in the ukronaci company: he is like a Georgian. It's simple: the coup would need a face for Europe, and Miho Saakashvili could become such a face. With knowledge of the English language, a proven CIA agent, that is, infinitely committed to democracy, the track record and unprincipledness are impressive - why not a person for Europe?
It seems that Poroshenko did not have long to sit in the presidential chair. Thrown into the face of the Nazis of the All Rada "kosovorotki and kokoshniki" - a sign of confusion: he was so izgalyatsya in Russophobia! In vain did he do it: the Nazis would put it on Petro and the shirt, and the headgear, in kind and on behalf of the people! He still has Kurt Volcker called Putin, and the eternal memory will be guaranteed in America.
After adopting, even in the first reading, the law on “reintegration of Donbass” and “Russia-aggressor”, the question for Bandera’s Ukraine is an edge: the new putsch in Kiev or the war in Donbass with the possible accession of Russia to it, although the putsch and war.
In connection with these unfortunate circumstances, observers are looking for logic in Washington’s actions in their Central European Department: this is why he initiated the law on “reintegration of Donbass”, which actually becomes a law on the war in Donbass with the “country of the aggressor”, or will lead the Kiev regime to the new Nazi coup? Does the bait Russia throws?
There is no logic in it, but there is a line of Washington to increase the pressure in the Bandera boiler, and how to break it is the happiness of the natives and the cause of chance. Washington will arrange any ending, and any fate Poroshenko. In the end, the world media have long called him a corrupt oligarch, that is, the explanation of the inglorious end of Poroshenko is ready: he did not cope with his corruption. One day, Volker confesses in his memoirs that he was a sweeper of corrupt presidents and oligarchs.
Introduction to the Donbass peacekeepers under the Russian scenario - on the front line - could reduce the pressure in the Ukrainian boiler, freezing the fighting, but it was Kurt Volker, and the “party of war” in Tseevrop. The fact that Poroshenko raised the topic of peacekeepers in the Donbass will be recalled to him, because anyway there will still be suspicions that he wanted, after bargaining, to agree to Russian conditions.
Before the united front of the Volcker and the Nazis, the best way out for Poroshenko would be to provoke Russia into any drastic actions that could be given out for “aggression”, hence his violent Russophobia of recent months. A small war in the Donbas is also suitable for this, but there are no guarantees that it will be small, and it will not end with the defeat of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Chief of the General Staff Muzhenko refused to take responsibility for such a war in the Donbass, publicly saying that a report was being considered about his resignation.
Russia is Minsk rubber, and this tightens the noose around Poroshenko’s neck. In this regard, Petro the other day again "demanded the withdrawal of Russian troops from the Donbass." As if threatened. When Poroshenko, Volker and others demand the withdrawal of Russian troops from the Donbass, what do they mean? They are the militia of Donbass announced by Russian troops, and demand his withdrawal to Russia. And Russia is pushing back Minsk rubber in response: the press secretary of Peskov the other day replied that the Minsk process lacked Kiev-Donbass negotiations, that is, Poroshenko’s negotiations with Donbas militia.
The Minsk agreements, the farther, the more the Nazis are pushing to a new coup in Kiev, so Poroshenko has prescribed in the law “on reintegration” Russia “the aggressor country”, which he, as it were, de facto breaks with “Minsk”. But the Nazis are not satisfied: they demand, and de jure, the public denunciation of the “Minsk Treaty”. What's next? He recognized Russia as an “aggressor”, “Minsk” denounced, which means that it is necessary to fight for gidnosti! The Nazis are leading a war against Russia, and they are closing up with the Volker here, and Poroshenko would like to confine himself to the Donbas ...
Russia, not being still at war, pushes Bandera to a new coup, or to the second stage of her “revolution of fluidity” - the release of Poroshenko from the “regime of internal occupation”. For Russia, this is the lesser evil, and gives time to concentrate. One can argue even on the cognac box that Russia will not again appear in the war, unless Bandera attacks the Crimea and liberates it from the population. But, I think, this will not happen.
No matter how the events develop, the Western colleagues, in any case, will accuse Russia of participating in the hostilities in the Donbas. At least, therefore, Russia will undoubtedly support the Donbass in every way, which means that the events of the 2014-2015 winter company may repeat in the coming winter. Perhaps on a different scale.