Military Review

A ban on nuclear weapons may come into force before the end of 2018 year

83
Nuclear Prohibition Treaty weapons (JNO) can recruit the necessary for the entry into force of 50 participants to the beginning of 2019, transmits TASS report from the Executive Director of the International Campaign for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) Beatrice Fin.




We looked at how long it took other treaties on the prohibition of weapons (mass destruction) to ratify 50. In my opinion, it took from 1,5 to 2 years. So our ambitious goal is to ensure 50 ratifications by the end of 2018. But it depends on the member states,
said fin.

She acknowledged that by adopting a treaty, disarmamentists would not be able to force the nuclear powers to abandon their arsenals.

They will do this when they realize that it is in their interests. With this treaty we want to ensure that disarmament is in their interests,
said the director.

According to her, ICAN representatives "are trying to make people perceive nuclear weapons as something unacceptable," because "in the end, governments have to do what the people tell them."

In turn, another activist who stood at the origins of ICAN, the Australian Tim Wright, said that in the “coming weeks and months there will be a campaign,” the purpose of which is to persuade governments to sign and ratify the ZNO.

This treaty offers an alternative to a world in which there is a threat of mass destruction,
added on.

Recall, the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons was adopted on July 7 following the results of negotiations in which the nuclear powers did not participate, including the Russian Federation, Britain, China, the United States and France. The document will take effect 90 days after it is joined by 50 countries. Now the document was signed by about 50 states, but only three have ratified it.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
83 comments
Ad

The editorial board of Voenniy Obozreniye urgently needs a proofreader. Requirements: impeccable knowledge of the Russian language, diligence, discipline. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. cniza
    cniza 10 October 2017 14: 43 New
    14
    All your life you will crush water in a mortar.
    1. pvv113
      pvv113 10 October 2017 14: 48 New
      54
      Nuclear-free countries agree to ban nuclear powers from using nuclear weapons. This is about the same as the frogs in the swamp agree among themselves that the heron will not eat them lol
      1. cniza
        cniza 10 October 2017 14: 53 New
        11
        Apparently I really want to receive the Nobel Peace Prize ...
        1. pvv113
          pvv113 10 October 2017 14: 57 New
          +5
          I would also like to, but, apparently, I didn’t come out with democracy
          1. cniza
            cniza 10 October 2017 15: 01 New
            +4
            Yes, there the main "democrat" determines who the "face" matches.
            1. pvv113
              pvv113 10 October 2017 15: 07 New
              +6
              In-in, and we with our snout yes in the democratic ranks
              1. cniza
                cniza 10 October 2017 15: 11 New
                +2
                No, they don’t need their “democratic row” for nothing, let them admire and love themselves ... lol
                1. pvv113
                  pvv113 10 October 2017 15: 15 New
                  +3
                  Here I am about the same thing - it’s better to stay with your snout than to get into their democracy
                  1. cniza
                    cniza 10 October 2017 15: 19 New
                    +3
                    Their Wishlist are very well paid, so this fuss will continue for a long time.
                    1. maxim947
                      maxim947 10 October 2017 15: 29 New
                      +4
                      Now it looks pretty naive and funny, but the phrase With this treaty, we want to ensure that disarmament is in their interest,[i] [/ i] suggests that in the near future there will be another occasion for a sanction war with states that refused to ratify this treaty, in short, they are preparing for themselves a "legal framework". And to hell with them ...
                      1. DMB_95
                        DMB_95 10 October 2017 16: 23 New
                        +3
                        Quote: maxim947
                        ... in the near future there will be another occasion for a sanction war with states that refused to ratify this treaty, in short, they are preparing for themselves a "legal framework". And to hell with them ...

                        We will not be left without sanctions in any case.
                        And to hell with them ...
      2. You Vlad
        You Vlad 10 October 2017 16: 33 New
        +2
        Quote: pvv113
        Nuclear-free countries agree to ban nuclear powers from using nuclear weapons. This is about the same as the frogs in the swamp agree among themselves that the heron will not eat them

        Yeah, kindergarten group number 2! lol
        1. pvv113
          pvv113 10 October 2017 16: 40 New
          +2
          Sometimes it seems that in kindergarten there is more reason
          1. Berber
            Berber 10 October 2017 16: 48 New
            +6
            You need to look where the ears grow. Here the moral is that - if the DPRK hadn’t had a nuclear bomb, it would probably have already been "democratized". And so, each state has a chance for a "sip of freedom"
            1. MadCat
              MadCat 11 October 2017 02: 37 New
              0
              Quote: BerBer
              Here the moral is - do not be

              it’s not yet evening, it takes time to prepare.
          2. You Vlad
            You Vlad 11 October 2017 15: 41 New
            +1
            Quote: pvv113
            Sometimes it seems that in kindergarten there is more reason

            Why sometimes? Everything in the kindergarten is in the know: who is stronger is the one who drives the best car! laughing
      3. Sharapov
        Sharapov 10 October 2017 19: 29 New
        +1
        Give this girl a peace prize, and let her calm down.
        Or continues to work out someone else's financial investments. This is a type of greenpeace-2
        1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 210ox
      210ox 10 October 2017 14: 49 New
      +2
      Does anyone listen to these clowns?
      Quote: cniza
      All your life you will crush water in a mortar.
      1. cniza
        cniza 10 October 2017 14: 54 New
        +3
        Someone is pushing these clowns to take such steps.
        1. pvv113
          pvv113 10 October 2017 15: 03 New
          +4
          Maybe they do not push, but pull the strings?
          1. cniza
            cniza 10 October 2017 15: 06 New
            +2
            What is their purpose? Again, evil Russia does not want peace.
            1. pvv113
              pvv113 10 October 2017 15: 08 New
              +4
              That's right, the evil Russia does not want a world imposed by the Anglo-Saxons
              1. cniza
                cniza 10 October 2017 15: 12 New
                +1
                Just like 200 - 300 years ago, nothing changes.
                1. pvv113
                  pvv113 10 October 2017 15: 18 New
                  +9
                  A lot more laughing
                  1. cniza
                    cniza 10 October 2017 15: 21 New
                    +1
                    I did not cite the entire digital series. lol
                    1. pvv113
                      pvv113 10 October 2017 15: 43 New
                      +2
                      And I celebrate April 5 every year! drinks
    3. vovanpain
      vovanpain 10 October 2017 15: 26 New
      +4
      The document will enter into force 90 days after 50 countries join it.

      And you think that the weight of these 50 countries in the international arena is greater than these countries? bully
      Quote: cniza
      Nuclear powers, including the Russian Federation, Britain, China, the USA and France, did not participate.
      Nuclear powers simply sent all these dwarfs in three letters and all. yes
      1. cniza
        cniza 10 October 2017 15: 34 New
        +2
        Greetings Vladimir hi drinks , there the main "democrat" is tweaking.
        1. vovanpain
          vovanpain 10 October 2017 15: 50 New
          +4
          Quote: cniza
          there the main "democrat" is tweaking.

          Hello Be Victor! drinks hi Let’s be fair, the chief democrat also sent them to the pipe with a sealed end. sad There, rather, small rogues muddied the water. hi
  2. Stoler
    Stoler 10 October 2017 14: 44 New
    +4
    They are terribly far from being aware of the current political situation. fool
  3. aszzz888
    aszzz888 10 October 2017 14: 45 New
    +3
    ... and what is hoping for? ... for PR more all this hype ... bully
  4. Komsomol
    Komsomol 10 October 2017 14: 46 New
    11
    They will do this when they realize that it is in their interests.
    No fools, Beatrice. First make your country destroy nuclear weapons, then the rest will think. Maybe ... smile
  5. Blombir
    Blombir 10 October 2017 14: 47 New
    10
    These offspring want everyone in the world to slaughter everyone, but without nuclear weapons. This is primarily a deterrence weapon and it still holds back all sorts of different, ready at any time, and for any reason to bomb those who disagree or are not pretty. This lady has fanatic eyes in her photo, scary eyes.
    1. BARKHAN
      BARKHAN 10 October 2017 19: 27 New
      +3
      Quote: Blombir
      These offspring want everyone in the world to slaughter everyone, but without nuclear weapons. This is primarily a deterrence weapon and it still holds back all sorts of different, ready at any time, and for any reason to bomb those who disagree or are not pretty. This lady has fanatic eyes in her photo, scary eyes.

      A nuclear power can refuse a weapon of the same name only in one case ... if it gets into service, something more powerful (more efficient). And even that ... the reserve does not rub the neck.
  6. Million
    Million 10 October 2017 14: 47 New
    +6
    Probably peace is maintained on Earth thanks to nuclear weapons. As a deterrence weapon
  7. afrikanez
    afrikanez 10 October 2017 14: 47 New
    +9
    It was not for this that nuclear weapons were created, which would then be eliminated. Similarly, the "people" have nothing to do. It would have been better if they had forbidden us to keep the peasant from sleeping in the west!
  8. KAPITANUS
    KAPITANUS 10 October 2017 14: 48 New
    +3
    Another office for "cutting" money and doing nothing.
  9. tanit
    tanit 10 October 2017 14: 49 New
    +1
    Well, there is such a not the worst guy from the DPRK, - so for him this is a joy. Why? Because, by exploding the TNT equivalent of a nuclear charge - he, like his dad, and like his grandfather - expected the best
    1. igorj 51
      igorj 51 10 October 2017 15: 03 New
      +5
      Well, there is such a not the worst guy from the DPRK, - so for him this is a joy.

      And why do you immediately translate the arrows into a Korean guy .. Besides him, there are 8 more heads of state with nuclear weapons. That's why it can tell them ..?
  10. vasilkovichi
    vasilkovichi 10 October 2017 14: 50 New
    +3
    “She acknowledged that by accepting the treaty, disarmament proponents would not be able to force the nuclear powers to abandon their arsenals.”

    Well, then why was it necessary to arrange this coven? Did the grandmothers of the states drank on business trips to the UN?
  11. anjey
    anjey 10 October 2017 15: 05 New
    +4
    because “in the end, governments have to do what the people tell them
    very controversial illusion all over the world .....
  12. Berg berg
    Berg berg 10 October 2017 15: 11 New
    +2
    And the first to undertake to destroy their nuclear weapons - America and all NATO countries! And not just disassemble and send to the warehouse, but destroy! Destroy them entrusted to Russia and China! And in order not to offend the DPRK, she will be an observer and will be honored with the last in the whole world to destroy her nuclear weapons!
  13. win
    win 10 October 2017 15: 13 New
    0
    The title of the article expressly categorically states that the ban will be.
    Well it's written right there representatives of ICAN "try make people perceive nuclear weapons as something unacceptable "
    What nuclear powers would agree to do this.
    Wow, what an aggressive and powerful representatives! laughing
  14. alexleony
    alexleony 10 October 2017 15: 14 New
    +2
    Will Israel be banned again too?
    1. A. Privalov
      A. Privalov 10 October 2017 16: 49 New
      +3
      Be sure to ban, but how else? lol
      1. sogdy
        sogdy 10 October 2017 19: 03 New
        +2
        Especially the Principality of Monaco. And Limpopo.
      2. MadCat
        MadCat 11 October 2017 02: 40 New
        0
        they will simply adopt the next resolution that Israel is to blame for everything, that’s why they will calm down. laughing
        1. A. Privalov
          A. Privalov 11 October 2017 10: 32 New
          +1
          Well, so be it. Praise to the Most High! For all these resolutions, Israel’s 70 has developed a strong immunity over the years. hi
  15. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 10 October 2017 15: 23 New
    +2
    It is difficult to invent a worthless document.

    But the Nobel Peace Prize in logic had to be given to Kurchatov, Teller, etc., since it was nuclear weapons that guaranteed the absence of a third world war.
  16. Alexey RA
    Alexey RA 10 October 2017 15: 35 New
    +2
    This treaty offers an alternative to a world in which there is a threat of mass destruction,

    The signatories to the Hague conventions and declarations also thought so.
    Twice, states gathered for peace conferences in The Hague and adopted highly humane documents. They wanted to get together for the third time - but alas, by the time of the scheduled meeting, most of the participants were too busy ... World War with each other. With the violation in the course of it of everything that was previously signed by them.
  17. IGOR GORDEEV
    IGOR GORDEEV 10 October 2017 15: 41 New
    0
    Let them respond from their nuclear weapons - if they need it. Let an example show :)
  18. fzr1000
    fzr1000 10 October 2017 15: 45 New
    0
    Who the hell is this? Have they slept the last hundred years? Pugs trying to dictate to elephants? Everything is turned upside down in their strange world.
  19. krops777
    krops777 10 October 2017 15: 56 New
    +1
    When we create weapons more powerful than nuclear then we will join your convention. wink
  20. Varyag77
    Varyag77 10 October 2017 16: 21 New
    0
    Quote: igorj 51
    Well, there is such a not the worst guy from the DPRK, - so for him this is a joy.

    And why do you immediately translate the arrows into a Korean guy .. Besides him, there are 8 more heads of state with nuclear weapons. That's why it can tell them ..?

    I can tell why it is for US. Without nuclear weapons, in the event of a confrontation with NATO (and most likely with China), Russia will cease to exist. Definitely.
  21. The comment was deleted.
    1. missuris
      missuris 10 October 2017 22: 25 New
      0
      if you drive in the Middle Ages, then the missiles themselves will fly to where they were aimed for the last time)
  22. ALEA IACTA EST
    ALEA IACTA EST 10 October 2017 16: 35 New
    0
    Or a sword carried overhead, or a knife sticking out of the heart.
  23. A. Privalov
    A. Privalov 10 October 2017 16: 52 New
    +2
    A ban on nuclear weapons may come into force before the end of 2018 year

    It may or may not. wassat Nobel Prize will not be taken back. hi
    1. sogdy
      sogdy 10 October 2017 18: 59 New
      0
      Especially when you consider that this is Australia, the largest supplier of uranium.
  24. Old26
    Old26 10 October 2017 17: 04 New
    +1
    Quote: pvv113
    Nuclear-free countries agree to ban nuclear powers from using nuclear weapons. This is about the same as the frogs in the swamp agree among themselves that the heron will not eat them lol

    Do not apply, but HAVE. In general, this is nothing but the Bullshit. Well, let's stir up another initiative at the UN. For example, to forbid the inhabitants of Africa to have a dark skin color. Or the people of Asia - slanting eyes. There is a well-known expression: "When a cat is doing good, he licks his balls." So here they messed up something that with a 100% guarantee will not be fulfilled. Maybe it is really necessary to liquidate the UN, as the Union of Nations was liquidated in due time and to do something else? At the same time, do not automatically let any country become a member of this organization? Membership requires growing. And then I did not have time to get off the palm, and even in the UN initiative
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 10 October 2017 18: 10 New
      +2
      Quote: Old26
      Well, let's stir up another initiative at the UN. For example, to forbid the inhabitants of Africa to have a dark skin color. Or the people of Asia - slanting eyes.

      I've been waiting for the initiative to ban air defense. For this defense makes it difficult to bring freedom and democracy to all totalitarian corners of the world. smile
    2. Ace Tambourine
      Ace Tambourine 11 October 2017 13: 08 New
      0
      yes what for create what, sooner or later will be worthless and idle?
      Rot your line, rot .. (c)
      Yes ... by the way .. Not the Union, but the League ...
    3. pvv113
      pvv113 11 October 2017 15: 56 New
      +1
      Quote: Old26
      Membership requires growing. And then I did not have time to get off the palm, and even in the UN initiative

      Very reasonable good
  25. Firework
    Firework 10 October 2017 17: 14 New
    +1
    ICAN representatives “are trying to make people perceive nuclear weapons as something unacceptable,” because “in the end, governments have to do what the people tell them”

    the main thing is to influence the Russian people so that they give up nuclear weapons, because the nuclear arsenal of Russia is so unnerving the West
  26. Bronevick
    Bronevick 10 October 2017 17: 14 New
    +1
    It is necessary to promote the ban on helicopter carriers, aircraft carriers, shock drones, in general, all of which we do not have.
  27. APASUS
    APASUS 10 October 2017 17: 57 New
    0
    Is this naivety or stupidity, that’s interesting. But what will they do with nuclear powers that have acquired a quiet nuclear bomb in a quiet state, they recognize in a quiet one? Or how, because some people like Israel, the United States will be covered up, and others like Iran and C Korea will have their hands twisted again. The Americans themselves have destroyed more than half of the agreements and now some kind of ICAN is trying to collect, which is impossible to collect. And if the United States now withdraws from the agreement with Iran , the number of people wishing to acquire nuclear warheads will grow exponentially.
    1. sogdy
      sogdy 10 October 2017 19: 01 New
      0
      Quote: APASUS
      Is this naivety or stupidity, that's interesting.

      This is Hubbardism. Violet.
  28. faterdom
    faterdom 10 October 2017 18: 12 New
    0
    It’s just a business like fighting AIDS! The task is a maximum of noise and bubbles, not a victory, otherwise they won’t give money for the “fight”!
  29. Snail N9
    Snail N9 10 October 2017 18: 56 New
    0
    Keyword: "ratified" ....
  30. Whaler
    Whaler 10 October 2017 19: 36 New
    0
    Yeah schAZZZZ)) fellow only overclocking take more lol
  31. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 10 October 2017 19: 43 New
    +2
    Arms Ban Treaty Missing Signatory Countries laughing Gorgeous.
    And the Mumba Yumba tribe has nothing but bows and darts. Let's ban all technology, more complicated than these bows and darts with stone tips.

    But the "Nobel Peace" was seized. For chatter.
  32. Machete
    Machete 10 October 2017 20: 52 New
    0
    and how will they control the disarmament of nuclear countries?
    Will they bomb them?
  33. Machete
    Machete 10 October 2017 20: 55 New
    +1
    Rejection of chemical weapons and all kinds of cassette garbage is a real blessing, but not in war, and no one in their right mind will abandon nuclear weapons. Moreover, having on our planet such a country as the United States.
  34. missuris
    missuris 10 October 2017 22: 20 New
    0
    The agreement on the prohibition of nuclear weapons was adopted on July 7, against which the nuclear powers spoke out. finally fire =)
    1. Soran
      Soran 11 October 2017 14: 56 New
      0
      The wiki page says that the Netherlands opposed - they are still addicts :).
      Someone abstained. The rest just scored.
  35. Old26
    Old26 10 October 2017 22: 49 New
    0
    Quote: Berg Berg
    And the first to undertake to destroy their nuclear weapons - America and all NATO countries! And not just disassemble and send to the warehouse, but destroy! Destroy them entrusted to Russia and China! And in order not to offend the DPRK, she will be an observer and will be honored with the last in the whole world to destroy her nuclear weapons!

    Are you so naive or live in your own imagined world? Do you imagine the treaty on the destruction of nuclear weapons? Well, I would understand if the United States would have 1500 charges, and Russia and China would have 200 or 300 thousand warheads each. Then conditions could be dictated. And so - only negotiate ...
  36. ILIA
    ILIA 11 October 2017 00: 01 New
    0
    The naive ones are already dumb .. I hope ..)
  37. Geisenberg
    Geisenberg 11 October 2017 09: 38 New
    0
    Aunt's eyes are crazy ... the idea is the same ....
  38. Egorovich
    Egorovich 11 October 2017 12: 49 New
    +4
    Why raise a dead topic, for talking rooms and transfusions from empty to empty?
  39. dvina71
    dvina71 11 October 2017 12: 58 New
    0
    Pfff .... nuclear weapons are not for mass destruction, but so that they would not happen within the framework of the existing social formation ... If nuclear weapons are massively used, then we must already talk about the formation of a new civilization and social formations ... rather old formations.
  40. Ace Tambourine
    Ace Tambourine 11 October 2017 13: 03 New
    0
    Return the psak !!!!
  41. Runx135
    Runx135 11 October 2017 19: 12 New
    0
    But it depends on the member states,
    said fin.

    She said everything correctly, so there is nothing for states without "members" to decide ...
  42. jekasimf
    jekasimf 11 October 2017 19: 51 New
    0
    Go ... you bl ... laughing Now. Everyone will take and disarm.
  43. Vasilenko Vladimir
    Vasilenko Vladimir 11 October 2017 20: 47 New
    0
    They will do it when they realize that it’s in their interests
    fool