Britain is preparing to support a military operation against the DPRK

40
UK Armed Forces are ready to become part of a coalition in case of possible military actions against North Korea, reports Газета.ру with a link to the Daily Mail.





According to a British newspaper source, military officials are instructed to draw up an action plan for the armed forces in case of a military operation.

According to the information, "one of the options involves the deployment of the newest British aircraft carrier, Queen Elizabeth, along with the 12 F-35 fighter jets on board." The aircraft carrier will have to join the US warships.

At the same time, the newspaper recalled that earlier the military had reported that the Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier, capable of carrying the fifth generation F-40 aircraft to 35, is planned to be used in operations only in the 2020 year.

Details of the UK's secret action plan leaked to the press after US President Donald Trump announced that the opportunities for a peaceful dialogue with the leadership of North Korea were exhausted.

The US presidents negotiated with North Korea over the 25 years, the agreements were concluded, but they were broken even before they had time to dry the ink on the papers, and the negotiators of the United States were fools. Sorry, but only one thing will work!
Trump stressed, referring to a forceful solution to the problem.
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    10 October 2017 13: 44
    Missiles from North Korea will certainly not reach them!
    Putin said he would not let the war flare up on the Korean peninsula.
    Let's hope so! Our missiles will fly ...
    1. +2
      10 October 2017 13: 47
      Before them, then surely no Iskander missiles fly!

      But the Hwason-14 missiles will fly ..!
      1. +14
        10 October 2017 14: 12
        In any case, the actions of England resemble `` yapping '' from behind.
        Where did the English crown go !?
        1. +5
          10 October 2017 14: 56
          Britain is preparing to support a military operation against the DPRK

          Here are the mongrels ... am
        2. +4
          10 October 2017 17: 38
          Quote: Logall
          In any case, the actions of England resemble `` yapping '' from behind.
          Where did the English crown go !?

          here, most likely, the Iraqi "adventure" taught them nothing !!! negative negative negative
  2. +3
    10 October 2017 13: 45
    Well try
  3. +10
    10 October 2017 13: 45
    That's the whole policy of the Anglo-Saxons in all its glory ... unwanted crush all the kagan. I just think that they will see ears from a dead donkey, and not the surrender of S. Korea.
    1. +7
      10 October 2017 14: 00
      If the northerners overwhelm the Queen (aircraft carrier) - I will rejoice!
      When the same should be the last battle of aircraft carriers, as a class ... bully
      1. 0
        11 October 2017 06: 59
        And here’s just the news about the topic:
        https://ria.ru/world/20171011/1506588763.html
        Sailors of the Shylo cruiser of the Seventh Fleet of the United States Navy, whose area of ​​responsibility includes the western part of the Pacific Ocean and the eastern part of the Indian, complained in an anonymous survey conducted by the Navy Times about poor conditions of service and low combat efficiency of the ship.
        The military personnel participating in the survey stated the helplessness of the leadership, the brutal attitude of the commanders, as well as thoughts of suicide. “Something terrible will happen, it's just a matter of time,” one of the sailors admitted.
        "I pray that we do not have to shoot down a North Korean rocket, otherwise everyone will see our inefficiency," another said, calling his ship a "floating prison."
        In addition, the crew talked about overwork, inadequate training and the long wait for ship repairs. At the same time, they noted that sailors are often afraid to complain, fearing punishment from the commanders.
        "This is a race. We are competing with our ship, who will break earlier," one of the respondents said.

        Something I do not see optimism and confidence in the victory of the brave American sailors. Quite the contrary ... Yes ..... With such a mood, it is better not to get involved in a war ...
    2. 0
      10 October 2017 14: 12
      Maybe they will try to put together a coalition against Eun. The Europeans were driven in to Yugoslavia, and so on. Mozh now want Asians to harness. These have not been in business for a long time. And the fire is now set on fire in the Far East, it is completely in their interests.
      1. +4
        10 October 2017 15: 28
        Even 5 AUGs will not guarantee protection against retaliation.
        1. +4
          10 October 2017 15: 43
          I think a couple of polite nuclear submarines and a couple of polite Chinese nuclear submarines, which will overwhelm Avik and then unanimously condemn Sev.Korea, are spinning there.
    3. +1
      10 October 2017 17: 02
      And there is. Canada with Australia is still a plus.
      1. +3
        10 October 2017 17: 05
        Quote: Diplomat-x
        And there is. Canada with Australia is still a plus.

        The dollar zone ... and everywhere the Anglo-Saxons.
  4. wot
    +5
    10 October 2017 13: 49
    Do not disgrace the Britons, China will not stand aside !!! the newest can go to the bottom
    1. 0
      10 October 2017 13: 59
      [quote] China will not stand aside / quote] That's right, he also joins America. Well done Trump, keep it up.
      1. +12
        10 October 2017 14: 03
        Quote: vearey
        That's right, he also joins America. Well done Trump, keep it up.

        Yeah ... that is, the Chinese are so stupid that they don’t understand that S. Korea’s fuss is directed against them ... and the deployment of missile defense systems and the increase in troops in Japan and the concentration of AUG in those waters ... all do not measure intelligence on their own. fool
        1. 0
          10 October 2017 16: 17
          .You then do not measure intellect by yourself
          Well, I didn’t know that I was meeting a Giant of thoughts. Perhaps the father of Russian democracy will be?
          1. +8
            10 October 2017 16: 31
            Quote: vearey
            Well, I didn’t know that I was meeting a Giant of thoughts. Perhaps the father of Russian democracy will be?

            Yes, so far to me to your exclusivity.
      2. 0
        10 October 2017 23: 13
        Such a small country and holds the whole world in one place! Apparently, an invasion of any country, as “bearers of democratic values” like to do this, can only be prevented by nuclear defense!
    2. 0
      10 October 2017 18: 33
      IMHO, they will be fortunate enough to (UK) send such a crown diamond for distribution, the gut is thin ... At most, in the parade of "winners" to pass, after the whole batch (if there will be one).
  5. 0
    10 October 2017 13: 50
    Where, Britain - and where is the DPRK ?! The British, completely "beguiled"? Previously, they made a story - now, they are lagging behind! Ugh ...! Thank you for reminding yourself ...
    1. 0
      10 October 2017 13: 58
      Quote: Fedalex
      Where, Britain - and where is the DPRK ?! The British, completely "beguiled"

      Eh ... The catch phrase from our "Mowgli": "And we will go north, and we will go north" lol
      Great Britain is the faithful dog of democracy on the whole planet, and if he conceived that he would immediately rush into hell before him in order to show his loyalty soldier
      "You don’t know anything, John Snow" .... recourse wink hi
      1. 0
        10 October 2017 14: 38
        Woof-woof, said Great Britain and, stumbled over the "owner"!
  6. 0
    10 October 2017 13: 55
    The longer they get sick, the less likely they are to fight.
    Let them continue to inflate their cheeks with a menacing look.
  7. 0
    10 October 2017 13: 57
    The ice has broken, gentlemen the assessors, the ice has broken.
  8. +1
    10 October 2017 13: 58
    Where Sher Khan, there and Tobaccos. Badly finished.
  9. +1
    10 October 2017 14: 01
    The British do not know exactly where to "stick" their "Queen Elizabeth" (Queen Elizabeth), along with 12 F-35 fighters on board. " Question: Why the hell do they need it? fool
  10. +4
    10 October 2017 14: 06
    One option involves the deployment of the latest British aircraft carrier Queen Elizabeth, along with 12 F-35 fighters on board. The aircraft carrier will have to join the USS.
    Predators get lost in a flock ... Is it really a hunt ahead? Oh well...
    Even a cornered rat fights off to the last. How would the North Koreans spoil the skin of the Anglo-Saxon hunters! And the Chinese Pope Carlo will not stand aside: he will surely help North Korean Pinocchio.
    IMHO.
    1. +1
      10 October 2017 15: 07
      Of course, the Chinese will not stand aside. Their nuclear weapons at the borders of the Russian Federation under the umbrella of Russian air defense are fine, they feel, if that.
  11. +2
    10 October 2017 14: 14
    Everything from the fact that the war criminal Cameron, who falsified intelligence about the Powell test tube, invaded Iraq and - did not suffer any punishment. Where is the international criminal court in The Hague? Huh?

    Now Theresa May is following in his footsteps - there is no UN resolution and will not be; there is no fact of aggression by the DPRK against anyone (although the Anglo-Saxon aggression against the DPRK does exist); there are no grounds for a military operation.
    1. +1
      10 October 2017 17: 10
      Quote: Gormengast
      Everything from the fact that the war criminal Cameron, who falsified intelligence about the Powell test tube, invaded Iraq and - did not suffer any punishment. Where is the international criminal court in The Hague? Huh?

      Now Theresa May is following in his footsteps - there is no UN resolution and will not be; there is no fact of aggression by the DPRK against anyone (although the Anglo-Saxon aggression against the DPRK does exist); there are no grounds for a military operation.

      Poodle Blair. hi
  12. DPN
    +3
    10 October 2017 14: 42
    In all likelihood, the Russian Navy needs to cruise more often off the coast of Britain so that bad thoughts do not enter their heads.
  13. +1
    10 October 2017 15: 04
    Here they are! They were also told in Russian that their new aircraft carrier is an excellent target!
  14. 0
    10 October 2017 17: 08
    And where are these horse-like? fool
  15. +2
    10 October 2017 17: 26
    I remember a conversation in the same family (my father was the commander of the missile unit). The little son asked (his son was about six years old): "Dad, how long can you fly to America?" Dad answered: "Yes, about twenty minutes." The wife was indignant: "Kolya, he asks about the plane, you are telling everyone about your“ Satan. "Do not confuse the child, and answer correctly." I have the honor.
  16. +4
    10 October 2017 18: 32
    Quote: NEXUS
    That's the whole policy of the Anglo-Saxons in all its glory ... unwanted crush all the kagan.

    Yes Yes Yugoslavia, the Middle East, now North Korea .... where then will this pack be carried?
  17. +1
    10 October 2017 18: 35
    Interestingly, the British themselves are prepared for the fact that their fleet may suffer losses and there will be no opportunity to bury the dead after a nuclear explosion. And the most modern English aircraft carrier can turn into a pile of scrap metal. Although one can safely assume that it is the British that the Americans can put the main striking force in place with South Korea
  18. +1
    10 October 2017 20: 59
    Again, an Englishwoman is crap? Masochists are damn ... And then they will whine like Ukrainians: what are we for?
  19. 0
    10 October 2017 22: 30
    Kerosene is not enough
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. The comment was deleted.