NATO does not seek a cold war with Russia, Stoltenberg said

October 10 2017 38

NATO does not need a new cold war with Russia, the alliance does not seek to isolate it, leads InoTV the words of the Secretary General of the North Atlantic bloc Jens Stoltenberg.

NATO is an alliance that keeps its promises. We talk about what we do and do what we say. We are adapting to new challenges and new security threats. Here, in Romania, we are striving to strengthen the Allied presence in the Black Sea. And the deployment of our forces is a direct response to Russia's aggressive actions in Ukraine,

Stoltenberg said at the plenary meeting of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly in Bucharest.

At the same time, he added:

We do not want to isolate Russia. NATO is not seeking a new cold war. (...) We are concerned about the build-up of Russian troops near our borders and the lack of transparency during the exercise.

In turn, Romanian President Klaus Johannes promised that his country would remain the "responsible participant" of the bloc. According to him, "there is no question of choosing between NATO and the EU."

These are complementary topics, if we want to get reliable protection,

the president stressed, noting the need to strengthen the military presence on the eastern borders of the alliance, primarily on the Black Sea.

http://www.globallookpress.com

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

210ox

+8

10 October 2017 09: 41

Of course she doesn’t aspire .. She (NATO) leads her ..
1. Crowe
  
  +2
  
  10 October 2017 09: 45
  
  Quote: 210ox
  she (NATO) leads her ..
  
  With hot places, foci. It’s about to come to direct collisions!
  1. hrych
    
    +1
    
    10 October 2017 10: 08
    
    To begin with, sanctions are the method of the Cold War. Moreover, we can safely say that the Russian Federation won the battle. But these army movements are also not in vain, America is not going to pay, and it does not have money, it is actually bankrupt, only creditors have no strength to knock out debts. Also in the rear of the EU, the Catalans and Scottes are reeling the regime, and this has already led to Brexit, etc.
    1. weksha50
      
      +1
      
      10 October 2017 11: 12
      
      Quote: hrych
      sanctions are a Cold War method, moreover, we can safely say that The Russian Federation won the battle.
      
      Hmm ... I would not want to add my own note of pessimism, but ... If the West wanted it, the sanctions would be different, and the consequences would also be different ...
      To say that Russia emerged victorious from these sanctions will be too early, unfortunately ...
      1. Lelek
        
        +3
        
        10 October 2017 12: 44
        
        Quote: weksha50
        If the West wanted it, the sanctions would be different, and the consequences would be different ...
        
        Hey. The West (I mean the EU) may be and wants to change the sanction tone to a pragmatic one, but the puppeteer will not allow him to do this by imposing sanctions on the “apostates”. So what we have today, what we have.
        
        weksha50
        
        +1
        
        10 October 2017 19: 20
        
        Quote: Lelek
        So what we have today, what we have
        
        Honestly, I didn’t mean it ... Here it is - something ephemeral, generalized, that in the West-EU, that in Russia ... Those - have lost, Russia - have overcome ...
        And I meant, at least, that WE - without our own diesel engines, without ship power plants, we don’t even have our own diesel locomotives ... Vaughn, Siemens, and General Electric have been dominating our market for more than 100 years ... Tomorrow, khrenak - and instead of today's fake sanctions against Russian embezzlers, they’ll simply cut off any supplies ....
        We already don’t have our nails ... So this article from Di Velta doesn’t warm my soul at all ...
        No matter how hard, no matter how regrettable, but the truth needs to look in the eyes ...
        There were no sanctions against us as such !!! What is now under the guise of sanctions is, so, a petty yard squabble woman ...
2. Uncle lee
  
  +9
  
  10 October 2017 09: 46
  
  Missile defense in Romania and Poland, troops in the Baltic states and Poland, NATO exercises at our borders - this is a call for peace and friendship! And so everything is good and peaceful!
  1. LSA57
    
    +8
    
    10 October 2017 09: 56
    
    Quote from Uncle Lee
    Missile defense in Romania and Poland, troops in the Baltic states and Poland, NATO exercises at our borders - this is a call for peace and friendship!
    
    but they have such concepts of friendship. and hot friendship is the bombing of cities
3. vovanpain
  
  +10
  
  10 October 2017 09: 51
  
  We are concerned about the buildup of Russian troops near our borders and the lack of transparency during exercises
  
  Oh yes, it’s not NATO that has moved closer to the borders of Russia, but Russia is threatening the borders of NATO.
  1. bouncyhunter
    
    +6
    
    10 October 2017 09: 57
    
    Hi bro! Brazenly lying on a blue eye - this is the height of cynicism and duplicity. Janus are damn!
  2. Anarchist
    
    +18
    
    10 October 2017 10: 00
    
    Good day, Vladimir!
    NATO sometimes says that it was Russia that forced them to approach the borders. They defend themselves like that!
    The whole world has already heard about their protection
    1. bouncyhunter
      
      +4
      
      10 October 2017 10: 08
      
      Hi Sasha !
      Quote: Anarchist
      Russia forced them to approach the borders.
      
      I recall a joke:
      "I was surrounded by kind and helpful people, gradually squeezing the ring of environment."
      1. san4es
        
        +4
        
        10 October 2017 10: 25
        
        ... surrounded by demons
        Hi Pash!
      2. Anarchist
        
        +16
        
        10 October 2017 10: 28
        
        Hi Paul!
        This environment only leads to the compression of another ring! And at all.
        
        san4es
        
        +5
        
        10 October 2017 10: 39
        
        ... they did not teach history
      3. Weyland
        
        +1
        
        10 October 2017 22: 48
        
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        I recall a joke
        
        This is not a joke, but a genuine statement by Brezhnev (quite natural for a front-line soldier). with a sense of humor, he was all right ...
  3. LSA57
    
    +7
    
    10 October 2017 10: 03
    
    Quote: vovanpain
    Oh yes, it’s not NATO that has moved closer to the borders of Russia,
    
    it is Russia that has pushed its borders toward NATO. so she took it and pushed it back. example? Crimea. fear the adversaries
  4. Orel
    
    0
    
    10 October 2017 10: 37
    
    Quote: vovanpain
    Oh yes, it’s not NATO that has moved closer to the borders of Russia, but Russia is threatening the borders of NATO. fool fool fool
    
    Before the events in Ukraine, there were practically no NATO troops on the western border of the Russian Federation. The United States completely withdrew its tanks in 2012 or 2013 from Europe. I won’t tell you exactly. What is the threat of NATO? At the same time, we were building up troops. And no one was afraid of it. They thought that we were just updating forces that, of course, had been in crisis since the 90s. When the Crimea and the Donbass struck, there was a surprise for them. They began to concentrate more on defense. They began carrying out modernization programs for equipment. Obviously, Stoltenberg is not cunning here. They respond to our activity and increased desire to solve problems by military means. Remember how in Germany they scandalized that most of the military equipment was not operational. Even separate hearings were held in the Bundestag. Therefore, the threat of NATO is a fairy tale for us. I am more concerned about the real million-strong Chinese army on our eastern border. What does she live there? Or are they afraid that Russia will attack China? Nonsense. So they stand in case there is an opportunity to snatch a piece. Here I am more afraid of them, because there is a real military force that is directed to the Far East. There is nothing of the kind on our western border. A pair of rotational battalions to calm the allies and no more. This is not a threat.
Lopatov

+4

10 October 2017 09: 44

Hehe ... If they "talk about what we are doing and do what we are talking about" (c), then why in their own governing documents should such a task of informing their own population as "smoothing the difference between NATO statements and reality "?
1. Uncle lee
  
  +7
  
  10 October 2017 09: 50
  
  Because you say what you don’t think, and think what you don’t think, you’re in cells and sit. And in general, all this bitter cataclysm that I observe here, and Vladimir Nikolaevich too.
  Kin-Dza-Dza
2. Lopatov
  
  +5
  
  10 October 2017 09: 52
  
  Almost literal translation from "NATO Military Policy on Information Operations" (2012, p. 20):
  strategic propaganda smoothes the gap between NATO statements and reality
  
  The funny thing is that the document is in the public domain. That is, they are not even shy ...
Mountain shooter

+2

10 October 2017 09: 44

Here's a nonsense ... Oh well them ... We’ll restore everything, better than it was. Let them shudder at night.
And the Romanians are still warriors ... If there were more such "members" in NATO.
aszzz888

+1

10 October 2017 09: 50

... another target for the Caliber ...
anjey

0

10 October 2017 10: 04

We do not want to isolate Russia. NATO does not seek a new cold war
what a sweet lie, well, yes you are running to the hot leaps and bounds ..
seregatara1969

0

10 October 2017 10: 06

NATO does not need a new cold war with Russia

in this regard, NATO just seek to take Russia in the ring and strangle
Altona

0

10 October 2017 10: 14

In the first lines, he "did not strive for a cold war," but in the ending he needed to "restrain Russia because of aggression in Ukraine." Right somersaults of logic and rhetoric. We want peace, but we’ll stick more missiles at the border just in case, you never know, you’re kind of aggressive and we’ll be calmer to “hold you back”.
1. Conductor
  
  +1
  
  10 October 2017 11: 02
  
  It’s a pity that yesterday, but 50 years ago, Che died, his energy would be in the southern states, to identify the baggage traders)))
Egorovich

+4

10 October 2017 10: 23

We do not strive for a cold war with Russia, but we want to get into wherever possible, around the world and to spoil everything. And so we are white and fluffy.
rotmistr60

0

10 October 2017 10: 31

the alliance does not seek to isolate it (Russia)

Still strange people are these American politicians. They contradict themselves and the statements of their former president (and the current one is not much different). Confused, lost, lost in their own constant lies. They just need to pay extra for harm.
weksha50

0

10 October 2017 10: 33

“NATO does not strive for a cold war with Russia” ...
Well, yes, yes ... In its actions, it seems that NATO needs a war with Russia only hot ...

“NATO is an alliance that keeps its promises.” ...
Especially after the promise of non-proliferation of NATO to the borders of Russia ...

“And the deployment of our forces is a direct response to Russia's aggressive actions in Ukraine” ...

It is a pity that Russia does not have the strength and resources to adequately respond to NATO (and, above all, the USA) by deploying its forces on the American continent ... UNTIL so far ...

“We are worried about the buildup of Russian troops near our borders and the lack of transparency during exercises "...

Near whose borders ??? Ukraine has already been admitted to NATO ??????? !!!!!!!
(This is - if we mean the unfolding combined-arms and tank associations in the Central Federal District) ...
1. Conductor
  
  0
  
  10 October 2017 10: 57
  
  And TTX S 500 or Almaty they do not need to be transparent?
pvv113

+1

10 October 2017 10: 35
NATO is an alliance that keeps its promises

We do not want to isolate Russia. NATO does not seek a new cold war
Conductor

0

10 October 2017 10: 52

Germany, in 1941, also stated that its troops on the borders of the USSR had a rest, and having gone on vacation didn’t go to England, for some reason))
Mikhail Zubkov

0

10 October 2017 11: 31

It is necessary to begin to defeat NATO with their new headquarters in Brussels - there it is necessary to aim the mine "Satan" No. 1, since it has a minimum radius of 700 km. And the rest of the package of heads is for the next air defense and missile defense radars. And end this whole stoltenberg! ...
faterdom

+2

10 October 2017 18: 34

Why publish this verbiage every day? Eyes are empty, thoughts, like the "Organ" from the city of Glupov ...
APASUS

+1

10 October 2017 20: 08

NATO is an alliance that keeps its promises.

Political grotesque!
We do not want to isolate Russia

Amnesia
Romanian President Klaus Johannes promised that his country would remain a “responsible participant” in the bloc.

Clowns went on the warpath ............
SEERforSEER

0

10 October 2017 21: 42

But what is it like?

May 28, 2014 "Obama recognized isolation of Russia successful"
https://www.rusdialog.ru/news/4654_1410601164

July 1, 2016 "Jens Stoltenberg: in return to partnership with NATO, the ball is on the side of Russia "
http://www.interfax.ru/world/516284
"Sanctions give a clear message: Russia will remain in isolationif he continues to undermine the peace order in Europe. "

2014-09-13 "The United States, NATO and their partners are ready to mobilize all forces to isolate Russia and support Ukraine: Obama"

April 2, 2014 "NATO believes that Russia can capture Ukraine in 3-5 days, but they warn the Russian Federation against invasion."
“If Russia were going to continue the invasion of Ukraine, I would no doubt call it a historical mistake that would entail further international isolation of Russia"

28/05/2014 "Obama: US Leadership helped isolate Russia"
http://politikus.ru/events/20181-obama-liderstvo-
ssha-pomoglo-izolirovat-rossiyu.html
Nemesis

+1

10 October 2017 22: 42

NATO did not stop the Cold War against Russia