Chizhov: the European Union is not ready to participate in the restoration of Syria

34
Currently, EU countries are not ready for full-scale participation in the restoration of Syria, reports RIA News statement by the permanent representative of Russia to the European Union Vladimir Chizhov.



At the moment, there is no political readiness of EU member states to take part in post-conflict reconstruction of Syria,
Permanent Representative told reporters in Athens on the margins of the EU-Eurasia-China Business Summit.

According to Chizhov, “The EU links its participation in reconstruction with the beginning of the process of political transition, according to the terminology agreed in Geneva.”

However, he noted that European countries still provide some assistance to Syria.

Some things they do. Participation in humanitarian aid - they finance, mainly through the UN structures, this assistance. It's true. Naturally, they are actively participating, wherever they can, in the international support group of friends of Syria,
said the diplomat.

But the EU is not directly involved in the negotiations in Astana and Geneva.

Of course, they want to - this is humanly understandable - to raise their profile, but so far they have not been able to overcome this link with the beginning of the political transition. Let's see what will happen
added Chizhov.
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vend Rank
    Vend
    +4
    10 October 2017 09: 22
    Destroy means ready. but not to restore. Familiar position.
    1. 210ox Rank
      210ox
      +2
      10 October 2017 09: 25
      Tolerasty is unusual to create. Well, it can only be with separate conditions ...
      Quote: Wend
      Destroy means ready. but not to restore. Familiar position.
      1. Vend Rank
        Vend
        +2
        10 October 2017 09: 39
        Quote: 210ox
        Tolerasty is unusual to create. Well, it can only be with separate conditions ...
        Quote: Wend
        Destroy means ready. but not to restore. Familiar position.

        Well, something they create, same-sex families. gay parades, chaos wink
    2. vovanpain Rank
      vovanpain
      +5
      10 October 2017 09: 30
      But did they restore Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq? To bomb, destroy it yes. Also, this suitcase without a handle is pushed to us for maintenance. feel
      1. LSA57 Rank
        LSA57
        +5
        10 October 2017 09: 32
        Quote: vovanpain
        .Ukraine also

        everything is trickier there. give a denyuzhku on recovery, but then three skins will tear off
      2. Sharansky Rank
        Sharansky
        +1
        10 October 2017 09: 57
        Quote: vovanpain
        But did they restore Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq?

        Foreign direct investment from EU countries accounted for 76% of the total number of foreign direct investment in Serbia for the period 2005-2014 (in numerical terms over the past 9 years, 13,5 billion euros have been invested in Serbia from the EU). In addition, the EU is the largest donor for Serbia, providing it with significant financial assistance in various fields from public administration reform to agriculture and environmental protection. In fact, Serbia is the main recipient of assistance from EU funds in the Western Balkans, receiving approximately 200 million euros annually. In 2001-2014, Serbia received assistance from the EU in the amount of more than 2,5 billion euros. In the framework of the EU program alone, Belgrade received an assistance tool for accession in 2007-2013 of 1,1 billion euros
        How did Russia help Serbia?
        1. LSA57 Rank
          LSA57
          +6
          10 October 2017 10: 47
          Quote: Sharansky
          How did Russia help Serbia?

          is Russia destroyed Serbia? belay
          1. Sharansky Rank
            Sharansky
            0
            10 October 2017 12: 13
            Who cares? There, the master claimed that no one was restoring anything. So it was a lie.
            1. LSA57 Rank
              LSA57
              +6
              10 October 2017 12: 31
              Quote: Sharansky
              What's the difference?

              big !!!! why should Russia restore what it did not destroy ???

              Quote: Sharansky
              There, the master claimed that no one was restoring anything.

              Why are they dragged to Russia ????
              1. Sharansky Rank
                Sharansky
                0
                10 October 2017 12: 46
                Quote: LSA57
                why should Russia restore what it did not destroy ???

                where I claimed, please remind.
                Quote: LSA57
                Why are they dragged to Russia ????

                it’s just interesting if Russia helped the fraternal people with anything. He helps Assad, he writes off debts to Africa (by the way, this is almost 10 times more than all the help of the European Union of Serbia). But did the Slav brothers help or not?
                1. LSA57 Rank
                  LSA57
                  +5
                  10 October 2017 13: 32
                  Quote: Sharansky
                  where I claimed, please remind.

                  please
                  How did Russia help Serbia?

                  your words?

                  Quote: Sharansky
                  Quote: LSA57
                  why should Russia restore what it did not destroy ???

                  where I claimed, please remind.
                  Quote: LSA57
                  Why are they dragged to Russia ????

                  it’s just interesting if Russia helped the fraternal people with anything. He helps Assad, he writes off debts to Africa (by the way, this is almost 10 times more than all the help of the European Union of Serbia). But did the Slav brothers help or not?

                  helped. disprove.
                  Africa was written off because it’s impossible to recover.
                  1. Sharansky Rank
                    Sharansky
                    0
                    10 October 2017 13: 52
                    Quote: LSA57
                    your words?

                    and how it follows from them that Russia should?
                    Quote: LSA57
                    helped. disprove.

                    Send this joke to Petrosyan, he will like it
                    1. sogdy Rank
                      sogdy
                      0
                      10 October 2017 23: 32
                      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Российско-сербские_
                      relations
                      section Economic relations
                      Plus the supply of weapons.
                      Chiv?
    3. Orel
      Orel
      +1
      10 October 2017 09: 56
      Quote: Wend
      Destroy means ready. but not to restore. Familiar position.


      Here Europe can be understood. They have sheltered thousands of refugees from there and they do not want to repeat this stream. All the same, many in Syria took up arms because they were against the Assad regime. Terrorists appeared there much later. Therefore, Europe rightly believes that restoring Syria and leaving there the same regime as it was before the war means risking the same thing in the future. Those. lose money when the war begins again. Syria should be a different country, not what it was before the war. In this sense, Assad’s withdrawal from power will most likely eventually be realized, but after the end of the active military phase. Without European investment, it will be difficult to recover. It is very expensive. We don’t have that kind of money.
      1. vovanpain Rank
        vovanpain
        +6
        10 October 2017 09: 59
        Quote: Orel
        In this sense, Assad’s departure from power will most likely be realized,

        Dreaming is not bad. Continue hi
    4. siberalt Rank
      siberalt
      +1
      10 October 2017 10: 27
      The allies of NATO and their master, the United States, should fork out for the restoration of Syria. am
  2. Komsomol Rank
    Komsomol
    +7
    10 October 2017 09: 23
    Strange, in Europe they always knew how to count money, only in the construction sector there are so many doughs that can be raised, because there are only ruins ... Does Big Brother not order?
    1. Kenxnumx
      Kenxnumx
      +2
      10 October 2017 09: 24
      Who will pay. VKS?
      1. kapitan92 Rank
        kapitan92
        +7
        10 October 2017 09: 35
        Quote: Ken71
        Who will pay. VKS?

        Russia! And when we knock out the barmaley from there, we will help restore the economy of Syria, and then they will kick us. As it was after the Second World War in Europe. hi
        1. Kenxnumx
          Kenxnumx
          +2
          10 October 2017 09: 39
          Correctly spell out
    2. LSA57 Rank
      LSA57
      +6
      10 October 2017 09: 34
      Quote: Komsomol
      Big Brother doesn't order?

      and scary. barmaley have not gone anywhere. hid a lot
  3. Kenxnumx
    Kenxnumx
    0
    10 October 2017 09: 23
    Guess who is ready. Something I already wrote.
  4. Esoteric Rank
    Esoteric
    +1
    10 October 2017 09: 26
    Currently, EU countries are not ready for full-scale participation in the restoration of Syria, RIA Novosti reports a statement by Russia's Permanent Representative to the European Union, Vladimir Chizhov.

    And within the walls of the UN it is necessary to raise such a question and find out who started, through whose fault everything was “brewed” and who would pay for the destruction. What is there to look at these sour faces? It means the UN ... and in Syria, who and what are doing there? Maybe they want to redeem hostage mercenaries? There are many ways, no need to be silent ...
  5. seregatara1969 Rank
    seregatara1969
    +1
    10 October 2017 10: 09
    Currently, EU countries are not ready for full-scale participation in the restoration of Syria

    But were there these moments in the life of all of Europe - when they dreamed of restoring at least one country previously thoroughly destroyed by NATO troops?
  6. padded jacket Rank
    padded jacket
    0
    10 October 2017 10: 13
    Quote: article
    Chizhov: the European Union is not ready to participate in the restoration of Syria

    Of course, why did they need this because the goal of the EU of the USA of Israel and the monarchies of the PZ was precisely in the destruction of Syria and the organization of the entire BV of the world terrorist Caliphate which they thought would act at their direction.
  7. pvv113 Rank
    pvv113
    +1
    10 October 2017 10: 22
    EU countries are not ready for full-fledged participation in the restoration of Syria

    The EU and NATO are just shitting the masters, but the rest are "not ready"
  8. Polite Moose Rank
    Polite Moose
    +1
    10 October 2017 10: 25
    The EU is not ready to participate in the restoration of Syria

    I don’t know if I’m right or not, but, in my opinion, there (in BV) such a market will soon open for the sale of any that Europe could not even dream of. Building materials, household appliances and other equipment, equipment for agricultural facilities, industry and infrastructure. As well as wagons, rails, salt, matches, cigarettes and much more. For suppliers, the prospects are gigantic. And if Iran is still to be added here with its Oil for Goods program, then the chances for the growth of our industry producing all this crap are simply cosmic. The main thing is not to ask them ... not to oversleep. Contracts for the supply and work to conclude in hot pursuit, already now begin to organize joint ventures, while the EU did not open their eyes and our cunningly narrowed friends of our foreign trade officials on the corner did not pass. In short, it would be foolish not to take advantage of the fruits of your victory. And for the EU there is an old English proverb: "When a lady leaves a convertible, the horse experiences some relief."
  9. rotmistr60 Rank
    rotmistr60
    +1
    10 October 2017 10: 35
    in international Syria Friends Support Group,

    This is understandable since this group includes just the direct enemies of President Assad and Russia. Breaking does not build. It’s easier to bomb on residential areas and infrastructure than to restore it later.
  10. aszzz888 Rank
    aszzz888
    0
    10 October 2017 10: 47
    ... and he, the EU, should he? ... dump everything on Russia ...
  11. rpuropuu Rank
    rpuropuu
    +1
    10 October 2017 12: 14
    Quote: Sharansky
    Quote: vovanpain
    But did they restore Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq?

    Foreign direct investment from EU countries accounted for 76% of the total number of foreign direct investment in Serbia for the period 2005-2014 (in numerical terms over the past 9 years, 13,5 billion euros have been invested in Serbia from the EU). In addition, the EU is the largest donor for Serbia, providing it with significant financial assistance in various fields from public administration reform to agriculture and environmental protection. In fact, Serbia is the main recipient of assistance from EU funds in the Western Balkans, receiving approximately 200 million euros annually. In 2001-2014, Serbia received assistance from the EU in the amount of more than 2,5 billion euros. In the framework of the EU program alone, Belgrade received an assistance tool for accession in 2007-2013 of 1,1 billion euros
    How did Russia help Serbia?

    Investments (Eng. Investments) - the allocation of capital for profit [1] [2].
    This is essentially a loan stop Destroy the country, then to cut down the "loot" from it oh yes ... Class wink EU has a good teacher Yes
  12. rpuropuu Rank
    rpuropuu
    +1
    10 October 2017 12: 16
    EU links participation in recovery with start of political transition

    All you need to know about democracy good In fact, they are engaged in blackmail No.
  13. APASUS Rank
    APASUS
    0
    10 October 2017 20: 11
    At the moment, there is no political readiness of EU member states to take part in post-conflict reconstruction of Syria,

    Who could argue. The EU, even when it admits its mistakes as in Libya, is not trying to do something, and then there are Putin’s troops in Syria
  14. SEERforSEER Rank
    SEERforSEER
    0
    10 October 2017 21: 22
    Quote: Sharansky
    Who cares? There, the master claimed that no one was restoring anything. So it was a lie.

    big, dear.
    and all these "investments" will come back with a big geshest.
    Do you know this :-)
  15. Nemesis Rank
    Nemesis
    +1
    10 October 2017 22: 43
    The Russian Federation also has nothing to restore foreign countries, especially on credit and for free. The Russian Federation needs to solve its problems, which are more than enough in the Russian Federation