Ustashi on Donbass: Croatian script

19


Western Ukraine and Galicia in the first place, the edge of the nationalist and Uniate, infinitely far from the rest of Ukraine and the local "gvar", and religion, and lifestyle and values. There are also purely medical differences, the Ministry of Health fixes iodine deficiency here, and the local population does not use iodized salt. Yes, and seven centuries of life outside of Ukraine itself have an effect.
However, medical and historical indicators only contribute to the choice of local residents as cannon fodder Maidan. As well as the allies. It is not surprising that the Ustasha flag appeared in the Donbass in the summer of 2014.



Ustashi on Donbass: Croatian script

Ustasha and Neobanderovtsy are united not only by religion, but even slogans. "Serb on willow" is surprisingly similar to "Moskalyaku on Gilyak". And just like Bandera, Ustashi distinguished themselves in World War II not by victories on the fronts, but by the genocide of the Serbian people, the Gypsies and the Jews. Mile Budak, the Ustashe’s chief ideologue, wrote: “kill a third, expel a third and convert a third of Serbs to Catholicism”. Surprisingly similar to the views of the Hauptmann Shukhevych, who led the UPA: "not to intimidate, but to exterminate. Do not be afraid that people will curse us for cruelty. Let only half of the Ukrainian population of 40 will remain half - there is nothing wrong with that."

Therefore, it is not surprising that, following the fighters, advisers from Croatia were drawn to Kiev. Recently, they even held a round table - they discussed the successes of Croatia in Operation Storm and the subsequent accession of the Danube.

At the same time, Kiev’s “experts” were more interested in Operation Storm, while the Croats strongly pressed on the peaceful component. Spring Shkare-Ozbolt, who in 1990 was the head of the Croatian presidential administration, participated in all negotiations on the return of territories, and in 1996, led the process of the peaceful reintegration of the Croatian Danube region, without much success trying to convey to "their Kiev partners" that the separatists need assist, provide financial assistance in the restoration of destroyed cities and villages, provide greater rights to the region. Understanding is not found.

And could not find. Kiev, after all, was not in vain interested in the military component. The fact is that by the time of the start of the operation, the UN’s “blue helmets” under the leadership of the French General Janviere were on the line of demarcation. Upon learning of the impending offensive, the French general immediately notified the sector commanders about the attack that was being prepared through 3 hours, and the latter, in turn, notified the Serbs.

It makes no sense to consider the reasons for the defeat of the RSK - they were simply left alone with the enemy, who not only outnumbered them many times, but also received full support from NATO - from planning operations to intelligence gathering.

But it is worth saying about peacekeepers. From the first minutes of the operation, the posts of "blue helmets" were under fire. Killed soldiers from the Czech Republic, Denmark and Nepal.

From the report of the UN Secretary-General on the 1009 resolution (1995), it is known that the Croats on August 5 used the captured UN peacekeepers and the captured Krajins soldiers as a human shield. The total losses of peacekeepers, including the wounded, were 18 people. Of which only one died from Serb bullets.

This is exactly the experience that Kia does not agree to enter peacekeepers, which he likes to talk about. And the reluctance to perceive the difference between Ukraine and Croatia lies altogether on a practical plane.

The scoundrels who perch in Kiev today received power as a result of an armed coup and do not enjoy the support of the population from the word at all. The rating of Poroshenko and his officials fluctuates within the limits of statistical error. He is even hated by the murderers of the unrelated units of the nationalists.

On bayonets and fear, they can stay in power. But they could never come to it democratically - each time they had to arrange the Maidan. And the "successes" after that are too sad and obvious every time to talk about them.

The predecessor of the current "president", Mr. Yushchenko, brilliantly failed the elections, which at the very least controlled. 5 percent (!) Is an absolute anti-record for the ruling head of state.

Therefore, no Minsk and no more or less free elections are possible. The people who demanded a referendum on federalization in February-April 2014 (peacefully demanded!), Will turn out to be in absolute majority, turning just Galicia into separatists. Just those three regions of Western Ukraine, of which for more than a hundred years, spread the infection of that very iodine-deficient Galician nationalism, which does not fit into the whole of Ukraine, although it is called "Ukrainian."

South-East of Ukraine has always demanded precisely the freedom to live on their own land in accordance with their own, and not Bandera ideals. And since it was always the opinion of the majority, it was necessary to organize Maidan, and then study the experience of the Ustashi.

But our Republic of Donbass is not Serbian Krajina, and Russia is not Serbia. Yes, and the remnants controlled by Poroshenko - not Croatia.

And therefore, the Galicia should already learn Polish
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    10 October 2017 07: 54
    Croats, these are executioners and sadists. Shortest Christians. What they did with the Serbs, words can not convey.
    1. +4
      10 October 2017 10: 03
      just remember how the Croats actually crossed into Catholics and everything falls into place
    2. +2
      10 October 2017 12: 55
      Quote: Blombir
      Croats, these are executioners and sadists.

      Serbo-Croatian, Russian-Ukrainian ethnic groups are subordinated and divided on false grounds for their subsequent self-destruction. This is a very rational method of colonization.
  2. 0
    10 October 2017 08: 01
    Quote: Blombir
    But our Republic of Donbass is not Serbian Krajina, and Russia is not Serbia. Yes, and the remnants controlled by Poroshenko - not Croatia.

    I would like to hear the fundamental differences
    1. +3
      10 October 2017 08: 50
      Territory, number of population, number and quality of weapons. Material capabilities and potential. It seems that on all counts the difference is more than substantial.
    2. BAI
      +7
      10 October 2017 09: 05
      fundamental differences

      Serbs in NATO surroundings with inactive Yeltsin Russia. Donbass has a common border with non-Yeltsin Russia. Besides geography, times have changed.
      1. +2
        10 October 2017 11: 49
        Quote: BAI
        Serbs in NATO surroundings with inactive Yeltsin Russia.

        Serbian Krajina had a vestibule in the form of Bosnia and Croatia - the closest NATO there at that time, only Italy was ... non-Yeltsin Russia was just as calmly observing the shelling of the inhabitants of Donbass by an ukrovermacht, only occasionally expressing concerns
        1. +1
          10 October 2017 15: 15
          Quote: Stirbjorn
          Quote: BAI
          Serbs in NATO surroundings with inactive Yeltsin Russia.

          non-Yeltsin Russia just as calmly observes the shelling of the inhabitants of Donbass ukrovermahtm, only occasionally expressing concerns

          Not only concerns, but also the lack of alternatives to the Minsk agreements ... And you see this is the main indicator that the Russian Federation turns out to be non-Yeltsin. Although, by and large, the whole difference is that the Yeltsin RF did not have such cool show-offs and such a cool television picture as the Russian Federation itself knows who. However, soon everything will return to square one - after all, there is no money, but it will not work for a long time to stay ...
    3. +3
      10 October 2017 16: 15
      Actually, I didn’t write it, but the idea is true. Still such a nuance, now is not the time of the Yeltsenoids and Serbian Krajina has no common border with Russia.
  3. +4
    10 October 2017 08: 04
    The longer modern Ukrina lives, the more it turns into a European Islamic State. The bandit formations of various orientations and religious movements have been flowing there for years now, mercenaries from countries sympathizing with the regime generally enjoy the support of these countries. And what is most disturbing, they are not prevented by regime authorities Poroshenko, if only they do not support him, which means that no people are legally able to change this power. In vain the Kremlin thinks that we will get off with little blood. It would be faster to finish off the animals in Syria.
  4. 0
    10 October 2017 11: 28
    neobandera in a hurry read like Neanderthals))) although essentially the same thing
  5. 0
    10 October 2017 14: 44
    It seems war cannot be avoided.
  6. 0
    10 October 2017 15: 20
    Quote: Mar. Tira
    The longer modern Ukrina lives, the more it turns into a European Islamic State. The bandit formations of various orientations and religious movements have been flowing there for years now, mercenaries from countries sympathizing with the regime generally enjoy the support of these countries. And what is most disturbing, they are not prevented by regime authorities Poroshenko, if only they do not support him, which means that no people are legally able to change this power. In vain the Kremlin thinks that we will get off with little blood. It would be faster to finish off the animals in Syria.

    Unfortunately, you won’t be able to finish off the animals. Absolutely. Too large population (75% of the population of the SAR are Sunnis by religion), and well fed by good and rich partners. One of them recently came to Moscow.
    1. +1
      10 October 2017 16: 29
      and where does the Sunnis? or do you have written in the training manual that the war is religious there?
      if you were even a little close to the truth, then with Assad you would have figured out without ISIS and the Turks.
      1. 0
        10 October 2017 19: 16
        In my training manual (of course, the State Department, as without a darling) it is written that Syria is split along religious lines. The Sunnis are against Assad simply because he is a swindler, and the Ba'ath party, which he represents long ago, has exhausted itself. Assad cannot be dealt with without the Turks and the caliphate. Just because those and those have their own interests. Caliphs got out of control, and Erdogan is just a scumbag. The West is not omnipotent in the process of Middle East chaos, but very skillfully uses the participants in this conflict, including Russia, voluntarily and very late, to fit into this mess.
        1. +2
          11 October 2017 16: 43
          Quote: romey
          Sunnis vs Assad simply because he

          tell me, is all Sunnis radical Islam? straight all ISIS and An-Well-Srovtsy? or all the same, and you are a little pervert? wink
          as for Russia, it’s up to you to think about this. I believe that Russia is successfully implementing its economic plans in this region. there will be no gas pipeline, weapons contracts are coming ....
          but the USA is really stuck. they lost control of the region. the maximum that they can prevent others from achieving their goals, but even this does not work out with Russia yet.
          they can’t leave Iraq and Afghanistan. local government is extremely weak and unable to hold on without the presence of American troops.
          so now the United States has far more problems in this region than Russia.
          1. +1
            11 October 2017 21: 55
            Quote: SanichSan
            Quote: romey
            Sunnis vs Assad simply because he

            tell me, is all Sunnis radical Islam? straight all ISIS and An-Well-Srovtsy? or all the same, and you are a little pervert? wink

            I repeat, Sunnis, whether they are radicals or not (in Islam in general radicalism and moderation are shared by the finest line), for anyone, only against Assad. Just because of their affiliation, they believe that the king of the beasts in Syria, by right of majority, should be their people.
            Quote: SanichSan

            as for Russia, it’s up to you to think about this. I believe that Russia is successfully implementing its economic plans in this region. there will be no gas pipeline, weapons contracts are coming ....

            This is your right, only time will show the result, and it works against us, since the resources of the Russian Federation are very limited due to the semi-colonial economic system entirely and completely subordinate to the interests of the West. In addition, there is no political solution to intra-Syrian contradictions on the horizon.
            Quote: SanichSan

            but the USA is really stuck. they lost control of the region. the maximum that they can prevent others from achieving their goals, but even this does not work out with Russia yet.

            Really ?! Is Israel hastily reoriented to the Russian Federation or China? Or did the Saudis stop driving US oil? This could be called "stick".
            They do not go out with Iran and, oddly enough, with Turkey. But it’s just the same with the Russian Federation. Firstly, all our very modest resources are very, very limited due to the reasons I mentioned above, and secondly, the Russian Federation, to the great joy of the United States, instead of solving problems on the main direction of the military-political front (Novorossia and Ukraine), it once again pretended to be a beautiful A picture intended solely for domestic consumption. Thirdly, the United States is actually very beneficial to the participation of the Russian Federation in the Syrian mess, because we ourselves took up the dirty work of a showdown with the Caliphate, suffering all military, economic and political losses.
            Quote: SanichSan

            so now the United States has far more problems in this region than Russia.

            It is now. When the Moor does his job and it becomes unnecessary, they will simply block the sea and air space and ... And that’s all, the expeditionary force of the Russian Federation has a cover. Tsushima and Port Arthur will seem happy.
            1. +1
              31 October 2017 14: 08
              I'm wildly sorry, but some kind of stream of consciousness ...
              a classic of the writings of some extremely dubious thesis, raising it to the rank of truth and, on the basis of this curve of the theory, drawing conclusions, which, as a result, are obviously erroneous.
              start with the Sunnis. Are you ready to “say a bucket of shit” that ALL Sunnis are against Assad? if so, it’s just because I won’t be looking for you and I won’t feed you a bucket wink and it’s completely stubbornly clear that among the Sunnis there are those who support Assad.
              as for the "extremely limited resources", this bullshit has been wailing since 2014. Yes Yes. tomorrow Russia fse ... laughing all theses following from this, and this honors the whole text of your post, are absolutely priceless. that is, they have no value since they are made on the basis of an erroneous judgment.
              doubts arise about your adequacy ....
              but basically .. it's up to you. there’s a crying wall in Moscow. You can go to repent. wink maybe let go ....

              PS
              and by the way with Israel you screwed up too wink
  7. 0
    12 October 2017 18: 07
    only contribute to the choice of local residents as cannon fodder Maidan ...
    They are PERFECTLY at checkpoints, and on the front line there are very few of them.
    It is unified by the fact that both the UPA killers and the Ustashi “packs” emigrated to the United States, Canada and received citizenship there.
    BUT Croatia officially refuses to glorify the Ustash, unlike the Ukrainian rulers.