Great commanders. Spartacus

32
The uprising of Spartacus, which began in the city of Kapuya in 74 BC. e., not only significantly influenced the development of Rome as a state, but also left its mark on the entire world history. The uprising of Spartacus is no longer an exclusively historical fact, having become, with the name of its leader, a symbol of the liberation struggle.

For the first time the artistic image of Spartacus was used by the French revolutionaries. It remains unknown who first remembered again the invincible leader of the insurgent slaves through the years of oblivion, but he liked the minds of the agitated French. Of course, there was a certain idealization, but we should not forget about the merits of Spartacus himself, as the authors of the works that have reached us speak of him as a noble and courageous person. Even distinguished by an extremely hostile attitude not only towards the uprising itself, but also towards its participants, Roman historians did not deny the positive personal qualities of Spartacus. For example, Flor, who does not hide his scornful attitude towards the rebel slaves, nevertheless admitted that during his last battle: “Spartacus, who fought bravely in the first row, died at the hands of the enemy, as befits a great commander”. Plutarch, more impartial in his judgments, characterizes Spartacus as “a man not only distinguished by outstanding courage and physical strength, but his intelligence and gentleness who elevated him above his position, giving greater resemblance to the Hellenes than could be supposed about a man of his tribe”.

Very little is known about Spartacus. For example, it is known that Spartacus was the birthplace of Thrace (present-day Bulgaria), and he was from the Meda tribe. The town of Sandanski, located in the Rhodope Mountains near the border with Yugoslavia, is considered to be the specific place of its birth. In 1 century BC. er on this place was the city of Medon, which was the capital of a large and strong tribe of honey, moreover, it took on many of the features inherent in Greek culture.

Probably, the Spartak family belonged to representatives of the local aristocracy, which confirms not only the consonance of the Spartak name with the generic name of Spartokids belonging to the Bosporan royal family, but also the confidence shown by them in managing a huge army.

The Thracians were warlike people, not only leading permanent tribal wars, but also supplying mercenaries in the armies of other states. These people considered military careers as the only acceptable for a man, especially for a representative of a noble family. Spartak is no exception. At the age of eighteen, he enlisted in the Roman army, where he was assigned to auxiliary Thracian units. Spartak has the opportunity to study from the inside the organization of the strongest army in the world, the practice of military operations, its strengths and weaknesses. Subsequently, this experience came in handy. After a few years of service, Spartak deserted, returning to Thrace, - at this time there began a war against the Romans.

Spartacus twice came to Rome as a slave. In the first case, he managed to escape. But after a while, Spartak was captured for the second time, and he was sold to Lentulus Batiatu, the owner of the Kapuan school of gladiators. The bulk of the pupils were Gauls and Thracians, whom the Romans considered to be militant and recalcitrant people.

Most likely, among them were many prisoners of war, who had just recently parted from freedom and were not yet accustomed to slavery. In order to organize a rebellion in such a situation, there was not enough for the leader, which was Spartak, who was a born leader and organizer, a brave and enterprising person.

But the plot was revealed, and its participants could be saved only by acting quickly and decisively. Seventy-eight gladiators made an unexpected attack on the guards and, having broken the doors of the school, disappeared beyond the city limits, as Plutarch writes, “thrifty taking with them the kitchen knives and skewers they got somewhere.”

In general, armament was a rather acute problem for the army of Spartacus throughout the war. Sallust writes that at the beginning the rebels, instead of copies, used sharpened and burned stakes with the help of which it was possible to cause practically the same harm as iron ”... Later, the rebels continued to produce weapon personally, making a centralized purchase of iron and copper from merchants, they also did not neglect the weapons of the defeated Roman soldiers.

Together with his small detachment, Spartak headed towards Mount Vesuvius, the summit of which was similar to a natural fortification, where one could wait out for a while until the detachment was replenished with escaped slaves from nearby estates. Indeed, the number of the detachment led by Spartak quickly increased, which makes it acceptable to assume that there is an extensive conspiracy structure that encompasses all gladiatorial schools, as well as large slave farms in Kapuy and its surroundings.

Initially, Spartak relied on the help of German Enomay, Gaul Crix, and Samnit Gannik in organizing the conspiracy and uprising. Spartak immediately began to create an army modeled on the Roman, preferring to lose part of his army rather than allow it to descend to the level of an overgrown predatory gang.

However, the military purposes pursued by him can only be guessed at. Numerous researchers of the Spartak wars put forward various hypotheses: from a utopian attempt to overthrow the power in Rome and destroy slavery, to simple plans for the withdrawal of detachments of former slaves to their native land. But each of these hypotheses is equally vulnerable. The inconsistency of Mishulin's theory about the revolutionary impulse of slaves and the poorest representatives of the free population of Italy has long been recognized. It is equally meaningless to say that Spartak waged a systematic war with Rome. Spartak did not even seek to create its own state in the occupied territories. Most likely, he really wanted to leave Italy. However, Spartak is not limited to creating a semblance of military units capable of breaking through the Roman barriers, but intended to be dissolved on the other side of the Alps. Instead, he is working hard to create a full-fledged army.

For a time, the detachment of Spartacus did not leave his camp, broken on Mount Vesuvius. The rebellion of runaway gladiators inspired slaves from nearby estates. 74 year BC. er as the year preceding it turned out to be a poor harvest, which could not but affect the moods of the slaves, and so are in extremely difficult conditions of existence. The continuous increase in the number of the detachment of Spartacus seriously worried the landowners. However, the detachments they assigned to fight the rebellious slaves suffered one defeat after another. The situation around Capua became increasingly tense, causing concern to the Roman authorities. Pretor Guy Claudius Pulkhra, who led the three thousandth detachment, was sent to restore order. The task before them seemed to be extremely simple, because, having climbed onto Vesuvius, Spartak seemed to deliberately drive his squad into a trap. At the top of the mountain one could get along a single path, blocking which, Claudius could quietly wait for the moment when hunger forced the rebels to surrender.

Nevertheless, Spartak did not intend to give up, proving himself in the current critical situation as a smart and persistent person in achieving the goal. Using vines growing on the slopes of a mountain of wild grapes, the rebels erected stairs, which they descended from a three-hundred-meter height to the nearest flat platform. Then they struck the rear of the praetor Claudius, who was not expecting an attack, utterly defeating his detachment.

In Rome, after learning of the defeat of Claudius, they sent to the war with Spartak Praetor Publius Valerius Warinius. At first he managed to force Spartacus to retreat to the south, to the mountains. But the whole thing was that Spartak wanted to avoid a battle with unfavorable conditions for himself, because the number of his army was significantly inferior to the Roman. And he continued to retreat, seeking to be in the rich southern provinces of Italy, in order to replenish his army, to join the battle with the Romans.

Arriving in Lucania, a detachment of Spartacus approached the small town of Appiyev Forum and took it by storm. And it cost the army of Spartacus, for the most part, consisting of runaway slaves to enter the city, as its soldiers, having completely forgotten all the orders, began to barbarously rob local residents, raping their wives and daughters.

At this moment, the tendency of Spartacus’s soldiers to the rapid disintegration of discipline, which Spartak feared, was particularly acute. Of course, he had no illusions about the consequences of the seizure of the city, but his army consisted of soldiers who were not bound by the oath, therefore it was difficult to call for discipline, thereby returning to service. The slaves who fell into his army did not hide their indignation at the need to obey, from which they, it seemed to them, they got rid of forever. However, to avoid looting was impossible. The supply of the army of Spartacus was based only on the withdrawal of food from the population, which logically explains his desire to attack wealthy slave-holding farms, which were more in the south of Italy, while in the north small peasant settlements were concentrated. Plundering large farms, Spartak replenished not only the reserves of provisions in them, but also increased the number of his troops — slaves working on estates, gladly joined the ranks of his army.

As a result of a series of victories over the scattered detachments of the praetor Varinia, the south of Italy completely passed into the hands of Spartacus. However, the rebels did not intend to stop there and, having ruined the southern regions of Italy, moved to the Alps.

Only then did the Senate clearly recognize the seriousness of the situation and appreciated the strength of the rebels. They began to act against Spartacus as against a serious opponent, really threatening Rome.

With all the evidence of the success achieved, the rebels ’troops did not differ in unity. The Gauls and Germans, who formed a large part of the army of Spartacus, considered it offensive to retreat after such triumphal victories over the Romans. However, Spartak continued to retreat from Italy, incidentally inflicting several more serious defeats on the Romans.

The uprising of Spartacus reached its apogee. The number of his troops reached 120000 people. The road to Transalpine Gaul was open, but Spartak, for some reason, is turning south again. The news of this caused a real panic in Rome. Spartacus became seriously compared with Hannibal and treated him as one of the most dangerous enemies of Rome.

Rome was preparing to meet with the army of Spartacus. The post of commander-in-chief was occupied by Mark Licinius Crassus, who had a personal interest in the speedy termination of hostilities and the defeat of Spartacus (his estates were heavily damaged by looting). In addition, Crassus wanted to get the glory of the commander and began, as they say, for his health - he made the advancing of the fighters. Thirty thousand people joined the ranks of the Roman army.

Crassus advanced to join the armies of the consuls. It is worth noting that in the Roman army reigned, if not panic, then very gloomy moods. In short, the morality of the Romans was not up to standard, after so many defeats, the Roman soldiers were afraid of the soldiers of Spartacus. Therefore, Crassus considered it necessary to teach his men a brutal lesson. To carry out reconnaissance, two legions were sent to the area where the army camp was located. Spartak sent two soldiers to the camp and fled to the camp during the ensuing battle, giving out the location of the main forces. Crassus ordered the punishment of the guilty and subjected the fled soldiers to a decimation - every tenth legionary was executed. After applying this harsh measure discipline in the ranks of the Romans was restored.

Meanwhile, having traveled the same route as when going to the Alps, Spartak stopped in the city of Furies at the southeastern tip of Italy and occupied the city itself, sitting on the surrounding heights. Spartak forbids its fighters to carry with them gold and silver, trying by all means to maintain discipline among them, stopping disputes between commanders.

Spartacus apparently sought to leave Italy through Sicily. However, this reasonable at first glance, the intention of Spartacus did not find support in the ranks of his army. A serious split was brewing among the rebels. A detachment from 10000 was separated from the main forces of the army of Spartacus and was immediately defeated by the Romans. Spartacus had already reached the coast and negotiated with the Cilician pirates so that they would help his army cross to Sicily. Despite the fact that an agreement was reached, the pirates for some reason did not keep their promise and did not give Spartak their ships.

Spartacus, pursued by Crassus, retreated to the southernmost tip of Italy, on the coast of a narrow strait between the Apennine Peninsula and Sicily. He still did not give up thoughts about a possible crossing to the island, attempting to build improvised boats and rafts of logs and barrels. However, the imminent clash with Crassus was obvious and inevitable.

However, Crassus was not too eager to fight, because the geographical features of the Regian Peninsula, which was narrow and elongated, suggested to him an even simpler solution. The army of Crassus conducted a 55-kilometer shaft across the isthmus, reinforcing it with a moat and palisades. Once again, the Romans hoped that the rebels would be forced to surrender in order to avoid starvation. At this time, the situation in Rome is changing dramatically. Assessing the seriousness of the threat, the Senate transfers all power over the army of Pompey, who arrived from Spain. Crassus, who wanted to win the laurels of the winner, should act as quickly as possible, otherwise he would have had a bad reputation for failure.

Learning of this, Spartak attempted to hold peace negotiations with the Romans, suggesting that Crassus, being not enthusiastic about Pompey's participation in the war, would be more compliant. However, the Roman commander did not even respond to the proposal of the enemy, so the army of Spartacus was forced to storm the Roman fortifications. On a rainy night, his soldiers piled the moat with fascines, and, overturning the guard units of the Romans, were able to break free. Crassus's army followed Spartacus, who was leaving for Brundisium, whose army began to fall apart in pieces. The end of the war, tragic for Spartacus, was close, the situation in his camp became increasingly tense.

Spartacus, retreating to the Petely mountains, was pursued by Quint, the legate of Crassus, and also the quaestor Skroff. However, as soon as Spartak turned against the Romans, they rushed to flee and escaped with difficulty, but carried the injured quaestor from the battlefield. This success turned the heads of runaway slaves, ruining Spartacus. His soldiers now forgot to think about retreating, not only refusing to carry out the orders of their superiors, but, blocking their path, forced them to lead the army through Lucania back to the Romans.

Great commanders. Spartacus
Cursed field. Place of execution in ancient Rome. Crucified slaves. 1878 Fedor Andreevich Bronnikov


In addition, the retreat of the army of the rebels from the coast was also due to information about the arrival of the army of Lucullus in Brundisium. Spartacus understood that the general battle was inevitable. Crassus himself wanted to fight Spartak as quickly as possible, because Pompey's army was inexorably approaching every day.

Roman troops overtook the army of Spartacus, not allowing them to go far from Brundisium. From different sides of the army of Crass replenished with more and more reinforcements, and as a result Spartacus was forced to build his entire army.

Spartacus, on horseback making his way to Crassus, was wounded in the thigh with a spear by Campanian aristocrat Felix. The grave wound caused Spartacus to dismount, but he, dropping to one knee and losing a lot of blood, continued to fight. The great commander of the ancient world Spartak fell in a fierce battle. The place of his burial remained unknown, since his body was not originally found on the battlefield.
Spartak - under the guise of a legend

32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. grizzlir
    +7
    23 March 2012 09: 01
    Over the past centuries, memory has been erased and nowadays people are less and less remembered about Spartak's identity. But you shouldn't doubt that he was a really great man. To start the fight against the oppressors, to turn from a slave into a commander, organize resistance, gather an army. Such a thing could only be done by a great man In my opinion, the name of Spartak has the right to be on a par with the name of Alexander of Macedon. Only the second initially had a small kingdom under control, and the first began its ascent into history with only slave chains.
    1. recitatorus
      +2
      23 March 2012 11: 58
      In times were !!! Not like today - consumerism and philistinism!
  2. predator
    +5
    23 March 2012 09: 12
    Spartak is a champion ! But seriously, it was an excellent "walk" through the Apennines, and Spartak's main mistake was that he had to go north in time, across the Alps, and not return to the south.
    1. +7
      23 March 2012 13: 22
      Quote: predator
      Spartak is a champion ! But seriously, it was an excellent "walk" through the Apennines, and Spartak's main mistake was that he had to go north in time, across the Alps, and not return to the south.


      Yes, if the champion is not in this life, He cannot yet resist the "cavalry" army and Gazprom's "blue" tweeters. But seriously, in the Alps, Spartacus did not strive at all in order to gain freedom, but for the alleged connection with the army of the new "Pyrenean Hannibal" Sertorius, who, having subjugated the Spanish tribes to his influence, managed to create there a kind of new state like New Carthage of the Barkids

      Having created around himself a "senate" of 300 Roman emigrants, Sertorius freed the local population from taxes and housing, put in order the courts, opened a school for the children of the local nobility. They were taught Latin and Greek, and Sertorius promised to involve them in the government over time, deliberately pursuing a policy of romanizing the local nobility. Sent to Spain at the head of the Roman troops, which consisted of battle-tested veterans, the generals Caecilius Metellus and Gnaeus Pompey could do almost nothing with Sertorius and were defeated. In 72, the power of Sertorius reached its apogee, the Celts and Iberians of Spain idolized him, he stood at the head of an efficient army, and rumors spread in Rome about the imminent appearance of "the second Hannibal" in Italy (this nickname Sertorius received from the Celtiberians). Like the great Puniyan, Sertorius also lost one eye, and this outward resemblance completed the striking similarity of their military tactics (focus on the speed of strikes) and their military-political strategy.


      Even after the defeat of the consuls, the army of the governor of Cisalpine Gaul and the praetor's army tried with suicidal tenacity to prevent Spartacus from reaching the Alps. And there were good reasons for this, much more important than the hypothetical loss of several tens of thousands from the "herd" of Italian slaves. However, as you know, these plans were not destined to come true. In order to prevent a catastrophe, the Roman Senate, losing the face of an honest enemy, went to bribe Sertorius' inner circle from among the Roman officers. For money and the promised rehabilitation at home, Guy Perpenne and his henchmen stabbed Sertorius to death, depriving the leader and soul of the whole enterprise, which he had fostered in the Spanish army. Therefore, Spartacus was forced to turn back and seek help.
      After the enterprise for which Spartak was preparing his slave army failed, the question arose of what to do with these forces. Ancient authors suggested that he had a plan for a campaign against Rome, but the existence of such a plan did not follow from the actions of Spartacus. Like Hannibal, he apparently did not aim to capture the Eternal City. More important was to get the Roman Senate to recognize the conquests of his opponent in the treaty. There could be no agreement with the slaves, and Sertorius, who represented the party of populations, was no longer there. As you know, Spartak takes a trip to the south of Italy, where he had some kind of agreement with the pirates. Despite all measures, Crassus fails to prevent these plans. However, at the last moment, Spartak’s plan fell through, remaining the subject of hypotheses and speculation of historians about its content.
    2. Sasha36543
      +6
      23 March 2012 14: 42
      "Everyone imagines himself to be a strategist, seeing the battle from the outside."
  3. orion-sticks
    +7
    23 March 2012 10: 01
    Strange as it may seem, Spartacus was led by Spartacus, and patrician, Lucius Sergius Katilina, a rather strong man (once a gladiator), but not rich and with ambitions for the throne. Lucius Cornelius Sulla was sick and the fuss for the throne was no laughing matter. lost to the oligarchs Mark Crassus and Gnei Pompey. During saturnalia, Spartak got freedom for heroism and could go to his native Thrace, but it was Katilina who killed him in rebellion. He supplied Spartak with weapons and money. If it weren’t for the political situation, the uprising could not to be. And Hollywood, as always, misinterpreted everything, they like to perceive the history.
    1. raptor_fallout
      +4
      23 March 2012 10: 28
      Plus article and your comment! I see that they read quite a lot of literature, and they didn’t leaf through the book of Spartak, but they read it seriously and thoughtfully. And Katilina also ended badly, as you know. It was necessary for Spartak to introduce a tough dictatorship, because his legions were initially formed by nationality, hence the fermentation in the minds! Anyway, the Great Man was.
      1. recitatorus
        +5
        23 March 2012 11: 57
        The human being, of course, was extraordinary, but what really happened there, we most likely will never know! Too well the Romans knew how to write out their story! Youngsters were brought up only on victories, even if they were not!
    2. 0
      23 March 2012 16: 32
      orion-sticksactually Catilina was a patrician !! wink and could not be a gladiator! Yes, and had nothing to do with Spartak! you would still Gracchus brothers would have dragged here !! there took place the usual struggle for power - the truth with unusual methods including! with the involvement of local authorities and gangs of robbers and runaway slaves, so to speak, and SPARTAK IS A SEPARATE TOPIC !! And ON HOLLYWOOD THIS IS YES - THEY LIKE to misinterpret everything, and at the same time sometimes be talented and colorful !! fellow
      1. orion-sticks
        0
        24 March 2012 06: 47
        Perhaps so, but the gladiators' laurels did not give rest even to emperors. Gladiators were not only slaves, but also Roman citizens and not infrequently poor patricians. For the laurel wreath is a synonym for wealth, and fame in ancient Rome was loved no less.
  4. +3
    23 March 2012 10: 10
    In our time, it would not hurt to appear such a hero.
  5. +1
    23 March 2012 10: 32
    It is always interesting to read a story, a very colorful character Spartak. Discovery movie watched.
    Now I’m watching the Spartak series, it’s very good, although of course the historical facts are corrected in it.
  6. +4
    23 March 2012 10: 49
    But I’m not sure that he died, they didn’t find the bodies! It seems to me that, in any way, the Romans would like to put the killed Spartak on display, but for some reason they chopped it up so that there was nothing left at all! So, I hope that historians will still study this issue, maybe some new finds will be made.
    1. raptor_fallout
      +3
      23 March 2012 10: 56
      Quote: Magadan
      But I’m not sure that he died, they didn’t find the bodies! It seems to me that, in any way, the Romans would like to put the killed Spartak on display, but for some reason they chopped it up so that there was nothing left at all!

      With Spartak, the story is muddy! Historians of that time generally tried to silence the fact of the uprising, the technology of distorting history was already launched then.
      1. +6
        23 March 2012 11: 14
        Well, you both think correctly.
        They said -a -... but they almost got to -b-.
        In Rafaello Giovagnoli's novel "Spartacus" there is a scene where Spartacus speaks to the patricians (Catiline, Varro, Caesar) with a program, so to speak, of reforms on slavery.
        He was not supported. Do not forget that before the start of the uprising, Spartak was personally free for more than 2-3 years. This war surrendered to him ... he clearly saw the futility, and this is constantly emphasized in the novel.
        All this rebellion is a civil war of some senators against others. And Spartak - ... well, like Zhirinovsky, now. Exposed - to see him.
        Therefore, the body was not found. And Rome was ashamed ... to recognize a civil war of this magnitude.
        Previously, it was trembling directly ... Spartak ... now it is no longer interesting. To me. Yes, and I do not believe in Rome ... such as everyone associates. A lousy village with ambition.
        This is my opinion ... I do not impose on anyone.
        1. raptor_fallout
          +2
          23 March 2012 11: 25
          Quote: Igarr
          He was not supported. Do not forget that before the start of the uprising, Spartak was personally free for more than 2-3 years. This war surrendered to him ... he clearly saw the futility, and this is constantly emphasized in the novel.

          Yes, but now it’s almost impossible to historically confirm many facts, propaganda was then at the level.
        2. 0
          23 March 2012 16: 49
          Igarr, Rafaello Giovagnoli in the novel "Spartacus" has a scene where Spartacus speaks to the patricians (Catiline, Varro, Caesar) with a program of reforms, so to speak, on slavery ---- THIS IS A TALENTED but fictional pseudo-historical work !! they have never met in real life and would not have met! never - who is Spartak and who are they !!!! think for yourself !!!!
      2. 0
        23 March 2012 16: 44
        raptor_falloutI agree with you, but it didn’t succeed in silencing-SPARTAK almost put RIM on his knees !!!!!! Yes AND HE was DANGEROUS AS AT THE TIME -
        Ganiball !!!
        1. +1
          23 March 2012 20: 43
          So then the novel ... I accented precisely on this ..
          But ..history, .. Roman ... speaks about it .. extremely reluctantly, extremely evasive .. from the words of someone .. It feels like they have nothing to say but to catch up with the fog.

          I will seem, of course, strange ... but my opinion is some sort of bred.
          Too picturesque the army of slaves walks back and forth across the metropolis ... and Rome - it seems there is no business .. then one moron will be sent, then another.
          Then - suddenly three at once - but not anyhow anyone .. but the best generals of Rome.
          All this is strange. Like in a soap opera.

          Guys ... serious sources say ... all this Roman literature is a product of 13-17 centuries of our era. A remake is all. And seriously discuss ... I can not.
          Spartak is very good as a hero .. as a model ... as an ideal. There’s nothing to say.
          But ... or fairy tales ... or reality.
          What will we stop at? Therefore, I say ... my opinion.
  7. +2
    23 March 2012 10: 59
    the adaptation of the 10 episodes "Spartacus, Blood and Sand" is a rather colorful picture. A hero with a capital letter. The greatest courage man. A worthy husband of his people.
    1. raptor_fallout
      0
      23 March 2012 11: 06
      Quote: ars_pro
      the adaptation of the 10 episodes "Spartacus, Blood and Sand" is a rather colorful picture. A hero with a capital letter. The greatest courage man. A worthy husband of his people.

      You’re still reading a book! - you can’t compare it with the film! I read it, I did not sleep all night!
  8. Rodver
    -2
    23 March 2012 11: 07
    As a result, in a difficult match, Spartak lost to CSKA. The people are the people, and the Army, represented by the legions of Mark Crassus, is the army. Although I am a fan of Spartak.
    1. +2
      23 March 2012 16: 58
      Rodver, for the destruction of SPARTAK, all the Roman generals were recalled! all !!!! Pompey, Lucullus !! belay and Crassus was given dictatorial powers !!!! (this was done only at the time of mortal danger to the state !!!!) this is not Khuhra-Muhra !! winked just imagine the level of threat if the proud Romans did this !!!! feel
  9. +1
    23 March 2012 11: 49
    There is a version that Spartak was not a Thracian at all, but was by origin the same Italian, but the war was civil, there were enough impoverished layers of that era, plus the Samnites, who were always dissatisfied with the politics of Rome, rather Caesar had nothing to do with it, as far as I remember, Crassus was friends and an assistant at that time, Katelina then lit up, in the conspiracy of 68, and at 73 he still reaped the fruits of the scriptures ...
  10. Green 413-1685
    +1
    23 March 2012 12: 09
    Yes. There are fewer and fewer veterans remembering that heroic time ...
    But seriously, the truth is even at that time, if it was known to anyone, then to the units that were silent. And now, by no effort can we unearth what was really there, only build hypotheses, to the extent of our historical knowledge, fantasy and social. beliefs. One thing is certain, that he was a man of outstanding qualities.
    Personally, I’m only annoyed by the desire of figures from the entertainment industry to try on those events, turn them into an entertaining show for the modern public, most of which have forgotten what a real war of destruction and the struggle to the death is. In any case, in the West.
    1. raptor_fallout
      +3
      23 March 2012 12: 16
      Quote: Green 413-1685
      Personally, I’m only annoyed by the desire of figures from the entertainment industry to try on those events, turn them into an entertaining show for the modern public, most of which have forgotten what a real war of destruction and the struggle to the death is. In any case, in the West.

      Now he would be called a terrorist or opposition, depending on the political situation (((
  11. orion-sticks
    +1
    23 March 2012 14: 50
    That two thousand years ago, that now, the generals win wars, but politicians begin all the same.
  12. -3
    23 March 2012 16: 13
    Sorry, a little rest. smile http://podkontrol.ru/ кому не сложно подпишите пожалуйста петицию о принятии закона "О контроле над иностранным финансированием некоммерческих организаций"
  13. zavesa01
    0
    23 March 2012 17: 12
    Another interesting fact of history, the gladiators were FREE people who signed certain treaties. So not everything is as smooth as on paper.
  14. -2
    23 March 2012 18: 52
    Crassus won the battle, and Spartak the war!
  15. Brut
    0
    23 March 2012 23: 26
    grizzlir,
    He cannot be put with Alexander. Despite the fact that Macedon had little power, he was only a little over 20 years old. And Spartak ?! I’m not trying to condemn Spartak, but Alexander did much more than Spartak! Example: capture of Persia. A Spartak ? Rebellion that was ultimately crushed!
    1. 0
      24 March 2012 17: 17
      yes but at what cost.
  16. 0
    April 19 2013 15: 47
    A little about the level of threat to Rome: the loss of two eagles (a symbol of the Roman legion) during the Parthian war caused the announcement of mourning in Rome. When they defeated Crixus, 5 Roman eagles were found in his camp ...