Russia is preparing an answer for the US media for the persecution of RT

In connection with statements by the US authorities that they may block the broadcasting of the Russian Today Russia TV channel to the entire territory of the United States, Russia is considering possible retaliatory measures. In particular, the Prosecutor General’s Office advocates the introduction of such retaliatory measures as blocking the broadcasting of several major American media to Russia. Reports about it "Interfax".

Officially, the list of such media is not voiced. However, earlier representatives, for example, of the deputies corps were in favor of recognizing the undesirable activity in Russia of the television channel CNN.

Margarita Simonyan, editor-in-chief of Russia Today, speaking at the 60 Minutes program, said the following:

In the United States, they simply cannot understand the simple thing: if they throw us out (RT), then they will throw them out of Russia (the media).

Recall that in the United States put forward a requirement for the following RT: register as a foreign agent. This will lead to the fact that the American authorities will transfer under their control virtually all of the financing mechanisms of the channel, up to and including blocking of some of them. In turn, this may lead to the final closure of the channel for the American audience. And this is a contradiction of the American Constitution, guaranteeing freedom of speech.

Russia claims that there are enough legal mechanisms to apply similar legislation to foreign media.

Margarita Simonyan referred to the President of the United States, Donald Trump, who calls on the US regulatory authorities to deal with the "fake news", which is enough in the United States. These are the US television channels and newspapers that Trump is sure are publishing false news. Trump on Twitter:

Why the Senate Committee on Intelligence will not deal with fake news networks in our country. After all, most of them are simply made up of news.

Comments

[Partyzan]

Russia claims that there are enough legal mechanisms to apply similar legislation to foreign media.

time is given - in the same way and in the same place

[Vend]

Quote: Partyzan

Russia claims that there are enough legal mechanisms to apply similar legislation to foreign media.

time is given - in the same way and in the same place

Yes, these channels are not so many watch. But RT will block it will not be very good. Although RT will go to the Internet, but you can’t block the network

[Monos]

In principle, they can be understood: it’s a shame when most Americans trust RT rather than CNN. Abydna, slush ...

[Shurik70]

Only it is necessary not to be limited to one or two channels, but proportionally.
Does Russia have only one TV channel in the USA? Well, that means closing it is a 100% blockage of Russian broadcasting. So we need to close 100%.
We do not need a mirror response to the “foreign agent”. I mean, in response to US control over the broadcasting of the Republic of Tajikistan, they demand control over the broadcasting of their channels. Hemorrhoids will be more than the result. Our chip is in the United States not controlled broadcasting in the United States.
And they will close RT - it doesn’t matter. The Internet - it is the Internet. It is quite possible to "broadcast" in the United States and from the territory of Russia, in English.

[Partyzan]

Abydna, slush ...

finally

[Monos]

Hi bob

Quote: Partyzan

finally

And then there was the Senate committee.

[Partyzan]

Quote: Monos

Hi bob

Quote: Partyzan

finally

And then there was the Senate committee.

[analgin]

Quote: Monos

In principle, they can be understood: it’s a shame when most americans I trust RT rather than CNN. Abydna, slush ...

Of the eight thousand who voted, it is unknown who knows where? Himself not funny?
Can I see RT ratings in the USA and England, for example? And when you do not find them (but you will not find them), then I will teach you how to find out.
But I warn you right away: you won’t like the result,

[Monos]

Quote: analgin

Himself is not funny?

No, not funny. The survey, of course, is not representative, but the argument is "It is not known who, it is not known where." also not convincing. Who voted, he voted. And your holy faith in ratings simply amuses me. Who are these ratings? American structures on the choke. And you suggest that we freeze in awe of them? And then, let's turn on the logic and think about it, would there be all this rascal, if on Americanism RT would not cover their propagandons like a bull sheep? I think no. So this survey is much closer to reality than your ratings.

[analgin]

Quote: Monos

Quote: analgin

Himself is not funny?

No, not funny. The survey, of course, is not representative, but the argument is "It is not known who, it is not known where." also not convincing. Who voted, he voted. :

I just now submitted your comment if the result of the "survey" were the opposite.

Quote: Monos

And your holy faith in ratings simply amuses me. .:

On health.

Quote: Monos

Who are these ratings? American structures on the choke.

Here you have the same Nielsen rating for 15 years (when there was no such attention to RT), because RT is simply NOT AT ALL there. Those. the number of viewers of this "powerful" company was so insignificant that it was considered useless to even include in the rating. http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/reference/list-o
f-how-many-homes-each-cable-network-is-in-as-of-j
uly-2015/434373 /.
I can cite the British television rating for the same period, where is the share of RT, attention! - 0,3% of the audience. And what can you answer? That's right, NOTHING.
Note: for more than 10 years of its existence RT has never been! did not publish its rating from any independent source.

Quote: Monos

And then, let's turn on the logic and think about it, would there be all this rascal, if on Americanism RT would not cover their propagandons like a bull sheep? I think no. So this survey is much closer to reality than your ratings.

Do not think, but try to bring at least something to reinforce your version. To such a connoisseur of American and European television kitchens, I hope this will not be difficult?

[Monos]

Quote: analgin

To such a connoisseur of American and European television kitchens, I hope this will not be difficult?

I am not at all a connoisseur of "telecookie" (a rather nasty word, I can imagine what kind of slop the soup is made from), neither American, nor any other. I just try to be guided by logic, common sense and a simple, straightforward analysis of the obvious facts. I leave the right to juggle with “ratings” to people who can read and write, but who have not learned to think. And the facts are as follows: the British and Americans have been trying for the second year to organize the persecution of RT; The President of America called the American media "fake news"; "70 million people watch RT every week, with half of them - 35 million doing it every day" (Ipsos study); the number of views on the Web has exceeded 3 billion
And the Nielsen rating can be rolled up, because it’s a trash can. Nielsen includes in the rating only those channels that pay companies for the opportunity to be represented on it. RT does not pay Nielsen, so the company does not measure the audience of the TV channel.

[zhekazs]

Quote: Monos

RT does not pay Nielsen, so the company does not measure the audience of the TV channel.

+
This is the whole "salt".

[analgin]

Quote: Monos

I just try to be guided by logic, common sense and a simple, straightforward analysis of the obvious facts.:

And what is this expressed in? The fact that you do not believe the rating of the same Nielsen, and spread the screen dude with an incomprehensible "survey" of as many as 8 thousand people? This is what you call: “guided by logic, common sense and a simple, straightforward analysis of obvious facts”?

Quote: Monos

I leave the right to juggle with “ratings” to people who can read and write, but who have not learned to think. And the facts are as follows: the British and Americans have been trying for the second year to organize the persecution of RT;

"But not learned to think," are you to yourself? After all, I specifically brought you research BEFORE "the British and Americans already second year They are trying to organize the persecution of RT. "And who can think here?

Quote: Monos

"70 million people watch RT every week, and half of them - 35 million - do it every day" (Ipsos study)

And where is this research? You, like Simonyan, will not show him either?

Quote: Monos

The number of views on the web has exceeded 3 billion.

You probably mean "Network" youtube? Well then, yes ... Someone else’s video from phones, surveillance cameras and other television channels, onto which RT stuck its logo. There is something to be proud of!

Quote: Monos

And the Nielsen rating can be rolled up, because it’s a trash can. Nielsen includes in the rating only those channels that pay companies for the opportunity to be represented on it. RT does not pay Nielsen, so the company does not measure the audience of the TV channel.

Tell this to Simonyan, who proudly told how the “trash” Nielsen did research and found out which RT was a successful, successful company.

MOSCOW, JULY 15, 2014 - RT's weekly audience in seven of the largest US cities has doubled, a Nielsen survey says *. Residents of Washington, DC, New York and other American cities prefer RT to other international TV channels, such as Euronews, Deutsche Welle and France 24.]

https://www.rt.com/about-us/press-releases/rt-aud
ience-double-us /
True, Nielsen himself for some reason does not know about this and there is nothing left but to believe the word Margarita.
So here, the "expert".

[Sling cutter]

Quote: Monos

And then, let's turn on the logic and think about it, would there be all this rascal, if on Americanism RT would not cover their propagandons like a bull sheep?

the whole question is, how many% of states finally know what rt is? and why the bolt do they need it?

[japs]

In fact, there is RT in space, if you want to watch, a hundred greens for a plate and a tuner, though your hands should be out of your shoulders. With this, the mattresses strained.

[Baloo]

Russia is preparing an answer for the US media for the persecution of RT
Why so late?
The answer to any sanctions must be instant so that the fly does not have time to fly.
Is it difficult to foresee, think through, prepare for an answer?
Why is it tango, and why in this tango is Russia led by our potential adversary, who openly calls us a threat?

[analgin]

Quote: Balu

Russia is preparing an answer for the US media for the persecution of RT
Why so late?

What sanctions are you talking about? Let them register with a foreign agent, business! Just like in Russia.
By the way, one third of the entire RT site traffic from Russia itself. They themselves are convinced of their significance. It’s funny.

[Uryukc]

Quote: analgin

By the way, a third of ALL RT website traffic worldwide

Website traffic ?? Probably the broadcast statistics will be more important, no?

Quote: analgin

They themselves are convinced of their significance. It’s funny.

We are strengthened in this belief by your masters from the USA)) What can you tell about the significance of the institutions of your new homeland? You tell us, and we laugh))

[analgin]

Quote: Uryukc

Quote: analgin

By the way, a third of ALL RT website traffic worldwide

Website traffic ?? Maybe broadcast statistics will be more important, no?

What kind of statistics is this? Enlighten.

[Uryukc]

How many and what kind of people does RT watch in broadcast countries ..

[analgin]

Quote: Uryukc

How many and what kind of people does RT watch in broadcast countries ..

Ask Simonyan, maybe she will say. Only she is afraid for some reason to conduct such research. Probably, that would not be disgraced, and then it will be difficult to justify for the 300 million dollars spent on it. and such a meager output result.

[Uryukc]

Quote: analgin

Ask Simonyan, maybe she will say.

You don’t need to ask Simonyan, you can just google it.

Quote: analgin

such a meager output result.

Such a meager result that it needs to be discussed in Congress)) Republicans will not agree with you. A scanty result is your comments))

[japs]

You, aspirin, see a little narrowly ...
It can be seen that your bell tower is low, your Mac limited.

[Sling cutter]

Quote: Balu

Why so late?

cabbage-nightingale-litter-tv will tell about stiff indignation)))))

Quote: Balu

The answer to any sanctions must be instant so that the fly does not have time to fly.

Do you belong to that category of "brutal" muscins that can bite vodka with their lower lip?
And if you pull this lip on your head, you can disappear! Be careful and polite with passengers! Give way to the elderly and women with children !!!
For you, in the USSR they wrote it !!!

[Baloo]

Quote: Stroporez

And if you pull this lip on your head, you can disappear!

Don’t dust, don’t dust. Sleep well. Do not forget to pull diapers on your brains.

[Sling cutter]

Quote: Balu

Don’t dust, don’t dust. Sleep well. Do not forget to pull diapers on your brains.

One hundred pardonoff if offended
And I keep my brains separately in a safe, well, so as not to gather dust

[NEXUS]

Quote: Partyzan

time is given - in the same way and in the same place

The information war is an integral part of any global war. And the United States and I are in a state of war since 45. Starting from 47, in my year, the United States 57 times! Developed a military plan of a nuclear strike on our territory if someone else believes that we are partners and friends.

[analgin]

Quote: NEXUS

. Starting from 47, in my year, the United States 57 times! Developed a military plan of a nuclear strike on our territory if someone else believes that we are partners and friends.

You are mistaken, 157 times. Any nightingales will tell you this on TV.

[NEXUS]

Quote: analgin

You are mistaken, 157 times. Any nightingales will tell you this on TV.

Of course he’ll tell, dear ... after all, such plans as Troyan, Bushweeker, Crankshaft, Hafmun, Cogwill, Offtek, Chariotir (1948), Dropshot was not at all ... they dreamed of Solovyov, while you were Dartanyan and a recognized expert.

[analgin]

Quote: NEXUS

Quote: analgin

You are mistaken, 157 times. Any nightingales will tell you this on TV.

Of course he’ll tell, dear ... after all, such plans as Troyan, Bushweeker, Crankshaft, Hafmun, Cogwill, Offtek, Chariotir (1948), Dropshot was not at all ... they dreamed of Solovyov, while you were Dartanyan and a recognized expert.

Where did you get this information, can I find out? Do RT?

[NEXUS]

Quote: analgin

Where did you get this information, can I find out? Do RT?

That is, you are so illiterate or want to seem so that you turned on the "fool", pretending that you do not know about the development of such plans in the USA ... Google is at hand, for each such scenario it is easy to find the Old. And the fact that you mow here under the "fool" does not add honor to you, dear.

[analgin]

Quote: NEXUS

Quote: analgin

Where did you get this information, can I find out? Do RT?

That is, you are so illiterate or want to seem so that you turned on the "fool", pretending that you do not know about the development of such plans in the USA ... Google is at hand, for each such scenario it is easy to find the Old. And the fact that you mow here under the "fool" does not add honor to you, dear.

I am illiterate and, unlike you, I do not know about such plans (57 pieces).
You, unlike me, smart and competent, do not mow under the fool and are responsible for your words (so far in words).
So show it in practice. So?

[NEXUS]

Quote: analgin

I am illiterate and unlike you. I do not know about such plans (57 pieces).

But very, I must say, primitively, trying to troll.

Quote: analgin

So show it in practice. So?

I repeat for those who are in the tank, you have Google at hand ... there are all the sources. Do not want to search, for you, lovers and admirers of the whole mattress, there is an undeniable source-WIKIPEDIA. Take a look there. Everything is described in an accessible language and chewed with names and dates.

[analgin]

Quote: NEXUS

I repeat for those who are in the tank, you have Google at hand ... there are all the sources. Do not want to search, for you, lovers and admirers of the whole mattress, there is an undeniable source-WIKIPEDIA. Take a look there. Everything is described in an accessible language and chewed with names and dates.

You can link to Wikipedia, where "everything is described in an accessible language and chewed with names and dates." I did not find.
Is that not difficult for you?

[NEXUS]

Quote: analgin

Is that not difficult for you?

It’s not a question ... here is at the WHAT .. Enlighten ..
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%BB%D0%B0%
D0% BD_% C2% ABDropshot% C2% BB
And here’s another link from an English source ..
http://www.allworldwars.com/Dropshot%20-%20Americ
an%20Plan%20for%20War%20with%20the%20Soviet%20Uni
on% 201957.html

[analgin]

Quote: NEXUS

Quote: analgin

Is that not difficult for you?

It’s not a question ... here is at the WHAT .. Enlighten ..
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%BB%D0%B0%
D0% BD_% C2% ABDropshot% C2% BB
And here’s another link from an English source ..
http://www.allworldwars.com/Dropshot%20-%20Americ
an%20Plan%20for%20War%20with%20the%20Soviet%20Uni
on% 201957.html

Let's say. It remains to give 56 more such links. Well, give at least 9 such plans and we will assume that it was so.
By the way, why did the Americans develop as many as 57 plans? This is not a Russian PF that changes its pension policy 3 times in five years.

[NEXUS]

Quote: analgin

Let's say. It remains to give 56 more such links. Well, give at least 9 such plans and we will assume that it was so.

Listen, well, if you don’t know how to use a search engine, so, I'm sorry, this is not my headache. I gave you the name of such plans ... look for yourself, there are no servants here. Hammer in the search engine-USSR nuclear strike plan and follow the links and you will be happy.

Quote: analgin

By the way, why did the Americans develop as many as 57 such plans?

And what do you think?

[analgin]

Quote: NEXUS

Listen, well, if you don’t know how to use a search engine, so, I'm sorry, this is not my headache. I gave you the name of such plans ... look for yourself, there are no servants here. Hammer in the search engine-USSR nuclear strike plan and follow the links and you will be happy.

Scored and passed. Nowhere is the truth, did not find mention of 57 plans. You are the only one who is aware of this ...

Quote: NEXUS

And what do you think?

I think from "idleness." By the way, how many similar plans did the USSR have?

[NEXUS]

Quote: analgin

You are the only one who is aware of this ...

Well, yes ... the Pentagon is the only one I know about. Do not even hesitate.

Quote: analgin

By the way, how many similar plans did the USSR have?

The USSR did not have such plans, as the doctrine of the Union was defensive all the way. And there were plans for a RESPONSE NUCLEAR STRIKE. Feel the difference?

[analgin]

Quote: NEXUS

Quote: analgin

You are the only one who is aware of this ...

Well, yes ... the Pentagon is the only one I know about.

So you are already two. True, the Pentagon does not confirm this ... however, like you.

Quote: NEXUS

.A there were plans for a NUCLEAR RESPONSE.

So how much is the response?

[APASUS]

Quote: analgin

Quote: NEXUS

Quote: analgin

You are mistaken, 157 times. Any nightingales will tell you this on TV.

Of course he’ll tell, dear ... after all, such plans as Troyan, Bushweeker, Crankshaft, Hafmun, Cogwill, Offtek, Chariotir (1948), Dropshot was not at all ... they dreamed of Solovyov, while you were Dartanyan and a recognized expert.

Where did you get this information, can I find out? Do RT?

However, I sucked it from my finger. Have you tried to teach history?

[analgin]

Quote: APASUS

However, I sucked it from my finger. Have you tried to teach history?

Here I’m even afraid to ask about proofs ... Something to "go to Google" yourself is already pretty tired of looking for something that is not there and that for some reason you yourself cannot find.

[APASUS]

Quote: analgin

Here I’m even afraid to ask about proofs.

You have not even kindly tried to look for something, but already express doubts.
just for example:
Dropshot Plan
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%BB%D0%B0%
D0% BD_% C2% ABDropshot% C2% BB

[ALLxANDr]

I’ll intervene a bit in search engines. Try changing the search engine to Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo or any other (I don’t specifically make links to Russian search engines) ..
Here are some links (through which you can find the rest, if you want of course):
- https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%BB%D0%B0%
D0% BD_% C2% ABDropshot% C2% BB
- https://rg.ru/2015/12/24/bomba.html
- http://ruxpert.ru/%D0%9F%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%8B_
%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B0_%D0%BF%D0%BE
_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8
%D1%8E_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%A1%D0%A1%D0%A1%D0%A0
- https://topwar.ru/74867-amerikanskie-plany-yadern
yh-udarov-po-gorodam-sssr.html
- https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/1110745.htm
l

RT may have covered this topic too, but I did not check, due to the sufficiency of the above links.

Although ... even RT write on this topic:
- https://russian.rt.com/opinion/354889-kononenko-y
adernaya-voyna

[analgin]

Quote: ALLxANDr

I’ll intervene a bit in search engines. Try changing the search engine to Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo or any other (I don’t specifically make links to Russian search engines) ..
Here are some links (through which you can find the rest, if you want of course):
- https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%BB%D0%B0%

Well? Where are there 57 plans?

[ALLxANDr]

What does not suit you? It is also written there, the plans were constantly being rewritten and either a city or a group of cities was added to each new plan. How much do you think they were? With justification, please.

[analgin]

Quote: ALLxANDr

What does not suit you? It is also written there, the plans were constantly being rewritten and either a city or a group of cities was added to each new plan. How much do you think they were? With justification, please.

I think that when someone claims that there were 57 plans and cannot even give 10 links (not to mention 57), the question: “What do you think yourself? With justification, please,” it looks to put it mildly ...

[ALLxANDr]

Have you decided to permanently spam this thread? 57 links to each plan you do not need? 10 links I was even too lazy to look for you, because no one has an interest in satisfying your ego. For myself, my beloved (if I really wanted to find exactly 57 links), I am ready to spend half a day sifting out unnecessary and duplicate links, but for you ... only after paying for my work. Each hour of my time spent searching for links will cost 2 thousand rubles. You will refuse to pay, because the sheepskin is not worth it. But if you were looking at least a little, then you would have found. And it would be free for you. And if you are too lazy to look, then for others it is even more so.

[analgin]

Quote: ALLxANDr

Have you decided to permanently spam this thread? 57 links to each plan you do not need? 10 links I was even too lazy to look for you, because no one has an interest in satisfying your ego. For myself, my beloved (if I really wanted to find exactly 57 links), I am ready to spend half a day sifting out unnecessary and duplicate links, but for you ... only after paying for my work. Each hour of my time spent searching for links will cost 2 thousand rubles. You will refuse to pay, because the sheepskin is not worth it. But if you were looking at least a little, then you would have found. And it would be free for you. And if you are too lazy to look, then for others it is even more so.

Let's make it easier. Name the amount for which you (if the previous person merged) will find me exactly 57 (fifty seven) plans for a US nuclear attack on the USSR and I will transfer it to any moderator of this resource. And after you provide them - you leave money to yourself.
If you do not provide, then send me half of what was requested.
Well, how?

[Reserve officer]

Freedom of speech in the media has long turned into freedom of lies and provocations. In our country this also sins here and there, but what has been happening in the American media with regard to Russia has long passed all sorts of rational boundaries. This is, indeed, an information war. So, if a precedent is created with RT, then we will have the full moral right to clean the information field in Russia. Closing candidates - more than enough.

[analgin]

Quote: Stock Officer

So, if a precedent is created with RT, then we will have the full moral right to clean the information field in Russia. Closing candidates - more than enough.

What frequency is CNN broadcasting in Voronezh, Pskov, Samara, Yekaterinburg ...? That's right, no way.

[ALLxANDr]

Several people have already told you that you do not know how to use search engines. Maybe you should listen and do something for your part?

- CNN in Voronezh, Lipetsk: http://tv.cmlt.tv/program?town=241&day=010920
17 & channel = 94 & time = 0
https://tv.mail.ru/voronezh/channel/835/
- https://ntvplus.ru/channel/cnn-international-338
- https://www.tricolor.tv/search/?q=cnn

Quote: analgin

That's right, no way.

And here it’s not right! This channel is available throughout Russia. There are in Krasnodar, Moscow, Tyumen, Irkutsk, Vladivostok. Don't like satellite broadcasting? CNN is on cable television.

[analgin]

Quote: ALLxANDr

Several people have already told you that you do not know how to use search engines. Maybe you should listen and do something for your part?

These are those people who can not answer basic questions and send for them (that he would search) in Google?

Quote: ALLxANDr

- CNN in Voronezh, Lipetsk: http://tv.cmlt.tv/program?town=241&day=010920
17 & channel = 94 & time = 0
https://tv.mail.ru/voronezh/channel/835/
- https://ntvplus.ru/channel/cnn-international-338
- https://www.tricolor.tv/search/?q=cnn

Well, why are you putting me

CNN International

The international version of the American CNN news channel, created in 1980 year and the first in the world to start broadcasting in 24/7 format. CNN International is currently distributed in more than Xnumx countries. The channel provides news to its audience. from around the world - political, cultural, sports, financial, as well as analytical and documentary programs, journalism, reviews of international business.

This channel, like RTTV-America, broadcasts exclusively to Russia, has its own chic office in Russia and receives $ 300 million from the state?

Quote: ALLxANDr

Don't like satellite broadcasting? CNN is on cable television.

And also on the Internet!

[ALLxANDr]

Quote: analgin

Well, why are you putting me

- these are links to your favorite cnn. You wrote that they did not broadcast it. And it’s still being broadcast))

Quote: analgin

Quote: ALLxANDr
Don't like satellite broadcasting? CNN is on cable television.

And also on the Internet! good

You correctly noticed that cnn also broadcast on the Internet, so that it can be watched even through a mobile phone) And here you raised the whole thread, how much they offend the poor CNN channel. Indeed - very unjustly clamped on all sides)

[APASUS]

Quote: analgin

What frequency is CNN broadcasting in Voronezh, Pskov, Samara, Yekaterinburg ...? That's right, no way.

I am amazed at the train of your thoughts, just like from a movie ................

[analgin]

Quote: APASUS

Quote: analgin

What frequency is CNN broadcasting in Voronezh, Pskov, Samara, Yekaterinburg ...? That's right, no way.

I am amazed at the train of your thoughts, just like from a movie.

For the future, you'd better not be dishonored. For example, I can directly watch



... and much more. These are live broadcasts. What can you watch, except for the Zvezda, RenTV, and other fake channels?
And most importantly - to understand what they are talking about? Do you speak languages, at least at the elementary school level? Be careful, otherwise I can check.

[APASUS]

Quote: analgin

... and much more. These are live broadcasts. What can you watch, except for the Zvezda, RenTV, and other fake channels?

You won’t believe it. I sometimes watch the Fox News Channel and read Haaretz, but less and less I get myself such indulgences.

Quote: analgin

And most importantly - to understand what they are talking about? Do you speak languages, at least at the elementary school level? Be careful, otherwise I can check.

Snot erase

[analgin]

Quote: APASUS

Quote: analgin

... and much more. These are live broadcasts. What can you watch, except for the Zvezda, RenTV, and other fake channels?

You won’t believe I sometimes watch Fox News Channel

Well, I posted a screen on the Fox News Channel. Let us now you.

Quote: APASUS

Quote: analgin

And most importantly - to understand what they are talking about? Do you speak languages, at least at the elementary school level? Be careful, otherwise I can check.

Snot erase

Why are you so nervous? Do not own?

[APASUS]

Quote: analgin

Why are you so nervous? Do not own?

You can not lay out a copy of the second passport or can the bank details?
Why is it that you suddenly decided to test me weakly.

[analgin]

Quote: APASUS

Why is it that you suddenly decided to test me weakly.

Well, if we are already on “you”, then: you’re balabol a lot, but as you ask “to answer for the bazaar” - you merge.

[APASUS]

Quote: analgin

Well, if we are already on “you”, then: you’re balabol a lot, but as you ask “to answer for the bazaar” - you merge.

You bullied me dear.
On Saturday I will be waiting for you Kauppapuistikko 15, 6. kerros Vaasa Finland. Before lunch, at the checkpoint you will say what you need Primo OY, at the factory ask Pavo from Russia.
Take money with you, I think there will be something to talk about, for one clip your loss.

[Partyzan]

if someone else believes that we are partners and friends.

spit, if you believe it - then they’ll kick off mom, don’t worry

[Sergey-svs]

Quote: Partyzan

Russia claims that there are enough legal mechanisms to apply similar legislation to foreign media.
time is given - in the same way and in the same place

It will be just a disaster and a form of horror for our liberalsni! And where are all the Shenderovichs, Makarevichs and others - “rays of freedom and truth in the dark realm of Putin’s propaganda”, now they will scream and pour slop on Russia ?! If only one “Echo” remains, they will wrangle there and rest in line to the microphone, all the more this shit and so few now listen!

[Kenxnumx]

Air Force Office should be slightly taxed by a tax audit

[Crowe]

This is an English channel! Ours does not dare to do this until the British begin to block our television channels.

[Professor]

In the United States, they simply cannot understand the simple thing: if they throw us out (RT), then they will throw them out of Russia (the media).

For me, the news is that in Russia someone is watching CNN.

Recall that in the United States put forward a requirement for the following RT: register as a foreign agent. This will lead to the fact that the American authorities will transfer under their control virtually all of the financing mechanisms of the channel, up to and including blocking of some of them. In turn, this may lead to the final closure of the channel for the American audience. And this is a contradiction of the American Constitution, guaranteeing freedom of speech.

1. Why was Simonyan so scared? What will everyone know her salary?
2. Do not confuse freedom of speech with freedom of propaganda.

PS

[aybolyt678]

Quote: Professor

Do not confuse freedom of speech with freedom of propaganda.

and do not confuse freedom with permissiveness. For words, comments, a compilation of facts you need to answer, better money, or freedom

[Baloo]

Quote: Professor

For me, the news is that in Russia someone is watching CNN.

And who is CNEN ???
What will everyone know her salary? And what about the salary?
Do not confuse freedom of speech with freedom of propaganda
What is American freedom of speech different from propaganda?
What such American laws did Simonyan violate?

[Professor]

Quote: Balu

And who is CNEN ???

That's it.

Quote: Balu

What such American laws did Simonyan violate?

She did not formalize her office in accordance with American laws. They do not cover it, but they demand that it be brought into compliance with the laws. And Simonyan in response threatens (by the way, is it in her competence?) To CLOSE the American media.

Quote: Altona

Professor, have you watched at least one RT program?

I tried it. Sick and had to stop the session. I would ask all "journalists" Rush Tudey from Israel in 24 hours for a hopeless lie.

Quote: Altona

Anyway, Larry King and Ron Paul, and others who speak out on this channel are more interesting than your Ediot Ahronot.

Do you read Ediot Ahoronot? I doubt it.

Quote: Altona

And if you think the Americans themselves are propagandists, then this is the finish, Professor, this is a dead end for you

In the United States, there are plenty of everyone, and highly professional journalists and propagandists. It's all about their ratio.

PS
I personally at Rush Tudey (read Russia Today) are very annoyed by news about today's Russia and especially criticism of Kremlin policies. And their investigative journalism, in particular about corruption in the highest echelons of Russian power, is a paragraph in general.

[Victor-M]

Quote: Professor

1. Why was Simonyan so scared? What will everyone know her salary?

You better tell about your "black salary", otherwise you are worried about strangers. Envy is a bad thing.

[analgin]

Quote: Professor

1. Why was Simonyan so scared? What will everyone know her salary?

Not this one. Simonyan is afraid that they will find out the true scale of financing her activities and the miserly results of this, despite more than generous funding. As well as how much advertisers spend on advertising on this “successful” and “popular” channel.
PS: By the way, there are no rashtudi in America. RTTV-America is registered there, not a Russian company, but an American one.
So, no one “Russian” journalists oppresses there because of the lack thereof. Like the "Russian" company. Like this.

[Uryukc]

Quote: analgin

By the way, there are no rashtudi in America. RTTV-America is registered there, not a Russian company, but an American one.

Oooh this changes everything, it’s a direct disruption of the veil, you turned our world upside down with this life-giving truth, I’m going to overthrow Putin))

PS. In Russia, registered for example, "Coca-Cola Russia" does this mean that "Coca Cola" is a Russian company?

[bronnco]

All kinds of NGOs are prohibited in AI! Maybe in Russia all their NPOs are prohibited, neher balamamut liberalists and bulkiness. They got with the Siberian Republic, and the same euro-evr (evronews) with their "know-how" are those liars ...

[bronnco]

Instead, read the USA.

[Altona]

Quote: Professor

1. Why was Simonyan so scared? What will everyone know her salary?
2. Do not confuse freedom of speech with freedom of propaganda.

--------------------------
Professor, have you watched at least one RT program? Anyway, Larry King and Ron Paul, and others who speak out on this channel are more interesting than your Ediot Ahronot. And if you consider the Americans themselves to be propagandists, then this is the finish, Professor, this is a dead end for you. Do not engage in political comments and statements in the style of "did not look, but condemn", not comme il faut.

[assa67]

Quote: Reserve officer

if a precedent is created with RT, then we will have the full moral right to clean the information field in Russia. Closing candidates - more than enough.

agree .... from impunity, the mericosa has already settled on its head .... not to mention the story of our property in the USA ... to throw them out of eburg, and generally from the periphery, where their "diplomats" do whatever they want

[kartalovkolya]

There are enough mechanisms, but the "mechanics" seem to be paid by the Washington Regional Committee! To do this, you urgently need to throw the "liberal minx" from our regulatory and decision-making bodies!

[Rostislav]

Anxious, however. RT will be closed, and then our menacingly will think for 2 years which of their channels to cover.
They still cannot come up with how to respond to the seizure of Russian diplomatic property. When they meet again, it will look like an attack, not a response.

[Victor-M]

Quote: Professor

I tried it. Sick and had to stop the session. I would ask all "journalists" Rush Tudey from Israel in 24 hours for a hopeless lie.

But "Charlie Ebdo" with pleasure and admiration, watch and read, probably the appetite wakes up an escaped newly-made Jew is a "professor."

[Prutkov]

Quote: analgin

Quote: Professor

1. Why was Simonyan so scared? What will everyone know her salary?

Not this one. Simonyan is afraid that they will find out the true scale of financing her activities and the miserly results of this, despite more than generous funding. As well as how much advertisers spend on advertising on this “successful” and “popular” channel.
PS: By the way, there are no rashtudi in America. RTTV-America is registered there, not a Russian company, but an American one.
So, no one “Russian” journalists oppresses there because of the lack thereof. Like the "Russian" company. Like this.

Yes, she is not afraid of disclosing the amount of funding. All the same, the American channels will not surpass the amount of funding for RT. Simply, through the actions of the US government creates an informational noise around the channel. Margarita and this is necessary - to attract the attention of the audience. The principle is simple - if the state closes this channel, then the channel is telling the truth. Just like with meldonium. WADA's ban on the use of meldonium increased its sales volumes. I think that Kaspersky would be worthwhile to promote sales volumes against the backdrop of the State Department’s bans. Like, Kaspersky does not merge user data to Big Brother.

[analgin]

Quote: Rods

The principle is simple - if the state closes this channel, then the channel is telling the truth.

Yes, no one closes it. Let it register as it should and continue to "work". Anyway, even with such ambitious free advertising, no one in the states is watching RT. Or are there figures refuting this?

[Professor]

Quote: analgin

Anyway, even with such ambitious free advertising, no one in the states is watching RT. Or are there numbers disproving this?

Confirming there is. Here is a rating of the first hundred channels in the USA. I can’t find Rush Tudey there. Where is the money, Margatite?
https://www.scribd.com/document/350063701/May-17-
P2-all-cable-pdf #

[Abracadabrus]

Here are some links (through which you can find the rest, if you want of course):

So what? That got Comrade Analgin (it would be better if he called Purgen) whose links so earnestly sought so what? Something answered? Recognized his incompetence? No. He simply switched to another topic and went on to carry the verbal blizzard further. Paid trolls, they are such trolls

[Abracadabrus]

Here Analgin asks a question

Quote: analgin

By the way, how many similar plans did the USSR have?

Indeed, how much? Well, if he is so demanding on the evidence from others, then he himself would have brought a couple of links? No, I didn’t. Interesting, but looking? Probably searched, since he complains

Something to "go to Google" itself is already fed up with the order to look for something that is not

[ALLxANDr]

Quote: analgin

Let's make it easier. Name the amount for which you (if the previous person merged) will find me exactly 57 (fifty seven) plans for a US nuclear attack on the USSR and I will transfer it to any moderator of this resource. And after you provide them - you leave money to yourself.
If you do not provide, then send me half of what was requested.
Well, how?

Oh Troll, did you really want to play recklessly? ) The previous opponent was tired of butting you. For any reasonable explanation, you include the "fool" and for some reason you think that they found a team here that owes you something. For example: to prove something to you, to convince you, to change your point of view, to explain something .. Let’s so, since you wanted me to spend time on you - we’ll play)) You pay for each sent link separately forward, as well like I have to spend time ahead of you (so that my time spent is not in vain). Those. your money is my time. It is possible through the moderator. You can immediately on my card. Each link will cost inexpensively - 500 rubles. I will look for links until you pay, and only so. This is a great offer.