Konstantin Semin on the highest rating of "United Russia": the truth or a fraud?

9
The United Russia electoral rating in mid-September updated the annual maximum and amounted to 52,9%, follows from the VTsIOM survey results. Commented publicist, TV presenter, the leader of the project "Last Call" Konstantin Semin.



9 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    5 October 2017 18: 44
    I would understand if several equal parties went on the same level. Then one could talk about fraud there. But when there is one big party of power and a bunch of small, contented with crumbs, then from whom it could steal the voice? It sounds just as ridiculous as if in the 70s they said that the Communist Party attributed votes to itself. belay
  2. +1
    5 October 2017 22: 24
    QUESTION NOT IN %%
    IMPORTANT - NO FEEDBACK
    THE UNIONS HAVE GONE, PARTCOMES, party controls have gone, over time I had to come up with ONF-

    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PARTIES was not enough to understand the "aspirations" of the people !!!!!!
    not everything is decided by elections, there are other forms of expressing our opinion and making a collective decision “where will we go” (not only with Piglet people go ..)
    TODAY, TEACHERS AND DOCTORS TAKE DISCHARGES AND ANSWERS ABOUT LIFE GIVE + PRIEST (NOT POP) AND Cops
    The authorities went into "lawmaking and PR" (without feedback) did the right thing - the rating has grown, it’s bad - we’ll fix it, but time will pass (and money)
    --- coordinate in advance the vector of development and go checking against those "aspirations", to the detriment of oneself.
    and liberal capitalism (?), individualism requires "change" your shirt "for a new one more often"
  3. 0
    6 October 2017 04: 32
    I want to recall Zadornov’s words about the election. It was something like, "I fully admit that there were no frauds. But what’s interesting: turnout barely exceeded 50 percent. Just think about it: no more than a third of the population makes a choice for the whole country!"
  4. +5
    6 October 2017 09: 31
    EP enjoys such support, oh I implore YOU my slippers are laughing, see how they behave, at the sight of gdp like rabbits ready to lick his tracks. How many people did not come to the vote speaks of how they feel about this party. This is not a party, if there are people in it who have changed their partisanship five times, if tomorrow Putin says that his party will be created under a new name, 95% of these will go there and run there. And how many of these party members are currently under investigation or are already sitting. This is not a party, but XP .... knows what.
  5. +1
    6 October 2017 18: 21
    Because of the ente partika, people don’t walk, why just beat their feet. At the polls. They work with the electoral committee with a pen on paper as the general says that I’ve made seats. And the percentage is overstated at least 30 times.
  6. 0
    6 October 2017 20: 17
    Among my friends, acquaintances, work colleagues, there are no supporters of this party embezzler.
  7. +1
    7 October 2017 14: 21
    As long as there is something to eat on the table, nobody moves. So they will - balabolit.
  8. +15
    7 October 2017 17: 21
    Someone once said: He won the election, but I won the vote count
    United Russia... lol wassat
  9. 0
    7 October 2017 22: 05
    Quote: g1v2
    I would understand if several equal parties went on the same level. Then one could talk about fraud there. But when there is one big party of power and a bunch of small, contented with crumbs, then from whom it could steal the voice? It sounds just as ridiculous as if in the 70s they said that the Communist Party attributed votes to itself. belay

    The most stupid and illogical statement, let alone comparison! In 1996, the results were very successfully rigged, despite the presence of these "small, content crumbs ..."! wassat