B-52 will stay in service until 2040 year

65
There are currently 76 Boeing B-52 Stratofortress aircraft in service in the United States of America in service in 1955. These second-generation strategic missile bombers are still the main strategic force. aviation America's reports National Interest.

According to the new information, despite the fact that the B-52 was developed in the fifties of the last century to meet the demands of the Cold War, it still remains the main aircraft of the long-range bomber aircraft of the US Air Force and will remain so until the 2040 of the year. Service life was increased by ten years due to the new program of deep modernization designed to significantly improve the fighting qualities of the bomber.

B-52 will stay in service until 2040 year


During the modernization, it is proposed to equip all aircraft in service with digital data transmission channels, displays with digital maps, next-generation avionics, and new radio stations. In addition, capacity will be increased, B-52 will be able to carry more rocket and bomb load due to optimization of the internal space and installation of new underwing pylons. In addition, the aircraft will be able to use the new high-tech weapon.

Some upgrades are already underway. In recent months, eight aircraft have already been upgraded through the program Combat Network Communication Technology, or CONECT, aimed at upgrading communication systems between aircraft. The airplanes replaced the radio communication systems, some of the electronic components were replaced with new ones, it became possible for the crews of the aircraft during the flight to transmit mission data or information about the targets directly to the computers of the group's aircraft, without having to duplicate information by voice.

It should be noted that by 2040, strategic bombers will be in service for 85 years, which will be an unprecedented period for modern aviation. Only Russian Tu-95, which made their first flight in 1952 and adopted for use in 1956, will be able to compete with them.
  • http://nationalinterest.org/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

65 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    5 October 2017 16: 32
    “It is worth noting that by 2040 strategic bombers will be in service for 85 years, which will be an unprecedented period for modern aviation. Only Russian Tu-95s, which made their first flight in 1952 and put into service in 1956, can compete with them"...

    Hmm ... Can we make any conclusion?
    Both the B-52 and Tu-95 once, during development, were ahead of their time ... They turned out to be so successful that they still serve ....
    In 2040, the life of the B-52 will turn 85 years old ... Not sickly ...
    God grant only to humanity in general, and the USA and Russia - specifically, to live to see this 2040 ...
    And then, after all, everything goes to the fact that we shall cross each other ...
    1. +9
      5 October 2017 16: 35
      Quote: weksha50
      The USA and Russia - specifically, to live to see this 2040th ...
      And then after all, everything goes to the fact that I’m grinding each other

      When does that start?
      I won’t even plant potatoes this year - anyway, no one will crack it smile
      1. +1
        5 October 2017 16: 38
        Quote: Thrall
        I won’t even plant potatoes this year - anyway, no one will crack it


        You’ll still have time to plant and potato potatoes ... Until 2040 ...
        And so ... I’m not an oracle ... And in this matter, I don’t think ... I think it’s particularly appropriate ...
        The world does not just go to war, it rushes towards it in full steam locomotives ... And the USA tirelessly brings the whole world closer to this ... hi
        1. +5
          5 October 2017 16: 40
          OK. I get it.
          I will not be in VO for a couple of days - I will dig a dugout somewhere in Ebe.yah smile
          1. 0
            5 October 2017 19: 39
            Quote: Thrall
            I will dig a dugout somewhere in Ebe.yah


            Well, so we will meet there ... How many liters should I take with me?
            PS And for a snack - potato will go ... Tea, not yet the year 2040 ...
        2. 0
          5 October 2017 17: 11
          Quote: weksha50
          The world does not just go to war, it rushes towards it in full steam locomotives ... And the USA tirelessly brings the whole world closer to this ... hi

          The space agencies of Russia and the USA have agreed on the joint construction of a new research station in lunar orbit. Construction of the Deep Space Gateway station starts in 2024, Izvestia writes. Probably, the Americans are going to fly into space during the war.
      2. +4
        5 October 2017 16: 39
        I won’t plant potatoes even this year - anyway, there’s no one to crack it with :)

        Anyone needs to be planted, but God forbid, we will deal with partners. Yes
        1. +1
          5 October 2017 18: 30
          Quote: Cheshire
          I won’t plant potatoes even this year - anyway, there’s no one to crack it with :)

          Anyone needs to be planted, but God forbid, we will deal with partners. Yes

          - What is happening in the world? - It's just winter
          “It's just winter, you suppose?” “I suppose.”
          After all, I myself, as I can, make tracks
          in your early asleep homes.

          “What will be behind all this?” - And it will be January,
          - It will be January, do you think? - Yes, I think so.
          I've been reading this white book for a long time,
          this one, with pictures of a blizzard, is an old primer.

          - How will it all end? - It will be April.
          - It will be April, are you sure? - Yes, I am sure.
          I have already heard, and this hearing has been verified by me,
          Source teksty-pesenok.ru
          as if in a grove today a flute rang.

          - What follows from this? - You should live,
          to sew sundresses and light dresses from chintz.
          “Do you think all this will be worn?”
          - I believe that all this should be sewn. should be planted !!!

          You should live, because no matter how much the blizzard circulates,
          her bondage and opal are short-lived.
          So permit in honor of the New Year's ball
          hand on the dance, ma'am, to offer you!

          Silver month, ball with a candle inside
          and carnival masks - in a circle, in a circle.
          The waltz begins. Give me, ma'am, a hand,
          and - one-two-three, one-two-three,
          one-two-three, one-two-three! ..
          smile
          1. +2
            5 October 2017 19: 40
            Quote: NIKNN
            What follows from this? - should live,



            Here, the most adequate reaction ... hi
          2. mvg
            +1
            5 October 2017 23: 19
            Great movie.
            1. +1
              6 October 2017 00: 07
              Quote: mvg
              Great movie.

              good lol
      3. +7
        5 October 2017 16: 53
        Quote: Thrall
        I won’t even plant potatoes this year.

        This year? recourse what Winter ......... ???????? No.
      4. 0
        5 October 2017 19: 56
        Quote: Thrall
        I won’t even plant potatoes this year.

        I ordered apricots, so that scuffle is canceled
    2. +3
      5 October 2017 16: 37
      B-52 is one of the most successful aircraft in the history of aviation!
    3. +2
      5 October 2017 16: 52
      Replacing is expensive even for the USA. As far as I know the resource F15, F16 also modernize and extend the resource.
    4. +1
      5 October 2017 17: 13
      At the current technological level of cruise missiles, they can soon be hung on civilian aircraft. And that the bomb-gate sawed out, instead of seats installed a drum with rockets and forward, the engines on modern airliners are excellent, the flight range is also decent, and the reliability is tested in millions of civilian flights.
      1. +1
        5 October 2017 17: 21
        Quote: RASKAT
        And that the bomb loader sawed out, instead of chairs installed a drum with rockets and forward

        Easier to transport - with the release of KR through the stern hatch. smile
      2. 0
        5 October 2017 21: 25
        Quote: RASKAT
        At the current technological level of cruise missiles, they can soon be hung on civilian aircraft.

        So they do.
        https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_P-8_Poseidon
    5. +2
      5 October 2017 17: 35
      Such is the table
      1. +5
        5 October 2017 18: 09
        What kind of game is this?))
        What 200 Su-25s were built in 2001-2003? Where does the 255 MiG-29SMT come from ?! Where were built more than 300 Su-27SM in 2008-2010?
        wassat wassat wassat
        1. 0
          5 October 2017 18: 12
          Apparently they take for modernization.
          1. +1
            5 October 2017 18: 16
            There aren’t so many flashes at all (255 pieces !!!), there hasn’t been and will not be a modernization. Yes, in general, for all positions, just years and numbers are written from the bulldozer fellow laughing
            1. 0
              5 October 2017 18: 31
              In general, we do not have modernization, I understand you!
              1. +1
                5 October 2017 18: 50
                No, there everything is completely wrong there - a lot has been mixed up to say yes / no =))
                For example, to make it clear, there are no 27 Su-300SM units, SM3 like 12 units have been released (new), and the old Su-27s have been upgraded to around 50 units, that is, the table should contain 1 units instead of 27 line SU-300SM - 3-4 years ... two lines 1. Su-27 - 250 units (although the number must be reduced by half) - 20-25 years. 2. Su-27SM (SM3) - 60 units - 3-4 years - that would be right.
                According to the MiGs, there are practically no old ones left (there are none), the age is also over 20, and the number of new buildings, and the age, respectively, are also different.
                In general, everything is confused and inverted, extremely confusing in the table, does not display the real positions at all, in my opinion. The old number of aircraft (which there are not so many now) is taken, then the age of the last modernization (which is 10% of the total number of aircraft) is taken and substituted for old aircraft. All mixed in a bunch!
    6. +2
      5 October 2017 17: 56
      "Tech" Tu-95 in service for a long time, only machines produced in the 80s
  2. +1
    5 October 2017 16: 46
    Why not serve them? He did not break through the air defense, just a flying launcher of the Kyrgyz Republic.
  3. 0
    5 October 2017 16: 46
    and who here claimed that we have old planes? there is even older!
    1. 0
      5 October 2017 17: 29
      I’ll throw you such a tablet
  4. +1
    5 October 2017 16: 55
    Note colleagues: about replacing or at least upgrading engines striped again not a word.
    Either at the end of the eighties, or in the nineties they wanted to put one modern double-circuit instead of sparks, but they decided that it would be expensive, it would do so ...
    What is it that they have spare parts in their forties?
    1. +2
      5 October 2017 17: 12
      Quote: Quzmi4
      What is it that they have spare parts in their forties?

      The innumerable reserves of the Davis Monten air base ...
      EMNIP, the Pentagon regularly question the remotorization of old strategists or transporters to new or even unoccupied civil engines. And just as regularly, upon receipt of proposals for the implementation of these works and familiarization with their cost, he turns his eyes to his own warehouses and storage centers. smile
    2. 0
      5 October 2017 22: 24
      Not true)) - they upgraded them under the "reset option" laughing good It was a message in the summer or spring, the B-52, when taking off from Gavaev, seemed to “bomb” one of its engines. belay laughing
  5. 0
    5 October 2017 16: 57
    By the way, when we cry that the weapons are outdated)
    B-52 is far from the only old technology that has been used in the USA for more than 50-60 years
    1. +3
      5 October 2017 17: 13
      There are things that you don’t need to do from scratch. Let's say: our mythical PAK YES, they write about the range of his missiles that it will be about 6-7 thousand km. The question is, if the missiles really have such a range, then why can’t the Tu160 be upgraded for them? Why is this a subsonic flying wing, which has already gone a lot of dough, but apart from the model plywood nothing serious? Another thing is front-line aviation, whose range of tasks is incomparably wider than in DA (go into the RPZ and start AKP, I do not take Tu22m3 into account, since it is a long-range and not a strategist). Here, of course, PAK FA, PAK DP, PSSh and so on are certainly necessary. And for long-distance vehicles, it’s already rolling, the more Americans are able to modernize equipment, cram more rockets, and put the equipment more perfect, voila. All-chinarin
  6. +5
    5 October 2017 17: 05
    It should be noted that by 2040, strategic bombers will be in service for 85 years, which will be an unprecedented period for modern aviation. Only Russian Tu-95, which made their first flight in 1952 and adopted for use in 1956, will be able to compete with them.

    They can’t. Because it is necessary to consider not the period of being in service, but the service life of now flying machines. In addition, we no longer have the Tu-95. We have the Tu-95MS - an anti-submarine-based strategist, which in turn was made on the basis of a reconnaissance and target designation machine.
    Production of the B-52 was completed in 1962. After that, they were only modernized.
    The Tu-95MS was in the series from 1981 to 1992. So our strategists are about a quarter century younger. good
  7. 0
    5 October 2017 17: 19
    Despite the fact that the B-52 was developed in the fifties of the last century to the requirements of the Cold War, it still remains the main long-range bomber aircraft
    like we have a reliable hard worker old man Tu -95 ....
    1. +2
      5 October 2017 17: 32
      He is 20 years younger.
  8. 0
    5 October 2017 17: 27
    Quote: Topotun
    Why not serve them? He did not break through the air defense, just a flying launcher of the Kyrgyz Republic.

    but in neutral waters? No one has abolished the air defense system of air defense ...., from a moment 31 horseradish will leave, at any height it will get ...
  9. +2
    5 October 2017 17: 53
    Good plane, do not take away. I saw his landing in Spain on AvB Zaragoza. Impressed ....
  10. +4
    5 October 2017 18: 02
    In the DPRK Impact, they will play a decisive role!
  11. +3
    5 October 2017 18: 18
    Quote: Holoy
    In the DPRK Impact, they will play a decisive role!
    here is the true face (F ... a) and the words of a man-terrorist and provocateur
    , to which the DPRK has done nothing wrong, also in parallel - the Tu -95 will play a decisive role in striking Israel, I will give a reservation if it unleashes military operations or a provocation against Russia ...
  12. 0
    5 October 2017 18: 20
    After 2040, Americans fanfare this trash for recycling as military weapons to their slaves.
  13. +3
    5 October 2017 18: 24
    They will be raped until complete wear and tear. As the glider begins to cover with cracks. And then they’ll think, “it can strengthen and fly another 10 years” laughing ? Moreover, there is NO visible replacement even in the layout. In 22 years they will manage to saw off a new strageteg from scratch, to test and build 70 pieces? I doubt it very much No. .
    1. +1
      5 October 2017 20: 08
      Quote: Michael Newage
      In 22 years they will manage to saw off a new strageteg from scratch, to test and build 70 pieces?

      Yes, for such a lot of money Lockheed Martin will get away. Fe-35 is an example.
    2. +1
      5 October 2017 20: 13
      Given the capabilities of their aircraft industry - they will make 70 new strategic bombers easy, and most importantly quickly.
      1. 0
        5 October 2017 20: 52
        Quote: Vadim237
        Given the capabilities of their aircraft industry - they will make 70 new strategic bombers easy, and most importantly quickly.

        To do is not enough. They still have to think up, draw and count. R&D is called, it seems. And to rivet, rivet. This is clearly set for them.
        1. +1
          5 October 2017 21: 33
          Quote: Vasyan1971
          Quote: Vadim237
          Given the capabilities of their aircraft industry - they will make 70 new strategic bombers easy, and most importantly quickly.

          To do is not enough. They still have to think up, draw and count. R&D is called, it seems. And to rivet, rivet. This is clearly set for them.


          12: 28, 29 February 2016
          US Air Force revealed a new B-21 bomber

          Externally, the aircraft is very similar to those in service with the B-2, however, the new project will eliminate the disadvantages of its predecessor

          US Air Force revealed a new B-21 bomber


          Image of the new American bomber B-21 Photo: Reuters


          Moscow. 29 February.

          INTERFAX.RU - The US Air Force held a presentation on February 27, 2016, during which it partially unclassified the project of the promising strategic bomber LRS-B, which is being developed to replace the existing B-2 Spirit and B-52 Stratofortress.
          1. +1
            6 October 2017 00: 10
            In vain I did not mention the B-21. I knew that some kind of omeriga lover would say that it was a hat laughing . And here he is, right there. The boys showed image future bomber and everything can be relaxed laughing . Not even a layout. And there I recall the F35 program and understand that 22 years is only the beginning of a long way that the US Air Force may refuse to go. I won’t be surprised if PAK YES gets on the wing earlier than B-21. The Americans, in terms of successful novelties in the weapons field, after the F-22, have only one file. Build yes, they can quickly. And forgot to create something worthwhile. The Cold War somehow encouraged them, and then apparently relaxed. But, nevertheless, in 20 years a lot can change.
        2. 0
          5 October 2017 23: 37
          In view of how they quickly design engines for aircraft, R&D will not come up.
    3. +1
      5 October 2017 22: 34
      Yes, they would rather act in their "cowboy" tradition - and not really want to. tongue That is, they will give out to the mountain an abstruse "scientific research" of the type - under modern conditions, long-range aviation has lost military expediency.
      We will speak frankly - but what the hell do they need him for? Well, seriously, that such an outstanding B-52 can do this: carry cruise missiles on board - this is how the submarine’s submarine forces are many times more vulnerable and less vulnerable, tens of tons of cast iron - and who would bomb them in such a volume in modern wars (?) , Already read all whom so "fall asleep" could be "dead." Neither against Russia nor against China did they plan to use them and are not planning to (they will not get to these old people, missiles will solve everything). request
      Yes - it’s a big and epoch-making thing, but Merikas already bomb all UAVs in a row. This is for us the Tu-160s are of great importance for "circling over the pole" where their enemy fighters will not precisely catch. And the Merikas are full of “friendly” airfields around which they either get eFkami or UAVs.
  14. 0
    5 October 2017 18: 29
    And someone else reproaches our VKS that so far the "bears" are used, they say they are already obsolete. Although they are the same age as the B-52.
  15. 0
    5 October 2017 18: 57
    I feel we will still see an unmanned version of this old man) this will be epic fellow
  16. 0
    5 October 2017 20: 06
    But it’s interesting: in such "extensions" and upgrades the factor of "metal fatigue" is taken into account? And then the loads are considerable, but the power set of the hull does not change, probably?
    1. ICT
      0
      5 October 2017 21: 39
      Quote: Vasyan1971
      And then the loads are considerable, but the power set of the hull does not change, probably?


      there is such a term, the extension of the resource (inspection of everything where you can climb), cap remott again
      1. 0
        5 October 2017 23: 26
        Panyatna. hi
        Quote: TIT
        extension of the resource (inspection of everything where you can climb), cap remott again

        And where can’t you climb let it burst? Will earnest prayer help? And what is included in the concept of "overhaul"? Knots, mechanisms, electronics, it's all clear, but if the case itself can’t stand it, well, like the tail is skewed, will the wing break or the turbine hang obliquely? Litak is a pensioner twice or even thrice. Not all can be solved by cannibalism. Grunting! And minus one stratosphere?
        I'm just interested ...
        1. +1
          5 October 2017 23: 45
          Now there are such modeling programs that allow calculating the structural strength of the airframe for various deformations — testing at maximum load, at least a million times — 52 will have deep modernization, including reinforcing the airframe, installing new engines and most likely increasing the bomb load to 40 tons
          1. 0
            6 October 2017 19: 55
            Panyatna. So it will become thicker.
        2. ICT
          +1
          6 October 2017 08: 41
          Quote: Vasyan1971
          and if the case itself can’t stand it, well, like the tail warps

          they also have static stands and they understand where it can crack,

          Quote: Vasyan1971
          And what is included in the concept of "overhaul"?


          here you can look
          https://bmpd.livejournal.com/1928730.html

          Quote: Vasyan1971
          I'm just interested ...

          laudable bully
          1. 0
            6 October 2017 19: 56
            Thank you. hi
            Live and learn.
  17. +2
    5 October 2017 21: 26
    Some kind of stagnation of civilization, what was progress at the beginning of the 20th century and what is now
    1. 0
      5 October 2017 23: 48
      Slowly we begin to go out to hypersound, in the future this rejuvenated old man will carry hypersonic missiles.
  18. +1
    5 October 2017 22: 19
    Quote: 2013 Reader
    Some kind of stagnation of civilization, what was progress at the beginning of the 20th century and what is now

    Do not stagnate. The rate of progress has decreased. Yes, and somewhat changed emphasis. And it is impossible for progress to be continuous.
  19. +1
    5 October 2017 23: 04
    There is something wrong with the Kingdom of Crooked Mirrors. The printing press wears out or there is a general debilitation of engineering. lol
  20. mvg
    0
    5 October 2017 23: 23
    Quote: Lord of the Sith
    Such is the table

    nonsense. nothing personal.
  21. 0
    6 October 2017 05: 04
    I advise the Americans to wrap the B-52 with adhesive tape in three layers - extending the service life to 2041.
  22. 0
    6 October 2017 10: 19
    Hmm ... Can we make any conclusion?
    Both the B-52 and Tu-95 once, during development, were ahead of their time ... They turned out to be so successful that they still serve
    Nobody was ahead of the very expensive new aircraft

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"