Ultimatum to the Russian elite?

51
An influential journal of the United States, American Interest, published an article by the well-known liberal economist and sociologist Vladislav Inozemtsev (in the photo), in which he offers the States a “rational and low-cost" way to neutralize the "Russian threat": Americans cynically offer Americans to buy Russia.





The author of the article notes that the emphasis on force deterrence, which is preferred in the USA today, is too expensive: only in 2017, their military expenditures will amount to almost 600 billion dollars. and asks, from his point of view, a logical question: “Why does the West need to drain its resources if Russia is not ruled by Stalin — or Hitler-like leaders obsessed with world-dominated ideologies — but rather, by a group of entrepreneurs who keep their money in Western banks buy real estate in the West, teach their children in Western universities and have passports and even temporary residence permits. ”

Corporation "Russia"

“These people,” writes Inozemtsev, “would not have ruled Russia as they are doing now, if they really wanted to rule in the world.” In his opinion, the Russian elite only seeks to “gain material benefits from the ownership of a corporation called“ Russia ”... And in the corporate world, the best possible steps that should be taken in relation to a small but aggressive company is an attempt to buy it and turn it on into a larger business conglomerate. "

The author of the article emphasizes that this, of course, is not about buying a territory, natural wealth or people, but about assets that the Russian ruling class considers its property.

At the same time, it is proposed to take the value of all Russian companies whose shares are traded on the Moscow Exchange as the basis for calculating the price of such a transaction. "On 1 August 2017, it was 33,6 trillion rubles, or about 559 billion dollars, that is, about the same as the cost of Alphabet or Microsoft," - said Inozemtsev. There are, of course, still private assets, as well as revenues received from state unitary corporations, therefore it is reasonable to increase this figure by one and a half to two times. “But even if we double the above-mentioned figure, we’ll get a total of 1,1 – 1,2 trillion dollars,” the Russian liberal calms down the Americans.

“Until now, the assets controlled by the Russian elite had a positive profit in the amount of 10 – 12% of their market value - or approximately 65 – 85 billion dollars annually, the author of the article calculated. “This figure actually coincides with the volume of net capital outflow from Russia: according to the Bank of Russia, from 2008 to 2016, the outflow of capital in total amounted to 644,7 billion dollars.”

“What will happen if all these people offer a“ fair ”price for their property — for example, 2 trillion dollars, which is 30 times their net annual income? Will these people bargain hard if a serious buyer offers them a good price? ”, The author of the article seduces the Americans. The Russian oligarchs, I am sure, Inozemtsev will be happy to seize such an opportunity, since “the overwhelming majority of the representatives of the Russian elite are prepared for losing all their assets.”

“2 trillion dollars is less than half of that amount (4,79 trillion dollars) that the US has already spent on the senseless war in Iraq,” the author explains. - These are about two US military budgets (in the 2017 / 18 fiscal year, the US military budget will be 824,7 billion dollars). 2 trillion is one-tenth of the US federal debt or the amount by which this debt increases every two years. ”

“Buying Russia,” the Foreigners cynically advises the US, “will be the best investment the US government has ever made.” The cost of Russian companies is seriously underestimated and makes up only a small part of the value of their American counterparts. If a more responsible leadership and a more transparent judicial system emerges in Russia, these assets will increase in price by at least five times. ”

Crime immunity

And then the author of the idea of ​​"selling Russia" goes to the most important thing for those who have made huge amounts of money on the robbery of Russia, and now he is afraid of losing them or is afraid that he will have to answer for the crimes committed. “Before concluding this transaction,” he writes, “all representatives of Russia will receive immunity from prosecution for committing financial crimes, that all money held in conditional deposit accounts will be exempt from any checks and that participants in the transaction selling assets worth more than 20 million dollars, will receive passports of western countries or permits for permanent residence ”.

Thus, the money that the West spends on this transaction will remain within Western economies and will be reinvested in real estate, stocks and other assets in developed countries.

“At the same time, Western companies will get a huge new market, huge reserves of resources and talents,” the Russian liberal seduces Americans, hinting that now the former businessman Donald Trump was at the head of the White House, his idea can be realized.

“Someone may say that this project is too unrealistic, because politics and business must be combined in it,” explains the author of the idea. “I can agree with this, but perhaps we should still try to implement it, since politics and business are already closely intertwined in the figure of a man who now holds the post of head of the White House.”

Well, as they say, all masks are reset. In this article with the utmost cynicism, all the goals and objectives that Russian liberals and corrupt oligarchic capital have set themselves are revealed. Having robbed the country in 90-s and having concentrated enormous wealth in their hands, they are ready to save them, in the most literal sense, to sell Russia to the Americans and make them a concrete and well-reasoned proposal for them.

And they do it not from a good life. First, they fear that Vladimir Putin will win again in the upcoming presidential election and, not without reason, suggest that he will start pursuing an even tougher policy towards the corrupt and the oligarchs who continue to rob Russia, and will finally strike at undermining the interests of Russia and trying to split her "fifth column" of the liberals.

Audit of the Russian elite

And secondly, they are frightened by the new sanctions announced by Trump. The US sanctions document states that within 180 days after the law entered into force (that is, until February 2018), the Minister of Finance, in consultation with the Director of the National Intelligence Service and the head of the State Department, must submit to the Congress detailed reports on the financial activities of the leading and influential foreign policy figures and oligarchs of the Russian Federation.

Thus, we are talking about the verification of financial activities for the corruption component of not only the Russian political leadership, including all members of the Government of the Russian Federation, deputies of the State Duma, members of the Federation Council, but also oligarchs.

At the same time, Russian oligarchs are subject to financial verification, regardless of whether they are tax residents of Russia or not.

The Americans proceed from the fact that, in one way or another, the property of Russian oligarchs is abroad, and they cannot hide it. The 105 sanctions law page states that in order to assist NATO and the European Union, the United States is obliged to work individually with the countries of Europe and Eurasia in identifying corruption components associated with Russian companies. We are talking about the work of American structures with the countries of the European Union and the CIS, including Belarus and Kazakhstan, using all the levers of political and economic influence on these countries, up to the threat of sanctions against them in the event of non-cooperation.

As for the NATO countries, where Russian oligarchs hold most of their property, the United States will act based on the NATO charter, which provides that the special services of the NATO countries are obliged to assist the NATO member country if it receives information about the aggressive actions of a third country aimed at against her interests. Such a third country the United States called the Russian Federation. Consequently, the special services of all other NATO countries are obliged to assist the United States in conducting an inspection to identify the corruption component of Russian or affiliated companies operating in these countries.

The American law on sanctions sets four tasks for the inspection bodies: 1) identifying influential people in Russian politics and oligarchs in terms of their proximity to the political regime in Russia; 2) determination of their financial condition (that is, the presence of their net assets in the accounts and in the form of property); 3) evaluation of the connection between political figures of Russia and oligarchs with President Putin personally or with other persons of the Russian elite; 4) identification of signs of corruption related to the above persons, as well as the sources of income of these persons and their family members.

In this case, the object of checking the financial activities of Russian politicians and oligarchs are also their close relatives. It is curious that as soon as the law on new sanctions was passed, it became known about the unexpected divorce of the oligarch Roman Abramovich.

Apparently, his lawyers conducted an analysis and concluded that Abramovich falls under the law on anti-Russian sanctions. Therefore, they are supposed to divorce his wife not because he stopped loving her, but because the law on sanctions says that family members are close relatives: spouses, children, parents, brothers and sisters. The former wife is no longer a member of the family from a legal point of view. And since Americans are terrible formalists, this information may not be included in the report to the US Congress. So in the near future we should expect other divorces of homegrown oligarchs.

US revision of privatization results

The new law also speaks of the need to identify non-Russian affiliated businesses of Russian oligarchs. We are talking not only about the American structures of our rich people, but also about their businesses in other countries. In addition, the law provides for an assessment of the creation (establishment) of Russian parastatal organizations and their role in the Russian Federation. Under parastatal organizations, the law on sanctions refers to those organizations where a certain percentage of property belongs to the state.

So we are talking about re-evaluating the results - terrible news for our oligarchs! - privatization of state-owned companies. In other words, the Americans intend to conduct a full audit of Russian privatization.

This law covers not only Russian companies, but all Russian oligarchs without exception, all members of the Government of the Russian Federation, all deputies of the State Duma and all members of the Federation Council, as well as their close relatives. For example, adult children of State Duma who live abroad abroad, of which there are many, are also subject to verification for sources of income. All properties of the Russian political elite and their close relatives, as well as their bank accounts located abroad, will be subject to verification for a corruption component. All this vividly shows how the United States, by arresting assets or other similar means, can deliver an ultimatum to our entire economic and political elite.

A plea for mercy

This ultimatum is that if the oligarchs and the Russian political elite, which influence the governance of the country, and at the same time have assets abroad, are registered both to themselves and to close relatives or to front or February 2018 will not replace the current leadership of Russia, and we are talking specifically about President Putin, then all their assets will be arrested as corrupt ones.

Therefore, the current publication in the American Interest, setting forth a seemingly crazy idea of ​​“selling Russia,” is in fact a testimony of a panic that engulfed the corrupt part of the liberal elite and those who fed from their handouts. After all, it was not by chance that it was voiced by Inozemtsev, one of the signatories of the appeal of the Russian opposition “Putin Must Leave”, who is a member of the Russian Council on International Affairs (INF) created in 2011 by order of Dmitry Medvedev. The Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs is also a co-founder of the INF. The media calls this organization "one of the instruments of public diplomacy and the" soft power "of Russia in the world." The oligarchs, the liberal opposition and the corrupt part of the political beau monde are well aware that Putin enjoys such strong support from the people and power structures in Russia that they will not be able to fulfill the US demand for its elimination, and therefore begin to beg Trump to spare them, cynically in return. buy Russia. "
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    5 October 2017 15: 32
    This liberal economist and sociologist Vladislav Inozemtsev (what a symbolic surname!) Did not discover anything new for anyone! This option has already been considered in Russia, when the oligarchs were asked to return their capital, overseas property and their children back to Russia! That the West and the US Federal Reserve, which controls 156 banks of the world out of 164, will definitely rob them in the end !!! In the West, they simply wait to rip off more money they have stolen in Russia from them!

    In fact, Brzezinski spoke about the same thing!
    1. +18
      5 October 2017 16: 12
      Quote: Tatiana
      I have not discovered anything new for anyone!

      For many, the discovery of the states of our "elite" will be a revelation.
      But yesterday, under the signature of a certain Shuvalov, who has a lot of things in NATO countries, a decree was issued on the unacceptability of deoffshorization of the Russian economy, in view of the great risks !!!
      You can go nuts!
      1. +12
        5 October 2017 16: 26
        In any case, in the end, the Russian oligarchs will have to part with their capitals, looted and exported from Russia to offshore zones, abroad! All of these offshore companies, which deliberately act as financial STORIES of the stolen comprador oligarchs from national states, were created by the Rothschilds in order to then rob the "uninitiated" in this native robber oligarchs on the principle of "Rob the loot!". At the same time, no one will intercede for them! And if they buck up against their robbery raider, then they themselves will still be hung on a scarf in some bathroom in their own foreign house, like Berezovsky!
        1. +6
          5 October 2017 16: 41
          Quote: Tatiana
          In any case, in the end, the Russian oligarchs will have to part with their capitals stolen and exported from Russia to offshore zones abroad!

          The question is not even that, but on the scale !!! Remember what the president said about the accounts of raldugin? We are talking about the level of corruption and offshore.
          Here is more detailed.
        2. +1
          5 October 2017 16: 44
          Quote: Tatiana
          In any case, in the end, the Russian oligarchs will have to part with their capitals, looted and exported from Russia to offshore zones, abroad! All of these offshore companies, which deliberately act as financial STORIES of the stolen comprador oligarchs from national states, were created by the Rothschilds in order to then rob the "uninitiated" in this native robber oligarchs on the principle of "Rob the loot!". At the same time, no one will intercede for them! And if they buck up against their robbery raider, then they themselves will still be hung on a scarf in some bathroom in their own foreign house, like Berezovsky!

          Well, Tatyana, you painted a very gloomy picture.
          Of course, such an option is possible, but unlikely. Rather, there will be a threat of deprivation of capital, and that is exclusively targeted.

          The fact is that the "safe haven" of American banks then turns into a "pirate bay." And besides the Russian oligarchs there are many other holders of "egg capsules".
          And in light of the fact that China is strengthening its yuan with leaps and bounds, some can try on the Russian "shirt" on themselves. And then the SGA can have serious problems of a different plan, and such that fussing with Russia will seem like child's play to them ..
          1. BAI
            +6
            5 October 2017 17: 20
            The fact is that the "safe haven" of American banks then turns into a "pirate bay."

            The US has already frozen the assets of Iraq and Libya. It affected someone - no. They can not only take the assets of the oligarchs (by the way, everyone around the world will welcome this - the war on corruption (no politics)), but also freeze the assets of Russia (as a state). And it will not strain anyone.
            1. 0
              5 October 2017 17: 40
              Quote: BAI
              The US has already frozen the assets of Iraq and Libya. It affected someone - no.
              It affected. But where to go from a boat in the middle of the ocean? And now another boat is floating nearby. Chinese And be calm - no one has forgotten this.

              Quote: BAI
              They can not only take the assets of the oligarchs (by the way, everyone around the world will welcome this - the war on corruption (no politics)), but also freeze the assets of Russia (as a state). And it will not strain anyone.
              Even as it will be. And already annoying. Recall graters from Paris, Deutsche Bank. But, again - where to go? The time has not come, but the Fed is confidently digging a hole for itself. There are no illusions.
              In fact, Libya has largely paid and due to the promotion of the idea to switch to gold.
      2. +2
        5 October 2017 16: 31
        Dear, Stroporez. Somehow this is at variance with what GDP said in 2013.
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9n0yBbAMr8
        1. +9
          5 October 2017 16: 46
          Quote: AA17
          Dear, Stroporez. Somehow this is at variance with what GDP said in 2013.

          Greetings, Colleague! hi
          The thing is that things in the state always diverge from what he said wink
          1. +9
            5 October 2017 19: 12
            Well, why "diverge ...", you just need to be able to, listen carefully, sometimes curious things slip through. Remember, during the "Olympics" he was informed there about the prohibitive cost of the "Olympic" facilities and that they stole about 15-25% of the total amount. To which he replied that it was still “normal” .... “fit into the realities of the modern Russian economy.” That is, to pinch off such a percentage from budget projects is not even a crime, but such a “norm” as in modern Russia .., but stealing a bag of potatoes is a yes- a matter of jurisdiction ... wink
            1. +6
              5 October 2017 19: 19
              Quote: Monster_Fat
              and that they stole about 15-25% of the total amount. To which he replied that it was still "normal" .... "fit" into the realities of the modern Russian economy. "

              I remember! And also, when he came to accept Olympic facilities, it’s all so “cool” after a ski jump for skiing ... they say it turned out to be three times more expensive, he’s where the contractor is, he’s in London! And this is on the fed channel .....
    2. +4
      5 October 2017 16: 33
      Quote: Tatiana
      This liberal economist and sociologist Vladislav Inozemtsev (what a symbolic surname!) Did not discover anything new for anyone!

      In general, yes. Only in his calculations there is one "trifle": the value of the assets of Russian companies is underestimated, and American companies are overpriced, and this is very softly said.

      Judge for yourself - Facebook surpasses Gazprom in capitalization. Not absurd? And all these Melkosoft are bubbles. Browser A. Rogers shows a good example of Apple, which, with a stable decrease in sales (more than minus 40%), capitalization is growing.
      Holland in the 17th century passed "stock bubbles" when whole mansions were sold for a tulip bulb ...
      1. +3
        5 October 2017 16: 48
        Quote: iConst
        Only in his calculations there is one "trifle": the value of the assets of Russian companies is underestimated, and American companies are overpriced, and this is very easy to say.

        You confuse capitalization with money in accounts that have quite specific zeros.
        1. +1
          5 October 2017 16: 58
          Quote: Stroporez
          Quote: iConst
          Only in his calculations there is one "trifle": the value of the assets of Russian companies is underestimated, and American companies are overpriced, and this is very easy to say.

          You confuse capitalization with money in accounts that have quite specific zeros.

          Is money not assets? This is one, and two - the text clearly says assets. And three - deposits (if we are talking about "zeros") are usually not the best money management. Usually these are operating amounts which are usually insignificant compared to the total capitalization (for large companies).
          So I don’t confuse anything.
          1. +2
            5 October 2017 17: 05
            Quote: iConst
            So I don’t confuse anything.

            Sorry, did not understand hi
            Only we are talking about accounts! And offshore, precisely, as about the possibility of tax evasion.
            I also agree that many real estate are listed on offshore companies.
            Offshore assets of state-owned companies is a different story.
      2. BAI
        +1
        5 October 2017 17: 23
        In general, yes. Only in his calculations there is one "trifle": the value of the assets of Russian companies is underestimated, and American companies are overpriced, and this is very softly said.

        A product does not cost as much as is asked for, but as much as is offered for it.
        1. 0
          5 October 2017 17: 44
          Quote: BAI
          In general, yes. Only in his calculations there is one "trifle": the value of the assets of Russian companies is underestimated, and American companies are overpriced, and this is very softly said.

          A product does not cost as much as is asked for, but as much as is offered for it.

          Yeah, current if it were a commodity! laughing Come on - feel Facebook! laughing
    3. +2
      5 October 2017 19: 17
      Quote: Tatiana
      This liberal economist and sociologist Vladislav Inozemtsev


      Quote: author
      a group of entrepreneurs who keep their money in Western banks, buy property in the West, educate their children in Western universities and have foreign passports and even temporary residence permits
      i.e. COMPRADORS.

      BUT, in Russia there are other people who will NEVER reconcile with such a proposal. And there are not a few such people! The period of unrest 1985-2000xx - has passed. Now, the PEOPLE and the new Minins-Pozharsky will complete the History of Russia ...
      Yehud - waiting, at best, exile, at worst - a personal lamppost ... and probably without a soapy rope. Well this is how lucky ...
  2. +7
    5 October 2017 15: 43
    I can’t even imagine what kind of hellish torments and nightmares our "... Russian oligarchs, all members of the Government of the Russian Federation, all deputies of the State Duma and all members of the Federation Council, as well as their close relatives ..." have movable and immovable property for abroad. (One thought disturbs them: Isn't it all in vain? What prospects opened up in the early 90s). "... I do not complain. But one thought, one thought torments me! Bitterly aware, bitterly aware that everything could be otherwise ..." (c)
  3. +3
    5 October 2017 16: 06
    From the tears of the Russian oligarchs. Who learned the news from behind the mound .reka Moscow overflowed !! laughing
  4. +4
    5 October 2017 16: 22
    They have already bought traitors, they will buy some nonhumans, new policemen
    But people will buy?
    All these hucksters from a position of profit, dough
  5. +11
    5 October 2017 16: 22
    ... Vladimir Putin will win again and, not without reason, suggest that he will begin to pursue an even tougher policy towards corrupt officials and oligarchs who continue to rob Russia, and also inflict a blow to Russia’s undermining interests and trying to split the “fifth column” of liberals.

    Less than 17 years have passed, how to conduct a "tough policy"? Where to rush?
    1. +4
      5 October 2017 22: 55
      Yes, they don’t like such questions in a hurry. Here is how the last money is stolen, then maybe activity will begin? They’re running in with the Nagans, they’ll introduce the article and bulging balls and finally remember about the people's money. We have it!
  6. +5
    5 October 2017 16: 41
    Offer designed for greed and stupidity. As soon as we sell our fortress, we will open the gates and throw our weapons, some of them will be killed, some will be robbed, and some will be stolen.
  7. +10
    5 October 2017 16: 48
    Our so-called elite eats no longer in two throats, but in all its holes, into which even the inhospitable tries to cram. My question is, why do not look at the names or any bodily abnormalities? For example, Inozemtsev, well, obviously he will sing to the tune of foreigners, let’s take Solzhenitsyn, how could he write the truth, if he already hinted a lie in his surname or Gorbachev - “God marks the huck”. Yeltsin finally - EBN fumbled, Khrushchev - Khrushchev: the May beetle and the national attitude towards the person who is called the beetle ...
  8. BAI
    +7
    5 October 2017 17: 16
    It has long been known - you don’t need to buy a competitor’s enterprise, just buy its management. So Mr. Inozemtsev is absolutely right. The oligarchs - a threat to Russia is much more serious than any military intervention.
    1. 0
      5 October 2017 21: 20
      Quote: BAI
      enough to buy his management

      On their own will write)))
    2. +3
      5 October 2017 21: 25
      Quote: BAI
      The oligarchs - a threat to Russia is much more serious than any military intervention.

      For the 90s, this is true. But not for the present time, Hodor and Birch will not let me lie.
  9. +1
    5 October 2017 17: 35
    laughing Does anyone else doubt that Trump is our person?
  10. +19
    5 October 2017 18: 33
    This liberal is cynically offered to Americans simply to buy Russia.

    Judges by itself
    Russia is ruled by a group of entrepreneurs who keep their money in Western banks, buy real estate in the West, educate their children in Western universities

    But this is true
    Do we live to see the leaders of the Stalin-Roosevelt level? Grinded politicians - lice basically.
    Wait and see
    1. +7
      6 October 2017 09: 01
      "Do we live to see the leaders of Stalin's level ..."
      Stalin appears when the demand for them ripens in society. In the meantime, we have a predominant demand for a well-fed, calm life, and preferably at someone else's expense.
  11. +2
    5 October 2017 18: 50
    The oligarchy will be expropriated, but the money will remain in the United States. This is simply a form of exporting capital from a newly converted colony, which for a short time imagines itself to be a “part of the West” and a “builder of capitalism”.
  12. 0
    5 October 2017 20: 07
    which the Russian ruling class considers its property.
    Yes, the assets are in their property. But tomorrow they can wake up, and GDP is a decree. "And the old woman stands with a broken trough" .....
    The oligarchs, the liberal opposition and the corrupt part of the political beau monde understand very well that Putin enjoys such strong support from the people and law enforcement agencies in Russia that they will not be able to fulfill the US demand for its elimination, and therefore begin to beg Trump to spare them, cynically offering in return " buy Russia. "
    I suspect it will be said: "Sama-sama-sama ..."
    And this is correct: "Do you like to pop, and soot in the stove." "Love honey, love and chill."
    And where should they go? The choice is not great. To the polling station or to the Swamp, to wake the next Herzen.
    1. 0
      5 October 2017 21: 10
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      wake up another Herzen.

      Herzen himself woke up. He published The Bell (City of London, BBC). An excellent student of the Air Force, so to speak. In general, if an ultimatum, then little depends on them.
      1. 0
        5 October 2017 21: 45
        Quote: iouris
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        wake up another Herzen.

        Herzen himself woke up. He published The Bell (City of London, BBC). An excellent student of the Air Force, so to speak. In general, if an ultimatum, then little depends on them.

        "Again deuce." To you at school. "The Decembrists woke Herzen ...." Who said and in what work?
      2. +2
        9 October 2017 23: 31
        IN MEMORY OF HERZEN *
        Ballad of historical lack of sleep
        (Cruel romance based on the work of the same name by V.I. Krupsky)

        Love for Good scattered their heart.
        But Herzen was sleeping, not knowing about evil ...
        But the Decembrists woke Herzen.
        He did not sleep enough. Everything went from here.

        And freaking out of their daring deed,
        He picked up a terrible world chime.
        What accidentally woke Chernyshevsky,
        Not knowing himself what he did.

        And that one from sleep, having weak nerves,
        I began to call Russia to the ax, -
        What disturbed Zhelyabov’s sound sleep,
        And that Perovskaya did not let him sleep.

        And I wanted to fight with him right away,
        Go to the people and not be afraid of rearing.
        So the conspiracy began in Russia:
        The big deal is a long lack of sleep.

        The king was killed, but the world did not heal again.
        Zhelyabov fell, fell asleep unsweetened.
        But before that he prompted Plekhanov,
        So that he went a completely different way.

        Everything could get by with the passage of time.
        Russian life could be drawn into order ...
        What kind of science woke Lenin?
        Who bothered that the baby is sleeping?

        There is no exact answer to that question.
        What year are we looking for him in vain ...
        Three components - three sources
        They don’t clarify anything here.

        Yes, he himself did not know, perhaps, this,
        Although revenge in him did not run out of stock.
        Although he scientifically investigated that question,
        I searched for about fifty years.

        Either in the Bund or in the Cadets ... Could there be
        Though there are traces. And in failure is angry
        He immediately made a revolution for everyone,
        So that not one of the punishment left.

        And with the song they went to Calvary under the banners
        Fathers are behind him, as if in a sweet life ...
        May the half-sleepy faces be forgiven us,
        We are the children of those who did not sleep well.

        We want to sleep ... And we can’t get anywhere
        From the thirst for sleep and the thirst to judge everyone ...
        Ah, the Decembrists! .. Do not wake Herzen! ..
        You can’t wake anyone in Russia.
  13. +5
    5 October 2017 21: 20
    For the sake of the last four lines, Mr. Sokolov worked ... The mythical confrontation between the "good Tsar" and the "bad boyars" seems to be the central theme of the Kremlin political technologists. "
  14. +7
    5 October 2017 21: 36
    Inozemtsev offers the United States to buy Russia ...
    My friend was late, Russia was sold out starting from the 1991 year, again, to US owners. Or the call of Inozemtsev is a call to war of some competing American clans against others for resources in a given territory called Russia?) Well, Chicago is just 30's! And they say it is necessary to strive for Western "democratic" standards where the current government has been dragging us all for 26 years. What now is it to strive for if the "moral" guidelines are ruined by the owners of our "democrats" themselves?)))
  15. +2
    5 October 2017 21: 51
    Robbed, robbed. They robbed me, a Russian pensioner with a pension of 11,5 tr at the age of 65 years, an engineer in automation and telemechanics - Robbed! It rushes from all sides. And I have a question, HOW did they do it. Someone will answer - they appropriated what belonged to the people under socialism. Good, I say. You yourself see, I lived under socialism and was a small piece of this people. In 1980, I graduated from MIIT, got into TRANSELECTROPROEKT. Salary 100 p. Clean - 86 rubles. The Ministry of Oil and Gas Industry of the USSR was engaged in the sale of petroleum products. So, I would like to know how many rubles, cents, tenths and hundredths of a penny were paid to me from the MFP. To come to Sechin and his tinsels: drive, a bandit, a coin. So that Uncle Zu’s words are not populist, but weighty. But the fact is that the subsoil and its contents belong to the state, but the mine already belongs to the one who mined. The state levies a tax on the extracted and sold. (When Putin became president and put his own out of the "Lake", the budget fullness increased 82 times, which made it possible to pay the IMF.).
    The eyes are blocked by children, grandchildren, yachts, over the hill. "Someone else's money is considered by fools and loafers," Weiners. "Visit to the Minotaur" I HAVE LAW, DIXI
    1. +5
      6 October 2017 09: 06
      "In 1980, I graduated from MIIT, got into TRANSELECTROPROEKT. Salary of 100 p. ..."
      In the same year I worked as a technician at the NIEFL, the salary of 110 rubles was strange. belay
      1. 0
        6 October 2017 13: 09
        We then got caught up to 110 a year later. (After the obligatory 3 years, I went to commissioning195 dirty) But this is not what really interests me. How did the oligarchs shod me? How did they rob the people? A Miller salary of 6 lyam does not bother me daily. His problems. (I somehow read the requirements for the senior manager of Gazprom. Nafig-nafig. Knowledge is needed be healthy)
        (. And here who really "shod" me was the Bailiff Service of the city of Kaliningrad. The Leningrad department. Your bosses were arrested and you quietly closed the proceedings on the writ of a lot of people. It won’t pass) THE RIGHT I HAVE DIXI.
        1. +5
          6 October 2017 18: 19
          "I somehow read the requirements for the senior manager of Gazprom. Nafig-nafig. Knowledge is needed be healthy)"
          And I talked with them (I'm talking about Gazprom). A shaggy paw or relatives are needed, nothing more. All the others - no one, at any time will be replaced by their own.
  16. 0
    5 October 2017 23: 45
    In some ways, he reminds me of Yeltsin with his face.
  17. +3
    6 October 2017 11: 07
    Wangyu the future of foreigners and others like him
  18. +3
    6 October 2017 11: 31
    Well done pin-ups, standing ovation! They do what the GDP should have done if he wanted to change anything in the country. By their actions they pest spiders in the bank, the layout is quite curious: on the one hand, all abomination and ghouls (whose place is on the gallows anyway), and on the other hand, the GDP set by them (but overgrown with time). The Supreme is placed in Pts. an interesting position: either cut the back one (which the electorate obviously does not appreciate), or voluntarily bring down the receiver and let the receiver out (but whom to put?) or stand in a pose and fight with evil spirits not for life but for death (which is unlikely, a crow is a raven, so to speak) .....). They will rather try to come to an agreement and at the same time prepare for the fight against the discontented population (which is already happening). Well, okay, the denouement is close. We will look at the movers in this serpentarium.
  19. +1
    6 October 2017 20: 06
    Mr. Inozemtsev was late with his advice. In the 80s they already bought everyone. Therefore, the country was ruined in the 91st. But now, probably, the money from these same "elites" is over and they decided to request in the second round. But I’m afraid that this will be the end of the country, final and irrevocable.
  20. 0
    7 October 2017 10: 00
    sorry there is not enough political will for Vladimir to outweigh such persons
    1. 0
      9 October 2017 10: 29
      What will there be !!! he reminds something of Nicky 2, but only harder. And so friends (there are uncles and relatives) in power and money.
  21. 0
    9 October 2017 10: 27
    And Vedbas will easily sell these aces to the Russian Federation. Bo these same aces are speckled.
  22. +2
    9 October 2017 23: 25
    Quote: Rus2012
    BUT, in Russia there are other people who will NEVER reconcile with such a proposal. And there are not a few such people! The period of unrest 1985-2000xx - has passed. Now, the PEOPLE and the new Minins-Pozharsky will complete the History of Russia ...
    Yehud - waiting, at best, exile, at worst - a personal lamppost ... and probably without a soapy rope. Well this is how lucky ...

    You live in a fantasy world, honestly.
  23. 0
    11 October 2017 16: 53
    Perfectly! There is a rule for the thieves-oligarchs, if in our country no one can cope with them, let the Americans take them for the fifth point! For this I am grateful to America, there is justice in this world! Let even America, even a different country, the main thing is that oligarchs and corrupt officials on a national scale understand that they are vulnerable and reachable, let one hydra devour another hydra!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"