Military Review
Sign In Register

The air regiment in the Kursk region was replenished with two more Su-30CM fighters

29
Aviation the regiment of the Western military district, deployed at the Halino airfield in the Kursk region, was replenished with two super-maneuverable Su-30SM fighters, reports bmpd with reference to the press service of the ZVO.

One of two new Su-30CM fighters built by the Irkutsk Aviation Plant of PJSC "Irkut Corporation" during a stopover in Tolmachevo (Novosibirsk) during the flight from Irkutsk to Khalino airfield.

During the planned rearmament of the regiment, the X-NUMX + fighters of the Su-4CM generation by the end of the year will be formed by the squadron.

It is reported that "the first flight crew has already received the practice of combat use on new machines during the flight tactical exercises with combat launches at the Ashuluk training ground in the Astarakhan region and during the active part of the joint strategic exercise West-2017".

Bmpd comment: “Thus, we are talking about the entry into the 14 Guards Fighter Aviation Regiment of two regular Su-30СМ Su-29СМ fighters built by the Irkutsk Aviation Plant (IAP) of the Irkut Corporation. Previously, the regiment received six fighters. Thereby the actual rearmament of the regiment was begun from the MiG-30SMT fighters on the Su-XNUMXCM currently in service. ”

To date, the Russian Aerospace Forces under the signed contracts received 74 fighter Su-30CM, and Naval Aviation - 20.
Photos used:
Andrey Tchursin / www.airliners.net
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Yandex Zen
29 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. RASKAT
    RASKAT 4 October 2017 12: 18
    +6
    In general, it is planned to purchase about 200 aircraft in the troops. It is gratifying to see that the army is rearmament in modern complexes.
  2. bagr69
    bagr69 4 October 2017 12: 19
    +2
    Re-equipment is still underway, despite the tantrums of different forces, both here and abroad.
    And this is good news.
    1. VadimSt
      VadimSt 4 October 2017 13: 21
      +2
      With such a pace of rearmament, we’ll be in time, maybe by 2041! It’s necessary so, a couple of planes in the regiment and is already news!
      1. Lord of the Sith
        Lord of the Sith 4 October 2017 14: 35
        0
        Which ones? Do you know which ones? Look on the Internet for replenishment per year and draw your own conclusions! This is not a couple of aircraft, but already received 74 aircraft and 20 to the Naval Aviation.
      2. Voyager
        Voyager 4 October 2017 15: 10
        0
        Have you calculated how many such and similar planes they delivered in a year before trying?
        1. VadimSt
          VadimSt 6 October 2017 17: 17
          0
          Before tryndet, read the speeches of the commanders-in-chief on how much this or that “technique” is required for rearmament and the required reserve in the Russian Armed Forces, and how they look at the real pace and timing.
          1. Voyager
            Voyager 10 October 2017 00: 38
            0
            What exactly are the speeches of which particular commanders? I ask again, did you familiarize yourself with the number of aircraft delivered at least this year?
  3. rpuropuu
    rpuropuu 4 October 2017 12: 22
    +2
    During the planned rearmament of the regiment, the X-NUMX + fighters of the Su-4CM generation by the end of the year will be formed by the squadron.
    The good news wink I am especially pleased that this is a planned rearmament yes
  4. NEXUS
    NEXUS 4 October 2017 12: 29
    +3
    This is certainly great, but one thing is not clear, why are there so many varieties of heavy MFIs for us? SU-30/35, SU-57, and even by 19 promise to launch the MIG-35 in a series ... we are sending the SU-35 export, and equip your videoconferencing equipment with 30s. The question is, where is the logic? Su-35 is more maneuverable than the 30th, it is more modern and performs essentially the same tasks as the SU-30. So why the 30s are not allowed for export, but the 35th is not left to them instead?
    1. Muvka
      Muvka 4 October 2017 12: 33
      0
      Why? We supply Su-30 both to ourselves and for export, as well as SU-35 - both to ourselves and for export.
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 4 October 2017 12: 40
        +4
        Quote: Muvka
        Why? We supply Su-30 both to ourselves and for export, as well as SU-35 - both to ourselves and for export.

        I’m talking about the fact that you need to equip your VKS with SU-35s instead of the 30s ... And do not plant a whole zoo of heavy IFIs. Despite the fact that the SU-57 is still approaching. It is clear that the SU-30 is cheaper than the 35th, and here they simply stupidly saturate our airborne systems with them, taking in quantity ... One hope that gradually the 30s pilots will be transferred to the SU- 35 and SU-57.
        1. Don
          Don 4 October 2017 13: 13
          0
          Quote: NEXUS

          0
          NEXUS Today, 12: 40 ↑ New
          Quote: Muvka
          Why? We supply Su-30 both to ourselves and for export, as well as SU-35 - both to ourselves and for export.

          I’m talking about the fact that we need to equip our VKS with SU-35-mi, instead of 30-x ... And do not breed a whole zoo of heavy IFIs.

          The main reason is money, or rather, their lack due to budget cuts. Yes, the Su-35 is more advanced, but today the task is to saturate parts with modern aircraft and bring to 75% by 2020 year. It is obvious that Su-57 will not be delivered to the troops in large quantities until 2030. So, whether we like it or not, the actual modernized version of the Su-2030 will remain the backbone of our VKS until the 27 of the year.
    2. tomket
      tomket 4 October 2017 12: 46
      0
      Quote: NEXUS
      why do we need so many varieties of heavy IFIs? SU-30 / 35, SU-57

      We want to catch up and overtake India !!!))))
      Quote: NEXUS
      Moreover, by the 19 year they promise to launch the MIG-35 in a series.

      There, apparently everything will be occupied under the Egyptian contract, and units will be transferred to us.
      Quote: NEXUS
      Su-35 is more maneuverable than 30, it is more modern and performs essentially the same tasks as SU-30.

      What stuffing you put, it’s what you get. And the gliders there for one, for the other, belong to one generation.
      Quote: NEXUS
      So why are 30s not allowed for export, but 35s are not left to them instead?

      Su-30 just got into our troops after export success. They say that such a cow is needed by himself. In general, it will be difficult for Su-35 to surpass the export success of 30. Probably not even possible. And by the way, a two-seater aircraft is more versatile, because it is in the global trend. So what they are doing right is that they buy Su-30 in large quantities.
    3. Voyager
      Voyager 4 October 2017 15: 17
      0
      35 and 30 together provide more efficient work, because the 30th in these conditions will be like command vehicles.
      1. Lesorub
        Lesorub 4 October 2017 17: 34
        +1
        Quote: Voyager
        30th in these conditions will be like command vehicles.

        In order for 30 cameras to be commander’s vehicles, they need to have a powerful radar, which in detection range will exceed the detection range of other machines (for example, Su 35), but this is not))))
        1. Voyager
          Voyager 4 October 2017 17: 45
          0
          In order for the 30-ke to be a command vehicle, it needs a co-pilot who would act as a navigator, gunner and other things, and the ability to hang in containers a bunch of additional devices for reconnaissance, target designation, electronic warfare. All this is. Among other things, his “Leopard” is quite capable of highlighting targets for other fighters.
          1. Lesorub
            Lesorub 4 October 2017 18: 21
            +1
            Quote: Voyager
            35 and 30 together provide more efficient work, because the 30th in these conditions will be like command vehicles.


            For these purposes there is A 50M. And when the driven aircraft (Su 35) “sees” further than the control aircraft (Su 30CM) - this is probably not entirely effective
            1. Voyager
              Voyager 7 October 2017 00: 56
              0
              MO does not agree with you.
              1. Lesorub
                Lesorub 7 October 2017 15: 36
                +1
                You can not justify, do not refer MO! )
                1. Voyager
                  Voyager 8 October 2017 23: 32
                  0
                  I justified it above, but this is not enough for you and you think up what is effective and what is not, contrary to the decisions of both pilots and Moscow Region. How else to react?)
                  1. Lesorub
                    Lesorub 9 October 2017 08: 39
                    +1
                    I would like to read about these decisions of pilots and Moscow Region. You need to understand the effectiveness of the use of these aircraft in joint operations - the Su 30 can actually control and direct combat aircraft, but in this context we consider aircraft such as MiG 29, MiG 23, Su 27 (earlier modifications), Su 35 has a more powerful radar with a range Target detection is superior to Bars Su 30CM radar (their combined use may be due to tactical necessity).
                    1. Voyager
                      Voyager 10 October 2017 13: 17
                      0
                      You want to read all the logs and decisions about how the Moscow Region weighed all the pros and cons, and came to the conclusion that yes, necessary to establish and continue production of the Su-30 for the Russian Air Force?)) Well, well) What about the pilots, the Knights spoke about this aircraft, and that we need modern sparks. Find on the net.
                      “in this context, aircraft of the MiG 29, MiG 23, Su 27 type are considered” - you yourself answered your own question. Only in addition to the old aircraft, the Su-30 will not be superfluous in working with the Su-35, I repeat, because the goals of the command vehicle are not limited to only highlighting.
                      1. Lesorub
                        Lesorub 10 October 2017 16: 45
                        +1
                        Quote: Voyager
                        Do you want to read all the logs and decisions about how the Defense Ministry weighed all the pros and cons, and came to the conclusion that yes, you need to establish and continue production of the Su-30 for the Russian Air Force?)


                        I would like to read about the combined use of the Su 30 and Su 35 (where the Su 30 will act as a control aircraft)?
                        Quote: Voyager
                        35 and 30 together provide more efficient work, because the 30th in these conditions will be like command vehicles.
  5. Bronevick
    Bronevick 4 October 2017 13: 02
    +2
    I will not tire of repeating, the Su-30 is a wonderful aircraft.
  6. Belyash
    Belyash 4 October 2017 13: 21
    0
    I heard that there are Israeli technologies in the Su-30 or modifications, in particular avionics. Does anyone know the details?
    1. Michael newage
      Michael newage 4 October 2017 15: 11
      +1
      Yesterday you said that Israeli Avionics is in MS-21 laughing . And today they have already reached the Su-30. Say you are not very smart, or just troll laughing ?
      1. Belyash
        Belyash 4 October 2017 23: 05
        0
        Well, about the MS-21, Putin himself spoke at a meeting with Netanyahu.

        And I read about the SU-30, well, here's an article of some kind http://periscope2.ru/2012/01/13/5389/
        1. Michael newage
          Michael newage 4 October 2017 23: 19
          +1
          Well, take it and read ATTENTIVELY your article. What year is there, what kind of modification and how it all ended. If you can’t explain: 2007, export Su-30MKA, no, there is no Israeli avionics there. About MS-21, I explained to you yesterday. Same thing 30 sec. search. People are so degraded that they cannot read No. ? Or do you have obsessions that you are gods in the aviation industry and no one can live without your systems? It’s funny.
  7. IQ12NHJ21az
    IQ12NHJ21az 5 October 2017 16: 03
    +1
    All the same, the Su-30SM and Su-35 are slightly different planes and are accordingly aimed at performing different tasks, for all that they are both multifunctional. The most important thing is the Su-30SM is a double, and the Su-35 is not, and this is the main difference. Su-30SM can stay longer in the air - two pilots.