Belgrade - Europe: Do not recognize Catalonia - withdraw recognition of Kosovo

87
Serbian authorities have responded to the statements of the European Commission regarding the independence referendum held in Catalonia. Recall that the European Commission recognized the Catalan referendum as legitimate, while adding that it stands for the territorial unity of Spain. In Brussels, they appealed to official Madrid and the Catalan authorities to resolve such issues at the negotiating table, and not at the level of tough confrontation.

The Serbian government noted that after such statements from Brussels, the European Union, by definition, should decide to withdraw recognition of Kosovo’s independence. Serbian Prime Minister Ana Brnabic said that the government, together with the country's president, Alexander Vucic, will send a letter to the European Commission regarding the EC position regarding the comparison of Catalonia and Kosovo.



Meanwhile, Serbian Foreign Minister Ivica Dacic noted that, calling the actions of Catalonia unilateral, the European Commission actually recognizes the illegality of attempts to secession of Kosovo from Serbia. According to Dacic, the EC, apparently, forgets that the EU recognized the recognition of Kosovo’s independence without a plebiscite on this territory.

Belgrade - Europe: Do not recognize Catalonia - withdraw recognition of Kosovo


Dacic:
When we say, what about the situation with Catalonia and Kosovo, we are answered: Catalonia is part of Spain, which in turn is a member of the European Union. And how to understand this? What does it mean? If a country is not a member of the European Union, can it be split into parts?


And this is the statement of Anna Brnabic:
Let's say this: if there is no sovereignty of Catalonia, then there is no sovereignty of Kosovo.


As can be seen, the official Belgrade is trying to point out to the European Union double standards, in which the EU got itself confused. However, the EU will clearly continue to ignore the claims of Serbia, guided solely by the interests of those who are now the masters of Europe.
  • Facebook / Political commentator
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

87 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    4 October 2017 07: 12
    Europe does not exist!
    1. +4
      4 October 2017 07: 18
      That is, that’s all, all countries are real Asia recourse or worse - America too? ?? what
      1. +9
        4 October 2017 07: 32
        Quote: Herkulesich
        or worse - America too? ??

        Yes, just parts of the land that are being redrawn at the direction of the Fashigton Regional Committee
        1. 0
          4 October 2017 07: 43
          Is the Serbian Minister naive?
          1. +1
            4 October 2017 07: 45
            Sometimes it's better to just sing smile
      2. +4
        4 October 2017 07: 34
        The situation is actually exactly the same, but they do not care. These are Serbs, Russians, etc.
        1. 0
          4 October 2017 07: 54
          The situation is not so similar that there is nowhere else to go.
          1. +26
            4 October 2017 08: 04
            Similar to disgrace.
            Everything is actually even deeper. The national minority Albanians in Serbia have the right to self-determination. The Serbian minority in Kosovo, accordingly, does not have such a right.
            Georgians have the right to self-determination and independence. Accordingly, the Khudars and Abkhaz have no such right
            Moldovans have the right to self-determination. Transnistria, not at all.
            And so on.
            Europe has long been entangled in its double, triple and quadruple standards ...
            1. +2
              4 October 2017 08: 16
              The main difference of Kosovo is the long power struggle of the Albanians. And in Catalonia there is a revolution from above. Ordinary citizens by and large not needed.
              1. +21
                4 October 2017 08: 34
                Quote: Ken71
                The main difference of Kosovo is the long power struggle of the Albanians.

                Yeah ...
                Is the struggle of Donbas not long enough or not enough power?
                Transnistria? Abkhazia? South Ossetia?
                Did Belgrade threaten the Kosovo Albanians with the complete destruction of the people, as the Georgians did with respect to the Abkhaz? Did the Serbian military do with the Albanians what Georgian "fighters for territorial integrity" "distinguished themselves" on the Zarskaya Road?
                Why is shelling of Zagreb a "war crime", and shelling of Donetsk is acceptable, is it a "struggle for territorial integrity"?
                1. 0
                  4 October 2017 08: 44
                  Take it easy. This is what we compare with Catalonia. And in Catalonia, a little fool with the police.
                  1. +19
                    4 October 2017 08: 53
                    Quote: Ken71
                    And in Catalonia, a little fool with the police.

                    Uh, no ...
                    For some reason, the European Union for some reason is much more loyal to the protesting methods of dispersing demonstrations in Moscow. Even, frankly, hysterically.
                    But when a protester in Vilnius is shot with a rubber bullet for life, it’s normal, it’s “within the standards of democracy”
                    ==
                    Where the hell are yelling about "They're the kids"? Where is the condemnation of the "bloody regime of Philip the Sixth and his punisher M. Rakhoy"?

                    If you blame others for not meeting certain "standards", be so kind as to meet them yourself, right?
                    1. 0
                      4 October 2017 09: 04
                      And Vilnius is the capital of Catalonia, or I do not quite understand what you are discussing.
                      1. +11
                        4 October 2017 09: 19
                        Quote: Ken71
                        And Vilnius is the capital of Catalonia, or I do not quite understand what you are discussing.

                        We are discussing the "standards of democracy and human rights", which, according to the Enlightened Europe, many countries, including Russia, do not meet.
                        Do they even exist? Standards? And then while they have the "Law that draws" (c)
                        And Europe most of all resembles a ferret, eating a freshly stewed chicken and at the same time giving an oh .. surprised hunter a lecture on the inviolability of the universal principle of "do not kill"
            2. +10
              4 October 2017 08: 25
              Cute old Europe, sclerosis tormented? I forgot where I threw the "rake" yesterday, has it arrived today? Messed up in the head something, gentlemen of the euro ... miracles ??? A wonderful moment to use Serbia and these contradictions to "blow up" this foul-smelling Europe to hell with a dog! Yes
              1. +1
                4 October 2017 08: 31
                So that in Europe there was the same ass as in Belarus.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. +3
                    4 October 2017 08: 47
                    It's good that you introduced yourself. Dear goatlord. It's nice to talk with a polite person who is not shy about his name.
                2. +5
                  4 October 2017 09: 38
                  I’m embarrassed to ask - what is wrong in Belarus?
                  1. 0
                    4 October 2017 10: 40
                    I'm shy to answer. But per capita income. Compared to the average per capita in the EU. And minor problems with solvency by industry and other economic indicators. As by the way, and in our God-saving Fatherland. Of course it's nice to ruin a rich neighbor. But it’s better to try to rise to his level.
                    1. +1
                      4 October 2017 10: 48
                      Do you live in Belarus?
                    2. +8
                      4 October 2017 11: 01
                      Quote: Ken71
                      I'm shy to answer. But per capita income. Compared to per capita in the EU

                      The EU is not an indicator. When some work and others eat. Because of what, in fact, rose butch in Catalonia, is not it?
                      Moldavia, Georgia, walking along the “European path of development”, Ukraine, for some reason, is losing to Belarus in terms of “average per capita income,” is not it? And do not talk about "support for Russia", financially supporting these countries, the US and the EU have much higher opportunities ...

                      So it turns out that the "totalitarianism" of Belarus is more successful than the "democracy" of Moldova, Georgia and Ukraine?

                      The question is: why is Georgia worse than Turkey? Why are the last revenues from the same tourism orders of magnitude greater? Because, according to Ankara, the "European development path" does not provide for a mandatory confrontation with Russia?
                    3. +2
                      4 October 2017 14: 36
                      And you take Lithuania as an example. Only donations do not forget to mash.
              2. +2
                4 October 2017 08: 39
                Quote: Cutter
                A wonderful moment to use Serbia and these contradictions to "blow up" this foul-smelling Europe to hell with a dog!

                What for?
                We need a strong, independent of the USA Europe.
                To “blow up” and weaken is more in the interests of the Americans. Keeping Europe as a trailer for a political locomotive called Washington
                1. +1
                  4 October 2017 09: 05
                  And do not feed some bread, give something to blow up on the side, or even better to yell about it.
              3. +3
                4 October 2017 09: 36
                Alexander, good morning! In Europe, the disease is more serious than sclerosis - double standards called
            3. +2
              4 October 2017 11: 54
              Quote: Spade
              Europe has long been entangled in its double, triple and quadruple standards ...


              Hey. And here you (IMHO) are deeply mistaken. This is not a "confusion" but a solid political dogma of the "West" - "I'm right, even if I'm not right." Talking about double standards imposed on the teeth is a bit sick.

              The appeal of Serbian politicians to the EU leadership and, possibly, the UN is the right way, but (again IMHO) is unpromising - they will be hushed up, squeezed and spit out. In these "organizations", it has long been no longer the rule of law, but the primacy of maintenance contributions.
        2. +2
          4 October 2017 08: 01
          Hypocrisy is an integral part of the Anglo-Saxon mentality.
    2. +5
      4 October 2017 07: 23
      The European Commission is a puppet, but the puppeteers are sitting in a different place and it seems to me that these children live the Catalan script ... The more weird in Europe, the better on another continent ...
      1. +8
        4 October 2017 07: 36
        Quote: Finches
        The more dry in Europe, the better on another continent ...

        of course. you can spoil all your guano here. and some "leaders" are happy. Guess mine neighbors have it, but they were ordered and they are carrying coal across the ocean. I’m thinking of such a ruler, my wife would walk for bread for 1000 miles on foot. She would quickly teach him the basics of economics
    3. +4
      4 October 2017 07: 30
      Quote: Thrall
      Europe does not exist!

      only on the map there is still
    4. +3
      4 October 2017 08: 39
      International law has not been working for a long time. There is a law of power and it dominates.
      Quote: Thrall
      Europe does not exist!
  2. +4
    4 October 2017 07: 14
    . And how to understand this? What does it mean? If a country is not a member of the European Union, can it be split into parts?

    Exactly! And I forgot to add – who did not bend under the United States.
  3. +5
    4 October 2017 07: 19
    Serbs, what kind of shaitan did you climb into the EU? ? To completely lose their statehood? ??
    1. +5
      4 October 2017 07: 25
      Herculesic
      Serbs, what kind of shaitan did you climb into the EU? ? To completely lose their statehood? ??
      Because the Serbs are like on an "island." That's why it turns out. Russia through the "little brothers" will pave the way for them. That's then there will be Russian Serbian Krajina hi
      1. +2
        4 October 2017 07: 33
        Quote: Observer2014
        Herculesic
        Serbs, what kind of shaitan did you climb into the EU? ? To completely lose their statehood? ??
        Because the Serbs are like on an "island." That's why it turns out. Russia through the "little brothers" will pave the way for them. That's then there will be Russian Serbian Krajina hi

        We must first deal with Ukraine. It doesn’t matter if, instead of a fraternal country, hostile pan territory grows on our border
  4. +2
    4 October 2017 07: 27
    That's right, the separation of Serbia was outside the legal field.
    1. 0
      4 October 2017 11: 56
      This is the kingdom of Serbs and Croats, the kingdom of Yugoslavia and the SFRY were near the legal field, but not quite in it. Serbia was not divided, but at first Yugoslavia fell apart. In a sense, the Serbs themselves have historically been to blame for something, although they have been implored from the same Europe (Austria-Hungary, France and England).
  5. +1
    4 October 2017 07: 28
    The voice of one crying in the desert, but one must yell and poke his nose at their gayropean guano!
  6. +1
    4 October 2017 07: 29
    Serbs can crucify about Kosovo as much as they like, there will be no sense from this. It was said from the Brussels empirees that Catalonia "is one thing, and you are something else."
  7. 0
    4 October 2017 07: 38
    Everything goes along the path of rocking the internal situation and shooting people in Las Vegas, and a plebiscite in Catalonia links in one chain. Everything is sewn with white thread. If the Spanish authorities were against the referendum, they simply did not recognize his decisions about suing, but they needed blood and a dozen policemen knocked grandparents with batons on camera.
    The same effect with the arrow. They couldn’t think of anything better to pick up the kooky millionaire in the arrows. Victims and internal contradictions are needed to further rock the countries.
    1. 0
      8 October 2017 18: 53
      They couldn’t think of anything better to pick up the kooky millionaire in the arrows. Victims and internal contradictions are needed to further rock the countries.-and is Russia to blame ???? in the swaying of the United States ??? fool fool
      1. 0
        8 October 2017 19: 00
        Quote: your1970
        They couldn’t think of anything better to pick up the kooky millionaire in the arrows. Victims and internal contradictions are needed to further rock the countries.-and is Russia to blame ???? in the swaying of the United States ??? fool fool

        Who told you that he was crazy?
        He carried about 20 trunks into the room past the hotel and casino guards. This is not a grandfather on the bedside table in the entrance.
        He chose a place according to all the rules of tactics, in order not to undergo return fire, he calculated the distance to the target, the height of the building.
        Moreover, he has no drives to the police, no problems with the law, no militaristic statements on the Internet.
        Everything suggests that the person was consciously taking this, but they helped him very much!
  8. +2
    4 October 2017 07: 55
    The Serbs can not decide who to lie under. And they will be like a village idiot. And with a stomach and not attached.
  9. +4
    4 October 2017 08: 04
    Naive Chukot ... Serbian "boy" ...
    But anyway, the Pandorra’s Box is open !!!
    Events / consequences are just beginning!
  10. +1
    4 October 2017 08: 06
    This demarche of Serbia is simply obliged to support the Russian Foreign Ministry.
    1. 0
      4 October 2017 08: 17
      To remember the Crimea.
      1. +3
        4 October 2017 08: 28
        Do you think someone will forget us?
        1. 0
          4 October 2017 08: 49
          This is hard to forget. This is the next step of the circus of separatism. Not only separate but also attach to yourself.
      2. +2
        4 October 2017 09: 06
        Remember the Crimea? We can also remember a lot of things. Even if we take the events of only the 20th century. So we have enough complaints.
        1. 0
          4 October 2017 09: 21
          Let me remind you that they introduce sanctions to us.
          1. +1
            5 October 2017 08: 52
            Yeah ??? And why then the European (primarily German) business is not the first year very dissatisfied (at least) with counter-sanctions?
    2. +1
      4 October 2017 09: 05
      Quote: Severok
      This demarche of Serbia is simply obliged to support the Russian Foreign Ministry.


      Then what about the Crimea?
      The Russian Foreign Ministry on the annexation of Crimea, referred to the Kosovo precedent.
      (in this case, between the Russian Federation and Ukraine by that time agreements were signed on territorial integrity and on the state border, why the international community does not recognize the referendum in Crimea as legitimate)
      1. +2
        4 October 2017 15: 28
        Yes, it’s normal with the Crimea. It is about recognition of the REFERENDUM, and not separation or accession. In Crimea there was a referendum and the people made a decision based on its results. There was a referendum in Catalonia. Its results may please or upset, but if we are for democracy, it must be recognized. Or do not bother about democracy and freedoms. It's just about the "dynamic" point of view of the West ...
  11. 0
    4 October 2017 08: 26
    Dacic: When we say, what about the situation with Catalonia and Kosovo, we are answered: Catalonia is part of Spain, which in turn is a member of the European Union. And how to understand this? What does it mean? If the country is not a member of the European Union, it can be split into parts?

    Golden words!
  12. +1
    4 October 2017 08: 46
    They didn’t get confused in the EU and they don’t have any double standards and haven’t had them since KOSOVO, there are only valuable guidelines from the states, abbreviated by the CIA.
  13. +1
    4 October 2017 09: 19
    Quote: Ken71
    This is hard to forget. This is the next step of the circus of separatism. Not only separate but also attach to yourself.

    Dear, as you said - "circus", was not invented by us. We have a very sane leadership. And you, my recommendation, should approach the question “wider” and “softer” and most importantly - “smarter”.
    tongue
    1. 0
      4 October 2017 09: 55
      The annexation of neighboring territories is your smart decision. Then it’s scary to imagine what a solution can be stupid.
      1. +1
        4 October 2017 10: 17
        where did you get the "annexation"? The vast majority, the inhabitants of the peninsula voted.
        stood for several hours, with children, with cat / dogs ...
        but stood!
        Do you really believe that those people came, stood for hours under the "barrels of Russian machine guns"?
        1. 0
          4 October 2017 12: 32
          And you are aware that the residents of Donbass of Transnistria voted for the same thing. You do not care about their opinion. And about the Russian troops, who told you. There were Martian troops out of modesty without signs of nationality. Very polite. And this action is called annexation. Whatever referendum is being held. By the way, in the Sudetenland there was also a referendum. But we do not consider it legal. But what now to say. It is impossible and wrong to give Crimea so that we do not think about the legality of accession.
      2. +2
        4 October 2017 10: 23
        Quote: Ken71
        The annexation of neighboring territories is your smart decision.

        And the opinion of the Crimeans-the referendum do not care? belay
        1. 0
          4 October 2017 12: 36
          And you do not care whether or not the opinion of Ukrainians.
          1. 0
            4 October 2017 13: 00
            Quote: Ken71
            And you do not care whether or not the opinion of Ukrainians.

            No, do not care. I take it completely agree.
            The vast majority (86%) of Ukrainians would like Crimea to return to Ukraine, while 60% believe that this is possible. This is evidenced by a sociological survey conducted by the research company InMind commissioned by the Ministry of Information Policy of Ukraine. The survey was conducted in March 2017. A total of 1000 people were interviewed in 77 settlements in all regions controlled by Kiev.
            Ukraine News: http://rian.com.ua/analytics/20170401/1022799594.
            html
            1. 0
              5 October 2017 00: 25
              And the opinion of the inhabitants of the Crimea when they were Ukrainians does not matter. Yes you are a hypocrite.
              1. +1
                5 October 2017 11: 47
                Quote: Ken71
                And the opinion of the inhabitants of the Crimea when they were Ukrainians does not matter. Yes you are a hypocrite.

                1. Residents of Crimea (the absolute majority) were not Ukrainians, they were citizens of Ukraine and you know for that!
                2. Have you carefully read my answer? Where did you find hypocrisy? fool
          2. +4
            4 October 2017 13: 33
            And what about the Ukrainians?
            10 men gathered and held a referendum on whether to consider the wife of one of them common. 90% are in favor, 10% are against. The decision of the referendum is to count.
            What relation can Ukrainians have to a referendum in Crimea? If they do not live there, of course
            1. 0
              5 October 2017 00: 25
              At the time of the referendum, they were all Ukrainians
              1. +1
                5 October 2017 07: 15
                You still say that the Buryats are currently Russian.
      3. +3
        4 October 2017 10: 31
        Quote: Ken71
        Annexation of neighboring territories

        Come on? Are you serious or are you joking now?
        Well look:
        1. 0
          4 October 2017 12: 39
          Of course I'm serious. There is a concept of international law. Let’s say in Russia the crisis is a revolution and a complete mess. And the inhabitants of Kaliningrad, for example, will want to join Germany and hold a referendum. How do you feel about its results.
          1. +2
            4 October 2017 13: 35
            Quote: Ken71
            There is a concept of international law.

            And where does the "international law"? It has nothing to do with referenda. Or are you trying to argue that the referendum in Scotland was contrary to "international law" because exclusively permanent residents of this particular region voted?
            1. 0
              5 October 2017 00: 27
              You are wrong, therefore, arguably changing the subject. A referendum in Scotland did not contradict the laws of Britain
              1. +1
                5 October 2017 07: 34
                Quote: Ken71
                You are wrong, therefore, arguably changing the subject.

                What is wrong? Does the mythical “international law” prohibit a referendum in Crimea and Catalonia, but allow a referendum in Scotland and chop off a piece of Serbia without referenda at all?


                Quote: Ken71
                A referendum in Scotland did not contradict the laws of Britain

                So in the legislation of Spain there is nothing directly prohibiting the holding of a referendum and detachment. The Spanish authorities simply went against such a fundamental principle as "what is not forbidden is allowed." And under a very strange pretext. In fact, declaring the Catalans people not related to the people of Spain.
      4. +5
        4 October 2017 11: 45
        Et you hint at sho !!!
        The country where the "city on the hill", such as not smart turns out ???
        Oh, they are NEIGHBORING, and not only territories annexed MORE THAN ALL !!!
        In short - the right of the STRONG to shawn, what they want, and before it was not very contested, but now how ???
        1. 0
          4 October 2017 12: 35
          You speak the truth. The right of the strong. Yes, that's just for this you need to be very stronger than others. Otherwise, minor troubles such as sanctions.
          1. +6
            4 October 2017 13: 21
            Minor troubles ??? This is probably a JOKE.
            Opinions on this issue from the DISASTER to DO NOT CANCEL ANOTHER YEARS ... NEVER, PLEASE ???
            I bastard with our people !!! Shaw there foreigners invented themselves ???
            And WE WILL BE STRONG, contrary to everything ... if we don’t tear the navel !!!
            1. 0
              5 October 2017 00: 27
              That's what I had in mind.
  14. +4
    4 October 2017 11: 36
    Quote: Velizariy
    Do you think someone will forget us?

    That's right!!!
  15. 0
    4 October 2017 12: 42
    Lopatov,
    You wrote so many beeches. And probably everything is right. But that's not what I mean. I mean that you don’t need to blow up Europe, but you need to try to raise the standard of living of our citizens to their level.
    1. +6
      4 October 2017 13: 25
      Oh, everything just does not need !!!
      So so many different things dragged here !!!
      And for GOOD I, too, FOR !!!
    2. +2
      4 October 2017 13: 26
      Those. become tolerant, adopt Finnish education (I want to, I don’t teach!), completely obey the United States, introduce external management and launch tens of millions of refugees from all countries of Asia and Africa?
      1. 0
        5 October 2017 00: 30
        Well, perversions of your choice. Our authorities have already launched migrants more than Europeans. And for the rest, I don’t see Czechs, for example, suffer from submission to the United States.
  16. +1
    4 October 2017 13: 22
    Europe says to Belgrade: "Ugh on you! They crushed the Turks, Austrians, Germans and now we will crush"
  17. +1
    4 October 2017 23: 40
    Quote: Ken71
    Of course I'm serious. There is a concept of international law. Let’s say in Russia the crisis is a revolution and a complete mess. And the inhabitants of Kaliningrad, for example, will want to join Germany and hold a referendum. How do you feel about its results.

    Russia has experienced the above over the past century twice. And lost a lot of territories. Including, for example, Poland.
    But about the fact that “there is a concept of international law” - so let me disagree with you, this is not a concept (a thing is precisely defined), but an abstraction, sort of like “honor”, ​​“duty”, “call of ancestors”. That is, there are general directions for thoughts, but the conclusions can be directly opposite. And the same SS men had both “honor” and “duty”, and many igilovites — how selfless they were — they all worked as jihadmobile drivers.
    1. 0
      5 October 2017 00: 31
      Yes, Poland cannot be direct like that. Poland fought off our blood.
      1. +1
        5 October 2017 07: 39
        Quote: Ken71
        Poland fought off our blood.

        Rather, she acted like an aggressor, starting to chop off pieces from Lithuania, Belarus and Ukraine. And only after that Russia intervened in the situation. The first time unsuccessfully, later bringing the situation to its logical conclusion.
        Poland was an aggressor, because it had to "fight back" with blood, do not forget that.
        1. +4
          5 October 2017 09: 05
          Information for consideration - Poland HAD “bright” periods in history, KINGS were gathered by the Commonwealth ... the main word in this thread was !!!
          The further history of the Polish state is characterized by the nickname given to it EXACTLY in Europe .... I won’t write the name of the animal that Poland was called, but for every normal person this animal is disgusting ... guess why?
          And for Chekhov, what can I say-they lived under Hitler \ worked quite successfully themselves ... does this say something about the mentality of the country \ nation ???
  18. 0
    5 October 2017 20: 34
    Unfortunately this will not happen. !!!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"