Glitter and poverty of the Minsk agreements

20
Recently, State Duma deputy Vyacheslav Nikonov said live that Moscow “continues to insist on Minsk, despite the fact that Kiev does not comply with the Minsk agreements, and now it directly violates their education law against the Russian language and the Russian-speaking population of Ukraine. But this is the policy of ethnocide.

Glitter and poverty of the Minsk agreements




What happens with the Minsk agreements? Moscow has long been accusing Kiev of sabotaging the Minsk agreements, demonstratively violating them, but forgives everything, does not denounce Minsk. Why? Berlin and Paris accuse Moscow of failing to comply with the “Minsk”, allegedly imposed sanctions for it, but the Minsk agreements also do not denounce. Why? Why are the Minsk agreements that are not implemented by anyone, and have not been denounced by anyone: neither by Russia, nor by Europe, nor by Bandera’s Ukraine? After all, they have not been fulfilled for the third year ...

Anti-Russian sanctions were formally imposed because of the Crimea and “Russia’s not fulfilling Minsk”, but this cart is still where it was. Moscow simply knows that this is just a false pretext: sanctions are imposed by the collective West, because Russia refuses to obey him, and stubbornly bends its line in world politics, defending its interests.

The only achievement of the Minsk agreements was the cessation of active hostilities in the Donbass and the establishment of a relative truce, despite all its costs and shelling. The poverty of the Minsk Agreements is that they have become a “long box” in which everything is sinking, lies a dead weight. It means that this is necessary for someone, for some reason it is necessary, if the Minsk agreements are still recognized as non-alternative by all its Norman guarantors, and by the American specialist Kurt Walker. It remains to be comforted by the fact that this situation is still better than the active military actions of the Bandera regime.

By and large, “the inactive“ Minsk ”suits everyone except Kiev: it has become a trap for him. Only Kiev is trying to get away from “Minsk”, replace it with something else, even peacekeepers, even with the law on “reintegration of Donbass”, and is already in direct violation of the anti-Russian law on education. But Europe and the United States still ignore Kiev, and repeat the mantra on the non-alternative ability of Minsk. What does it mean? "Minsk" is beneficial to everyone except Kiev.

Yes, “non-working“ Minsk ”is beneficial for Russia, America and Europe together with Poland, Bandera is not beneficial, therefore he wants to get rid of Minsk fetters, however, the Norman guarantors block these attempts. Unfortunately, Donbas republics suffer from artillery shelling and their uncertain situation.

Thanks to the “non-working Minsk”, the Bandera Ukraine is effectively destroyed, and all the Normans have nothing to do with it. One may broadcast to the media about the power of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, make terrible statements and make terrible laws, but all the socio-economic potentials of Ukraine diminish with each passing month. The big industry of Ukraine, deprived of the Russian market, is collapsing, so everything is falling, therefore the flow of labor migrants abroad is increasing, and no reforms and help from Europe can do anything about it, and cannot. And Europe knows this very well. Only debt obligations to the collective West are growing in Ukraine, and soon they will have to be repaid ...

It turns out that the Minsk process is beneficial to Moscow, because its Bandera enemy collapses on its own, without war! This economic reality will inevitably come out and become a political reality. The Minsk process is beneficial to Berlin, Paris and Washington, because it is easier to knock out logs from the degrading country and pump out skilled labor, demand repayment of debts or other concessions, for example, territorial ones. Therefore, Bandera can not break the Minsk fetters.

If you recall the wisdom of pre-liberal times, philosophers like Machiavelli, you can see that politics is a cynical and deceitful thing, and big politics is big cynicism and big lies. All states are lying when, through the mouths of their heads, they say that everyone else in the world desires only prosperity and freedom and equality. They want quite the opposite, for example, the United States wants its own "dominance", expansion in the world at the expense of others. Nothing changes in this world, only liberal global lies are becoming more and more.

Post-Crimean Russia adopted the rules of this world game without rules: to live like wolves with wolves. All "world players" secretly adhere to the old maxim: tell more truth as much as possible, however, never tell the whole truth. And Russia also does not speak the whole truth about the goals of its policy, including in relation to Bandera’s Ukraine. Officially, the Kiev regime does not even call the Bandera / nationalist regime, and Nazism in Ukraine, officially, does not see, unless it is the radical elements and incomprehensible activists.

Therefore, by the way, analysts, political scientists, journalists and just bloggers are in demand. They talk about real political meanings that state politicians deliberately drown in their speeches and keep silent about fake Western media, according to the definition of truth president Donald Trump.

Officially, Russia does not blame the West for aggressive expansion in the world and in Ukraine, for manipulating the Bandera neo-Nazi regime that it cited by means of a coup to power in Ukraine. But this does not mean that Moscow is not preparing the appropriate accounts for payment.

This means that the uncontested Minsk agreements will not be safely implemented until the new military civil strife in Ukraine, or in Kiev itself, as many say, or its final destabilization. Only then “Minsk” will finally die, and some reformatting of the Ukrainian post-Soviet space will take its place. Given the new political weight and the Syrian achievements of post-Crimean Russia.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    October 4 2017
    "All the" world players "tacitly adhere to the old maxim: speak as much truth as possible, however, never tell the whole truth." Perhaps a slightly different principle works here ... lies said a hundred times, become the "truth" ...
    1. +1
      October 4 2017
      This is an American principle, you need to know it, you don’t need to use it, because a lie as an awl will always come out, it has already come out in the USA, although you tried to defame it ...
      1. +5
        October 5 2017
        Quote: Victor Kamenev
        This is an American principle, you need to know it, use it is not necessary

        Why not? If this American principle will work for the national interests of Russia. The Minsk agreements stopped open hostilities, is that not a plus. The Norman troika transferred him to the "sluggish tripper" phase. I will not talk about the West, but Russia is also on hand. Leading the battle on two fronts is hard and expensive, Syria is a serious burden!

        Quote: Victor Kamenev
        use - it’s not necessary, because a lie as it was, will always come out, in the USA it has already come out, although they tried to slander it too ...

        I will quote Prince Gorchakov, the head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Empire.
        Sometimes it’s better to work your tongue to save blood ... - Alexander Gorchakov
  2. +1
    October 4 2017
    If you recall the wisdom of doliberal times, philosophers like Machiavelli, you can find out that politics is a cynical and deceitful thing, and big politics is big cynicism and big lies. All states lie when, through the mouths of their heads, they say that they wish everyone else in the world exclusively prosperity and freedom, and equality.

    Does it follow from this that if Russia wants the rest of the world exclusively and prosperity, and freedom, and equality, then it also lies?
    If not, then why write it?
    If so, what can I talk about?
    Why did the author solder Nikolasha here?
    1. +1
      October 4 2017
      Oh, yes, and Russia is not telling the truth, because it does not tell the truth, for example, about the "genesis of the Kiev regime", what Peskov said, and ... did not continue. Do you want to play with open cards with sharps? Therefore, Lavrov is so sullen, only sometimes it will break out: de * bily ... As for equality, what equality can there be when there are also national interests? Only limited to these interests is the nature of the state, about which Nikolasha was one of the first to say ...
      1. +1
        October 4 2017
        Well, then you correctly interpret Machiavelli "From which it follows that a rational ruler cannot and should not remain true to his promise if it harms his interests and if the reasons that prompted him to make a promise have disappeared."
        Otherwise sweeping "All states lie when, through the mouths of their heads, they say that they wish everyone else in the world exclusively prosperity and freedom, and equality. "causes a violation of your own logical chains and makes Machiavelli roll over in his grave.
        He not only writes about the fox. And also about the lion and, in fact, man.
        Therefore, Nikolasha turned out
        1. +2
          October 4 2017
          I am not a fan of Machiavelli, do not flatter yourself, but he told a lot of truth about the rulers of all times and peoples. Today he is even more honest than many supposedly pacifists and humanists, with humanitarian bombardments at the ready.
          As for my quote, it is real. Or do you think that the United States wants the prosperity of Russia, and Russia wants this to the United States? To compromise your own safety? Here our leaders are telling lies, or “diplomatic truth”, which conceals their thoughts. That is life...
          1. +2
            October 5 2017
            Tell us what else he said there? Apparently, you at best read about it on Wikipedia.
            Enrage people who refer to something that they do not really know / do not understand.
            Maybe take a couple of hours and read the source? It is very small. But then you will understand what it is about
  3. +4
    October 4 2017
    Easily understood by style, Kamenev’s next creation. Although he is not new here. The plan is simple-wait. Perhaps it will resolve itself. The author conflicts with many articles, where it is said that MS weakens the Russian Federation. Deprives resources and maneuver, strengthens the sanctions burden, forms the image of an aggressive state, etc., etc.
    But since this is Kamenev, the main leitmotif is that everything is bad in Ukraine, we only need to wait a bit.#Soon
    The Ukrainian theme is fertile, as is the land. Someone is good to feed on this, if only Russian realities do not slow down
    1. +2
      October 4 2017
      “It turns out that the Minsk process is beneficial to Moscow, because its Bandera enemy is destroyed itself, without war!”

      The war is just there. The shelling of kindergartens and schools, the deaths of children and civilians, destroyed infrastructure - is this not a war? It turns out, beneficial to Russia?
      If this phrase of the author is sarcasm, then you can still understand. But if this is one of his versions of what is happening, then I just have no words ...
      1. +1
        October 4 2017
        You, the reserve officer, to the shelling you want more tank attacks? What stock are you from?
    2. 0
      October 4 2017
      You can't decide on your gender, but climb into empiricism. Yes, Bandera will soon resolve, although ask Sergei Taruta, he says that not only is everything bad, but the people are already running away, who can where, from your good life.
      "Minsk" is not related to sanctions, they are not because of Ukraine, this is a Ukrainian coup because of Russia's foreign policy, but it is difficult for you to understand, with maydanny brains.
      1. +1
        October 4 2017
        Essentially nothing to answer? Micro-hysteria? Your manners of conversation are just like that of the legendary Panikovsky - "who are you?"
      2. 0
        October 5 2017
        Quote: Victor Kamenev
        You can't decide on your gender, but climb into empiricism. Yes, Bandera will soon resolve, although ask Sergei Taruta, he says that not only is everything bad, but the people are already running away, who can where, from your good life.
        "Minsk" is not related to sanctions, they are not because of Ukraine, this is a Ukrainian coup because of Russia's foreign policy, but it is difficult for you to understand, with maydanny brains.

        Yes, sir, you should get involved in an empty polemic. Minsk itself has already outlived itself in January 2017, because the events stipulated in it and the terms of their execution expired by the indicated time, and none of those involved in the process (the EU and the Russian Federation) had time or desire to create a new interaction format, and therefore Minsk was simply prolonged without re-signing and additional agreements because they rely on the fact that the centrifugal processes that have begun will themselves solve the problem of this "under-state" without exposing the guarantors to political risks. THOSE. let everything go as it goes, and therefore you just have to wait a while because there is nothing to talk about with Kuev’s authorities, because all her decisions are in the Washington regional committee. Now, both the Russian Federation and Berlin and Paris simply took a break so that the United States on Urkain could get rid of it fully and independently.
  4. +1
    October 4 2017
    Do not fulfill Paris and Berlin, why only Kiev should do something there? And, in general, the Minsk Agreements are not about Ukraine, but about the division of the USSR. Merkel in her campaign statement about the reunification of Germany, in fact, said that sooner or later Crimea will go to the “Europe”, and this is possible only under one condition: the Russian Federation will not. Understood the opposite. Negotiations and even arrangements between a bear and a hunter who shares his skin - this is what the Minsk Process is. A bear hunter is accompanied by a pack of dogs. Ukraine is already a den. “Drang nah Osten” is what the Minsk Process is.
    1. +1
      October 4 2017
      Minsk is a separate agreement between Russia and Europe, in Ukraine. He does not like the United States, and Bandera, so what? Nothing but Minsk is nothing and never will be. As for Drang, so Hitler showed how it ends, his followers will end up worse, take a word. They are weaker than Adolf and his General Staff.
  5. 0
    October 4 2017
    A dead project ... Ukrostan is profitable, since the puppeteer moves the rope - APU scorching ... and no more ... Because then, if they actively trample, there will be an operation to force peace, even the mattresses do not bother, they were told that LDNR is not abandoned, they understood! Mishiko was sent to prepare for this, ties were being imported, menus were being developed, sauces for the tie ... Mishiko said that it wasn’t very good for a dry lazet ...
  6. +5
    October 4 2017
    Sorry, guys. War has come. Let's rest. Come to me. All together. Or one by one. Just rest. I'm waiting for everyone on Lake Baikal.
  7. 0
    October 6 2017
    Interestingly, the author knows what "Nazism" is?
  8. +1
    October 9 2017
    The Minsk agreements of Russia are not profitable. They do not prevent Bandera from destroying the Russian population of Donbass with artillery fire. Moreover, the Minsk agreements are needed exactly by Kiev, which openly says that it needs Donbass and Crimea without Russians ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"