Glitter and poverty of the Minsk agreements
Recently, State Duma deputy Vyacheslav Nikonov said live that Moscow “continues to insist on Minsk, despite the fact that Kiev does not comply with the Minsk agreements, and now it directly violates their education law against the Russian language and the Russian-speaking population of Ukraine. But this is the policy of ethnocide.
What happens with the Minsk agreements? Moscow has long been accusing Kiev of sabotaging the Minsk agreements, demonstratively violating them, but forgives everything, does not denounce Minsk. Why? Berlin and Paris accuse Moscow of failing to comply with the “Minsk”, allegedly imposed sanctions for it, but the Minsk agreements also do not denounce. Why? Why are the Minsk agreements that are not implemented by anyone, and have not been denounced by anyone: neither by Russia, nor by Europe, nor by Bandera’s Ukraine? After all, they have not been fulfilled for the third year ...
Anti-Russian sanctions were formally imposed because of the Crimea and “Russia’s not fulfilling Minsk”, but this cart is still where it was. Moscow simply knows that this is just a false pretext: sanctions are imposed by the collective West, because Russia refuses to obey him, and stubbornly bends its line in world politics, defending its interests.
The only achievement of the Minsk agreements was the cessation of active hostilities in the Donbass and the establishment of a relative truce, despite all its costs and shelling. The poverty of the Minsk Agreements is that they have become a “long box” in which everything is sinking, lies a dead weight. It means that this is necessary for someone, for some reason it is necessary, if the Minsk agreements are still recognized as non-alternative by all its Norman guarantors, and by the American specialist Kurt Walker. It remains to be comforted by the fact that this situation is still better than the active military actions of the Bandera regime.
By and large, “the inactive“ Minsk ”suits everyone except Kiev: it has become a trap for him. Only Kiev is trying to get away from “Minsk”, replace it with something else, even peacekeepers, even with the law on “reintegration of Donbass”, and is already in direct violation of the anti-Russian law on education. But Europe and the United States still ignore Kiev, and repeat the mantra on the non-alternative ability of Minsk. What does it mean? "Minsk" is beneficial to everyone except Kiev.
Yes, “non-working“ Minsk ”is beneficial for Russia, America and Europe together with Poland, Bandera is not beneficial, therefore he wants to get rid of Minsk fetters, however, the Norman guarantors block these attempts. Unfortunately, Donbas republics suffer from artillery shelling and their uncertain situation.
Thanks to the “non-working Minsk”, the Bandera Ukraine is effectively destroyed, and all the Normans have nothing to do with it. One may broadcast to the media about the power of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, make terrible statements and make terrible laws, but all the socio-economic potentials of Ukraine diminish with each passing month. The big industry of Ukraine, deprived of the Russian market, is collapsing, so everything is falling, therefore the flow of labor migrants abroad is increasing, and no reforms and help from Europe can do anything about it, and cannot. And Europe knows this very well. Only debt obligations to the collective West are growing in Ukraine, and soon they will have to be repaid ...
It turns out that the Minsk process is beneficial to Moscow, because its Bandera enemy collapses on its own, without war! This economic reality will inevitably come out and become a political reality. The Minsk process is beneficial to Berlin, Paris and Washington, because it is easier to knock out logs from the degrading country and pump out skilled labor, demand repayment of debts or other concessions, for example, territorial ones. Therefore, Bandera can not break the Minsk fetters.
If you recall the wisdom of pre-liberal times, philosophers like Machiavelli, you can see that politics is a cynical and deceitful thing, and big politics is big cynicism and big lies. All states are lying when, through the mouths of their heads, they say that everyone else in the world desires only prosperity and freedom and equality. They want quite the opposite, for example, the United States wants its own "dominance", expansion in the world at the expense of others. Nothing changes in this world, only liberal global lies are becoming more and more.
Post-Crimean Russia adopted the rules of this world game without rules: to live like wolves with wolves. All "world players" secretly adhere to the old maxim: tell more truth as much as possible, however, never tell the whole truth. And Russia also does not speak the whole truth about the goals of its policy, including in relation to Bandera’s Ukraine. Officially, the Kiev regime does not even call the Bandera / nationalist regime, and Nazism in Ukraine, officially, does not see, unless it is the radical elements and incomprehensible activists.
Therefore, by the way, analysts, political scientists, journalists and just bloggers are in demand. They talk about real political meanings that state politicians deliberately drown in their speeches and keep silent about fake Western media, according to the definition of truth president Donald Trump.
Officially, Russia does not blame the West for aggressive expansion in the world and in Ukraine, for manipulating the Bandera neo-Nazi regime that it cited by means of a coup to power in Ukraine. But this does not mean that Moscow is not preparing the appropriate accounts for payment.
This means that the uncontested Minsk agreements will not be safely implemented until the new military civil strife in Ukraine, or in Kiev itself, as many say, or its final destabilization. Only then “Minsk” will finally die, and some reformatting of the Ukrainian post-Soviet space will take its place. Given the new political weight and the Syrian achievements of post-Crimean Russia.
What happens with the Minsk agreements? Moscow has long been accusing Kiev of sabotaging the Minsk agreements, demonstratively violating them, but forgives everything, does not denounce Minsk. Why? Berlin and Paris accuse Moscow of failing to comply with the “Minsk”, allegedly imposed sanctions for it, but the Minsk agreements also do not denounce. Why? Why are the Minsk agreements that are not implemented by anyone, and have not been denounced by anyone: neither by Russia, nor by Europe, nor by Bandera’s Ukraine? After all, they have not been fulfilled for the third year ...
Anti-Russian sanctions were formally imposed because of the Crimea and “Russia’s not fulfilling Minsk”, but this cart is still where it was. Moscow simply knows that this is just a false pretext: sanctions are imposed by the collective West, because Russia refuses to obey him, and stubbornly bends its line in world politics, defending its interests.
The only achievement of the Minsk agreements was the cessation of active hostilities in the Donbass and the establishment of a relative truce, despite all its costs and shelling. The poverty of the Minsk Agreements is that they have become a “long box” in which everything is sinking, lies a dead weight. It means that this is necessary for someone, for some reason it is necessary, if the Minsk agreements are still recognized as non-alternative by all its Norman guarantors, and by the American specialist Kurt Walker. It remains to be comforted by the fact that this situation is still better than the active military actions of the Bandera regime.
By and large, “the inactive“ Minsk ”suits everyone except Kiev: it has become a trap for him. Only Kiev is trying to get away from “Minsk”, replace it with something else, even peacekeepers, even with the law on “reintegration of Donbass”, and is already in direct violation of the anti-Russian law on education. But Europe and the United States still ignore Kiev, and repeat the mantra on the non-alternative ability of Minsk. What does it mean? "Minsk" is beneficial to everyone except Kiev.
Yes, “non-working“ Minsk ”is beneficial for Russia, America and Europe together with Poland, Bandera is not beneficial, therefore he wants to get rid of Minsk fetters, however, the Norman guarantors block these attempts. Unfortunately, Donbas republics suffer from artillery shelling and their uncertain situation.
Thanks to the “non-working Minsk”, the Bandera Ukraine is effectively destroyed, and all the Normans have nothing to do with it. One may broadcast to the media about the power of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, make terrible statements and make terrible laws, but all the socio-economic potentials of Ukraine diminish with each passing month. The big industry of Ukraine, deprived of the Russian market, is collapsing, so everything is falling, therefore the flow of labor migrants abroad is increasing, and no reforms and help from Europe can do anything about it, and cannot. And Europe knows this very well. Only debt obligations to the collective West are growing in Ukraine, and soon they will have to be repaid ...
It turns out that the Minsk process is beneficial to Moscow, because its Bandera enemy collapses on its own, without war! This economic reality will inevitably come out and become a political reality. The Minsk process is beneficial to Berlin, Paris and Washington, because it is easier to knock out logs from the degrading country and pump out skilled labor, demand repayment of debts or other concessions, for example, territorial ones. Therefore, Bandera can not break the Minsk fetters.
If you recall the wisdom of pre-liberal times, philosophers like Machiavelli, you can see that politics is a cynical and deceitful thing, and big politics is big cynicism and big lies. All states are lying when, through the mouths of their heads, they say that everyone else in the world desires only prosperity and freedom and equality. They want quite the opposite, for example, the United States wants its own "dominance", expansion in the world at the expense of others. Nothing changes in this world, only liberal global lies are becoming more and more.
Post-Crimean Russia adopted the rules of this world game without rules: to live like wolves with wolves. All "world players" secretly adhere to the old maxim: tell more truth as much as possible, however, never tell the whole truth. And Russia also does not speak the whole truth about the goals of its policy, including in relation to Bandera’s Ukraine. Officially, the Kiev regime does not even call the Bandera / nationalist regime, and Nazism in Ukraine, officially, does not see, unless it is the radical elements and incomprehensible activists.
Therefore, by the way, analysts, political scientists, journalists and just bloggers are in demand. They talk about real political meanings that state politicians deliberately drown in their speeches and keep silent about fake Western media, according to the definition of truth president Donald Trump.
Officially, Russia does not blame the West for aggressive expansion in the world and in Ukraine, for manipulating the Bandera neo-Nazi regime that it cited by means of a coup to power in Ukraine. But this does not mean that Moscow is not preparing the appropriate accounts for payment.
This means that the uncontested Minsk agreements will not be safely implemented until the new military civil strife in Ukraine, or in Kiev itself, as many say, or its final destabilization. Only then “Minsk” will finally die, and some reformatting of the Ukrainian post-Soviet space will take its place. Given the new political weight and the Syrian achievements of post-Crimean Russia.
Information