The National Interest compares the combat capabilities of the F-16 and the "deadly" Su-35

Over the decades, that the F-16 Fighting Falcon fighter is the basis of the US Air Force and its allies, it has become a multi-purpose aircraft capable of performing various missions. In modification Viper ("Viper"), this machine will remain in service for many years. But now she has potential adversaries - for example, Su-35, which surpasses the Attacking Falcon in many characteristics.

About this in the publication material The National Interest wrote military commentator Dave Majumdar, reports RG-Sil

During training, the United States Air Force uses Su-27 ("Flanker" for NATO codification) as an "enemy". He is among the most likely air opponents that American pilots may encounter. Su-35 - is a deep modernization of the "Flanker", not very common, but the most powerful of the currently created. In the hands of properly trained pilots and with the support of ground services, this machine poses an extraordinary threat to any Western fighter. The only exception may be F-22 and F-35 due to its electronic equipment. Although the correct tactics in the case of them can play a useful role for the Russian aircraft.

But the "workhorse" of the United States and its partners is the F-16 Viper. The main disadvantages of this fighter are the lack of the latest radar with active electronic scanning (AESA) and the inability to use the AIM-120 air-to-air missiles at altitudes at which the F-15 Eagle, for example, can do this.

The AESA system is necessary for tracking cruise missiles and other hard-to-reach targets. Improved F-16E / F in the United Arab Emirates are equipped with modern radar APG-80 AESA, but the fleet of such aircraft is extremely small. The United States Air Force planned to upgrade the F-300's 16 aircraft under the Combat Avionics Programmed Extension Suite (CAPES), but it was canceled due to budget cuts. For the F-16 Viper, the air-to-air missions are secondary, and yet with the presence of AESA, these planes could engage in long-range Su-35 confrontation. However, such battles will be very problematic, sums up Majumdar.

At short distances, the outcome of the fight comes down to the skills of the pilot and the characteristics of the weapons used. The appearance of the R-73 and AIM-9X missiles led to the fact that hostilities took place under the scenario of mutual destruction. In this regard, a certain advantage arises from the Russian aircraft due to super-maneuverability. However, an experienced F-16 pilot will still be able to neutralize it.

Anyway, the Su-35 is an extremely capable aircraft. He wiped out the enormous technological advantage that the fourth-generation Pentagon fighter fleet had in the past decades

- the analyst concludes.

Comments

[Zaurbek]

UVT for the F-16 would greatly extend the life of this beautiful aircraft. AFAR, as I understand it, is already in the latest versions.

[d ^ Amir]

UVT glider can not stand .... it will have to redesign the entire plane ...

[Michael newage]

The glider will withstand. Experienced F16 was with OBT. Not launched for other reasons.

[Tusv]

Quote: Michael Newage

The glider will withstand. Experienced F16 was with OBT. Not launched for other reasons.

Here is a prototype. If you are familiar with the thermal bath, then slightly reject and there is no tail. Here stabilization is needed. One keel will not stand. Need compensation. With what? Which one? The Su-35 and F-22 are not a problem. Two vectors give rise to the desired vector without loading the glider

[Michael newage]

I didn’t hear that that laboratory would fall apart in the air when its tail fell off . She completely flew to herself and even made a Pugachev cobra. This just says that the glider there was normal. I don’t know, maybe it was strengthened, but fact is a fact. It's not about keels, even though I rubbed it. fur. not studied.
http://www.airwar.ru/enc/xplane/nf16dvista.html

[Tusv]

Quote: Michael Newage

She completely flew to herself and even made a Pugachev cobra.

And where did you see OVT in this link? The deflected thrust vector or Controlled is an egg in profile, but the plumage and air brakes support the variable stability - pure aerodynamics - no snot. Do not confuse Beat with Byte in general

[Michael newage]

This link contains the TITLE of this aircraft and the fact that it did not crash due to a torn tail. Here's where you say that it had a UVT engine:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Dynamics_F-
16_VISTA
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrust_vectoring
So I don’t confuse anything, and byte with bit are related concepts like a centimeter and a decimeter .

[Gunxnumx]

still found https://www.nkj.ru/archive/articles/14891/

[opus]

Quote: Tusv

Draft thrust vector or Steered - an egg in profile,

butter, butter

Management thrust vector (UHT) of a jet engine - deviation jet engine from the direction corresponding to the cruising mode.

Those. under the concept of “thrust vector control” of a jet engine is any technical solution that allows you to deflect the jet from some, relatively speaking, “main” position (cruise speed vector, as a rule). Moreover, the “deflected nozzle” is only one of the methods for controlling the thrust vector.
Example

and how it is implemented, case 10e
So

so
NF-16D MATV (Multi Axis Thrust Vectoring - traction vector control)

or as

in FIG.
this is uvt, but the methods are different

[opus]

Quote: Tusv

then slightly reject and there is no tail. Here stabilization is needed. One keel will not stand.

why not three "tails" then? Al four?
1.Axisymmetric Vectoring Exhaust Nozzle-
GE Axisymmetric Vectoring multi-angle nozzle used on the F-16 MATV

and nothing breaks
2. "reject and no tail"
The tail has nothing to do with it.
Vertical plumage (VO): Provides the aircraft with road stability, controllability and balancing with respect to the vertical axis
And the plumage (in general) refers to aerodynamic surfaces that provide stability, controllability and balance of the aircraft in flight.



Threat. maybe this picture will explain what?

and this one with UVT m / y by the way, probably will not have vertical tail

Quote: Tusv

Two vectors give rise to the desired vector without loading the glider

Yes bullshit.
What does “needed” mean?

all forces acting on the aircraft in flight can be reduced to three: total aerodynamic force Ra (->), gravity G (->) and engine thrust P (->). These forces, in turn, can be reduced to the resultant force F (->) applied at the center of mass of the aircraft, and the moment M (->) relative to the center of mass:

In the general case, the force and moment acting on the plane are nonzero and the plane moves progressively along the force vector with acceleration j = F / m and rotates about an axis directed along the vector with angular acceleration

j is the linear acceleration of the center of mass of the aircraft, m / s2;
F - force acting on the aircraft, N;
m is the mass of the aircraft, kg;
ε– angular acceleration of the aircraft, rad / s;
M is the moment of forces acting on the plane, Nm;
Jm is the moment of inertia of the aircraft relative to the center of mass, kgm2.

[Nitochkin]

Stirlitz smashed nonsense. Nonsense squealed and escaped from the hands.

[DimerVladimer]

Quote: d ^ Amir

UVT glider can not stand .... it will have to redesign the entire plane ...

Why would such an opinion?
Are you an aircraft designer?
The designed overload for the F-16 is 9g - more than enough.
Another thing is that the UVT design itself has more weight and it will be necessary to solve the problems of compensating the rear centering.
But no one will do this - the concept of supermoveability was studied in detail on the experimental X-31A from 1991-1994.


According to representatives of the US Air Force. X-31A reversal time in supercritical mode is 30% less than conventional reversal with high overload. Evaluation of the combat effectiveness of the X-31A in numerous research fights with the F-18 aircraft "yielded remarkable results." This assessment was aimed at studying the effectiveness of supercritical maneuvering. In the process of joint maneuvering, three main combat maneuvers were studied and mastered: a sharp change in pitch, a turn with access to supercritical angles of attack, and a helicopter attack maneuver. In the latter case, according to the pilot, “tracking the target with the yaw line of the fuselage was achieved well.”

In UVT (Vector) projects, they plan to abandon vertical plumage.

[HEATHER]

the "deadly" su-xnumx And quotes for what?

[Reserve officer]

Quote: VERESK

the "deadly" su-xnumx And quotes for what?

Correctly noticed. Only now I won’t understand something, but why was this pair chosen for comparison? Wrong, actually. I-15 and MIG-15, these analysts did not try to compare?

[HEATHER]

I-15 and MIG-15, these analysts did not try to compare? Soon we’ll also see a comparison of water with ice in combat qualities ...

[Gransasso]

Quote: VERESK

I-15 and MIG-15, these analysts did not try to compare? Soon we’ll also see a comparison of water with ice in combat qualities ...

This is not the worst option ... one freak recently compared an iron with a sperm here ...

[opus]

Quote: VERESK

quotes for what?

has not yet killed anyone.
There are no military victories.

Quote: Reserve officer

. Only now I won’t understand something, but why was this pair chosen for comparison?

because the F-16 is the workhorse of the United States and NATO in fact
and the Su-35 will be the same horse in the Russian Aerospace Forces

[Scoun]

Quote: Zaurbek

UVT for the F-16 would greatly extend the life of this beautiful aircraft. AFAR, as I understand it, is already in the latest versions.

Yes, but when I remember how our Su-27 flew to the USA and the subsequent vile steps of the mattresses, after losing “fights” in the trash, I don’t feel like talking about a “beautiful” plane and wonderful US Soviets ... especially after Majumar) )))
Just read the statements of Kharchevsky.

More than, including about trade cuts in the military-industrial complex on both sides.

https://rg.ru/2007/08/10/reg-chernoz/harchevskiy.
html

[Tusv]

Quote: Zaurbek

UVT for the F-16 would greatly extend the life of this beautiful aircraft

Is UVT possible on a single nozzle? Imagine the thrust vector, but it’s not frail in the falcon, it’s wet with a sledgehammer along the tail with all the dope

[Solomon Kane]

Volodya, Salute! I will not go into the discussion ... I was pleased with another news:

“The crews of the latest Su-34 fighter-bomber aircraft of the Eastern Military District, deployed in the Khabarovsk Territory, performed flights to the stratosphere in supersonic mode,” the press service of the Eastern Military District reports.

According to the press service of the BBO, the crews of combat aircraft worked out elements of aerobatics and elements of air combat.

Interestingly, do our “striped colleagues” train there?

[Thunderbolt]

Quote: Solomon Kane

Interestingly, do our “striped colleagues” train there?

Where to them . The stratosphere starts at 11.000 m, commercial airlines fly at such altitudes --- there are more stable flight conditions, not to mention military aviation. They would also write that the training took place in "pre-space", it sounds pretty cool.

[Hardyhard]

and two snot - two sledgehammers! Logic 

[archangel Michael]

It’s more correct to translate the name of the Viper modification not “viper”, but “reptile”

[HEATHER]

It’s somehow unethical to compare the characteristics of the light F-16 and heavy Su-35. But both cars are really beautiful. And this one is generally lovely. And whoever will bury someone in a battle, I hope it won’t reach it. Otherwise, the 16th will leave ... for anything. And this is near Khabarovsk.

[Radomir]

Totally agree with you. If you compare the Falcon then with Mig 29.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Radomir

Totally agree with you. If you compare the Falcon then with Mig 29.

Rather, with the MIG-35.

[HEATHER]

NEXUS! We have a lot of 35's? All the data is different.

[NEXUS]

Quote: VERESK

NEXUS! We have a lot of 35's? All the data is different.

No ... he is being finished, completed ... in general ... there are a lot of problems with him. Serial production is scheduled for 2019. But I'm afraid that this average MFI is becoming obsolete faster than necessary. It seems that the Bug-A radar was brought to mind, but they suffered with it unforgivably long.
At the same time, its price is almost close to the cost of the already proven SU-35S, which is a heavy IFI. This is unacceptable, given the concept of a fighter pair, the ratio of the number of heavy to light fighters should be one heavy, 2 light, due to the fact that light fighters are stupidly cheaper.
Another problem, I think so, is the weight of the MIG-35, which translates it from the class of light fighters to medium. That is, in fact, we have already four heavy fighters, these are SU-30/35 and in the future SU-57, and In addition to this, the MIG-35 is also not much lighter than the ones listed above, while the functions of the dryers are almost the same as those of the MIG-35. That is, the mottling of machines will greatly add to the work of techies.
I think that it would be much more useful for the Mikoyanites to concentrate their efforts on creating a really light front-line fighter of generation 5. Such work is underway, but information on this issue is very slow. In fact, my opinion is that the MIG-35 was 20 years late and there is no point in reanimating this project now, as drying has occupied its niche a long time ago.

[HEATHER]

Apparently, Mikoyanovtsy are trying to rush from wall to wall. MIG-35 was 20 years late Namely, a lightweight fighter is needed. The MiG is no longer able to concoct it. Who will? Not everything is good in the country of advice. Thank you.

[NEXUS]

Quote: VERESK

But a light fighter is needed. The MiG is no longer able to concoct it. Who will be?

Now all design bureaus are united in a single corporation and work on generation 5 LFIs, which started the MIG design bureau on an initiative basis, now I think will continue throughout the world.

[HEATHER]

, Now I think they will continue with the whole world. We believe. God bless us.

[Michael newage]

For the price, like for two Su-35S three MiGa-35s. This is quite bearable. So let them saw, it will come in handy for us. In general, the MiG-35 is more of an export project. He will be fooled by all the small countries that are currently sitting on 29 MIGs and looking for new customers. Many fighters do not want to buy heavy fighters in principle, for various reasons, this is an excess for them. F35 a lame duck and if your country is not an American mongrel, it is not needed for nothing. Remain F-16 in full mincemeat, Rafal, MiG-35 and Gripen. The rest or junk, or do not reach the characteristics.

[max702]

Quote: NEXUS

In fact, my opinion is that the MIG-35 was 20 years late and there is no point in reanimating this project now, as drying has occupied its niche a long time ago.

In fact, this error comes from MIG-29 .. Initially, he lost to Sushka in all respects, and only the lobby of the MiG office gave him life .. There can be no cheapness of modern aircraft because you can forget about efficiency .. Generic drawback of MiG 29-35 it was not possible to solve a small fuel supply, in the 35th version the weight increased sharply and brought to nothing the MiG's trump cards in maneuverability .. There is no sense in this aircraft .. Only export to occupy the plant’s capacities ..

[Michael newage]

And the range was increased there and the weight there is normal due to the use of composites. The maneuverability there is the same, and if the engines with UVT are left, it would be even better. So it's quite a norm. And cheapness is a relative concept, but 40 cartoons in any case are less than 60.

[HEATHER]

There is a very old shooting. Pilots hang out. An-12. Flight only 12 minutes. They can slap at a height.

[Mih1974]

Let's stop the hypocritical lisp with the Americans !! All their planes and pilots - Must "die out in weeds" for those atrocities against civilians in other countries that they have been repairing for more than half a century !!
"Good American - Dead American"

[serriy]

During training, the United States Air Force uses the Su-27 as an "enemy"

I wish our pilots during training used F-16, F-22 and F-35 as an “enemy”! Good practice.

[Martian]

Quote: serriy

I wish our pilots used F-16, F-22 and F-35 as an “enemy” during training

Yeah, I can imagine how the “partners” will respond to the request to sell a couple of F-16s or any other -15 or -18 for any thread of the training center with the wording - “study guide” or “for representing a likely opponent” The "democratic" media of the white and fluffy West would have raised such a stench, and the generals in the Pentacon would have pulled out of their coils. I’m silent about "Tse Europe" ...

[HEATHER]

What for? For serriy It’s enough for us how they “train.” We know their machines. And not sorry, for some reason!

[In100gram]

Quote: serriy

I wish our pilots during training used F-16, F-22 and F-35 as an “enemy”! Good practice

For this there is a Yak-130. Can imitate anything

[Martian]

I'll take it from the marine theme. For a start, certain criteria are usually chosen. Take, for example, one-year from one class and compare. Or take two vessels of the same displacement and compare. And entot American "analyst" with a hard-to-pronounce last name compares one criteria he knows. Just two fighters. Well it is, my personal opinion

[Zubr]

Firstly, I consider it absolutely incorrect to compare the Su-35 and F-16. These are two different classes of cars.
They would try to compare the F15 and Su-35, I agree that the comparative performance characteristics would clearly not be in favor of the F-15.

[HEATHER]

The F-15 is a good car. But no longer in time. Su-35 is a masterpiece. Compare these two cars is an empty lesson. Iron with a sperm. Who is cooler and faster?

[Zubr]

I'm talking about what .. Firstly, the similarity of the airframe, weight category, thrust-weight ratio, a similar two propulsion system, sighting systems, radars. Two heavy fighters gaining superiority in the air, for which they actually were created. Only ours, this is the further development of the Su-27, but there is no further development of the F-15, as a fundamentally new machine. Well, comparing the lightweight F-16 with the Su-35 is tantamount to a Lada vs Volga.

[Gransasso]

Quote: Zubr

I'm talking about what .. Firstly, the similarity of the airframe, weight category, thrust-weight ratio, a similar two propulsion system, sighting systems, radars. Two heavy fighters gaining superiority in the air, for which they actually were created. Only ours, this is the further development of the Su-27, but there is no further development of the F-15, as a fundamentally new machine. Well, comparing the lightweight F-16 with the Su-35 is tantamount to a Lada vs Volga.

And the F-15SE Silent Eagle, presumably, is not the further development of the f-15 but which thread of another aircraft ...

[Zubr]

This is one of the modifications to the F-15. The abbreviation has not changed. We also had SU-27M, SM, SM3, etc. But the fundamental changes to the airframe, its materials ...

[Gransasso]

Quote: Zubr

This is one of the modifications to the F-15. The abbreviation has not changed. We also had SU-27M, SM, SM3, etc. But the fundamental changes to the airframe, its materials ...

That's how ... it was worth the amers call it F-314 for example, that's all, it would be another plane ....


Maybe you will still be interested in the differences between the f-15SE and the basic f-15 ... you will learn a lot of interesting things for yourself .. and on avionics and motors .. and on gliders and materials .. and on EPR .. maybe you won’t write after that their conclusions with such an unjustified aplomb ...

[Zubr]

I will certainly take your advice ..

[Gransasso]

Quote: Zubr

I will certainly take your advice ..

I doubt it ... but better late than never ...

[samoletil18]

Better Compare Tu-22 and Tu-22M3

[HEATHER]

Better Compare Tu-22 and Tu-22M3 Wow, Doc! These cars are not just different, but from simply-absolutely.

[Gransasso]

Quote: VERESK

The F-15 is a good car. But no longer in time. Su-35 is a masterpiece. Compare these two cars is an empty lesson. Iron with a sperm. Who is cooler and faster?

And in this allegory of yours, the Su-35 iron or sperm?

[HEATHER]

Su-35 iron or sperm? Read the comments carefully. Then prerogatives in priority setting may come.

[Gransasso]

Quote: VERESK

Su-35 iron or sperm? Read the comments carefully. Then prerogatives in priority setting may come.

For some reason, your linguistic exercises resemble the famous: ... from the point of view of banal erudition and further in the text ...

[HEATHER]

from the point of view of banal erudition And then in the text, no way? Okay. I’ll explain it simply. "Sperm" -Su-35. Will it be okay?

[ZVO]

Quote: VERESK

from the point of view of banal erudition And then in the text, no way? Okay. I’ll explain it simply. "Sperm" -Su-35. Will it be okay?

Lives quickly and briefly ... so you wanted to say?

[arane]

Quote: VERESK

NEXUS! We have a lot of 35's? All the data is different.

Maybe I'm wrong, but they’re not at all in the troops

[HEATHER]

but they’re not at all in the troops No.

[Vasyan1971]

How would I decide: whether Viper ("Viper"), which is known to be born to crawl, and therefore can not fly, or whether the proud "Attacking Falcon".
And in general, the worst weapon is a person. And if we are not talking about flapping ears at the airfields, as in 1941, then the native walls will help, definitely.

[Gransasso]

Quote: VERESK

from the point of view of banal erudition And then in the text, no way? Okay. I’ll explain it simply. "Sperm" -Su-35. Will it be okay?

I am exactly .. this is your classification ... de gustibus non est disputandum ...

[HEATHER]

.de gustibus non est disputandum ... I’m not interested in your drawings. It’s too late. Compare. If you have desires and professional suitability.And this. The same car is not bad. Identify the pros and cons of both cars.

[Shahno]

I completely agree with my colleague that comparing the characteristics of the show is not very adequate.
Multo magis interesting est theatrum vitae

[Gransasso]

Quote: VERESK

.de gustibus non est disputandum ... I’m not interested in your drawings. It’s too late. Compare. If you have desires and professional suitability.And this. The same car is not bad. Identify the pros and cons of both cars.

Aqvila non captat muscas .... and the circus at the air show has a very distant relation to the combat properties of the aircraft ...

[HEATHER]

.a circus at an air show has a very distant relation to the combat properties of an airplane ... Namely, if Syria is an Airshow. Do you drop the video of maneuvers in the sky of Syria or do you find it yourself? Or a video of F-16 shot down in the UAE by our Kurgan? Fortunately, not Satan.

[Shahno]

Heather. Remember the story of the bombing of a plant near the base of Hmeimim. Sushki had a chance. And our squadron (mixed) was waiting for an answer. But did not wait.

[HEATHER]

Sushki had a chance There wasn’t. According to the contract, the VKS protect only their own. The rest is in the hands of Assad’s troops. You’re not at all going to get there. If there isn’t a contract. And if it is, I don’t envy you.

[Shahno]

Well, so categorically. I think our VKS and yours on this TVD are equal in strength. And therefore, even with the agreement, they will not be brought to a fight ...

[_Jack_]

What do they mean equal in strength? you have 400 planes there and how many, 20-30? funny to compare

[Shahno]

No, we have 400 fighters, and you have 1200. Only they still need to carry a battle bowl. over a large territory and a range of up to several thousand kilometers of TVD. Plus, the greater experience of our pilots in the conditions of warfare, but a significant advantage in UAVs.
That's who the sky will be for. Such a real comparison (f 16-su 35)

[_Jack_]

our 1200 aircraft (of which 350 are modern, the rest are old) per thousand kilometers. from Syria, and surpassing them closer is unrealistic - there is no infrastructure for them in Syria, so there simply aren’t any actions for the BV theater, there really are a couple of dozen planes, well, sometimes strategists come in to train, enough to drive the barmen in the desert, but no more Togo

[HEATHER]

I think our VKS and yours Do you also have a videoconferencing system?

[Mih1974]

Well, who are you lying to here? Everyone here already knows that “yours” first “call” us, ask permission and only then fly somewhere! You don’t have any “freedom to bomb anyone we want”, from the word at all. Each time you are given a one-time permit and try only to deviate from the stated (permitted) goals - you will be writing out the funeral. With all your show-offs, your few thermonuclear charges from the sizzling blow of the Strategic Rocket Forces will not save. And if necessary, then with caliber “from the Caspian Sea” we will make a glass lake out of your desert. So don’t “bounce” here

[Shahno]

What permissions. This is a myth, a defensive reaction of some colleagues on the site during. Of course, no one will agree on one-time actions in a changing operational environment, especially politics. Yes, command headquarters warn on a special channel about strikes, operations. No more.

[Michael newage]

Your "knowledge" in that part is even more distantly related to the subject of discussion. .

[prior]

Why compare specifications?
If the war with the Americans, then this is the third world nuclear.
Yankee, are you ready to die?

[Mih1974]

Not the fact that the collision of these aircraft will be between the United States and Russia. ALREADY there was a war where on the one hand there were Su-27 on the other - Mig-29. Yes yes in black Africa . I don’t know who piled on whom, but the fact of real military operations of aircraft that were actually created as Allies is important to us.

[Dongrand]

ABOUT! And Khrushchev thought so, and to this music, the fleet, aviation and artillery were cut ...

[Slam]

Quote: VERESK

the "deadly" su-xnumx And quotes for what?

Is this the plane that has the secret code Whack-9? Probably fate drove by hand

[iouris]

But if we compare the capabilities of 200 F-16s versus 50 Su-30s?

[Holoy]

Then it’s more logical to take F-15 as rivals, he is definitely a worthy opponent!

[Stepych]

Doubtful expert, compares different classes of fighters.
Su-35 heavy fighter, F-16 light.

It is necessary to compare with the lungs. But even the F-16 with the Mig-29 is somehow not right. The F16 has one engine, and the Mig-29 has two.

[gukoyan]

Su-35 eats any ...

[Dongrand]

Question: why does the NI expert compare these two machines? It makes more sense, I think, to compare "classmates." F-15 and Su-35, F-16 and MiG-35?

[Michael newage]

Because he is not an expert, but a clown who entertains American military pensioners and couch wars .

[Sergey Minin]

F-16 Fighting Falcon- American multi-functional light fighter.
If we compare it, it is with a moment. With regard to the creation of a rotary nozzle and its management is a very difficult technical task. The simplest single-axis scheme implemented on the aircraft Su-30MKI, F-22. A more complex two-axis scheme, which is used on the MiG-29OVT, F-16 MATV "VISTA", F-15 "ACTIV" and provides independent control of pitch, yaw and roll. When reaching large angles of attack, the flow stalls at the edges of the air intakes and a so-called surge occurs - pulsations of the air flow, due to which the engine stalls. The appearance of surge effects is highly dependent on the location of the air intakes and their shape. The configuration of the air intakes on the Su-27 and MiG-29 fighters ensures stable operation of the engine when reaching large angles of attack corresponding to tail-to-front flight. In addition to this moment, the speed drops sharply, and the working conditions of the air intake become close to the operation of the engine on a fixed stand, where there is no flow stall.