Bangladesh - UN: And why was the General Assembly session held at all? ..

42
An informational boom about persecution of Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar has virtually disappeared in the international press. There are no reports of new promotions in support of the Rohingya, there are no reports of protests against the policies of the authorities of Myanmar. However, as it turns out, the decrease in the degree of discussion of the topic in the major international media does not mean that the problem has disappeared.

According to the latest figures provided by the International Organization for Migration, the number of refugees from Myanmar in Bangladesh alone exceeded half a million people. Official statistics - 518 thousand.



On the eve of the Bay of Bengal, which Muslims of Myanmar are trying to use to flee the country, the ship, carrying up to hundreds of Rohingya, turned over. 25 dead bodies found. About 40 people are reported missing. Search and rescue work at the site of the tragedy continues, but the chances of finding the missing people alive are becoming more and more unreal.

Bangladesh - UN: And why was the General Assembly session held at all? ..


In the refugee camps in Bangladesh, there are approximately 300 of thousands of immigrants from Myanmar. These people receive scant assistance from the UN (in particular, UNICEF). The remaining hundreds of thousands face total hunger and lack of medicine.

In Bangladesh, they complain to the United Nations that the 72 UN General Assembly has come to an end, but according to its results there was no effective way to resolve the humanitarian crisis in the region and no political measures were taken against the actions of the Myanmar authorities against the Muslim population of the country .
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    29 September 2017 18: 16
    As they say - they made a noise and fled ...
    1. +21
      29 September 2017 18: 34
      Quote: Nashensky city
      As they say - they made a noise and fled ...

      But the banquet was good drinks
      There are always good feasts ... Crazy money ...
      1. +5
        29 September 2017 18: 38
        But the banquet was good 

        Drunk for the health of refugees drinks
        1. +3
          29 September 2017 18: 45
          And wished them a happy life in a new place.
          1. +1
            29 September 2017 18: 58
            Yellow article.
            The representative of Bangladesh did not bother to speak at the 72nd UNGA at all. But Myanmar very adequately pulled speculators on this issue.
            http://webtv.un.org/news-features/un-stories/chin
            ese / watch / Republic-Union-Myanmar-First-law-on
            Reply-General-debate-72nd session / 5585914862001 /? ter
            m = & lan = russian? lan = russian
      2. +1
        29 September 2017 18: 43
        Quote: Logall
        But the banquet was good drinks
        There are always good feasts.

        and eat from hands?
        1. +2
          29 September 2017 23: 01
          and eat from hands?
          It is not known for certain. But probably not only with hands, but also from the floor, and other people's plates eat up and lick.
    2. +1
      29 September 2017 18: 42
      Quote: Nashensky city
      As they say - they made a noise and fled ...

      her, "A hippopotamus sits in a puddle," lets the bullets "..."
    3. +3
      29 September 2017 18: 45
      Bangladesh claims to the United Nations that the 72nd General Assembly of the United Nations has ended, but its outcome has not yet been adopted an effective option to resolve the humanitarian crisis in the region

      Well, you, the beacon of democracy, Trumpam promised to destroy the whole country, along with the population, and then some sort of Bangladesh. feel
      1. +14
        29 September 2017 19: 07
        Volodya, he will destroy Bangladesh if his electorate pleases ...
        1. +3
          29 September 2017 19: 23
          Quote: Logall
          Volodya, he will destroy Bangladesh, if his electorate pleases

          It is he who can Sanya, Bangladesh doesn’t have at least one small atomic bomb to hit in the teeth, here the tramp will be very brave. drinks hi
          1. +15
            29 September 2017 19: 37
            That’s why, little ones, they have to fall four bones in front of the USA!
            Or another option
        2. +1
          30 September 2017 05: 03
          Rohingya left Bangladesh and settled in Myanmar (Burma). But in Burma they did not receive citizenship, refugee status, UN assistance.
          As a result, a riot, a bloody riot. Myanmar's security forces responded with tougher terror.
          Muslims returned to Bangladesh. History repeats itself.
  2. 0
    29 September 2017 18: 16
    Claims, send us, and yes, a piece of paper, a toilet, re-sign with 127 countries!
  3. +3
    29 September 2017 18: 23
    No Rohingya exists in nature - all these people are illegal immigrants from Bangladesh. The authorities of Burma are only deporting Bangladeshis to their homeland.
    1. +4
      29 September 2017 18: 34
      just as the Ukrainian authorities deport Russians from Ukraine, and no DNI and LC exist in Ukraine, am I logically right?
      1. +1
        29 September 2017 18: 37
        This is when the Russians managed to emigrate illegally to the outskirts?
        1. +2
          29 September 2017 18: 49
          Quote: Operator
          This is when the Russians managed to emigrate illegally to the outskirts?

          and in a heap when Ukraine was without Russians?
        2. +1
          29 September 2017 19: 02
          then when rohingya to myanmar!
        3. +1
          29 September 2017 19: 03
          and yes, why are you offended then that the Russians were politely forced to return to Russia from Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan. yutaji, etc., shorter than 2 standards you have!
          1. +2
            29 September 2017 19: 28
            Quote: Stalinium
            Russians politely

            then you are in those places and so YOU ​​so "politely" asked. not standard ....
            1. +3
              29 September 2017 19: 35
              it is necessary to read from a to z and not to tear it out of context, you are our non-standard ...
          2. +4
            29 September 2017 19: 57
            I think the Russians are offended because of ingratitude towards themselves, yes, once they (Central Asia) were colonized, but this led to progress in these territories and no one imposed their religion on the locals.
            And you want to put alongside the Russians and the Islamists of the Rohingya, who, before they were expelled to their homeland, terrorized the inhabitants of Burma. Just a rare case when fundamentalists from Islam received an answer.
            1. 0
              30 September 2017 08: 08
              Quote: garnik
              fundamentalists from Islam received an answer.

              Alas, civilians get the answer. But it is from them that militants or partisans are reproduced, as it is more convenient to consider.
    2. +4
      29 September 2017 18: 47
      Quote: Operator
      No “rohingya” exists in nature. Burma’s authorities only deport Bangladeshis to their homeland


      The logic is clear. If something, God forbid, happens with the Russians in the Baltic States, they will also be announced that they "just deported them to their homeland, since they illegally immigrated to Estonia / Latvia / Lithuania"
      1. +2
        29 September 2017 19: 27
        Quote: Volodin
        The logic is clear. If something, God forbid, happens with the Russians in the Baltic States, they will also be announced that they "just deported them to their homeland, since they illegally immigrated to Estonia / Latvia / Lithuania"

        The comparison is not entirely correct. The Baltic states were part of the Republic of Ingushetia and the USSR. The Russians always lived there, even in the short period of "independence" 1920-1940. Rohija are people illegally crossing the border of another state (Myanmar).
        This does not mean that they are not people and do not need to be taken care of, but these are two completely different situations. The analogy would be with the expulsion from Russia of illegal labor migrants who violated the legislation of the Russian Federation.
        Are you outraged about this?
        1. +2
          29 September 2017 19: 36
          and who told you that they illegally crossed the border? Myanmar authorities? Do not be surprised then that the Baltic authorities will say the same about the Russians))))
          1. +2
            29 September 2017 19: 50
            Quote: Stalinium
            and who told you that they illegally crossed the border? Myanmar authorities?

            This is a well-known fact that is not denied by anyone. Especially for you, the mass migration of Bengalis from Bangladesh to Burma began in the 70s of the 20th century, the authorities of Burma at that time had little control over the borders of Rakhine State. No laws of Burma were complied with. The authorities of Myanmar (Burma) never considered the arrived Bengalis to be their citizens.
            I note that Bengalis fled from Muslim Bangladesh. And that in doing so they violate the laws of Burma. This again does not mean that they should be massively deported to their homeland (Bangladesh), but the fact is that your analogy with the Baltic is not true.
            1. +1
              29 September 2017 21: 53
              SIMPLY I ANSWERED TO THOSE WHO WRITTEN THAT ROKHINJA IN NATURE DOES NOT EXIST, BY ITS LOGIC AND RUSSIANS IN THE BALTIC AND IN UKRAINE DOESN’T EXIST, IT IS WRONG (I can’t deny that I’m in Russian for Russia, I’m ready to give my life for it, as my maternal grandfather gave when crossing the Dnieper at 43, and my paternal grandfather at 45 in Berlin — died on April 13, I am Dagestan — and I won’t tolerate when in my motherland, Russia, when mother comes to the Russians (I respect them) —that they exist in the Donbas (with which I agree) —when it comes to the Rohingya Muslims, they are not there in nature! how is it not? what are these 2 standards? are the Russian policemen from Dagestan and Chechens do not defend their homeland in Syria together with VKS and specialists from Russian-speaking regions? Yes, my cousin has been there for 4 months already from botlikh, ept, just when you write about Muslims in Russia being Russian, you should not forget that there are 25 million of them in Russia! I hate ukro Bander, for the fact that they destroy the Russian world, I envy Russia, I have nothing him against the Orthodox, but insult the people of the Muslims of Rohingya-inappropriately!
  4. +2
    29 September 2017 18: 32
    518 thousand. belay But!
    1. 0
      29 September 2017 18: 57
      Quote: VERESK
      518 thousand.  However!

      Large half a million or small. What's the difference. All the same, they don’t know how to count. Well, you think 282 thousand hung somewhere. Felts in Burma, either in Myanmar, or in Bangladesh
      1. +1
        29 September 2017 19: 14
        282 thousand hung somewhere Like in the Great Patriotic War. Almost 10 million were stuck in an incomprehensible place. Only Russians. Sorry, but I don’t count Ukrainians.
        1. 0
          29 September 2017 19: 26
          Quote: VERESK
          As in the Second World War. Almost 10 million were stuck in an unclear where

          Why is it not clear? This is called the Russian world. And there 518 from somewhere around 800, like refugees. Well, let’s fight for the rights of the Gypsies, also Indo-Europeans and finally runaways in life. And they live in camps, whom they call a camp
          1. +1
            29 September 2017 19: 28
            I wrote about the Second World War. Read carefully. If you need to familiarize yourself with the history of the beginning of the Second World War, I can drop not only texts, but also declassified documents on the site. There are almost 300 volumes of 600 sheets each now. There is still a lot to dig into.
            1. 0
              29 September 2017 19: 48
              Quote: VERESK
              I wrote about the Second World War

              And I'm talking about Rojedges and the UN. What does the Second World War and ours? Well, do not throw in a personal if not difficult. I am pleased to read hi
  5. +1
    29 September 2017 18: 33
    There was a lot of noise, and nothing from the word at all! am This is not Russia, which can be discussed for a million years, what an unknown unknown - half a million refugees lol they didn’t come to Europe, unfortunately fool to smash everything in revenge! am Where there, in well-fed Europe, mass marches and rallies in support of refugees? ??? crying Europe is full of its problems, which they themselves have created, but these are just flowers. ...
  6. +2
    29 September 2017 18: 41
    The problems of the Indians concern only the Indians. The policy of white masters does not change over time. Only Indians are added blacks, Asians and other non-humans, unworthy of attention. Such events in Europe would arouse much greater interest, close to hysteria.
  7. 0
    29 September 2017 18: 50
    Well, in the pubs they hung, the resolution on the Crimea was adopted and scattered. There was no Putin, they didn’t strain Moscow - beauty. And then some Bangladesh is talking about some people of Rohij. Not servile this thing. That Trampush with Vladimir Vladimirovich phoned, maybe the UN will be scratched
  8. +1
    29 September 2017 18: 55
    In Bangladesh, they complain to the United Nations that the 72 UN General Assembly has come to an end, but according to its results there was no effective way to resolve the humanitarian crisis in the region and no political measures were taken against the actions of the Myanmar authorities against the Muslim population of the country .
    Yes, the problems of the “Indians”, as it were, are of little concern to the “sheriffs" ... they are more concerned about "interference in the elections" than the lives of people on the other side of the globe.
  9. +1
    29 September 2017 20: 59
    They have long wanted to help them, but Russia vetoes each time.
    1. 0
      30 September 2017 00: 00
      Russia and China only once in 2007 double vetoed the Myanmar issue, because the mattress wording “poses a serious danger to peace and security in the region” was recognized by Russia and China as untenable and could serve as a reason for invading the Celestial Underbelly
  10. 0
    30 September 2017 00: 02
    Quote: Belyash
    They have long wanted to help them, but Russia vetoes each time.

    So that's who is to blame !! laughing Well then everything fell into place .....