The United States will not sign the proposed Russian agreement on the coordination of ground operations in the SAR

32
Moscow offered Washington to sign an agreement on coordination of actions in Syria not only in the sky, but also on the ground, but the American side did not accept the proposal, according to News.



This plan, in fact, duplicated the already existing agreement on preventing incidents in the air, but the United States refused. Anyway, there is coordination between us, but it is not regulated by any document,
said a source in diplomatic circles.

According to him, the possible reason for this behavior of Washington is that "if there was an agreement, the Americans, at the request of the Russian side, would have to disclose the location of their parts in a particular region of Syria, but apparently they want to avoid it."

Recall 20 September, the Chief of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, Sergei Rudskoy, said that the offensive of the Jabhat al-Nusra terrorist group (banned in the Russian Federation) and the militants who had joined it with an attempt to surround the Russian military police unit in Syria in the Idlib de-escalation zone, “ according to reports, it was initiated by the US intelligence services. "

The next day, American Army Colonel Ryan Dillon said that the representatives of the US-led coalition and the Russian military held a meeting to discuss the avoidance of incidents in Syria.

A face-to-face meeting took place between Russian officers and coalition representatives. It was nearby, Dillon said at the briefing. He also added that "additional meetings can take place in the same region."
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    29 September 2017 10: 55
    In practice, concluding a real ground agreement with the Americans is many times more difficult than an air one.
    The US Air Force is subordinate to the Pentagon. And on the ground in Syria there are many American structures. These are the non-direct military forces of the USA, the CIA, private traders, etc. etc.
    1. +2
      29 September 2017 11: 00
      Yes Yes. As long as they themselves would not be profitable, hell will agree.
      1. +3
        29 September 2017 12: 34
        That is, until our forces (the Russian Federation and the SAR) begin to wet them in batches.
    2. +2
      29 September 2017 11: 00
      Moscow invited Washington to sign an agreement on the coordination of actions in Syria not only in the sky, but also on earth, but the American side did not accept the proposal

      Mattresses do not want to give out barmaleny places ...
      1. +11
        29 September 2017 11: 05
        "Russia needs peace," said the president of Russia ....
        And the world shuddered ....

        Pasha, Salute !!!!! hi
        1. +2
          29 September 2017 11: 09
          Hi Kostya! hi We are peaceful people, but our armored train ....
        2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +6
      29 September 2017 12: 00
      But you must????? They warned once and enough. WET. After all, give no amers ??? They say no. EASY TO WET, As for a river soaked.
      1. +2
        29 September 2017 13: 02
        Many amerovsky generals in Syria died?
        Each stick is it with 2 ends. Victory is near and everything must be done correctly neatly so as not to merge it ... hi
        As, for example, Erdogan was re-educated. What would happen if several Turkish planes were shot down in response? And so we’re going to visit, although it would be my will ...
    4. +2
      29 September 2017 12: 18
      10.55. Thrall! They do not want, and do not! So you need to water everyone in a row and express bewilderment. We did not know about the presence of Americans there! That honest word did not know! They did not tell us where they are! We didn’t know! We just drenched the barmalei! Then they themselves will come running to us to beat with a brow and to tearfully beg not to bomb these places where we (USA) are! We must use the situation to our advantage.
    5. +5
      29 September 2017 12: 31
      Quote: Thrall
      In practice, concluding a real ground agreement with the Americans is many times more difficult than an air one.

      After the statements made by our party’s tough ones, I believe that now the time for compromise has passed. The mattresses were made clear that for any attack in our direction, for any sabotage, there will be a forceful response. By the way, the five leaders who were involved in the murder of our general in Syria are no longer alive.
  2. +6
    29 September 2017 10: 55
    Who would doubt ... Peace and tranquility mattresses need the least. But oil fields are another matter.
  3. +2
    29 September 2017 10: 57
    In other words, the United States reserves the right to “erroneously” bomb our positions.
    But they can, imperceptibly for themselves, cross the red line.
  4. +3
    29 September 2017 10: 58
    It is difficult for Americans and British to admit that "seals" and CAC sometimes remove false beards and other Muslim-jihadist paraphernalia and again become "fighters against world terrorism."
    1. SSR
      +2
      29 September 2017 11: 01
      Quote: Altona
      It's hard for Americans and British to admit

      Yes, it’s not difficult for them, it’s just historically it has turned out to deny the obvious and to crap shit, and when they get it by the cabbage soup they start yelling loudly - Barbaras! us for what ?!
    2. +1
      29 September 2017 12: 23
      10.58. Altona! Yeah! Fighters against all the bad! England at one time used pirates to their advantage. They were protected by the English crown, they were given orders and titles. And since then, nothing has changed. Today, the same pirates (only amphibians) are at the service of their capital.
      1. +1
        29 September 2017 12: 39
        Quote: 34 region
        (amphibians only)

        + Reptiles, reptiles !!! laughing
  5. +12
    29 September 2017 11: 03
    the American side did not accept the proposal

    It seems to me that when American specialists fall under the air distribution, or under the action of our militants of the MTR, so immediately there will be a desire to accept the Russian proposal.
    1. +2
      29 September 2017 11: 07
      Your words to God in the ears! good
    2. +1
      29 September 2017 11: 16
      Quote: rotmistr60
      when American specialists fall under

      In fact, I think that both our and the US military in Syria have placed their leadership in a tight framework - in no case prevent each other from losing. It’s the military, but there are enough other other structures, whose opinions may differ from the point of view of the military.
    3. 0
      29 September 2017 12: 29
      11.03. Rotmister! Judging by the refusal, they have not yet come under the distribution. It's a pity! After all, we too can make a mistake and bomb them. And so forty times in a row! Then make a surprised face. How so !? We bombed them !? Can not be! It was they who accidentally fired upon themselves! Few of them had completely random shelling !? So it is here. They accidentally bombed themselves! On the outskirts, they also believe such an interpretation. Why won't they believe here?
  6. +6
    29 September 2017 11: 03
    The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation made this proposal on the basis of recent events and betrayals by the American coalition, so to speak, checked the pence for lice, for us these agreements are like a dog’s fifth paw;
  7. +4
    29 September 2017 11: 09
    the American side did not accept the proposal

    Then these are US problems. Do they have few problems?
    The United States is panicked about the problem of how to present to the public information about the deaths of at least 14 US Special Forces troops with terrorists who were simply “completely destroyed” in Syria by missile attacks by Russian aerospace forces

    https://cont.ws/@bigone/727456?utm_campaign=trans
    it & utm_source = mirtesen & utm_medium = news & am
    p; from = mirtesen
    1. +2
      29 September 2017 11: 37
      Quote: pvv113
      Then these are US problems.

      You can continue until you give up, like the Germans in the 45th. It is strange why the disagreement of a potential enemy should worry about the warheads on the Russian Caliber?
      1. 0
        29 September 2017 16: 18


        Paphos is very much, however))))
    2. +1
      29 September 2017 11: 41
      with such a batch, who will sort them will only God in heaven ...
  8. +1
    29 September 2017 11: 40
    Quote: pvv113
    the American side did not accept the proposal

    Then these are US problems. Do they have few problems?
    The United States is panicked about the problem of how to present to the public information about the deaths of at least 14 US Special Forces troops with terrorists who were simply “completely destroyed” in Syria by missile attacks by Russian aerospace forces

    https://cont.ws/@bigone/727456?utm_campaign=trans
    it & utm_source = mirtesen & utm_medium = news & am
    p; am
    p; am
    p; from = mirtesen

    It is precisely such "voluntary" adoption of measures in relation to units of the coalition that has not been requested in Syria that our intelligence and the air forces must take care of. They will immediately become more accommodating and their behavior will become more adequate! The clever understands the arguments - a fool is only a force! bully
  9. +1
    29 September 2017 11: 48
    It would be proposed - and so, one might say, they showed goodwill. Give another day to remove special forces from Syrian territory, after which the Syrian government must declare them illegal and proceed with prosecution throughout the territory of the SAR. And we will have the right to peck the adversaries at the slightest suspicion of intentions to harm us. It should be added that they will be equated with terrorists, and in the event of a capture they will be considered not as prisoners of war, but as war criminals.
  10. +5
    29 September 2017 11: 56
    "If there was an agreement, the Americans, at the request of the Russian side, would have to disclose the location of their units in a particular region of Syria, but apparently they want to avoid this."

    Of course they want to avoid. Because next time after photographs of equipment, bombs will fly on it ...
  11. +5
    29 September 2017 12: 37
    There is no need to negotiate with mattresses, they need to be destroyed along with the barmalei. And for the destroyed striped then you can apologize.
  12. +1
    29 September 2017 13: 31
    They are partners ....
    But "Friendly Fire" has not been canceled.
    It's nothing personal.
    The mistake came out of the lack of coordination of actions.
    Sorry Uncle Sem.
    "First shoot then think"
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&
    ;
    ; v = DpAopy3Icqk
  13. 0
    29 September 2017 16: 43
    Now they are not signing, so it is necessary to make sure that they themselves ask. There are opportunities for this.
  14. 0
    29 September 2017 23: 34
    Americans are inherently inconsistent, especially given that operations are carried out there under the supervision of the CIA, which, even they themselves mention, are traditionally not burdened with any ethical and moral norms, universal, meanness and falsehood have based their actions, not unlike from the most thawed-out militants of the bandits, in general, they prepared and taught them. Yes, and what can we expect from the country's armed forces, which was created with the help of Colt and Winchester, through the genocide of Aboriginal people, fugitive convicts, crooks and adventurers from all over Europe and the world . The history of the country which is built on war and lies, meanness, at the heart of the driving force where the thirst for profit lies at any cost and by any means, ways and methods to achieve the goal do not matter.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"