Military Review

The Ministry of Defense has reduced the number of recruits

34
In Russia, for the first time, the number of conscripts was reduced by almost 20 thousand people, RIA News Post Deputy Chief of the organizational-mobilization management of the General Staff of the Armed Forces, Lieutenant-General Yevgeny Burdinsky.




Earlier, the president signed a decree on military conscription in the fall of 2017, 134, a thousand people. A year ago, in the autumn call, thousands of people were called152.

A significant reduction occurred as a result of the recruitment of civilian and non-commissioned officers for military service under contract,
said Burdinsky.

According to him, the acquisition of scientific and sports companies will continue. The general clarified that "today there are 12 scientific companies that employ 648 people, as well as four sports companies where 381 people serve."

Burdinsky recalled that "January 1 came into force changes to the Federal Law" On Military Duty and Military Service, "now the delay is available to students in educational institutions of secondary vocational education for the entire period of study."

This year, the list of regions of the Far North was clarified, where citizens will be called up for military service once a year (spring or autumn),
added on.

The general also noted that "before being sent to the troops, all the draftees will change into everyday clothes: for the Navy - black, for the VKS and Airborne Forces - blue, for other types and types of troops - protective."
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
34 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. svp67
    svp67 29 September 2017 09: 13
    +6
    The number of draftees was reduced for the first time in Russia by almost 20 thousand people
    Given the “demographic hole”, a wise and timely decision ...
    1. alex-cn
      alex-cn 29 September 2017 09: 18
      +5
      I do not agree. Every young man fit for service must undergo at least some training in the minimum army specialty. To clearly know which side the machine or grenade launcher is charging. Not during the war (God forbid) teach him.
      1. The black
        The black 29 September 2017 09: 22
        +2
        Quote: alex-cn
        I do not agree. Every young man fit for service must undergo at least some training in the minimum army specialty.

        Minimum training can be obtained at the military department of the university. Unlearned, received sergeant epaulettes and walk. The army now needs specialists who can handle complex equipment. Such training can also be done in specialized universities ...
        1. dik-nsk
          dik-nsk 29 September 2017 09: 58
          +3
          I remember the unforgettable 90s when, in the 96th election, Yeltsin promised a fully contracted army by 2000, earning pluses on this, because there was a mess in the army and nobody wanted to go there .. now this trick wouldn’t pass, it’s being revived "who didn’t serve that’s not a man "and it pleases
        2. Per se.
          Per se. 29 September 2017 12: 24
          0
          Quote: Black
          Minimal training can be obtained at the military department of the university.
          You can, even in school you can get a minimum of military training. But there is a Law, the Constitution, simply, common sense, according to which the entire population in the event of war will be divided into those who should be at the front, and those who will have to work for the front in the defense industry. In the modern realities of a big war, with the use of weapons of mass destruction, as well as natural and man-made disasters, natural disasters, the topic of training the population in civil defense is also relevant. What it all says, but to the fact that there can be no citizens who are not involved in the country's defense by definition. All adolescents, reaching the age of majority, should be equal in conscription, including girls, some serving in the army (on the “front”), others working as a foundation for the army (in the “rear”), but all going through short, but real courses, such as courses of a young fighter, calling for at least two months. From these courses it would be possible to sort recruits, who to call to serve further, with benefits and bonuses, who to send to the “rear” to work out and finance those who will actually serve in their place. This is fair and reasonable, our lawmakers and the authorities would be willing to undertake such preparation of the population for the defense of the Fatherland.
      2. svp67
        svp67 29 September 2017 09: 22
        +5
        Quote: alex-cn
        I do not agree.

        With what? To call in the army "dead souls" who are not born? How do you imagine this? Or produce "current lack of set"?
        Quote: alex-cn
        Every young man fit for service must undergo at least some training in the minimum army specialty.

        I completely agree with you. The question is otherwise, for this it is necessary to change our structure for the training of conscripts.
      3. Voyager
        Voyager 29 September 2017 09: 32
        +1
        Previously, such things and the ability to navigate on maps and much more were taught at school - it would be better if they returned this practice.
    2. Finches
      Finches 29 September 2017 09: 23
      +2
      This is not a decision, but a necessary measure, precisely caused by the terrible demography of the 90s. But no one has yet canceled the military-trained reserve ...
      1. Sergej1972
        Sergej1972 29 September 2017 16: 18
        0
        But really young male people at the age of 18 are several times more than twice (taking into account the spring and autumn calls) this figure of the call. True, someone is studying, someone for health cannot serve.
    3. siberalt
      siberalt 29 September 2017 10: 01
      0
      How much wisdom is needed if there aren’t enough people to call. laughing But the point may be that they reduced a large number of old generals and the need for summer builders fell away? what
  2. Million
    Million 29 September 2017 09: 15
    +2
    Children of officials and deputies will not go to serve?
    1. The black
      The black 29 September 2017 09: 17
      +1
      Quote: Million
      Children of officials and deputies will not go to serve?

      They’ll go ... then ... someday ... smile
    2. Vard
      Vard 29 September 2017 09: 20
      +3
      To be honest ... then they are not needed in the army ... some problems from them ...
    3. Topotun
      Topotun 29 September 2017 09: 20
      +5
      And they didn’t go before. And the fact that there are more contractors is right. not such a razdolbaysky attitude to weapons and equipment as the conscript.
      1. Doliva63
        Doliva63 29 September 2017 11: 47
        +4
        To the level of secretary of the district committee, they certainly walked, served normally, by the way. Above - I have not met, except for one case - the grandson of a deputy of the Supreme Council, Hero of the Soviet Union, was a problem comrade.
    4. sdc_alex
      sdc_alex 29 September 2017 09: 47
      0
      Quote: Million
      Children of officials and deputies will not go to serve?


      And what? When did you go?
    5. Stas Snezhin
      Stas Snezhin 29 September 2017 10: 08
      +2
      Quote: Million
      Children of officials and deputies will not go to serve?

      Yeah, they’ll go to serve at the place of residence.
      That is, in the army of other countries ..
    6. Gardamir
      Gardamir 29 September 2017 10: 53
      0
      Children of officials and deputies will not go to serve?
      liberal children will not go; they have the right to slope.
      But take an interest in the fate of Jacob Dzhugashvili, Vasily Stalin, Artyom Sergeyev, Stepan Mikoyan, Vladimir Mikoyan, Alexei Mikoyan, Timur Frunze, Sergo Beria and many others.
      1. Million
        Million 29 September 2017 11: 14
        +1
        why be interested. I already know. the speech is about these, not about those)
  3. The Grubby
    The Grubby 29 September 2017 09: 29
    +1
    It is interesting, by what principle do draftees choose in the conditions of their redundancy for the armed forces? Are the best of the best called up for the army, or how will the card fall?
    1. The black
      The black 29 September 2017 09: 31
      +1
      Quote: Rude
      Are the best of the best called up for the army, or how will the card fall?

      how the envelope will fall ... smile Now it’s not so easy to get into the army .... at least with us .. wink
      1. cariperpaint
        cariperpaint 29 September 2017 11: 10
        0
        Oh well. go give))) why this nonsense to write?
    2. rpek32
      rpek32 29 September 2017 12: 25
      0
      health bar raised. I read that one comrade so eagerly requested the army, but they didn’t want to take him, that almost through court he made his way to urgency.
      1. CT-55_11-9009
        CT-55_11-9009 29 September 2017 16: 14
        +1
        There is one. A friend wanted to go to serve voluntarily three years ago - they refused, did not go only to the dentist, the bite was wrong. Well, put the braces, corrected, came to the next call - not a fig, they didn’t take it again, it was no longer suitable.
      2. Sergej1972
        Sergej1972 29 September 2017 16: 20
        0
        Probably after wanted to go to the police? And there is no way without an army.))
  4. Bondik05
    Bondik05 29 September 2017 09: 58
    +1
    It’s time to return the school and summer fees from the school. Here they have a minimum course and skills in handling weapons and must be vaccinated. Why reinvent the wheel, everything is thought up to us.
    how the envelope will fall ...  Today it’s not so easy to get into the army .... at least with us.
    This is the most interesting! The military commissar milks those who want to join the army and those who don’t. Some of my friends want to join the Army, others do not, the sum of the solution to the question is voiced by both!
    1. cariperpaint
      cariperpaint 29 September 2017 11: 13
      0
      if you have such a person, then he will soon disappear. I recently just probed this issue with a mustache) it is unrealistic to solve. it’s easier to adopt two children and for this reason not to get into the army.
  5. stolz
    stolz 29 September 2017 09: 58
    0
    Quote: Topotun
    And the fact that there are more contractors is right ...

    There will be another problem, they will marry and start a family, but where to get apartments for them, for all?
    1. LAWNER
      LAWNER 29 September 2017 10: 25
      +2
      If a soldier does not have his own house, why should he protect a stranger ????
      The call of the Far North, why the Chukche tank or Yakut machine?
  6. yuliatreb
    yuliatreb 29 September 2017 10: 22
    +2
    So that, like the ones in the photo, I went against the army, for what purpose, pushing pi .... to be behind the double basses, in general, why not list all the charms.
  7. Gardamir
    Gardamir 29 September 2017 10: 44
    0
    Does anyone represent a contract army, for example, in 41-45:?. Liberalism paces the country. Many go to a contract to close loans.
  8. Bronevick
    Bronevick 29 September 2017 10: 45
    0
    Now in the army do such hairstyles?
  9. ser65
    ser65 29 September 2017 10: 54
    +2
    on the other hand, the troops were filled with crowds of uneducated contract soldiers, whom there was no one to teach military affairs.
  10. stolz
    stolz 29 September 2017 11: 22
    0
    Quote: LAWNER
    If a soldier does not have his own house, why should he protect a stranger ????

    The house for the soldier is his barracks, but if you follow your reasoning, you can agree to the question: what and why are we doing in Syria?
    It looks like you never served in the army, you didn’t take the oath and in general are far from military service, but it’s not clear why and why you are here?