Haley: US insists on IAEA inspections of Iran’s military facilities

The United States insists on inspections of Iran’s military facilities by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as part of the Joint Comprehensive Action Plan (DIPA), said the country's permanent representative to the UN, Nikki Haley, criticizing Russia for allegedly protecting Iran.

The US Permanent Mission on Thursday noted that the IAEA Director General, in an interview with Reuters, spoke in favor of providing more clarity on inspections of the so-called provision "T" of the SAPS, which prohibits the development of nuclear explosive devices.

At the same time, the agency notes that Russia objects that the IAEA may, by agreement, verify this activity. The US mission also noted media reports that Russia "does not believe that these inspections fall under the mandate of the IAEA."

If an agreement on Iran has any meaning, the parties should have a common understanding of its terms. Iranian officials have already said they refuse to allow inspections at military sites, even if the IAEA says that there should be no difference between military and non-military facilities. Now it seems that some countries are trying to protect Iran from large inspections. Without inspections, a deal with Iran is an empty promise

- declared Haley, transfers RIA News

Comments

[Shura Perm]

They have not been credible for Iran for a long time ... they impose and impose sanctions, while at the same time they demand something ...

[Shurik70]

They also started with Iraq. First, the IAEA sniffed out everything that is possible under the guise of a search for non-existent nuclear weapons, then the Americans bombed themselves over the reconnoitered sites with high precision.

[Logall]

Iraq did not have normal air defense! And ours with a 300-weighty argument, so as not to attack ...

[Thrall]

In the USSR, the population was never informed of what nonsense the US representatives in the UN are carrying.
Our media needs to take an example and filter the news from Mordor.

[Shurik70]

Quote: Logall

Iraq did not have normal air defense! And ours with a 300-weighty argument, so as not to attack ...

How many S-300 are there in Iran? Five divisions? One division is 12 installations (4 missiles each) can reflect up to 24 targets at a time.
That is, for one division, 40 tomahawks in one salvo are guaranteed to be destroyed. Five divisions - five volleys. Well, given the inevitable errors - ten salvos. Then, as in Iraq, for a long time to hammer missiles with any hint of any air defense. After the destruction of air defense and aircraft - the bomb anyone you want, can not answer.
S-300 is not a defense in case of a full-scale war. This is a defense against terrorist attacks by small aviation units. That the "casual" bomb from the Israeli or Saudi plane did not fall. Well, to repel the very first strike, so that the rest of the forces could be put in combat readiness.
Iran’s main defense is its Navy, there are only submarines there, and there are missile cruisers.

[dik-nsk]

If an agreement on Iran has any meaning, the parties should have a common understanding of its terms.

as I understand it, we decided to rewrite already signed agreements for myself

[mvg]

his Navy, there are a bunch of submarines, and there are missile cruisers.

Sorry for the immodest question (envy just takes ), but didn’t you take anything in the morning? Give the aircraft carriers under the Iranian flag !!!

[Shurik70]

Quote: mvg

his Navy, there are a bunch of submarines, and there are missile cruisers.

Have you taken anything in the morning?

On the Navy, I will not even give a link. Look for it yourself.
According to the adoption in the morning - I'm on vacation. What I want is what I accept.

[Vlad.by]

But Iran, then, will sit and wait for the next salvo? And forget about their ICBMs?
They constrain the exceptional.

[Maz]

They want Russia to pull through Iran

[Black_Vatnik]

That case, when only yesterday I learned about the IAEA, and only because the text had to be memorized.

[Flexsus]

I can’t understand one thing, the State Department on what principle appoints its representatives to the UN Security Council? Dumb and dumber, or what?

[tatarin_ru]

This time, she did without the words “Iran should”, “the whole world should know”, “in the name of our security and democracy”, usually these words on duty in each striped speech.
What is it? the screenwriter got sick?

[japs]

This is just a talking head, it only speaks the text from the State Department.
The presence of brains is contraindicated.

[Ilja2016]

And we want to test US nuclear facilities

[Flexsus]

And this is not democratic ...

[The black]

Haley can save her wet dreams for her husband ... and it’s not up to her to allow the IAEA representatives to Iranian facilities or not ..

[Vlad.by]

Oh, these WET DREAMS ... well, you kind of prankster ...
With such a Hayley, and even wet ... :-)

[Ilja2016]

Quote: Flexsus

I can’t understand one thing, the State Department on what principle appoints its representatives to the UN Security Council? Dumb and dumber, or what?

Worse and worse

[Flexsus]

Here, I broke my head !!!!

[kg pv]

And also a greyhound and a greyhound.

[pvv113]

I look at this Hale and ask myself the question: where are the beads?

[tatarin_ru]

Her dress is valid, under the sea battle .

[pvv113]

Yeah, only the cells are empty

[tatarin_ru]

Yeah, only the cells are empty

Well, we don’t see everything, she doesn’t get up from a chair.
Although I would not be surprised if she and Psaki play him like that

[pvv113]

They stand each other

[Old26]

US insists on IAEA inspections of Iran’s military facilities as part of the Joint Comprehensive Action Plan (JCPOA)

Americans play in public. After all, the IAEA inspections are already provided for by agreement. Why repeat ... Except it doesn't smell like PR

[Belyash]

Islamic terrorist Obama colluded with Iran.

[Herculesic]

Rabinowicz You literally prayed to Obama and now, b / y you don’t like any more - what is the reason for the change of opinion? ??

[APASUS]

It is interesting how this treaty with Iran can be interpreted, as I understand it, under this topic can inspections be carried out even in schools? Although a rather strange statement, such a comprehensive agreement should include all aspects, including the number of inspections and by what services it is carried out.
Who is stirring up water again? Do the Americans read on their own or did Iran sign the sleeves later?

[Vard]

The USA is squeezed out of Syria, so they spoil how they can ...

[Old26]

Quote: APASUS

It is interesting how this treaty with Iran can be interpreted, as I understand it, under this topic can inspections be carried out even in schools? Although a rather strange statement, such a comprehensive agreement should include all aspects, including the number of inspections and by what services it is carried out.
Who is stirring up water again? Do the Americans read on their own or did Iran sign the sleeves later?

This is not an agreement, but an agreement. If Iran wants to, at any time it will be able to withdraw from this agreement, but other participants in this case may not fulfill those conditions with Iran. which have been agreed upon. That is, for example, the UN will again impose sanctions and Iran’s accounts will be blocked.
The appendices to the agreement stipulate inspections of certain objects, their number, etc. No inspections of schools are, of course, provided. But the restrictions are quite strict and long-term (15 years)

[Herculesic]

By the surname and name of the Hindu, it seems like smart should be, but carries utter nonsense! !! It’s a pity for her — it would be better there to do levitation and meditate, what shame sitting on behalf of the United States in the United Nations! !!

[soul]

First, liquidate your chemical weapons as promised. And then check the others, the rags are auditors

[afrikanez]

The same thing happened on the part of the states in the 90s, when Russia disarmed in full. We also believed in the word that the Americans are disarming. This once again suggests that the states themselves have never fulfilled these promises and that is why they always doubt and make others doubt it. The Americans often need to look in the mirror, that's what !!!

[NEXUS]

US insists on IAEA inspections of Iran’s military facilities as part of the Joint Comprehensive Action Plan (JCPOA)

Late to drink Borjomi ... the train left and there will be no Iraqi scenario. And the United States and the Saudis have a very serious hemorrhoids in that region ...
And simply, Iran outplayed the United States, and now the State Department screams as a girl with low social responsibility that the United States used without their consent.

[alibabaewitch.vasilij2018]

just nafig, nafig and no need to explain anything the cone will still be .. if they need a reason.

[Tolstoevsky]

and at the same time adjust the goals for the bombing

[without reverse]

I am for a strong Iran. Let Sriel-Jankers have a headache.

[Nikolai Petrov]

Here are insolent "exceptional". Or maybe they also have the keys to the apartment where the money is? At comrade You check it out. Let's see how the "verification" ends. And Iran, I am sure, will show them a donut hole. An example of such "checks" at his side near the western border.

[Pavlovsky]

Circles cut

[Old26]

Quote: Shurik70

Quote: mvg

his Navy, there are a bunch of submarines, and there are missile cruisers.

Have you taken anything in the morning?

On the Navy, I will not even give a link. Look for it yourself.
According to the adoption in the morning - I'm on vacation. What I want is what I accept.

Sorry, comrade, but you are bearing a specific blizzard against the Iranian Navy. The basis of the Iranian submarine forces is THREE boats of the Varshavyanka project. nested in 80-90 shaggy years. Which have NEVER undergone any repairs. And if before they were called the "black hole in the ocean", now now they probably will only not be heard by the deaf.
The rest of the "Boats" are mini-boats with a crew of 2-7 people and 1-2 torpedoes. In a sudden attack, Americans can be damaged and inflicted if they are in the Strait of Hormuz. They simply "will not reach" other places. Of the surface ships, there are several destroyers of English construction of almost the 50s, a certain number of corvette frigates. A fairly large number of missile boats and ground anti-ship systems. But most of them have missiles with a range of damage of 15-40 km. So Iran’s fleet is hooded (especially compared to Iraq’s, which is not at all)

[Kostadinov]

This must be expected. What did Teheran think when they agreed with the USA? Really beat Iraq. "Check" of military objects, which is not included in the contract, and then the bombing of these objects themselves. Therefore, Iran has only one exit. Immediately, the United States would have torn off the treaty and purchased nuclear weapons from the DPRK. The only way to save the world.