Iraqi forces are waiting for orders to be dispatched to areas in dispute with Kurds

Iraqi troops are waiting for the order of Supreme Commander Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi to be sent to areas in dispute with the Kurds on Friday, said RIA News local source in power structures.

After the independence referendum on autonomous Iraqi Kurdistan on Monday, the Iraqi parliament decided to send troops to disputed areas, in particular the oil province of Kirkuk. The districts do not belong to the Kurdish autonomy under the constitution, but they came under its control as a result of the fight against the Islamic State grouping *.

The Iraqi military has finished preparations and are in places nearby, awaiting orders from the Prime Minister, Supreme Commander Haider al-Abadi tomorrow, to go to protect civilians in disputed areas tomorrow

- the source said.

On Friday, the Iraqi authorities had previously set a deadline for the termination of international flights with the cities of Erbil and Sulaymaniyah in Iraqi Kurdistan.

According to the highest independent commission on elections and the referendum of Kurdistan, 92,7% of voters voted for independence. The Iraqi authorities declared the referendum illegitimate and stressed that they would not negotiate with the regional autonomy government on the results of the vote. Against the voting were the neighbors of Iraqi Kurdistan - Turkey and Iran, as well as the United States and the United Nations.

"Islamic State" * is a terrorist organization banned in Russia.

Comments

[Shura Perm]

will there be a new war now ???

[newcomer]

oh, did she stop? the theater is the same, actors are changing, periodically.

[Nashensky city]

Exactly. usa realized that the women were exhausted, and made a new deal ...

[newcomer]

I always used to say, Kurds are the very option b with which they scared us in Syria. I hope our measures have already been taken.

[Nashensky city]

In any case, the General Staff is considering many options for the development of events. I am sure it will not be a surprise for them

[The black]

The Iraqi army is too weak, especially since it suffered huge losses near Mosul. So in Kurdish areas, she has nothing to catch except (censorship)

[Scalpel]

On the contrary, I have gained combat experience and is ready to take control of all of Iraq.

[newcomer]

that’s the point. and why, why, do you think, is all this started? _ to finally make Iraq a void in the name of Kurdistan. if the Iraqis had bits of reason left, they needed allies, albeit temporary, but with a good army. and Iraq is so weak that the allies can finally resolve the Iraqi issue together with the Kurdish. In general, Iraq has neither a choice nor a way out. as in that tale: you’ll go to the left to lose the horse, to the left you will perish.

[Nashensky city]

Turkey has already stated that it will begin a military operation if Official Baghdad calls on it with the corresponding request. In any case, the Janissaries will not stand aside

[newcomer]

Well, I say, there is no way out. or Kurds land, or Turks oil and a place under the base (which also means land).

[Thracian warrior]

As long as the Kurds are in control of the oil province of Kirkuk, the United States will be opposed, if the Kurds depart from there, the referendum will automatically be determined as a democratic will.
Dollar is all sacred for them ..

[newcomer]

why should they step back and lose such leverage? Well, perhaps, they will be ground.

[Per se]

Well, Kurds sailed, tramps ... SchA will show you your place ... What they hoped, naive, when they signed a deal with the Devil (USA) with their blood ...

[Topotun]

It is not the Kurds who have sailed; they have nothing to lose. But Iraq and Turkey have that. It is unlikely that they will stand to death. Especially considering how Iraq gave its territory to the IS ... The only Iran, but there is a question.

[Kurare]

Quote: Topotun

The only Iran, but there is a question.

Iran can easily crush Iraq under this guise. Which is naturally completely unacceptable to the states.

[Corsair0304]

The districts are not constitutionally included in Kurdish autonomy, but came under its control as a result of the struggle against the Islamic State group *.

And while the United States type condemn the referendum! Level 80 duplicity! It was p * Russia that armed the Kurds and trained them; it was the states that led the Kurds through the positions of the Islamic State (banned in Russia) to the oil-bearing regions. And here they say, "We condemn ..."
But in fact, atm now such a batch can begin that the barmalei will not stand nearby .. When countries start to fight, this is no laughing matter. And all this - against the background of the fact that they still have not fully understood the broads!

[Scalpel]

In Iraq, the United States supports the official government, but not in Syria - that’s the whole difference.

[yuliatreb]

Probably among the Kurds there are wise people who must do everything to avoid a bloody, brutal war, a war the consequences of which will be terrible for all conflicting parties. And not only among the Kurds.

[Kurare]

For the Kurds, this is probably the only chance to create their own state and not just autonomy. Another thing, they encroached on a very fat piece of oil cake in Kirkuk. Those. for Iraq - this is completely unacceptable - money is past the checkout. For Turkey - this is even more unacceptable - the Kurds will not abandon their own in Turkey, and now they will also have money.

[Monarchist]

Quote: Nashensky city

Exactly. usa realized that the women were exhausted, and made a new deal ...

And here it is not necessary to conclude anything: the Kurds slept and saw sovereignty.
When Washington invited the Kurds to the Turvalz, they certainly asked about sovereignty, and the Americans answered like: “Come in for a week: we need to discuss it”.
The Kurds also have a “lip not a fool” Kirkuk decided to “grab”.
Haydar al-Abadi knows that no one will write for the Kurds now and begins to "protect citizens in disputed areas"

[APASUS]

Sounds like the main batch is yet to come? Although the main message was made by the Americans towards Syria, too many dissatisfied countries gathered by Kurdish referendum

[Belyash]

The Americans did not bring Iraqi terrorism to defeat at the time.

[LeonidL]

In general, they had been kicked out of there already. Really want to repeat? I don’t understand Putin’s position - disconnecting Crimea from Ukraine as a result of a referendum is good. Is it bad to disconnect Kurdistan from Iraq during a referendum? No, dear, either a cross on his chest or underpants on his ass.

[high]

Amid the defeat of the armies of Iraq and Syria from Yigil, Kurdish military units successfully smashed Yigil.
Therefore, the result of the “meeting” of the Kurds and Iraq is obvious and the Iraqi troops will remain in their places ....

[high]

Quote: LeonidL

I don’t understand Putin’s position - disconnecting Crimea from Ukraine as a result of a referendum is good. Is it bad to disconnect Kurdistan from Iraq during a referendum? No, dear, either a cross on his chest or underpants on his ass.

You can provide a link where Russia opposed the Kurdish referendum.

[syndicalist]

The Kurdish state is almost an accomplished fact. Even if neighbors succeed in asking it at this stage, it will inevitably be reborn. This is a historical trend that neither Turkey nor Iran, nor even Iraq, can overcome. Russia should proceed from this fact, not try to write against the wind and support the Kurds. Then it will be a much more reliable ally of the Russian Federation in the region than Assad

[FLOOD]

Quote: Kurare

Quote: Topotun

The only Iran, but there is a question.

Iran can easily crush Iraq under this guise. Which is naturally completely unacceptable to the states.

Iran doesn’t need this carballet anymore and it will never agree to any “Kurdistan” at its borders. Otherwise, Iranian Kurds, and even worse, Azerbaijanis (30 million in Iran) will declare themselves.

[FLOOD]

Quote: Belyash

The Americans did not bring Iraqi terrorism to defeat at the time.

And what is the manifestation of Iraqi terrorism? Do you want to say that the Americans went to Iraq because of terrorism?