Military Review

Permanent Representation of the Russian Federation spoke about the difficulties in reducing nuclear weapons

26
Russia can not move towards reducing nuclear weapons exclusively on a bilateral basis with the United States, disregarding the potential of other states, transfers RIA News a comment published on the website of the Russian Permanent Mission to the UN.




Russia cannot move further along the path of reducing nuclear weapons exclusively on a bilateral basis with the United States (not to mention that the line of the Donald Trump administration on issues such as the future of the Treaty on measures to further reduce and limit on the elimination of medium and shorter range missiles). In fact, we have already reached the line beyond which the corresponding hypothetical negotiations should be multilateral. Not taking into account the potentials of all other nuclear-weapon States in the process of such discussions no longer works,
the commentary says.

The Permanent Mission also stressed the need to be extremely responsible and cautious in evaluating the overall prospects for nuclear disarmament.

We give and will continue to give priority to all factors affecting the situation in this area. Among them are the creation of a US global missile defense, the prospect of weapons in space, the non-ratification of the CTBT (Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty) by the United States and several other states, Washington’s plans to build a global lightning strike potential, remaining imbalances in conventional weapons,
The report says.

The agency recalls that 7 July, following several weeks of negotiations in the UN, a convention on the complete prohibition of nuclear weapons was adopted. The nuclear powers did not participate in drafting the treaty, including the permanent members of the UN Security Council - Russia, the United Kingdom, China and the United States.

The Convention will enter into force 90 days after it is ratified by at least 50 countries. On September 20, the number of signatories was 51.
Photos used:
https://militaryarms.ru
26 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Logall
    Logall 28 September 2017 12: 09
    +17
    The United States reduces nuclear weapons as well as chem. weapons!
    USA - fucking cowgirl with wolves ...
    And more precisely - the "jackal" among the wolves ...
    1. DEPARTMENT
      DEPARTMENT 28 September 2017 12: 17
      +2
      Following several weeks of negotiations, the UN adopted a convention on a complete ban on nuclear weapons

      We were already disarmed in the 90s! Let the USA show an example to all countries (we also destroyed our chemical weapons, unlike the United States ..)))
      And the conclusion is .. Tricky, arrogant moneylenders!
      1. pjastolov
        pjastolov 28 September 2017 12: 39
        +5
        And the conclusion is .. Tricky, arrogant moneylenders!
        Vital you're wrong
        The United States does not plan to accede to the Convention on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, the text of which was agreed on July 7 by the participants of the UN conference. This was stated by the official representative of the US State Department, Heather Neuerth, reports a REGNUM correspondent.
        “The United States did not participate in these negotiations and will not support this agreement,” the press service of the US Foreign Ministry quoted Neuert as saying.
        The State Department spokeswoman noted that Washington "over the years and under various administrations has clearly expressed its willingness to work with all states to improve international security and reduce the risk of nuclear war."
        “However, the proposed treaty ignores current security challenges that make nuclear deterrence necessary,” said Neuert.
        She emphasized that "not a single nuclear-weapon state has participated in these negotiations, and not a single US ally that relies on expanded nuclear deterrence has supported the final text."

        signed it
        it was ratified by representatives of 51 states, including Algeria, Austria, Brazil, Vatican, Costa Rica, Indonesia, Cuba, Libya, Liechtenstein, Mexico, New Zealand, Palestine, South Africa, Thailand, Venezuela and others ...
        Source: https://rueconomics.ru/276424-konvenciyu-o-polnom
        -zaprete-yadernogo-oruzhiya-podpisala-51-strana # f
        rom_copy
        - Papuans, yes neutrals hi
      2. dorz
        dorz 28 September 2017 12: 58
        0
        Americans will never reduce nuclear weapons because they border Canada and the evil Mexicans. No.
    2. stolz
      stolz 28 September 2017 12: 25
      +3
      And why reduce it, it is necessary to increase it, on the contrary, do we have something else to counter the predatory aspirations of our "partners" in NATO?
      1. zhekazs
        zhekazs 28 September 2017 13: 00
        +2
        Quote: Stolz
        And why reduce it, it is necessary to increase it, on the contrary, do we have something else to counter the predatory aspirations of our "partners" in NATO?

        It may not be worth it to build up, but constantly improve technologically, update, this must be done. As is generally happening now. And if we were to set the apple on hyper, then we’ll look at the squeals of mattresses with their much-praised missile defense.
    3. siberalt
      siberalt 28 September 2017 12: 34
      +2
      Yeah. Let them first make Eunu shrink! laughing And we'll see what happens. laughing laughing
      1. zhekazs
        zhekazs 28 September 2017 13: 11
        0
        Quote: siberalt
        Yeah. Let them first make Eunu shrink! laughing And we'll see what happens. laughing laughing

        Eunu, let China and I force-coerce-caress-persuade, and let the mattresses force Israel to acknowledge and destroy it. We can destroy with us, for denyuzhku. On which we build ourselves something worthwhile))
    4. 79807420129
      79807420129 28 September 2017 12: 46
      +8
      Quote: Logall
      The United States reduces nuclear weapons as well as chem. weapons!

      Sanya, Hello. I look in the mail repent. hi And for Mirikans, we have roughly equal nuclear potentials, I write from memory, please forgive me if something is wrong. About 1600 warheads on each side, they are ahead of us in carriers, we are tactical nuclear weapons in tactical nuclear weapons, but it’s correctly noticed that the arsenal is not taken into account NATO, where England and France, is +400 warheads and delivery vehicles.
      1. Logall
        Logall 28 September 2017 12: 59
        +16
        Hi!
        But the main thing is not the number of warheads, but their delivery vehicles!
        Here it is impossible to make concessions, in no case ...
        Accepted, answered.
      2. weksha50
        weksha50 28 September 2017 13: 14
        +1
        Quote: 79807420129
        correctly noted, not taken into account the arsenal of NATO where England and France, this is +400 warheads and delivery vehicles.



        Um ... If we seriously talk and take into account, then we can not forget about the long-term friendly China, at least ...
        1. 79807420129
          79807420129 28 September 2017 13: 26
          +7
          Quote: weksha50
          about bye friendly China, at least ...

          This is plus another 200-300 warheads and carriers. hi
          1. Starover_Z
            Starover_Z 29 September 2017 00: 22
            0
            Quote: 79807420129
            Quote: weksha50
            about bye friendly China, at least ...

            This is plus another 200-300 warheads and carriers. hi

            China is not friendly. China is still neutral to us, while it has less modern and better weapons for the ground forces!
  2. 210ox
    210ox 28 September 2017 12: 11
    +7
    What is the reduction of nuclear weapons? We are still alive because of this.
  3. pjastolov
    pjastolov 28 September 2017 12: 14
    +4
    On July 7, following several weeks of negotiations at the UN, a convention on the complete ban on nuclear weapons was adopted. Nuclear powers did not participate in the development of the treaty, including the permanent members of the UN Security Council - Russia, Great Britain, China and the USA.
    what's this? got married without me? I wonder who these signatories are? probably the Papuans? how can you forbid what you don’t have and will not appear soon laughing
    1. weksha50
      weksha50 28 September 2017 13: 18
      +1
      Quote: pjastolov
      what's this? got married without me? I wonder who these signatories are? probably the Papuans? how can you forbid what you don’t have and will not appear soon


      Nobody "married" anyone ... Signed by such "Papuans" as Liechtenstein (demanding the abolition of the veto power of Russia in the UN Security Council), Costa Rica, Zimbabwe ... Non-nuclear countries ...
      And NUCLEAR - put on these signatories ... Just did not notice, passing ...
      1. pjastolov
        pjastolov 28 September 2017 13: 20
        +4
        Already found who signed what mattresses said about this, laughing
  4. newcomer
    newcomer 28 September 2017 12: 18
    +5
    not bad, however. we destroyed our chemical weapons, the Yankees pull up to 23g. you never know what they have in mind before the 23rd. here and with yao moment. we must cut, the Yankees pretend to cut. and NATO jackals: Britons, paddles? other nuclear club recruits? very interesting.
  5. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 28 September 2017 12: 20
    0
    A global missile defense is like a global nuclear weapons, which many states already have, including North Korea.
  6. Bronevick
    Bronevick 28 September 2017 12: 22
    +1
    In my opinion, now is the time to build up nuclear potential.
  7. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 28 September 2017 12: 24
    +1
    They did not participate in the development of the treaty, including the permanent members of the UN Security Council - Russia, Great Britain, China and the USA.

    Therefore, they will not sign any convention. Therefore, countries without nuclear weapons should not be in the clouds and hope that the nuclear powers begin to disarm. Not for this was created nuclear weapons, so that someone does not know who banned him.
  8. Dezinto
    Dezinto 28 September 2017 12: 25
    0
    Trump is certainly a setup in terms of unpredictability, and in general the absence of a coherent policy. Figs know what to expect from him. Hence, such advances in fundamental treaties with the United States.
    1. Makarov
      Makarov 28 September 2017 12: 30
      0
      there are definitely two things you can expect from him: work to get the US out of the crisis and the “republican” model of behavior in foreign policy .. as for me that's all you need to know about this person as the US president ... he reminds Reagan, only much worse versed in politics and better in economics ...
  9. weksha50
    weksha50 28 September 2017 13: 11
    0
    "Russia cannot move towards reducing nuclear weapons exclusively on a bilateral basis with the United States, not taking into account the potential of other states"...

    Lord, I finally waited for a real understanding and assessment of the situation, - thank God - openly said this not only to the avid "partner" - the United States, but to the whole world ... good
    PS True, it is disappointing that Russia destroyed its chemical weapons, but the USA has not yet begun ... and the US bio-bio-laboratories in Georgia and / or Ukraine are very "embarrassing" to me ...
  10. Old26
    Old26 28 September 2017 16: 00
    +1
    The title of the article is frankly IDIOTIC. What we did not know all these last 30-40 years, that this is the problem7, Reductions are in the direction of Russia-USA. Everything else before our treaties with the Americans is simple Violet.
  11. Georges Pompidou
    Georges Pompidou 28 September 2017 20: 32
    0
    Based on the current situation, the nuclear arsenal needs to be increased and not reduced.