Tehran's missile shield: Iran’s nuclear bomb is much more real than we all think

22
Tehran's missile shield: Iran’s nuclear bomb is much more real than we all think


Official Tehran is preparing for a new round of confrontation with the United States. Donald Trump is clearly aggravating relations with Iran, and it’s time for his leadership to think about what will happen next, that is, after the confrontation with Washington takes more open forms.



Sanctions sanctions discord

Iran is not afraid. Today, the situation for him looks much more acceptable than ten or twelve years ago, when Tehran decided to develop its nuclear program and faced a sharp increase in political and economic pressure in its address.

And here the point is not even that today the Iranian army is one of the strongest in the region and is not very afraid of Israeli or American raids aviation.

The C-300 missile systems, recently delivered by Russia, reliably covered the Iranian sky.

The most important factor in the tranquility of official Tehran was the creation of an alternative American global economic system centered on China. The military, political, and economic union created by Moscow and Beijing makes the isolation of Iran virtually impossible today.

Moreover, on the issue of anti-Iran sanctions, the West today is far from united. European countries are already looking askance at Washington, which has drawn them into a senseless and ruinous economic war with Russia. They do not want to attack the same rake again and again, especially against the background of huge problems with Middle Eastern refugees.

A confrontation with Iran can only exacerbate this problem.

So, we see that Tehran is ready for sanctions. But in this stories There is another very interesting “North Korean” moment.

Iran's missile program

The missile programs of the DPRK and Iran are quite intertwined. Pyongyang was originally for Tehran was the main supplier of rocket technology. Many Iranian ballistic missiles are, in fact, copies of North Korean missiles, which were then improved by Iranian specialists.

During the Iran-Iraq war in 1980, the DPRK became the main supplier of BR to Iran. Initially, these were copies and improved models of the good old Soviet rocket P-17.



After the war, North Korean experts helped Tehran to create their own production of such missiles. From this, in fact, the Iranian missile program was launched.

Today, the Iranian army is armed with the Shahab-3 long-range (medium) ballistic missiles. It was created on the basis of the North Korean “Nodon” rocket and today is capable of throwing warheads with a mass of about 1 tonnes to a range of up to 1300 km, and light warheads up to 2000 km. She initially worked on liquid fuel. Then the rocket was equipped with solid-fuel engines, and today its version of “Shahab-3D” is the main component of Tehran’s “missile deterrence”.

But Tehran did not calm down on this. As soon as solid-fuel Shahab-3 began to take over combat duty, Iran began developing a more modern missile. This program is known as "Sajil" ("Sajil-1" and "Sajil-2").



There is another name for it: “Ghadr”.

Apparently, the Iranians continue to experiment creatively with Shahab-3, trying to get the best possible characteristics and the widest range of tasks that it solves.

Now the BBs of the rocket check their GPS trajectory, and one of them is even capable of striking large enemy ships.

This can also be attributed to the recently tested rocket "Khorramshahr."



So, we see that the missile programs of Iran and the DPRK dispersed and began to develop in their own way. But today there is something in each of them that makes them very useful to each other and dangerous for potential opponents.

What is interesting in the missile programs of the DPRK and Iran today.

In many ways, they complement each other, and this is very dangerous for the United States and Israel.

North Korea already has a nuclear charge, and they are working on its miniaturization. Iran has a working platform for breeding warheads (and, by the way, for a long time).

One of the versions of the warhead (which is about 10 years old) “Shahab-3” has 5 BBs weighing 220-280 kg.

The technology of separable warheads (MF) is quite complex, and it is not particularly needed for the removal of conventional warheads. It has always been developed and used precisely for nuclear launch vehicles. weapons, because the total destructive power of 5 close nuclear explosions in 100 kt is more than one with 500 kt. In addition, they create much more problems with missile defense systems. There is no great sense in splitting up a normal charge. Probably, Iranian experts, despite official assurances, still developed their own nuclear charge, and at the same time, the MIRV technology for their ballistic missiles. Tehran was forced to freeze the program on “Yadren-baton” reluctantly, but the creation of the program for the creation of the MIRP was completed ...

As we understand, if Tehran and Pyongyang agree, then very soon the first will receive their nuclear charge, and the latter will solve the problem of equipping their missiles with divided warheads.

And it is possible that this is what makes the United States and its regional allies very nervous today. By giving impetus to the exchange of experience between Iranian and North Korean experts in the field of nuclear missile technology, they can get a chain reaction of problems with which they can never cope.
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    29 September 2017 06: 43
    Iran’s nuclear bomb is much more real than we all think
    I don’t think about Iran at all ... let Israel think with the USA ....
    1. +1
      30 September 2017 10: 30
      Iran has the same nuclear bombs as it did in Iraq.
      But the fact that in secret Israel has such bombs, no one doubts.
      And the fact that one day he will apply them is also no doubt.
      1. 0
        2 October 2017 15: 51
        Give everyone a bomb and fly for a year as a tourist on the ISS ???
  2. +5
    29 September 2017 06: 45
    Poor Scud. As soon as they do not call him.
  3. +4
    29 September 2017 07: 15
    if Tehran and Pyongyang agree, then ....

    Then they will both be erased into powder, and neither the Russian Federation nor China, as it seems to me, will interfere with the process.
    1. +5
      29 September 2017 07: 52
      While the DPRK is not erased, despite promises
      1. +2
        29 September 2017 07: 58
        Quote: yurasumy
        While the DPRK is not erased, despite promises

        The keyword is bye.
        We will see.
    2. 0
      29 September 2017 15: 49
      The gut is thin in miners. This is not the Papuans to drive
  4. +1
    29 September 2017 08: 14
    Despite the different names of countries. The key word here is Russia. Because all this bodyagi is near our borders, in the east, in the south. Yes, and in the west partners seven hundred kilometers from Moscow.
    1. +2
      29 September 2017 09: 26
      There is also it is the keyword China
  5. +1
    29 September 2017 10: 10
    It seems to me that Iran has not stopped developing nuclear weapons. In Iran, in the mountains, so much has been accumulated; there is more than one nuclear program that can be hidden.
  6. 0
    29 September 2017 10: 47
    If the theses described in the article are true, it turns out that Iran and the DPRK will soon develop a series of ballistic missiles and compact nuclear warheads for them. In addition to all this, they do not give a damn about the sanctions, they can also put it on the black market at an inexpensive price, so that any banana republic can acquire a "set" of intimidation.
  7. +6
    29 September 2017 11: 21
    Quote: Snail N9
    It seems to me that Iran has not stopped developing nuclear weapons. In Iran, in the mountains, so much has been accumulated; there is more than one nuclear program that can be hidden.

    Quite a lot is known about Iran’s nuclear program. And it all depends on how clearly the provisions of the agreement concluded in 2015 are being implemented. No one disputes that even ending Iran’s military nuclear program will not lose the knowledge gained as a result of its implementation. Knowledge will remain, there will not be just opportunities.
    As for what is "hidden in the mountains." By agreement, it is in factories "hidden in the mountains" that most of the relevant equipment will be dismantled.

    In general, the article, to be honest - about nothing, although with a claim to analytics.
    The author claims that the Iranian army is the strongest army in the region and is not very afraid of American and Israeli air raids. As they say, "freshly tradition, but hard to believe." Iran may not be afraid of Israeli air raids, since mass raids are impossible due to the limited number of Israeli refueling aircraft and the absence of jump airports in the region. But as for the American one, I would not make such a peremptory statement. From repeating the words as a mantra that deliveries of our S-300s will make Iran’s air defense impenetrable, this will not happen. We will supply Iran with FIVE S-300 divisions. And EMNIP, in the form of our divisions, where the number of launchers reaches 12, 40 launchers will be delivered to the Iranian side as part of 5 divisions. But they will not make the weather, because they will be deployed in the capital region (4 divisions) and in the area of ​​the Bushehr nuclear power plant.

    Saying that now Iran is not afraid of sanctions, since Russia and China are stirring up the EU - the SCO and BRICS - is also quite stupid. According to the most modest dreams, economic organizations with the participation of China, Russia and other countries have reached the weight of the EU in about a year in 2050. This is what the participants in these structures themselves say. Therefore, if the sanctions are again imposed on Iran, they will still be enough for him and difficult. Hat-making, as the author here is not appropriate.

    Further. Although Iran’s missile program is also developing, it is extremely far from perfect and for the most part is still a North Korean clone. If they "dispersed", then not by much. The fact that “Shahab-3” has a variant of the RGCh with 5 warheads for ten years does not mean that these missiles are in service. In addition, even in the video test of the new Iranian missile, it is clearly visible that the separated warhead is a warhead of a cluster-wise, "scattering" type, and not an individual homing warhead. so even here not everything is as “violet” as the author presents
    1. 0
      2 October 2017 20: 35
      The bottom line is that the "barbarians" (in the understanding of the West) suddenly also became the owners of their own "gunshot" instead of a bow. And somehow it’s so simple they can’t be forced to “democracy” anymore. Have to "bother" - and this is the cost of additional resources, which already have very specific limitations. Pichalka, however ..
      And your analytics - in particular, against the background of the general historical process.
  8. +2
    29 September 2017 12: 17
    At one point, the author did not take into account the Pakistan atomic bomb. In Islamobad, they openly say that they will provide YaZ to Tehran for the war with the Americans.
    1. +1
      29 September 2017 16: 24
      Quote: SarS
      In Islamobad, they openly say that they will provide YaZ to Tehran for the war with the Americans.

      Brad.
      Or proofs in the studio!
  9. 0
    30 September 2017 01: 48
    Quote: SarS
    At one point, the author did not take into account the Pakistan atomic bomb. In Islamobad, they openly say that they will provide YaZ to Tehran for the war with the Americans.

    Link please Pakistan ally USA ...
    1. 0
      2 October 2017 15: 59
      Ally in words, while military assistance is received. In fact, the Pakistani military is extremely negative about the actions of the special services of the Americans in Pakistan. Who remembers the amer packs created big problems under Obama with the supply of USarmi in Afghanistan.
  10. +3
    30 September 2017 12: 41
    Quote: SarS
    At one point, the author did not take into account the Pakistan atomic bomb. In Islamobad, they openly say that they will provide YaZ to Tehran for the war with the Americans.

    The probability is almost zero. Rather, Pakistan will hand over a nuclear bomb to Saudi Arabia than Iran. But the fact that the Iranians received their centrifuges from Pakistan through the Kar Khan network at one time is true. Although this "network" is not a state structure, but an underground private
    1. 0
      2 October 2017 16: 15
      No need to mix everything. It’s one thing - the war between Iran and the USA, everything is clear for one hundred percent - the Iranians will get the Pakistani bomb (no links - I’m not saving up, the info went somewhere half a year - a year ago there were negotiations at the level of defense ministers.
      In the event of a war, KSA and Iran are not so simple. On the one hand, the Saudis paid the bomb to the Pakistanis, on the other, the Pakistanis from time to time show that they are not Saudi puppets (Qatar, Yemen, Arab NATO).
  11. +1
    1 October 2017 00: 59
    Quote: Gardamir
    Despite the different names of countries. The key word here is Russia. Because all this bodyagi is near our borders, in the east, in the south. Yes, and in the west partners seven hundred kilometers from Moscow.

    So what do you suggest? Sit back and do nothing?
    1. 0
      1 October 2017 12: 00
      Perhaps this will be the surest model of behavior ... Any real war in the Persian Gulf is very beneficial for us ...