China has demonstrated a full-fledged analogue of the American shock drone MQ-9 Reaper

China has developed a full-fledged analogue of the American percussion drone MQ-9 Reaper. According to the portal janes.com, China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) tested combat capabilities drone CH-5.

During the tests, the Chinese drone launched new missiles and successfully hit targets. Characteristics of ammunition are not disclosed. In addition, CASC reported that in August of this year, the AR-5 missiles equipped with a laser guidance system were successfully launched with the CH-1.

Tests of the combat capabilities of the CH-5 drone were held at a military airfield located in Gansu Province. The launch of a missile equipped with a fragmentation warhead was carried out at an altitude of 3500 m. The CASC indicates that test launches made it possible to test both the capabilities of the missile and the operation of the electro-optical module and mounts for ammunition.

The CH-5 drone (Cai hong 5, “Rainbow-5”) was first unveiled at the AirShow China last November. The developers are positioning it as an analogue of the American shock drone MQ-9 Reaper. Chinese drone looks similar to its American "brother", and is almost identical to him in weight and dimensions. The CH-5 is about 11 m long, its wingspan reaches 21 m. The drone can be in the air for up to 60 hours and rise to an altitude of up to 10 km. The maximum take-off weight of the drone is 3,3 t, of which about a third is given to weapons and combat systems, reports "Warspot".

Comments

[Engineer]

On the MAX was, apparently, a layout, but it was immediately obvious that it was Chinese.

[katalonec2014]

Quote: Engineer

Standing at MAX

So it will be on sale soon. Maybe buying a stranger will push our developers, I know, not patriotic, but you need to somehow bridge the gap, but it’s already decent.

[kapitan92]

Quote: katalonec2014

Quote: Engineer

Standing at MAX

So it will be on sale soon. Maybe buying a stranger will push our developers, I know, not patriotic, but you need to somehow bridge the gap, but it’s already decent.

When will we demonstrate anything besides the “Rogozin” chatter?

[APASUS]

Quote: kapitan92

When will we demonstrate anything besides the “Rogozin” chatter?

A video of the flight of the Russian reconnaissance UAV Orion in the sky over Syria appeared on the Web. According to the commentary, the footage was shot over the city of Al-Latamina in the province of Hama.

[Lavrenti Pavlovich]

And why push ours, they work and keep quiet. Who should this drone fight against? Any army with air defense will knock him and money down the drain.

[Sharansky]

yes, not far away here in Syria, for example

[okko077]

I’m already tired of explaining on the forum that UAVs are a simple sensor for the system. Without a system, this sensor is not effective ... The system receives a signal from the sensor and controls an actuator, a means of destruction, starting from an artillery system (for example, MCTs) and ending with a rocket. The work of this entire system should take place in real time and in automatic mode. If there is manual control, the system immediately loses its efficiency and cannot work in real time .... All our trouble, all our lag is due to the lack of a system in the form of combat information systems. . We simply don’t have them ... You can buy UAVs - Chinese or Israeli, but nothing can change from this. This UAV will not be able to work in our system, it will not be able to control our weapons ... No one understands this on the forum. The problem is not in UAVs, the problem is in combat information systems. They do not understand this in the military leadership ... There were attempts, but they were defeated by idiots in general uniforms ... For example, even the MSTU and the MLRS Tornado provide for work from non-existent combat information systems .... Without such systems, you can’t even fight in Syria. We don’t know anything about the enemy, and if we learn something with the help of non-systemic UAVs, we’ll be very late, and we can use this information, target designation only for stationary purposes ....

[x.andvlad]

This one stood on MAX.

It is hard to say whether the author is talking about this or not. Outwardly - similar.
But its name was "Wing Loong Multipurpose Unmanned Aerial Vehicle".

[Kasym]

Wing Loong Kazakhstan purchased.

[iConst]

Quote: Engineer

but it’s immediately obvious that it’s Chinese.

Or maybe not Chinese, but just squinted?

[oldseaman1957]

China has demonstrated a complete analogue of the American impact drone MQ-9 Reaper.

- The funniest thing would be if the Chinese counterpart is better than the American.

[Topotun]

Well, if not worse, it also means a lot. The price is incomparable ...

[okko077]

Does the control come from a toy remote control within a radius of 50 m?
For pyndos, the shock drone works almost anywhere in the world, and control is carried out from the territory of the USA, and this drone is integrated into the general information system ...
The question is to all dummies, and the Chinese and the Israelis are selling their information system? No, they sell a remote in the form of a car ... And what is its radius?
You can’t buy an impact drone, then compare a piece of cake in the form of a UAV, and a cake - an integrated information system - with a piece of useless shit ... with a remote control .. How much can you repeat nonsense?

[Maz]

Ah well done Chinese, at such a pace they will squeeze Israel out of the niche of mass drones. The grip is cleaner than the Jewish one. No wonder the Chinese are more years old than the Jews. Experiences

[Lelek]

Quote: Maz

The grip is cleaner than the Jewish one.

Hey. The Chinese are great fellows for themselves. They carry out silent glanders expansion throughout the globe. Australia and Africa will soon have more Chinese than Aboriginal people. And now their interest is the Indian Ocean, where their adversary is located - India. Soon we will witness the clash of two densely populated sworn neighbors.

[Thrall]

When will it be possible to order on Aliexpress with delivery to the USA?

[pjastolov]

it is better to order a rocket with self-propelled delivery to the white house

[wot]

sore spot .... we all don't have drummers

[Thrall]

Quote: wot

we all don't have drummers

We too

[iConst]

Quote: Thrall

Quote: wot

we all don't have drummers

We too

But in the USSR there were drummers ... There are all kinds of Stakhanovs, milkmaids ...

[NEXUS]

Quote: iConst

But in the USSR there were drummers ... There are all kinds of Stakhanovs, milkmaids ...

No, TU-300 (Korshun-U), as well as TU-121 and TU-130DP, which were intended for delivering nuclear strikes against targets on the territory of the enemy. Work in this direction has advanced far enough, even prototype tests have taken place. However, due to the development of intercontinental ballistic missiles, both projects were closed at the very beginning of the 60s.
And there were also super-sonic UAVs, for example, Hawk, with a maximum speed of 2700 km ... and this was in the 60s.

[iConst]

Quote: NEXUS

Quote: iConst

But in the USSR there were drummers ... There are all kinds of Stakhanovs, milkmaids ...

No, TU-300 (Korshun-U), as well as TU-121 and TU-130DP, which were intended for delivering nuclear strikes against targets on the territory of the enemy. Work in this direction has advanced far enough, even prototype tests have taken place. However, due to the development of intercontinental ballistic missiles, both projects were closed at the very beginning of the 60s.
And there were also super-sonic UAVs, for example, Hawk, with a maximum speed of 2700 km ... and this was in the 60s.

Greetings!
I was joking about drummers. :)

But still. Development would not be in vain ... if not for the betrayal of the 90s.

[NEXUS]

Quote: iConst

I was joking about drummers. :)
But still. Development would not be in vain ... if not for the betrayal of the 90s.

I can’t understand all of this in one way ... we have so much experience in reconnaissance UAVs, drums from the 60s, and we still can’t give birth to anything worthwhile ... there were even supersonic UAVs (serial) and strike carriers for nuclear weapons . There is a base and documentation, but we are all lagging behind this race, instead of being a leader.
Nonsense who gives up idiocy.

[iConst]

Quote: NEXUS

Quote: iConst

I was joking about drummers. :)
But still. Development would not be in vain ... if not for the betrayal of the 90s.

I can’t understand all of this in one way ... we have so much experience in reconnaissance UAVs, drums from the 60s, and we still can’t give birth to anything worthwhile ... there were even supersonic UAVs (serial) and strike carriers for nuclear weapons . There is a base and documentation, but we are all lagging behind this race, instead of being a leader.
Nonsense who gives up idiocy.

In the middle of the “zero” I was engaged in the search for technologies translated into the dual-use category - in factories - “mailboxes” of declassified technologies for civilian use.
So the people told me how in the nineties they "merged" the technology "for" to America, for beautiful promises. The then management of factories poisoned by ideas of thoughtless conversion and commercialization was worth saying the word "fax" and they rolled their eyes and... The emerald spring light flashed and trembled in the dark corners of the plagued janitor. Diamond smoke held on to the ceiling. Pearl beads rolled across the table and hopped across the floor. A precious mirage shook the room ..."(with)

They exported megatons of various documentation, a bunch of "brains". And in return they slipped Gaidar with a training manual on the destruction of the country.

I do not exclude that a lot of documentation was lost, exported without a trace. Then all the special services were perplexed. Gorbachev, and then the EBN hammered that we have no secrets from American "friends". How they annealed with Klin Blinton. Only the second did not forget about matters.

Some of the technologies have been lost, others have stopped and are already hopelessly outdated by the time of renewal. Technology needs evolution. Here, I think the answer.

[NEXUS]

Quote: iConst

I do not exclude that a lot of documentation was lost, exported without a trace.

I don’t think ... otherwise the United States would have had a supersonic UAV for a long time, and they are all riveting from Ripers ... although they are riveting because of cheapness, but still ... they covered the same X-47B. Although they put him on an aircraft carrier.

[iConst]

Quote: NEXUS

Quote: iConst

I do not exclude that a lot of documentation was lost, exported without a trace.

I don’t think ... otherwise the United States would have had a supersonic UAV for a long time, and they are all riveting from Ripers ... although they are riveting because of cheapness, but still ... they covered the same X-47B. Although they put him on an aircraft carrier.

I will responsibly say that the Americans were not ready that the Union would fall apart so quickly. For them, this was also a surprise.
Moreover, they were opponents of the collapse of the USSR. Not from some friendly positions, but they were purely afraid that nuclear weapons would spread and fall to Islamic terrorists.

And then, this bacchanalia with technology was also unexpected, and therefore unsystematic. What anyone got anywhere was not known. Intel and IBM and Lokhi-Martin and Boeing rode around Russia and who just did not roam. Intel managed to snub the development of the superscalar processor - the current Pentium - in front of the nose at IBM at Babayan (ICST).

The documentation could not get on the profile - they dragged everything that comes across - then we'll figure it out, plus various internal lobbies did not allow us to realize our best practices. As an option.

[Esoteric]

Quote: Thrall

Quote: wot

we all don't have drummers

We too

I looked behind the sofa ... Also did not find ...
On this topic. All at once only by the pike command ... It is high time for the Chinese comrades to try (in order to strengthen the commonwealth) something in the war zone. In Syria, for example. Under the patronage of the aerospace forces. And then it seems that these friendships are not sincere ...

[Per se]

Don’t worry, the Chinese also DO NOT have a full copy ... As usual, a cheap fake ... I, hoping that they finally learned to steal the technology of white people, bought a stationary circular saw (Stihl), in the hope that they finally learned how to fake GERMAN TECHNIQUE ... So then I had to Relatives in Nizhny To ask the city of Novogorod to bring the real one from the Shtilevsky, German Center ...

[Sharansky]

Better a cheap fake than nothing at all except promises ..

[Atlant-1164]

how not ?? and Rogozin-B !!

[rail.rf]

In short, the DPRK and the United States will bark at each other. The spirit is not enough, but someone has the opportunity to bite for a frog.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Rail.rf

In short, the DPRK and the United States will bark at each other. The spirit is not enough, but someone has the opportunity to bite for a frog.

Dear, if one of them bites someone for a thigh, it may very well be that your laughter on this subject will stop at that moment when your mushroom grows in your house, but nifiga is not a boletus ...

[Galleon]

Oppa! Why not buy and run in Syria? Hello, statesmen, we need initiative!

[donavi49]

Already purchased and already run-in. His younger brother. For Syria and Iraq, the CH-5 is redundant.

[Nashensky city]

Here are the Chinese who can copy and produce everything at home, but what are we? Conscience does not allow? Or what other prejudices? Copy everything that is possible, the best in the world, which is not available to ourselves, and produce on our own. Even the Chinese are overtaking us in this regard. And we are all calving with Skat ...

[shark]

Frames do not allow. With us, wherever you spit, you’ll get a manager or a lawyer. A sensible engineer unit. School education is more like accelerated courses for downs. Here is the natural result.

[Esoteric]

Quote: Nashensky town

Copy everything that is possible, the best in the world, which is not for themselves,

To start the end - a hundred-dollar bill and start paying them pensions (optional) ...

[Nashensky city]

Well, yes, we do not have enough of such a printer ... The military budget would immediately have caught up with Amerovsky

[wot]

Quote: Galleon

Oppa! Why not buy and run in Syria? Hello, statesmen, we need initiative!

I completely agree that the Chinese, in spite of their (in comparison with us) economy, are not shameful to buy the S-400, Su-35 .... and ours, if they themselves can’t, but shock UAVs are needed, why not buy ... pride does not allow either the Design Bureau to finance their projects, they are ready to gnaw at the state’s throat, but there is no result ....

[killganoff]

Pride does not allow one to buy really advanced developments, but all domestic electronics was crammed with imported components, and they can’t even think of copying.

[Esoteric]

Quote: killganoff

Pride doesn’t allow you to buy really advanced developments,

How many people in China and how many in Russia? They have hands for everything ... Everywhere you go, we have wide mouths and deep pockets ...

[aszzz888]

The developers are positioning it as an analogue of the American impact drone MQ-9 Reaper. The Chinese drone looks similar to its American "brother", and is also almost identical in weight and size.

... the Chinese are true to themselves ...

[Esoteric]

Quote: aszzz888

... the Chinese are true to themselves ...

The Chinese are loyal to socialism and the ideas of Mao, the CPC program and the Charter, and the observance of elementary legality in the sphere of national (!!!) interests.
The Russian authorities are faithful to the ideas of Yeltsin and his center, the EdR program (???) and the size of the authorized capital. And they have not separated national interests from their own for a long time ...

[jovanni]

Enviously, damn it ...

[Whaler]

No, no, no, we don’t have anything)))) uzbaGee, we have a mustache, but not about your honor DD) They’ll finish the cut .... Orion carries 350 kg on open. useful ... one TPK Kornet-D 26kg. .... no, no, no, we don’t have anything .... sleep))))

[wot]

Quote: Whaler

No, no, no, we don’t have anything)))) uzbaGee, we have a mustache, but not about your honor DD) They’ll finish the cut .... Orion carries 350 kg on open. useful ... one TPK Kornet-D 26kg. .... no, no, no, we don’t have anything .... sleep))))

all that you have listed is only on paper

[Whaler]

bgggg)) nude - nude ... continue to observe, only wipe eyepieces periodically

[wot]

Quote: Whaler

bgggg)) nude - nude ... continue to observe, only wipe eyepieces periodically

and you take it easier with alcohol, or even not to the psychiatric hospital Eka warped you

[Dart]

Quote: wot

sore spot .... we all don't have drummers

Watch periodicals .... or are polymers more important?)))

[Lesorub]

The Chinese are riveting and not shy !!! Well done! ) When will our industry begin production of combat drones (without regard to "partners")!

[Bert]

Quote: NEXUS

Quote: iConst

I was joking about drummers. :)
But still. Development would not be in vain ... if not for the betrayal of the 90s.

I can’t understand all of this in one way ... we have so much experience in reconnaissance UAVs, drums from the 60s, and we still can’t give birth to anything worthwhile ... there were even supersonic UAVs (serial) and strike carriers for nuclear weapons . There is a base and documentation, but we are all lagging behind this race, instead of being a leader.
Nonsense who gives up idiocy.

And then you don’t need to think. Where did the money go all these years since the 90s? And if so, what questions.

[padded jacket]

Quote: article
China has demonstrated a full-fledged analogue of the American shock drone MQ-9 Reaper

Most likely it’s just the USA that he sold his license on the sly it painfully looks like.

[Vasyan1971]

"The Chinese drone looks like its American" brother ", and is almost identical to it in weight and size."
They did not guard the Americans, they stole the tsatsku!

[san4es]

... Rivet +100500 pcs

a complete analogue of the American impact drone MQ-9 Reaper

... will gather in a flock ... Fly doves, fly.
... Right now, only the update for the software will be completed and tied to satellites