WSJ: Washington will limit flights of Russian military aircraft over the US

36
The US authorities intend to limit the flights of Russian military aircraft over the United States under the Open Skies Treaty, reports Wall Street Journal.

The Open Skies Treaty was signed in Helsinki on March 24 1992 by representatives of the OSCE participating States 23. Russia ratified it in May 2001. Contracting parties may fly over each other’s territories to control military activities.



WSJ: Washington will limit flights of Russian military aircraft over the US


According to the WSJ, the restriction will be the response of the American authorities to the Kremlin’s ban on flying over Kaliningrad. Within the framework of the Open Skies Treaty, the range of a reconnaissance flight can be up to 5,5 thousands of kilometers. "Russia has introduced a" sublimit "in 500 kilometers over Kaliningrad," adds the publication.

According to the newspaper, the United States may limit the flights of Russian military aircraft over Alaska and Hawaii.

We want to force Russia to respect the treaty again.
- quotes the publication of an unnamed US high-ranking official.

The US delegation will announce new measures on Tuesday during a meeting of the Consultative Commission of the Open Skies Treaty, which will be held in Vienna, reports RIA News

At the same time, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation reports that a group of Russian inspectors in the framework of the implementation of the International Treaty on Open Skies plans to carry out two consecutive observation flights on the Russian Tu-154М Лк-1 aircraft over the US territory.

Observation flights will be operated from 25 to 30 September from the Wright-Patgerson open sky airfield with a maximum range of 4 thousands of 900 kilometers and October from 2 to 7 October from the Trais open sky skyline with a maximum range of 4 thousands of 250 kilometers
- informs the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.

The Russian aircraft will fly according to the routes agreed with the observed party, and US experts on board will monitor the use of the observation equipment and compliance with the provisions stipulated by the Treaty.
- added to the military department

  • Vyacheslav Lukin / youtube
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    26 September 2017 11: 09
    Well, limit, so what? .... there will be a mirror answer ...
    1. +9
      26 September 2017 11: 10
      We want to force Russia

      In turn, bitch children smile
      1. +6
        26 September 2017 11: 22
        Quote: Black
        Well, limit, so what? .... there will be a mirror answer ...

        How is that WHAT ?? !!!
        That's where it limits, we need to take a closer look, from the same satellites, for example, and ordinary spies no one has canceled scouts. There will surely be something interesting, just hide!
        Well, we need to limit the mirror. For example, where seasonal migration occurs bears deer. Nefig them to fix our deer.
        1. 0
          26 September 2017 12: 00
          So after all, just a couple of days ago, the spy launched the mattress a new satellite, and they’ll look at our bears.
          1. +1
            26 September 2017 17: 28
            So let them think what kind of Mystery lies in this migration.
      2. 0
        26 September 2017 11: 31
        We won’t let them into our sky either, here are the results of their action
    2. +3
      26 September 2017 11: 15
      And yet gentlemen, you can’t stop the Russians ....
      We are fucked up ..

      Do not make us angry ...
    3. +6
      26 September 2017 11: 23
      On the contrary, I would be surprised if minke whales would say: -Please fly. what
    4. 0
      26 September 2017 11: 39
      Quote: Black
      Well, limit, so what? .... there will be a mirror answer ...

      And the United States will again begin to roll a barrel on Russia, shouting about transparency laughing
      1. +2
        26 September 2017 12: 03
        Quote: Black
        Well, limit, so what? .... there will be a mirror answer ...

        So this is their mirror response to our ban on flying over Kaliningrad, the article is about)))
    5. RL
      +3
      26 September 2017 12: 37
      You didn’t seem to read the article. It is written there:
      “According to WSJ, the restriction will be the answer of the American authorities to the“ ban of the Kremlin on flying over Kaliningrad. ”Under the Open Skies Treaty, the reconnaissance flight range can be up to 5,5 thousand kilometers.“ Russia introduced a sublimit of 500 kilometers over Kaliningrad "- adds the publication."
      This means that this is a response from the United States.
      1. 0
        27 September 2017 04: 48
        And why on Kaliningrad they 5,5 thousand km? Are they going to fly in a spiral there?
        500 km and enough ... as they say either in length or across.
  2. +19
    26 September 2017 11: 09
    It is necessary to limit flights over Syria. To zero!
    1. +3
      26 September 2017 11: 14
      Quote: Logall
      It is necessary to limit flights over Syria. To zero!

      It's time ... for a long time. And we all play diplomacy ....
      1. +4
        26 September 2017 11: 20
        It’s time, yes, I think, we will limit ourselves to the next expression of deep concern. Or deep regret. Or what else are we expressing ...
        1. +3
          26 September 2017 12: 05
          So it is written: in response to the restriction over Kaliningrad. They respond to our actions. Although they could write in the article what was there before.
    2. +1
      26 September 2017 11: 18
      Quote: Logall
      It is necessary to limit flights over Syria. To zero!

      Except Israel ... heh heh Let them amuse their vanity!
      1. +15
        26 September 2017 11: 20
        I would amuse their vanity, with the help of air defense ...
    3. +3
      26 September 2017 13: 50
      Quote: Logall
      It is necessary to limit flights over Syria. To zero!

      Unfortunately, this will not work ... it will be necessary to take off their complexes from duty and transfer them to Syria. It is not worth it. With what we have in Syria and the Syrians, so far it turns out to block only the most important areas. Perhaps to storm Idlib and Raqqi, they will transfer a couple of three of the new Shell-C1 for a break-in ...
  3. +3
    26 September 2017 11: 14
    So I noticed a long time ago that all contracts are no longer valid. Only the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact retains relevance.
    1. +1
      26 September 2017 11: 18
      Quote: iouris
      So I noticed a long time ago that all contracts are no longer valid.

      not only did you notice wink ..... let it sound rude, but - international law for suckers .... No strong state will abide by it if it is contrary to its interests ..... examples of this are the sea ...
    2. 0
      26 September 2017 12: 18
      Quote: iouris
      So I noticed a long time ago that all contracts are no longer valid. Only the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact retains relevance.

      Especially the "secret protocols" that no one has ever seen and everyone comes up with in their favor. sad
  4. +1
    26 September 2017 11: 19
    Quote: Black
    Well, limit, so what? .... there will be a mirror answer ...

    It should be so, but we will now have six months to think, and then they will invite the children of Ameikan pilots to the New Year tree in the Kremlin - this will be such an asymmetric answer.
  5. 0
    26 September 2017 11: 20
    We want to force Russia to respect the treaty again.

    And again, "force" Russia. Interestingly, the "screensaver" has not yet dried up? They go to restrictions, but Russia is not observing the contract.
    "Russia has introduced a" sublimit "of 500 kilometers above Kaliningrad"
    Yes, even if they looked at the map. There it took off and you need to return already.
  6. +2
    26 September 2017 11: 22
    Judging by the information in the media, adversaries fly over us under the Open Skies Agreement much more often than we do over them
  7. +4
    26 September 2017 11: 27
    why didn’t anyone notice that Russia was the first to impose restrictions, and this time the mattress covers are mirrored?
    1. +1
      26 September 2017 11: 36
      they didn’t immediately understand that the Russians were looking at them in the mirror ..... wassat
    2. +3
      26 September 2017 11: 53
      Quote: bogart047
      why didn’t anyone notice that Russia was the first to impose restrictions, and this time the mattress covers are mirrored?

      This is because you had the opportunity to observe the participants of the special Olympiad among the best beer patriots of the site.
      They either do not read the article, or simply are not able to understand the content of 3 paragraphs of the text without special terms.
      But they are always patriotically ready to move their sofa to another corner of the room as an answer to the Enemies of the Homeland (tm).
      1. +1
        26 September 2017 14: 23
        Is this the problem? According to the media (https://iz.ru/news/619901), we were the first to switch to new equipment for these machines. Maybe the dog rummaged here? As for Alaska - a flag in hand. satellites will work well there.
    3. +1
      26 September 2017 13: 25
      Because it was the Americans who were the first to unilaterally introduce a ban on the flight of a Russian aircraft, so we gave a mirror answer. Now everything will go in a new circle.
      1. +1
        26 September 2017 14: 34
        Americans were previously the first to unilaterally ban

        Something theme passed me by. It is possible in a nutshell where they banned and how did they argue?
  8. 0
    26 September 2017 11: 41
    We want to force Russia to respect the treaty again.

    I can’t even imagine how they will do without us ... belay Well, for example, we will not comply, so what? belay In place of our state, we must radically revise all the Russian-American treaties, the systematic violation of which is practiced by the Americans ... and get out ... quietly, in Russian ...
  9. 0
    26 September 2017 13: 23
    Who needs this "open sky" in the current conditions? Denounce, and observe from space.
    1. +1
      26 September 2017 16: 54
      Quote: av58
      Who needs this "open sky" in the current conditions? Denounce, and observe from space.

      Because observation from an airplane is much more informative.
  10. +1
    26 September 2017 14: 18
    That's it, the process has begun. The United States is sliding into a frank confrontation. Apparently, nevertheless, they need a great war somewhere (the main thing away from them) as air. Promotion of hysteria is growing, tension in various regions, too. And then the transition from quantity to quality. And away we go ......
  11. 0
    26 September 2017 16: 10
    Russia must answer the Yankees with the same
  12. The comment was deleted.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"