British General of the Armed Forces: Victims among civilians - the price necessary to defeat terrorism

Rupert Jones, General of the British Armed Forces, commented on the current counter-terrorism operations against ISIL (* banned in Russia). According to Jones, the anti-Igilov coalition makes "all possible efforts" so that during these operations the civilian population does not suffer, but "it suffers."

In the material The Independent The following statement is made by a representative of the British generals:

Civilian casualties with such an enemy are inevitable. And all these sacrifices are the necessary price that we all pay to defeat the terrorists.

According to Jones, the victims are “inevitable” also because the terrorists are trying to use civilians as human shields.
One of his examples:

They take people hostage, lock them in the building where the sniper is located. Then they mine the house so that any hit of a coalition projectile caused a powerful detonation.

InoTV cites several comments by British users of The Independent.

Rubal Khali:

It is a pity that they are not citizens of Britain. Then it would matter.

Rightiswrong:

Where were these generals when the leading media cried and howled about the events in Aleppo? One gets the impression that the NATO bombs are good, and the Russians are bad.

Indeed, everybody perfectly remembers the statements of the same NATO generals, who literally shouted about how “Russians kill civilians in Aleppo”. By the way, now new accusations against the Russian Space Forces are coming from London: allegedly Russian planes are bombing civilians in Idlib. The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation rejects such charges.

Comments

[Thrall]

So the sniper then the cap.

They take people hostage, lock them in the building where the sniper is located. Then they mine the house so that any hit of a coalition projectile caused a powerful detonation.

[Maz]

One word - Anglo-Saxon with the mentality of a colonial power.

[The black]

Quote: Maz

One word - Anglo-Saxon with the mentality of a colonial power.

... and the victim of a sloppy obstetrician

[dik-nsk]

Civilian casualties in the presence of such an enemy are inevitable. And all these sacrifices are the necessary price that we all pay to defeat terrorists

then I will continue "the victims of the twin towers, the London Underground are necessary in the fight against the world Anglo-Saxon fascist terrorist", nothing personal - only the logic of the general

[NIKNN]

Quote: dik-nsk

victims of the twin towers

This is the work of their own hands. However, they noticed that they need victims everywhere. Already even the words do not disguise, said at least inevitable, and then they are necessary ... what is the need for? In fact, his example can be described as such. "Here is a sniper in the house, and we are a crowd of civilians at him, and when he runs out of ammunition ..., here he’s finished, while he runs after the cartridges, we will guard his place ..."

[the villain]

Quote: Thrall

So the sniper then the cap.

Something a sniper then they get some kind of disposable, irrational. Mutant british general ...

[pvv113]

Have Anglo-Saxons ever been sincere to the end?

[INVESTOR]

It is a pity that they are not citizens of Britain. Then it would matter.

Strongly said

[Orel]

If you do not try to be “holier than the Pope,” as many here try to expose themselves, then the general said everything correctly. Unfortunately civilian casualties are inevitable. They die under coalition bombs just like under our bombs. The living shield is used almost everywhere by ISIS. You will not go to the bayonet in such circumstances.

[Blombir]

Alas, the victims of non-combatants in the war are inevitable, especially during the storming of the city. But you can choose different tactics. Naglosakssy chose the most unpretentious. They thresh with whatever they hit anywhere, they do not consider indigenous losses. This is their credo. Their whole history, continuous war crimes.

[Herculesic]

About the victims, he correctly said, when the terrorists make their announcements in London, we will fly in, bomb the Landon a bit, nonsense, and the British will only benefit from carpet bombing! ! So, perhaps, it is possible, in short, it is likely that we will extinguish terrorists too! !! You almost call there, "strategists" already with "democracy" on take-off are waiting for takeoffs! !!

[Alexander 3]

Moreover, the bombs of their mothers, fathers, and adult children, they explode very selectively. Only about the head of the barmaley.

[voyaka uh]

"we will fly, a little bombing the landon, nonsense, carpet bombing of the English will only benefit" ///

Hitler was thinking the same way when he started bombing London in 1940. And he was very mistaken.
The British then demolished in retaliation all the major cities of Germany "under the foundation."

[Siberia55]

Yes, London has something to be proud of.

[Blombir]

Especially, the Anglo-Americans, tried to bomb the territories that fell under the Soviet zone of responsibility to a fine ash. The meanness of Anglo-Saxon is well known to us. Those are allies.

[Skay]

British civilian casualties - the price needed to defeat terrorism

[rotmistr60]

all these sacrifices are the necessary price we all pay to win

It’s good to talk about this when the victims are not English, but “natives” (in their opinion), who are not sorry. Even here double standards are clearly manifested. The Russians are stigmatized in their media for the bombing, which was not there, and "necessary victims" are killed under their bombs.

[aszzz888]

... nothing is new under the moon ... all the same charges, and all the same excuses who make the charges ...

[Galleon]

Yes, Dostoevsky would never have been born an Englishman. Our most difficult dilemma about the tear of a child does not touch their hearts from the word "completely."

[Tolstoevsky]

Mass brutal killings of civilians - corporate identity and centuries-old tradition of the Anglo-Saxons

[Livonetc]

In England, as a class, there is no democracy.
The sole rule is the aristocracy.
They do not allow anyone outside their circle to power.
They cannot have an understanding of a simple person and humanity in principle.
All the rest are subhuman to them.
Is it because in due time members of the Kingascoan family were inspired by the ideas of Nazism and even zigzagged in public.
People for them are just supplies.

[CooL_SnipeR]

I suggest that the Ishilovites begin with his family ... it is advisable that they send him another package

[Topotun]

"Civilian casualties in the presence of such an enemy are inevitable. And all these victims are the necessary price that we all pay to defeat terrorists."
And why then are they so diligently trying to make stuffing that Russia bombed someone? After all, sacrifices are inevitable? Or are they inevitable only for the Anglo-Saxons? Well then, it does not correlate well with the professionalism of their military ....

[Berkut24]

British General of the Armed Forces: Victims among civilians - the price necessary to defeat terrorism

There is terrorism in Britain too. I wish this general and his fellow citizens a more active fight against terrorism on the island according to his prescription!

[corporal]

And what is it all so excited? Just because the Englishman said that? Well, there we, too, erased many civilians into powder. Is hell to do if the barmalei are hiding behind a peace, turn around and leave?
In war as in war.

[nesvobodnye]

It is necessary to cram bookmarks, as a keepsake.

[razved]

Cynically so, purely British.

[rocket757]

Why is it in British ???
He listened to an Israeli officer, so when he asked about a cannon in the courtyard or on the roof of a civilian house, he didn’t bother ... to wet, and then Allah or what other chief would figure it out where he deserved.