Ukrainian tankers conducted NATO standards exercises

The Ministry of Defense of Ukraine reports that on one of the training grounds of the operational-tactical group "Lugansk" on Saturday, September 23, tactical exercises with crews were held tanks by NATO standards

The Ukrainian Defense Ministry reports that the crews of combat vehicles were practicing driving skills in difficult terrain conditions with theoretical damage to visual observation units.

The main difference between these exercises is that for the first time in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, a platoon has an 4 tank. This is very expedient, because during the damage of one tank, another vehicle can evacuate from the battlefield, and a pair of vehicles that remain operational can fully perform the assigned tasks.

- According to the statement of the Ministry of Defense

Also, it is noted that ended with flank shooting exercises from the course in the conditions of raid actions, as well as tank “swings” with the transition of a tank platoon to the offensive without the use of ammunition.

According to the information, elements for training were borrowed from the “Strong Europe-2017” tank competition in Germany, taking into account the experience of the military acquired in the ATO.

Comments

[Gray brother]

Well that's it, now we have a khan.

[Shura Perm]

They do to NATO, as to China at the fifth point ...

[Logall]

Think NATO has a high bar? Remember Estonia: the brave NATO members drove grandfather with a gun ...

[kg pv]

Napoleon entered Moscow and cho?

[Gray brother]

Quote: kg pv

Napoleon entered Moscow and cho?

Yes, nothing, then they followed him from there for good. Even the peasants of the captured Frenchmen did not kill, but simply stripped naked and released in peace.

[kg pv]

So we are good)))

[oldseaman1957]

Ukrainian tankers conducted NATO standards exercises

- As Taras would say: "What lads, do you think the Poles will help you?" That is why Svidomo Gogol not really favor. He described all of their corrupt insides 200 years ago.

[antivirus]

the steppe is Wild, then the Russian field.
it would be nice to let them go to the Carpathians, to their homeland. happy to collect nuts

[asiat_61]

Good peasants.

[Grach-25sm]

Yeah, in the winter!

[Megatron]

Mountain, mountains clear so it doesn't go out!

[Firework]

there is a feeling that they are jokingly saying this to everyone, and then after recording they neigh on their own words)))

[Gray brother]

Quote: Salute

it feels like they’re jokingly saying that

You underestimate them. Everything is in all seriousness there.

[deputy ___ watered]

Well, so far nothing is new, in the USSR Armed Forces there were states in the tank units of the 4 tank, as far as I remember it was in the Far Eastern Federal District. True, the argumentation of these states was different!)

[Gray brother]

Quote: deputy ___ watered

Well, so far nothing new, in the USSR Armed Forces in the tank units there were states and 4 tanks each,

The Wehrmacht also had four tanks, but for some reason it did not help them.
NATO structure was torn at them.

[Sextant]

Curious to look at these standards! If Krajina is in the know then Yandex! Throw the link!

[Egorovich]

And what actually can distinguish NATO standards from the standards of the Armed Forces of Dill in tank exercises? In the "frog jumping" or something?

[Mikhail Zubkov]

They simply have platoon commanders and zampotech mouths with a large shortage - a quarter is not enough. So they came up with the "NATO standard". One tank was left without a single track - consider that two tanks were knocked out of battle. And the remaining pair will immediately cover the waste. And the fourth tank’s commander’s platoon simply does not discern during an attack on rough terrain.

[BMP-2]

practiced driving skills in difficult terrain conditions with theoretical damage to visual observation units

?

Come on! Oh, wow, those shy ones! Something tells me that this was not theoretical damage!

[Gray brother]

Triplexes drank and spare too.

[Clone]

How lovely... And cars, cars, they crushed? And shot with pistols? But how can it be without these elements that are most difficult for tankers, if by "NATO standards"?

[Lganhi]

Db! In fact, if a tank in a platoon is knocked out, then the rest of the platoon tanks continue to carry out a combat mission, and not allocate a tank to evacuate a damaged tank. Similarly, these horses have empty pots.

[Sergey-8848]

What did not doper before! Within the framework of NATO, it is necessary to include the fourth crew member in the tower (it is supposed that you will do it). Or vice versa, in order to optimize (damn word), remove someone from the crew.

[Evil 55]

Something nonsense- "This is very advisable, because during the damage of one tank, another machine can evacuate from the battlefield, and a pair of vehicles that remains combat-ready can fully fulfill the assigned tasks." The tactic is to evacuate the machine after the battle or push the enemy back. .

[LeonidL]

I read and remember Grandfather Krylov: "And you friends, as you don’t sit down, everyone is not good at musicians ...". At least according to NATO standards, at least according to Limpopo standards ...

[Vanek]

In Ukraine, by definition, it is impossible to conduct exercises according to NATO standards.

Tanks in Ukraine are not of that standard ...

[Altona]

Quote: Egorovich

And what actually can distinguish NATO standards from the standards of the Armed Forces of Dill in tank exercises?

--------------------------
Firstly, it's beautiful ...

[VadimSt]

The fact that they conducted the exercises according to NATO standards, and they will ring them, according to the standards of the USSR!

[Corsair0304]

Well, they rolled out one and a half armored carriages, rode all the way, but yell! By NATO standard, where to go

[Topotun]

“The main difference between these exercises is that for the first time in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, a platoon has 4 tanks. This is very advisable because during the damage to one tank another vehicle can be evacuated from the battlefield, and a pair of vehicles that remains combat capable can be fully complete tasks "
Strange, I thought that a platoon should first perform a combat mission. And the evacuation of damaged equipment is carried out by the Rembats .... Probably the NATO tactics are much trickier ...

[Yoshi]

I watched the video. Liked. No politics. Shit on Russia do not pour. Serve yourself. Learn. Normal work. What is it to pour slop on them?

[Firework]

Sergius was appointed commander for a reason; he was not too lazy to learn the Ukrainian language, like 3 other soldiers. they didn’t take any interviews from the rest in the state language of Ukraine!

[Grach-25sm]

By NATO standards? .. That is, Ukrainian tankers master the tanks "Abrams", "Leopard", "Leclerc"! .. No? Shaw, again - on the ancients, like the feces of the mammoth T-64B ?! But no - nevertheless, the Saxon armored evacuation armored car was present on the battlefield - the same one that killed two crews in the Kharkov region to death when it first arrived "in Ukraine"!
All the rest, sorry, hu ... fiction! "Khdentifikuvati tsilі" ... Yeah. This is how it actually happens. From the memoirs of the commander of the tank of the Separate Tank Battalion "Diesel" about the Debaltsev offensive operation: "You give the line of tracers from the machine gun coaxial with the cannon. If you see ricochets, there’s something iron in there, you’ll hit it with a shell. So we destroyed, as it turned out later, two armored personnel carriers and a T-64 tank of Ukrainian wax. In general, they’re "identifiable" - "T-72 tank, ordinary, T-72B3, T-90 or Tiger armored car. Not otherwise than they have for the gunner - who took 0,7 on the chest "president" Poroshenko.
D, B! in short! ..
.

[Clone]

Quote: Vanek

In Ukraine

In Ukraine, if ...

[sgr291158]

But how is the transition to the offensive without the use of ammunition. Or there’s nothing to shoot already.

[alexxxxz]

"with the transition of a tank platoon on the offensive without the use of ammunition" - an offensive without ammunition? Neighing. NATO standards, they are - STANDARDS.