In Syria, shot down T-90A, previously captured from government forces

21 September 2017

A photo of a black pad appeared on the Internet tank T-90A, which was seized from the Syrian government forces last year, reports Messenger of Mordovia.

In Syria, shot down T-90A, previously captured from government forces

Militants of the so-called “black” grouping (coalition group “Hayat Tahrir ash-Sham”, which also included the banned in the Russian Federation “Dzhebhat al-Nusra”) actively used this tank in battles against the Syrian army.

“This victory was recorded by the crew of the Syrian T-72. An armor-piercing projectile hit the board of the enemy's machine. As a result, the tank was completely burned out and could not be restored, ”the publication says.

In addition, it was reported that the CAA units beat off another trophy T-90А from the Islamists.

The car, although it was damaged, but judging by the video materials, they are not fatal. According to reports, the gunner who was in the tank was destroyed by the military while seizing the car.

Photos used:: twitter.com/withinsyriablog, facebook.com/mod.gov.sy

Military Reviewin Yandex News

Military Reviewin Yandex Zen

bagr69 21 September 2017 13: 00
+4

4

0
Good news.
Another small step to victory.
1. Juborg 21 September 2017 14: 36
  +3
  
  3
  
  0
  Author, ARTICLE TITLE CORRECT!
  
  "In Syria, T-90A, previously captured from government troops "
2. creak 21 September 2017 14: 44
  +10
  
  10
  
  0
  Quote: bagr69
  Good news.
  
  The good thing is that the bearded in service with the T-90 captured from government troops ?. I don’t see anything good in having to destroy modern tanks delivered to the Syrian government troops .... Other bearded armored vehicles (armored personnel carriers and armored personnel carriers) are also largely Russian - and this is probably not very good news, although this is actually not news. ..
  1. bagr69 21 September 2017 22: 55
    
    0
    
    0
    
    0
    
    Those. bad that destroyed, it was necessary to leave ??? However...
    Quote: ranger
    Other armored vehicles (infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers) of the bearded are also largely Russian
    
    And a lot of these they have according to your information? I didn’t hear something about the “Russian” technology from the terrorists, but I heard about the artisanal light armored cars and the old Soviet equipment, and the video about it is full ...
    1. verner1967 23 September 2017 14: 51
      
      0
      
      0
      
      0
      
      Quote: bagr69
      Something I have not heard about the "Russian" technology from the terrorists
      
      because they talk about it only when they grab it back or beat it up, as in this case. They didn’t tell us in detail how the Islamists captured these tanks.
3. Maz 21 September 2017 15: 04
  +19
  
  19
  
  0
  So they shot down him, took off all the dynamic defense, of course there was no chance. He visited three offensives and naturally, that he lost the protective modules. And there were no spare needles. Excellent advertisement for tank survivability for the t-90. The fact that the Syrians clicked him is another matter
4. RASKAT 21 September 2017 19: 34
  +8
  
  8
  
  0
  Our MTRs also excelled slightly in the area.
  1. Leeds 22 September 2017 07: 15
    
    +2
    
    2
    
    0
    
    Sorry, of course.
    
    Video - slicing old frames. Where is autumn, where is winter, where is summer, where is the Palmyra desert, where is Hama, where is Aleppo. The most interesting thing is that it was launched by the Star. Absolutely what?
donavi49 21 September 2017 13: 00
+10

10

0
Both T-90 in one day.
bogart047 21 September 2017 13: 01
0

0

0
well, even so. By the way, why aren’t self-destruction charges built into the tank? Just for such cases ...
1. Thrall 21 September 2017 13: 08
  +33
  
  33
  
  0
  Quote: bogart047
  By the way, why aren’t self-destruction charges built into the tank? Just for such cases ...
  
  This idea draws on the Nobel Prize.
  PS Beware, the premium can be self-destructing
  1. bogart047 21 September 2017 13: 32
    
    +1
    
    1
    
    0
    
    at least - a remote engine lock. Cases of theft of military equipment are not isolated.
    1. Kasym 21 September 2017 23: 24
      
      +3
      
      3
      
      0
      
      Grenade in the barrel - that's all self-destruction. Still, the gun is the main weapon of the tank. And the engine ... bury the car in the ground like a firing point.
2. Hariton laptev 21 September 2017 13: 09
  +4
  
  4
  
  0
  Quote: bogart047
  well, even so. By the way, why aren’t self-destruction charges built into the tank? Just for such cases ...
  
  Well, why? - one played and let the other play what would not be offensive
3. zivXP 21 September 2017 13: 18
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  As if he met Rabinovich again
  1. Paranoid50 21 September 2017 21: 34
    
    +3
    
    3
    
    0
    
    Quote: zivXP
    as if he met Rabinovich again
    
    Rabinovich with us now - Snowball .. Yo, Black Bros will come for him. and will wean black sisters away.
4. Sharansky 21 September 2017 13: 36
  +5
  
  5
  
  0
  Quote: bogart047
  By the way, why aren’t self-destruction charges built into the tank? Just for such cases ...
  
  there is already a full automatic loading of such charges
5. Topotun 21 September 2017 15: 18
  +3
  
  3
  
  0
  There are already enough charges. At any moment, catching a hit can catch the detonation of ammunition. It was still not enough to accidentally undermine the "elements of self-destruction" ... And if the crew could not or did not want to get their car out of danger of capture - no system will help ....
6. Plombir 21 September 2017 15: 49
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  In a tank, and so on, any kind of good stuff to a fig.
enot73 21 September 2017 13: 11
+3

3

0
“This victory was recorded at the expense of the crew of the Syrian T-72. An armor-piercing projectile hit the side of the enemy’s car. As a result, the tank completely burned down and cannot be restored ”, One of the sources said that on this tank (destroyed) there was no longer a dynamic and active defense.
Sharansky 21 September 2017 13: 12
+8

8

0
Is it about that “unkillable” T-90 that was killed by an old T-72?
1. Thrall 21 September 2017 13: 14
  +25
  
  25
  
  0
  Quote: Sharansky
  Is it about that “unkillable” T-90 that was killed by an old T-72?
  
  Don’t be so afraid.
  Keep observing.
2. tihon4uk 21 September 2017 13: 19
  +15
  
  15
  
  0
  Name at least one tank that can withstand BOPS on board?
  1. trenitron 21 September 2017 15: 06
    
    +7
    
    7
    
    0
    
    Quote: tihon4uk
    Name at least one tank that can withstand BOPS on board?
    
    Now would independent citizens unanimously shouted that there is such a tank is Oplot
  2. Bourbon 21 September 2017 15: 09
    
    +6
    
    6
    
    0
    
    Quote: tihon4uk
    Name at least one tank that can withstand BOPS on board?
    
    but he doesn’t need this, the main thing is to post nonsense and watch how they respond to him ... maybe someone will mock - and he will answer the complaint!
    1. Captain Nemo 22 September 2017 00: 08
      
      +4
      
      4
      
      0
      
      Ahh .... That's why I live with a warning for no apparent reason and the admin did not even deign to explain
      1. Bourbon 22 September 2017 07: 54
        
        +2
        
        2
        
        0
        
        Quote: Captain Nemo
        Ahh .... That's why I live with a warning for no apparent reason and the admin did not even deign to explain
        
        I slammed for the word - "SPECIALIST" .... I just quietly "lose weight" ...
3. zivXP 21 September 2017 13: 19
  +2
  
  2
  
  0
  No, this is not about that one, but about this one.
4. RL 21 September 2017 13: 26
  +3
  
  3
  
  0
  Who is Sharansky who writes for me?
  1. Sharansky 21 September 2017 13: 28
    
    +2
    
    2
    
    0
    
    all questions to the curved forum programmers
    1. RL 21 September 2017 13: 34
      
      0
      
      0
      
      0
      
      Be sure to do it!
5. Muvka 21 September 2017 13: 44
  +7
  
  7
  
  0
  Quote: Sharansky
  Is it about that “unkillable” T-90 that was killed by an old T-72?
  
  Note - on board. While another tank distracted itself. And on board ANY tank breaks through BOPS.
  1. jonhr 21 September 2017 14: 51
    
    +1
    
    1
    
    0
    
    Well, that makes it clear. but what completely burned out after the bops it raises questions
    1. Muvka 21 September 2017 15: 34
      
      +2
      
      2
      
      0
      
      What is so unusual about this? Fuel and lubricants in any tank can catch fire. Especially from getting on board.
      1. jonhr 21 September 2017 17: 20
        
        +1
        
        1
        
        0
        
        naturally can. the question remains open where are the fire extinguishing systems?
    2. Roma 1977 22 September 2017 11: 28
      
      +1
      
      1
      
      0
      
      Very large kinetic impact energy. Ignites the tank at a time.
6. _Jack_ 21 September 2017 14: 51
  +2
  
  2
  
  0
  BOPS on board guaranteed penetration of any modern tank, if not in the subject, why show yourself from a stupid side?
  1. Sharansky 21 September 2017 14: 53
    
    +3
    
    3
    
    0
    
    What did you get to the bottom of me. The post is not mine, but a certain RL above. The fact that for the curvature of administrators for some reason I glow as an author does not mean anything.
    If not in the topic, why show yourself on a stupid side?
    1. _Jack_ 21 September 2017 14: 56
      
      +1
      
      1
      
      0
      
      I answer the one who left the message, the rest is not my problems, but yours
      1. Sharansky 21 September 2017 15: 04
        
        +3
        
        3
        
        0
        
        with the same success you can bang your head against the wall
        
        _Jack_ 21 September 2017 15: 12
        
        +1
        
        1
        
        0
        
        these are your problems, not mine, so fight about what you want, a message under your nickname and do not write about the great hackers who broke into the forum to discredit such an important person
        
        Sharansky 21 September 2017 15: 32
        
        +2
        
        2
        
        0
        
        Quote: _Jack_
        do not write about the great hackers who broke into the forum
        
        and who talked about hackers, they came up with? Here it’s not the hackers who are to blame, but the crooked-handed programmers who have confused account IDs in posts.
        
        Analyst 1973 21 September 2017 15: 30
        
        +1
        
        1
        
        0
        
        Quote: Sharansky
        with the same success you can bang your head against the wall
        
        On the wall, Kokoity would love to hit you! For using his photo on the profile picture, laehsidz!
        
        Sharansky 21 September 2017 15: 32
        
        +3
        
        3
        
        0
        
        Go ahead, give the address where to come?
7. Olegovi4 21 September 2017 20: 41
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  Quote: Sharansky
  This is about that "unkillable" T-90,
  
  how do you bomb then your seat)))
polkovnik manuch 21 September 2017 13: 19
+2

2

0
Why give new samples that are themselves lacking, the Syrians. Is there really no more “old” machines left in storage. Did such problems appear in Syria from such “handouts”, and we don’t repent, or does one of the “effective managers” do this?
1. enot73 21 September 2017 13: 34
  +2
  
  2
  
  0
  Quote: polkovnik manuch
  Why give new samples that are themselves lacking, the Syrians
  
  Successful experience in using Russian weapons in Syria helps to increase Russia's military exports. This was announced by Russian President Vladimir Putin during a meeting of the Commission on military-technical cooperation between the Russian Federation and foreign countries, which was held on July 6 in Novo-Ogaryovo. In particular, as Minister of Industry and Trade Denis Manturov told Izvestia, negotiations are currently underway to supply the T-90 tank with several countries at once, including Kuwait.
2. Dart2027 21 September 2017 21: 16
  0
  
  0
  
  0
  Quote: polkovnik manuch
  Why give new samples that are themselves lacking, the Syrians
  
  This is a good test in combat.
Pecheneg 21 September 2017 13: 46
+3

3

0
Apparently very actively used both tanks barmalei, completely naked tanks, without any protection.
1. Analyst 1973 21 September 2017 15: 33
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  Quote: Pecheneg
  Apparently very actively used both tanks barmalei, completely naked tanks, without any protection.
  
  It makes no difference to them, just to shoot!
Unbearable 21 September 2017 14: 18
+2

2

0
This tank has seen a lot. Transportation from one country to another, inept handling of him, with the help of one he captured some settlements. Now this happened to him, because you can repair it and continue to fight on it.
RL 21 September 2017 14: 21
+2

2

0
And then. How to find and quickly train T-90 crews with insufficient human resources in Assad’s army, mostly not very educated? So the Russians are there. I do not want to say that they are fighting for Gazprom, but it looks like that.
IG, there it is clear, there are many trained from the CIS countries.
1. zivXP 21 September 2017 14: 48
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  It’s easier to retrain from a tank than from a bus.
2. Gado 21 September 2017 21: 33
  +4
  
  4
  
  0
  And what, you just now realized that the Russians in Syria ?! And of course, they are fighting for Gazprom, for whom else?
  1. Siberia 9444 22 September 2017 07: 16
    
    +1
    
    1
    
    0
    
    And why not for Rosneft
    1. Gado 22 September 2017 20: 40
      
      +2
      
      2
      
      0
      
      Well, you understand my sarcasm, but the Czech may not, he has a showdown with Gazprom.
MaksoMelan 21 September 2017 14: 58
0

0

0
And how many T90 Bormalei took it! Was there one and where did you get the second?
1. Viktor.12.71 21 September 2017 19: 58
  +3
  
  3
  
  0
  Quote: MaksoMelan
  Was there one and where did you get the second?
  
  All the tanks of the thugs igil is a trophy, there was not a lot of news as from the sight of two carts, the soldiers of Assad threw everything and darted. Not surprisingly, the T90 was abandoned. Without the Russian Aerospace Forces and the special forces of the Russian Federation, everything would have been over long ago not in Assad’s favor.
Analyst 1973 21 September 2017 15: 48
+1

1

0
Fine! Them away l Armata let it be, what's the difference? And during the Second World War, the Germans used captured T-34s and nothing, ours, too, were finished off as enemy ones!
Andrew 21 September 2017 15: 56
+2

2

0
I saw a video of how, even in life, it was a captured T-90 taken by militants from a copter, nightmare the Syrian army in an occupied settlement, alone. White tiger ...
Snowball 21 September 2017 16: 08
+1

1

0
It is not good to supply arms to both sides.
1. Ugolek 21 September 2017 16: 24
  +5
  
  5
  
  0
  You tell the Americans that.
2. green-grei 21 September 2017 17: 05
  +8
  
  8
  
  0
  Quote: Snowball
  It is not good to supply arms to both sides.
  
  It is good that Israel has decided and delivers an-nusra and treats its fighters !!
  And then it blows around the world how the terrorists from Hesbollah get it! It is visible an-nusra just peacekeepers fighters for the independence of Israel !!!
  1. Viktor.12.71 21 September 2017 20: 04
    
    +1
    
    1
    
    0
    
    Quote: grengrei
    It is good that Israel has decided and delivers an-nusra and treats its fighters !!
    
    An enemy of my enemy, a political move as old as the world.
3. Roma 1977 22 September 2017 11: 17
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  The article just tells how to correct such situations.
Young_Communist 21 September 2017 16: 33
+1

1

0
“This victory was recorded at the expense of the crew of the Syrian T-72. An armor-piercing projectile hit the side of the enemy’s car. As a result, the tank completely burned down and cannot be restored ”

Is the T-90 so easily destroyed from the T-72?
voyaka uh 21 September 2017 17: 05
+2

2

0
An interesting tank battle: T-72 failed T-90. OBPSom, as I understand it?
1. Rusj 21 September 2017 18: 09
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  One tank distracted and the other shot on board.
Kachesgm 21 September 2017 17: 34
+3

3

0
For once, the tank in Syria was shot down not from manual anti-tank weapons. Reading many news, it has already become an axiom to destroy any tanks either from airplanes or from hand-held anti-tank weapons. This tank battle at least showed that once tanks were created for tank battles, duels. And now the tank crews are more afraid of spirits with RPGs than meeting with a worthy enemy ...
1. Viktor.12.71 21 September 2017 20: 08
  +2
  
  2
  
  0
  Quote: KachesGM
  And now the tank crews are more afraid of spirits with RPGs than meeting with a worthy enemy ...
  
  The T72 leaves little chance for the crew to survive after being hit, and the Arabs can understand why they hastily leave the car on their first hits.
  1. Roma 1977 22 September 2017 11: 19
    
    +3
    
    3
    
    0
    
    And the T-72 leaves little chance to survive the crew of the tank that it is shooting at. That is why the Russians do not leave the car until they first hit the enemy.
Aim point 22 September 2017 13: 38
0

0

0
The main thing is to continue joking about Abrams
Bronevick 23 September 2017 19: 35
0

0

0
Didn’t even the boshka fly off?