Reuters: Russians violate sanctions by supplying fuel to North Korea

54
Information Agency Reuters comes out with a material alleging a violation of the sanctions imposed on the DPRK. The material of the Western media stated that 5 tankers with fuel went from one of the ports of North Korea "to bypass sanctions" from Russia. The tankers, as stated, belong to the DPRK, while in the system for monitoring the traffic of civilian ships the final ports of entry are the ports of China and the Republic of Korea.

Reuters claims that tankers do not go to China and South Korea, but to North Korea. It was stated that the North Korean oil tankers “were in the roads of the ports of Xinnam, Rajin, Chongjin and Gimchek.

From the material:
Then most of the tankers headed for Russia again.


Reuters: Russians violate sanctions by supplying fuel to North Korea


Further, IA Reuters contradicts itself. The submission says that the tanker Ma Du San, owned by Korea Kyongun Shipping Co., left the port of Vladivostok on May 20 with 545 tons of fuel from the Khabarovsk refinery. If the ships went out in May, then what kind of circumvention of the sanctions could be involved, even if they were really unloaded in the DPRK. Sanctions and today do not close the oil trade at 100%. This is the first. Secondly, the new package of sanctions was approved a few days ago and the “May” fuel did not exactly fall under it.
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    21 September 2017 06: 12
    Western media remind me of small shaking mongrels. Driving terriers or droch terriers, I will not say more precisely. Something blurted, knocked, SMSka spiked, flooded with a hysterical bark laughing
    1. +4
      21 September 2017 06: 17
      But pooh on them ... But ours, why are these "sanctions" being carried out? Sword beads in front of pigs? They will not appreciate!
      Quote: Black
      Western media remind me of small shaking mongrels. Driving terriers or droch terriers, I will not say more precisely. Something blurted, knocked, SMSka spiked, flooded with a hysterical bark laughing
    2. Maz
      +3
      21 September 2017 09: 26
      Where we want there and deliver. We are not Gabon. Thank God
      1. 0
        22 September 2017 14: 58
        So Russia itself officially voted behind sanctions against the DPRK. Why then do this?
        1. mmk
          0
          22 September 2017 17: 52
          To trade in this country ourselves. And as Comrade Lavrov said, nothing can be achieved with sanctions.
          1. 0
            22 September 2017 21: 44
            Have you ever understood what kind of nonsense you said?
    3. jjj
      0
      21 September 2017 10: 04
      Quote: Black
      Western media remind me of small shaking mongrels. Driving terriers or droch terriers,

      Still there are such dogs - sadness
    4. 0
      22 September 2017 17: 44
      Quote: Black
      Drich terriers or droch terriers, I will not tell more precisely

      don't insult yokers-terriers ... my favorite breed ...
  2. +4
    21 September 2017 06: 12
    And I think that we have gas at the gas stations "Session feed, 10 liters" per tank!
    1. +4
      21 September 2017 06: 15
      Quote from Uncle Lee
      Why do we have gas at the gas stations "Session feed, 10 l" per tank

      Where is such happiness?
      1. +5
        21 September 2017 06: 20
        Quote: insular
        Where is such happiness?

        Sakhalin - a supplier of oil, gas and carbohydrates!
        1. +2
          21 September 2017 06: 22
          Quote from Uncle Lee
          Sakhalin

          In the morning, refuel at Rosneft at Citimol - flooded 29l (95) ...
          1. +4
            21 September 2017 06: 24
            You're lucky ! Better in the South, and Khan in Kholmsk!
            1. +2
              21 September 2017 06: 27
              Quote from Uncle Lee
              and in Kholmsk - Khan!

              The port city is damn ... Then it definitely converges - it went to the DPRK))
              1. +6
                21 September 2017 06: 28
                And on Sakhkom mumble something about cleaning containers and other nonsense ....
                1. +3
                  21 September 2017 06: 44
                  Well, knowing the stupidity of our local idiots in the leadership who dug up the WHOLE regional center and froze the work, laying 300 meters of asphalt for half a year, I can readily believe that the exact same idiot could undermine the plan for cleaning all the tanks at all gas stations in the city, simultaneously laughing
                  But it is better to believe what went to the DPRK, let it be better for the benefit))
                  1. +7
                    21 September 2017 06: 48
                    The reason for this was the fact that RN-Vostoknefteprodukt LLC carries out scheduled tank repairs, inventories, and accounting for fuel residues and will do this for a month.
                    is infa from Sakhkoma!
                    1. 0
                      21 September 2017 06: 59
                      Well, it means soon and we will again have kilometer-long lines for refueling ... (Successfully, I filled the tank).
                      Sakhalin doesn’t need a bridge, but oars - sail away with this ...
                      1. jjj
                        0
                        21 September 2017 10: 06
                        Sakhalin is also a reserve of various sects. And South Korea is their breeding ground
  3. +1
    21 September 2017 06: 28
    And why not five hundred, and immediately supertankers? fool They would have lied that they fly there XNUMX hours a day — they just drained fuel, and on a new one, to load fool !
    1. 0
      21 September 2017 08: 28
      Quote: Herkulesich
      just drained fuel, and on a new one, to boot

      Or they got into a chain and pumped fuel through each other directly to Korea.
  4. +3
    21 September 2017 06: 30
    Russians violate sanctions

    Again, the Russians do not give to die (according to Michael Bohm) to Koreans. Not an order, additional sanctions are required against Russia. The Americans are not even shy about openly declaring that they are ready to destroy millions of Koreans. This is what I understand as "democracy."
    1. +2
      21 September 2017 06: 45
      Quote: rotmistr60
      The Americans are not even shy about openly declaring that they are ready to destroy millions of Koreans.

      In their democracy, they (Trump) agreed to the point that they are ready to wipe out the entire Korean Peninsula ... belay
      And, in my opinion, the earthquake in Mexico is the last natural warning to the "newly-born Americanos gods - rulers of human destinies" ... Yes
      1. jjj
        0
        21 September 2017 10: 08
        Yeah. Several hurricanes in a row. Now Mexico shook. Iam especially ominously awoke volcano
  5. +4
    21 September 2017 06: 32
    And even if it hit - what the hell! It is the states that impose sanctions against us (no matter what), and against the DPRK. Both states are sanctioned by the same NATO member, so let them choke - boldly trade and do not disgrace, trading in low tide. DPRK and I are in the same boat.
    1. +3
      21 September 2017 06: 49
      Quote: bald
      It is the states that impose sanctions against us.

      I completely agree with you. Why should we look back at the sanctions adopted against us by one country? Who are these world leaders who can forbid us to live?
      Recent events in Syria have shown what happens to those indulged by the United States. And Russia is not a whipping boy at all, it can be so hung up that all appetite, along with sanctions, will disappear ...
    2. +3
      21 September 2017 08: 40
      Quote: bald
      Both states are sanctioned by the same NATO member, so let them choke - boldly trade and do not disgrace, trading in low tide. DPRK and I are in the same boat.

      good The best comment. Our authorities have already made excuses and grovel. If you are independent and independent, then act independently. That’s concern, then looking back at the "partners" ... That's enough. Well, the war is already underway, albeit so far cold. And no need forget that the DPRK is already almost our border. Do not let anyone in there ...
    3. 0
      22 September 2017 15: 01
      Quote: bald
      DPRK and I are in the same boat.

      how do you then explain the fact that Russia, just like the United States and China, voted behind UN Security Council resolution imposing sanctions against the DPRK? Is it done in the same boat?
      1. 0
        22 September 2017 17: 57
        It seems there are reservations that we do not know. BUT!!!!! The other day, the docking of the DPRK railways with Vladivostok and trains with fuel have already gone to the DPRK !!! Today's news.
        1. 0
          22 September 2017 21: 44
          It seems you just have nothing to answer for that .. That's all.
          1. 0
            23 September 2017 01: 42
            You, throw me a presentation, as to the Permanent Representative of Russia. This is their game. It would take a long time to explain this. Briefly, of the entire nuclear club (the seven), no one is interested in increasing the number of nuclear countries. Hence, Russia and China supported the initial sanctions of the UN Security Council. At the same time, the DPRK is conducting final tests of nuclear weapons and carriers capable of repelling the United States. After that, Russia's Permanent Representative to the UN Security Council said - the sanction pressure on the DPRK has been exhausted. That is, Russia refuses to support further resolutions regarding the DPRK - it refuses !!! In short, Russia refused to support sanctions. Something like this.
  6. +1
    21 September 2017 07: 55
    apparently, if the truth is, the contract was concluded before the entry of the sanctions regime. delivery at the level of 2016 without an increase is allowed.
  7. 0
    21 September 2017 09: 01
    but I don’t understand why we must comply with the sanctions against the DPRK
    ... the street rule is simple - if someone is in disgrace, and you too, it is very likely that you will be friends
  8. 0
    21 September 2017 09: 20
    "a tanker with 545 tons of fuel" ...... they represent what they write about? 545 tons of fuel is a small bunker.)
    1. jjj
      0
      21 September 2017 10: 09
      Quote: Serg662
      "a tanker with 545 tons of fuel" ...... they represent what they write about? 545 tons of fuel is a small bunker.)

      Some ten railroad tanks
      1. 0
        21 September 2017 11: 11
        Yes, but for maritime transport this is an absolutely meager volume.
  9. +2
    21 September 2017 09: 41
    Russians violate sanctions by supplying fuel to North Korea

    Let the Anglo-Saxons first deal with their supplies of weapons to the ISIS basmachi
  10. +2
    21 September 2017 10: 07
    There is nothing to look at different “sanctions” there. You can’t let am crush another country.
    Why Russia joined am on sanctions against the DPRK is very regrettable and worthy
    conviction. I think most Russians will join my opinion.
    1. 0
      22 September 2017 15: 02
      Most Russians watch TV and do not know that Russia itself has joined the sanctions against the dog-eater
  11. 0
    21 September 2017 11: 13
    Russia is not a NATO country, and your sanctions do not concern us ...
    1. 0
      22 September 2017 15: 03
      sanctions were imposed not by NATO countries, but by the UN Security Council, including the votes of Russia along with China
      1. 0
        22 September 2017 16: 06
        Well, as you entered and we will deduce, especially since Russia was sanctioned by the same countries as North Korea, and China did not stop trading with it, spitting on the Yankees and their sixes
        1. 0
          22 September 2017 16: 09
          Quote: Msta
          Well, as entered and withdraw

          ha, judging by the fact that this fact is hushed up in all the central mass media, no one will deduce anything. And so certainly no one will ask you.
          Quote: Msta
          sanctions imposed on Russia by the same countries as on North Korea

          You want to say that Russia imposed them on itself, together with China?
          1. 0
            22 September 2017 16: 12
            Well, if the government in the Russian Federation does not care about the opinion of the people, then I guarantee him the new 1917 ... As for the rest, put it more clearly ... I wrote to you that China treats sanctions against North Korea purely formally and does not comply with them and Russia needs to treat the Yankees sanctions as well
            1. 0
              22 September 2017 21: 47
              Quote: Msta
              if the government in the Russian Federation does not care about the opinion of the people, then I guarantee him the new 1917 ...

              Haha For such a statement in our time, you can get into jail for extremism.
              Quote: Msta
              China treats sanctions against North Korea purely formally and does not comply

              China is one of those who imposed these sanctions. And he fulfills them.
              Quote: Msta
              Russia needs to treat the Yankees sanctions as well

              so who doesn’t give? Would have shown will, would not have supported the sanctions openly. Then the whole world would have understood that the Russian Federation has a Faberge, like Kim. And as much as you can, you can hang noodles on TV about beautiful life in the DPRK and how we are united. But outside, nobody looks at this bullshit. Everyone sees it as it is.
              1. 0
                22 September 2017 22: 28
                (I) Well, if the government in the Russian Federation does not care about the opinion of the people, then I guarantee him the new 1917 .... (YOU) Haha. For such a statement in our time, you can get into jail for extremism. 1) This is not extremism, this is knowledge of history. This was the case in all countries of the world and it will be so .... Kings were chopped off in England and in France, and if a foolish king doesn’t write him to saints .... And he won’t nobody should consider Nikolashka holy, and those who wrote him to the saints themselves do not believe in God, because if they believed, they would live differently and not the way they live today ... (YOU) China is one of those who have these sanctions introduced. And he fulfills them. 2) China is North Korea’s largest trading partner and is even recognized in the United States, which is why they are furious, demanding that China stop supporting North Korea, only China does not need it, they know that the USA is digging a hole for China ...
                1. +1
                  22 September 2017 22: 43
                  About Nikolashka this is to Poklonskaya with Mikhalkov. They will quickly explain to you who is the boss and who is the serf
                  Quote: Msta
                  China is North Korea's largest trading partner and even the United States recognizes this.

                  The United States is China's largest trading partner, and China is the United States' largest trading partner, and even North Korea recognizes this. Then what? Sanctions continue to work.
                  1. 0
                    22 September 2017 22: 49
                    Nevertheless, China is North Korea’s largest trading partner, it is a fact recognized even by the United States ... But Mikhalkov allows himself a lot, he agreed so far that he said that “He needs serfs.” But he himself doesn’t want to serfs ?! And then after all, he doesn’t have much merit before the Russian Federation, he doesn’t pull on a nobleman at all, from the word at all ... The actor is mediocre. I can only remember two of his roles, in the films ,, The Hound of the Baskervilles '' and ,, His Among Strangers. Alien Among His Own, '' and as a director, complete mediocrity.
                    1. 0
                      22 September 2017 22: 54
                      Quote: Msta
                      And then after all, he doesn’t have much merit before the Russian Federation, he doesn’t pull on a nobleman at all, from the word at all ...

                      Yes, for sure, pot-bellied little thing.
                      1. 0
                        22 September 2017 22: 58
                        “Kings '' come and go, but Russia remains, and the favorites do not last forever, Luzhkov just stood there, and now on the criminal wanted list ... Mikhalkov very much reminds me of Tseriteli, with his ridiculous sculptures, I think -, if not worse. ''
  12. +2
    21 September 2017 14: 52
    Even if we post, then in fairness. The whole world to a tiny country? Beasts?! (
  13. +1
    21 September 2017 20: 46
    It doesn’t matter whether it is a “May” or not a “May agreement,” but there’s no trace of what’s next.
    North Korea, is fighting not only for its independence, but also for its coexistence on our land.
    So you need to help them in this, and not destroy.
  14. 0
    21 September 2017 21: 02
    What an owl on a stump, what a kick on an owl. We will observe, we will not, all one will blame us for all sins.
  15. 0
    22 September 2017 18: 10
    They say that between Vladivostok and the DPRK is not such a great distance. What prevented the laying of a pipeline for fuel on the bottom? Say that the DPRK has nothing to pay? Whatever the case, the DPRK is one of the largest "holders" of rare earth deposits, which is what China is successfully using, which has raised its armored, engine-building, machine-tool, rocket and other industries by exchanging rare-earth metals for rice and other grub ... Again, "lost "whose capabilities were not visible behind the" fat "" oil and gas "years? Well, yes, the "Olympics", "football championships", "empty-summit summits" were much more important ...