Military Review
Sign In Register

Overview of the status of multi-purpose nuclear submarines that are part of the Russian Navy

60
Multipurpose submarines can be assigned a wide range of tasks: search and destruction of enemy submarines, primarily SSBNs, in combat patrol areas and at crossings; destruction of surface ships and transports; fight (together with surface forces and aviation) for gaining dominance at sea; organization of boundaries in narrowness with the aim of preventing the passage of enemy ships into the open ocean; participation in siege actions; protection of carrier groups and formations; protection of maritime communications; striking KR on ground targets; hidden mine laying, reconnaissance, landing of reconnaissance and sabotage groups.


Currently underwater fleet Russia includes multipurpose nuclear submarines of projects: 671RTMK Schuka, 945 Barracuda, 945A Condor, 949A Antey, 971 Schuka-B and 885 (M) Ash.

1. Project 671RTMK "Pike" - a series of Soviet torpedo nuclear submarines of the second generation.

As of 2017, the Russian Navy consists of three boats of this project, namely the Obninsk B-138 (SF), handed over to the fleet in 1990 — Tambov (BF) B-448, handed over to the fleet in 1992 year - under repair, B-414 "Daniel of Moscow" (SF), handed over to the fleet in 1990 year - in reserve.



2. Project 945 "Barracuda" - a series of Soviet torpedo nuclear submarines of the third generation.

Currently, the boats K-239 "Karp" and B-276 "Kostroma" are in the reserve of the Russian Navy. The question of the restoration of the boats was raised on the agenda, then closed. At the moment, repair and modernization of these boats is not underway.



3. Project XNUMHA "Condor" - a series of Soviet torpedo nuclear submarines of the third generation.

As of 2017, the Russian Navy consists of two boats of this project, namely the Pskov B-336 (SF), was handed over to the fleet in 1993 — Nizhny Novgorod B-534, was handed over to the fleet 1990 year - in the ranks.



4. Project 949A "Antey" - a series of Soviet nuclear submarines of the third generation, armed with anti-ship missiles "Granit".

As of 2017, the Russian Navy includes eight boats of this project, namely: Irkutsk K-132 (TOF), commissioned to the fleet in 1988 - is being repaired and modernized at the Zvezda DVAR, K-442 Chelyabinsk "(TOF), handed over to the fleet in 1990 year - under repair and modernization at the DVZ Zvezda, K-456 Tver (TOF), handed over to the fleet in 1992 year - in the ranks, K-186 Omsk (TOF) commissioned to the fleet in 1993, under repair, K-150 “Tomsk” (TOF), commissioned to the fleet in 1996, in service, K-119 “Voronezh” (SF), delivered to the fleet in 1989, in operation, K- 410 "Smolensk" (SF), handed over to the fleet in 1990 year - in the ranks, K-266 Eagle "(SF), put the fleet in 1992 year - in the ranks.



5) Project 971 "Pike-B" - a series of Soviet multi-purpose nuclear submarines of the third generation.

As of 2017 year, the Russian Navy includes 11 boats of this project, namely: K-322 “Kashalot” (TOF), delivered to the fleet in 1988 - in reserve, K-391 “Bratsk” (TOF), handed over to the fleet 1989 year - waiting for repair and modernization at the Zvezdochka SRH, K-295 Samara (TOF), delivered to the fleet in 1995 - waiting for repair and modernization at the Zvezdochka SRH, K-331 Magadan ( PF), handed over to the fleet in 1990 year - under repair, K-419 "Kuzbass" (TOF), commissioned to the fleet in 1992 year - in the ranks, K-317 "Panther" (SF), commissioned to the fleet in 1990 year - in the ranks, K-461 "Wolf" (SF), handed over to the fleet in 1991 - under repair and modernization at the Zvyozdochka shipyard, K-328 Leopard (SF); delivered to the fleet in 1992; - under repair and upgrade at the Zvyozdochka shipyard, K-154 Tiger (SF), commissioned to the fleet in 1993 year - is awaiting repair and modernization at the shipyard Zvezdochka, K-157 Vepr (Federation Council), commissioned to the fleet in 1995, is being repaired at the shipyard Nerpa, K-335 Gepard ), delivered to the fleet in 2001 year - in the ranks.



6. The 885 / 885М "Ash" project is a series of Russian multi-purpose nuclear submarines with fourth-generation cruise missiles.

As of 2017, the Russian Navy has one submarine, Ave. 885 Severodvinsk (SF), was commissioned to the fleet in 2014, in service. Also, at present, the construction program of six submarines Ave. 885, namely: K-561 "Kazan", laid down in 2009, is being implemented at Sevmash's facilities - launched in 2017, K-573 "Novosibirsk", laid down in 2013 year - in construction, K-571 "Krasnoyarsk", laid in 2014 year - in construction, K-564 "Arkhangelsk", laid in 2015 year - in construction, K-? Perm, laid down in 2016 year - in construction, K-? Ulyanovsk, laid in 2017 year - in construction.



And briefly on the status of the US Navy submarine fleet.

As of 2017, the United States Navy has thirty-three Los Angeles 3-generation boats, three 4-th generation Sivulf-generation boats, four 3-Ohio-generation boats, re-equipped in the KR. " Tomahawk "and thirteen Virginia-type 4 boats (there are plans to build more 30 boats in the interests of the US Navy).






PS Some US Navy boats may be under repair.
Author:
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Yandex Zen
60 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Odysseus
    Odysseus 18 September 2017 15: 25
    +8
    It is easy to calculate that out of 27 nuclear submarines in the fleet, 11. 27 of XNUMX are new (Severodvinsk).
    So here the comparison is not more relevant with the US Navy, but with China. The data on them is classified, but it is believed that they have at least 7 nuclear submarines (2 old), and by 2020 there will be 10 (1 old).
    1. Setrac
      Setrac 18 September 2017 19: 47
      +3
      Quote: Odyssey
      So here the comparison is not more relevant with the US Navy, but with China.

      There is nothing to compare Antey and Ash with, no one has any analogues.
      1. Gransasso
        Gransasso 18 September 2017 19: 56
        +8
        Are you serious?....
        1. Setrac
          Setrac 18 September 2017 20: 17
          +1
          Quote: Gransasso
          Are you serious?...

          And you compare what missiles Severodvinsk or Antey has with many American multi-purpose submarine missile carriers. This is very serious.
          1. Gransasso
            Gransasso 18 September 2017 20: 20
            +1
            So are we talking about rockets or submarines? ...



            And what is the non-analogy of these missiles? ...
            1. Setrac
              Setrac 18 September 2017 20: 46
              +2
              Quote: Gransasso
              So are we talking about rockets or submarines? ...

              We are not shooting submarines at the enemy?
              Quote: Gransasso
              And what is the non-analogy of these missiles? ...

              That is, you yourself do not have enough to compare ...? What is missing?
              1. Gransasso
                Gransasso 18 September 2017 20: 52
                +5
                You see .... if you put even the most super duper rocket on an old rusty bucket rumbling across the ocean with bolts and even without any minimally adequate target designation system .... then yes .. there are no analogues to such a miracle ...
                1. Setrac
                  Setrac 18 September 2017 21: 23
                  +3
                  Quote: Gransasso
                  You see .... if you put even the most super duper rocket on an old rusty bucket with bolts rumbling across the ocean

                  The submarine will be in the warrant of the ships of the Russian fleet and the fact that it is noisier will not help the enemy.
                  Quote: Gransasso
                  without any minimally adequate target designation system ....

                  There will be many target designators in the battle of the Russian fleet with the American fleet, but if you send one submarine to fight with the entire American fleet, then of course there is a problem with target designation, but we will not discuss the spherical horse in a vacuum?
                  1. Gransasso
                    Gransasso 18 September 2017 22: 56
                    +3
                    That's it .. you are doing just that right now ..
                    1. Setrac
                      Setrac 19 September 2017 17: 27
                      +1
                      Quote: Gransasso
                      That's it .. you are doing just that right now ..

                      This is what you are doing in contrasting one ship to the entire American fleet.
                2. Usher
                  Usher 16 July 2018 14: 57
                  0
                  What are you joking about? Say it in person to the submariners? I give 150% that you piss)
      2. ZVO
        ZVO 18 September 2017 20: 26
        +2
        Quote: Setrac
        Quote: Odyssey
        So here the comparison is not more relevant with the US Navy, but with China.

        There is nothing to compare Antey and Ash with, no one has any analogues.


        Ashes competitor is any US boat and moose, and virgin and wolves ...

        Antei is a relic of the past. the giant killer boat KUG, though only in conjunction with Liana as a MAPL, is worse than a bucket.
        1. Gransasso
          Gransasso 18 September 2017 20: 32
          +2
          There are no analogues except as a roaring cow ...
        2. Setrac
          Setrac 18 September 2017 20: 48
          +1
          Quote: ZVO
          Ashes competitor is any US boat and moose, and virgin and wolves ...

          As I wrote above, the arsenal of the Americans is not the same.
          1. Gransasso
            Gransasso 18 September 2017 20: 54
            +2
            Well, list this powerful arsenal of no analogues ...
            1. Setrac
              Setrac 19 September 2017 17: 36
              0
              Quote: Gransasso
              Well, list this powerful arsenal of no analogues ...

              Harpoons against granites, onyxes, calibers - yes, the Americans simply have no chance.
          2. ZVO
            ZVO 19 September 2017 11: 18
            +4
            those. 154 KR Tomahawk - Bullshit?
            And if they are in the RCC version?
            Yes, one such volley gives 100% destruction of any modern ship group. At least KUG, at least AUG. For they will necessarily "overload" any air defense. And eventually destroyed. Throw in hats, fill up with carcasses. As you wish. But they will fail.
            And 24 anti-ship missiles Antey, all the same too little for a similar task. And talking about the difference in arsenals is complete stupidity.
            Tasks. only tasks need to be compared and their implementation, and the ways to achieve the task do not care.

            And yes, do not forget that Granite in low-flying flight - flies no further than 150 km.
            1. Setrac
              Setrac 19 September 2017 17: 35
              +1
              Quote: ZVO
              those. 154 KR Tomahawk - Bullshit?

              Tomahawks far from garbage however
              Quote: ZVO
              And if they are in the RCC version?

              such an option does not exist in nature.
              Quote: ZVO
              Yes, one such volley gives 100% destruction of any modern ship group.

              It’s just your dreams, they can only shoot harpoons and not salvo.
              Quote: ZVO
              And 24 anti-ship missiles Antey, all the same too little for a similar task.

              24 granites - enough for one aircraft carrier group - this is a lot.
              Quote: ZVO
              Tasks. only tasks need to be compared and their implementation, and the ways to achieve the task do not care.

              The task is simple - the confrontation of two fleets in the North Atlantic.
              1. ZVO
                ZVO 19 September 2017 19: 58
                +2
                Quote: Setrac

                24 granites - enough for one aircraft carrier group - this is a lot.

                That was a lot.
                Before the appearance of ships with Aegis and Mk41 as part of the AUG.
                After that, Antei turned into a pumpkin.
                Stupid huge and useless boats.
                And their modernization and reconfiguration into arsenals with Tomahawk clones - Caliber, the only chance, at least some of these already useless boats to get normal ...
                1. Setrac
                  Setrac 19 September 2017 20: 20
                  +1
                  Quote: ZVO
                  Before the appearance of ships with Aegis and Mk41 as part of the AUG.

                  Mk41 is the main drawback of the American fleet, they cannot shove normal anti-ship missiles into it.
                  Quote: ZVO
                  Stupid huge and useless boats.

                  You just have Anglophile dreams, the praised Aegis cannot intercept Soviet heavy missiles with the required efficiency.
              2. ZVO
                ZVO 19 September 2017 20: 02
                0
                Quote: Setrac
                Quote: ZVO
                those. 154 KR Tomahawk - Bullshit?

                Tomahawks far from garbage however
                Quote: ZVO
                And if they are in the RCC version?


                such an option does not exist in nature.


                learn materiel.
                Tomahawk Block IV.
                On January 11, 2017, Raytheon completed the successful completion of testing the latest Tomahawk Block IV rocket.
                1. Setrac
                  Setrac 19 September 2017 20: 25
                  0
                  Quote: ZVO
                  On January 11, 2017, Raytheon completed the successful completion of testing the latest Tomahawk Block IV rocket.

                  How does it refute my words
                  Quote: Setrac
                  such an option does not exist in nature.

                  ??
                  While they are not in service, in addition, ship defeat is an additional opportunity for them, and they do it very poorly.
                  1. ZVO
                    ZVO 19 September 2017 21: 22
                    0
                    Quote: Setrac
                    Quote: ZVO
                    On January 11, 2017, Raytheon completed the successful completion of testing the latest Tomahawk Block IV rocket.

                    How does it refute my words
                    Quote: Setrac
                    such an option does not exist in nature.

                    ??
                    While they are not in service, in addition, ship defeat is an additional opportunity for them, and they do it very poorly.


                    Well, yes, instead of seeing the anti-ship version of the Tomahawk in the video, you can continue to write stubbornly: "this does not exist in nature" ...
                    There is video - but no rocket.
                    The production contract has already been concluded. 2 weeks ago.
                    And not just rockets. but also combat replaceable units. which will be equipped with other tomahawks already available ...
                    And you keep counting. that there are no tomahawks in the form of RCC.
                    And yes. no one destroyed the BS and GOS of the old Tomahawks that Garpunovsky. They can also be returned to their place.
                    For the rocket was originally modular.
                    1. Setrac
                      Setrac 19 September 2017 22: 54
                      +1
                      Quote: ZVO
                      The production contract has already been concluded. 2 weeks ago.

                      That's when they will be standing on the ships - then we'll talk. And let's talk about the performance characteristics of this ancient, primitive rocket, which is shot down by almost hoes.
                      Quote: ZVO
                      For the rocket was originally modular.

                      From the rearrangement of the places of the terms the sum does not change; this missile cannot overcome the air defense of even an unmodern ship.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
  2. Sivasa
    Sivasa 18 September 2017 15: 43
    +6
    Alas ... the 945 project is most likely not the tenants. 949A must certainly be capitalized and modernized. About 10 years will still serve. But this is also not a transition to the future. Animal series, of course, workhorses. And with 885 something incomprehensible. With such terms of commissioning, whether it's a series, or just a PR - they say there is, we are building.
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 18 September 2017 16: 01
      +4
      Quote: Sivasa
      And with 885 something incomprehensible.

      And what is not clear ... Kazan is not 885, but 885M. In fact, the head, and not the passage in the series. 885 Severodvinsk will remain the only Ashen ... the next is a small series of Ashen-M. Only with such a pace of construction of 885-M, only our children will see the last, unless they are sawn on slipways as a result of the obsolescence of the project.
    2. Sailor
      Sailor 2 January 2018 13: 19
      0
      In my opinion, 945pr needs to be upgraded first of all, any equipment can be supplied to the eternal building.
  3. Monarchist
    Monarchist 18 September 2017 16: 05
    +2
    With the submarine, we have a middle and a half: we climbed out of the priests a little bit, where we ended up in the 90s. It’s good that there’s at least some hope. On the "recovery", and then some already have funeral for our submarines
    1. Sivasa
      Sivasa 18 September 2017 16: 33
      +8
      And what does climbing out consist of? The fact that they stopped writing off and left the youngest of the Soviet-built? For 17 years, with a sin, they launched the new SSBNs in half and completed the construction of Severodvinsk. There is no way out to rhythmic fleet renewal.
      1. Curious
        Curious 18 September 2017 19: 40
        +2
        And the people, after all, also require aircraft carriers.
      2. Firework
        Firework 19 September 2017 17: 23
        +1
        note quite a lot of submarines were handed over to the fleet in the 90-91s precisely at the end of the USSR
  4. exo
    exo 18 September 2017 16: 32
    +2
    A lot of repairs. And in storage. Unfortunately, they are not often returned from storage.
    And terribly long construction time. 8 years, on the ship, a lot.
  5. Doliva63
    Doliva63 18 September 2017 17: 00
    +10
    How many of 11 boats can be on the database at the same time? 5-6?
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. Gransasso
        Gransasso 18 September 2017 20: 42
        +3
        It’s not thick .... and the “near the wall” database is such a shy cover for the fact that the boats are not on the move actually ... the sense of them is “near the wall” ...
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. Gransasso
            Gransasso 18 September 2017 21: 14
            +2
            And when they are “near the wall” - they are “under the pairs” always ready for launch, for example, or are the systems practically disconnected? ...


            And it's probably hard to imagine a more unprotected target than a submarine at the wall ...
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. Gransasso
                Gransasso 18 September 2017 22: 50
                +3
                I just saw a photo of how they stand in the Northern Fleet ... in pairs ... the distance is literally a few meters between them ..


                I doubt that if one launches at least one rocket, the second will be able to launch at least something
                1. Ocha3
                  Ocha3 19 September 2017 01: 10
                  +2
                  Ships on the database do not stand in pairs.
                2. The comment was deleted.
                  1. Andrey NM
                    Andrey NM 19 September 2017 10: 37
                    +4
                    When starting from the pier there is one problem - the "fox tail" does not sniff. Yes, and the "solid" exhaust also does not smell like roses. Then, at the start of the “solid” pressure accumulators are first triggered (on the 941st approximately 450 kg of “gunpowder”). When purging a TA or a central cylinder block at a pier, people can carry a wave, but what will happen from the "mortar charge"? So, as they say, radish horseradish is not sweeter that "solid", that "liquid".
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. Andrey NM
                        Andrey NM 20 September 2017 05: 00
                        +4
                        Rudolph, I also did not see the boat alive, just as I did not see the floating and submerging submarines of our flotilla, all the time inside. "Fox tail" - a pair of nitrogen compounds. The first time I saw it when I left the ship. The engine exhaust is also so brown and red. And goryuchka smells like a mixture of the smell of a country "push" and pretty leaves. Only well them, these smells. You look at the brave, who are without a satellite, and what’s there, dragging the boss, there’s almost no smell ... And then they’re "resting" at the cemetery aged 40-45. And those who did everything right, they are already under 80 years old, they still run across us.
              2. Andrey NM
                Andrey NM 19 September 2017 07: 55
                +7
                In the 90s, they were on duty at the wall to save money. Booms do not need to be paid, marine only 30%, not 50%, food is not at the rate of going to sea, etc., you do not need to start a "samovar". At the same time, there wasn’t enough people, despite Grachev’s “reforms”, eternal secondments ... It was allowed to go ashore in one shift. And the people were rushing to which republic to join: either go to Ukraine, or to Belarus ... Or stay in mother Russia ... This also affected the top leadership. Cowless - as an example. Hard times were.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. Firework
                  Firework 19 September 2017 17: 32
                  +1
                  And the people were rushing to which republic to join: either go to Ukraine, or to Belarus ... Or stay in mother Russia ... This also affected the top leadership. Cowless - as an example. Hard times were.

                  the film 72 meters is just about it
                  1. Andrey NM
                    Andrey NM 20 September 2017 06: 46
                    +5
                    How then Rear Admiral Bezkorovayny famously repainted - a separate issue. Immediately became an opponent of the deployment of the Russian fleet in Sevastopol, the Ukrainian Navy, it turns out, originates from some Cossacks, Crimea has always been Ukrainian, etc. And this was the whole commander of the 3rd SF flotilla, where 3 out of 4 divisions were strategic.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. Shadow shooter
    Shadow shooter 19 September 2017 08: 35
    +2
    If here there is a comparison of multipurpose submarines only with amers, then do not forget that our apl can come in support of a dap, the amers have them dumb wink
    1. ZVO
      ZVO 19 September 2017 11: 42
      +1
      Quote: Shadow shooter
      amers have them dumb wink


      Then do not forget to assign to the amers their satellites, which are sure to "climb" in the case of BP: Japanese, Australian, South Korean, Canadian submarine fleets.
      Also fleets of submarines of NATO countries.
      1. Setrac
        Setrac 19 September 2017 17: 39
        0
        Quote: ZVO
        Then do not forget to assign to the amers their satellites, which are sure to "climb" in the case of BP: Japanese, Australian, South Korean, Canadian submarine fleets.

        A hypothetical battle between the Russian and American fleets can occur only in the North Atlantic region, neither Koreans nor Japanese will be there, as well as Chinese and North Koreans.
        1. ZVO
          ZVO 19 September 2017 20: 11
          0
          Quote: Setrac
          Quote: ZVO
          Then do not forget to assign to the amers their satellites, which are sure to "climb" in the case of BP: Japanese, Australian, South Korean, Canadian submarine fleets.

          A hypothetical battle between the Russian and American fleets can occur only in the North Atlantic region, neither Koreans nor Japanese will be there, as well as Chinese and North Koreans.


          Those. the possibility of Russian-Japanese territorial conflict, followed by the mandatory pulling into it of the allies of Japan in the form of the United States, Australia - you absolutely do not consider? Well, well ... probably a chess player. indulge in etudes ...
          Are you planning on fleets?
          There will be no fleets. there will be groups and ships all over the ball.
          In the event of a clash in at least one of the places of presence, the Middle-earth, the Baltic and all the rest will go automatically ...
          1. Setrac
            Setrac 19 September 2017 20: 26
            +2
            Quote: ZVO
            Those. the possibility of Russian-Japanese territorial conflict, followed by the mandatory pulling into it of the allies of Japan in the form of the United States, Australia - you absolutely do not consider?

            I do not consider, the Japanese even go to the toilet at the direction of the United States.
  8. Shadow shooter
    Shadow shooter 19 September 2017 14: 08
    0
    Quote: ZVO
    Quote: Shadow shooter
    amers have them dumb wink


    Then do not forget to assign to the amers their satellites, which are sure to "climb" in the case of BP: Japanese, Australian, South Korean, Canadian submarine fleets.
    Also fleets of submarines of NATO countries.

    I wrote that "if there is a comparison of current with amers" wink
    1. ZVO
      ZVO 19 September 2017 20: 12
      0
      Quote: Shadow shooter
      Quote: ZVO
      Quote: Shadow shooter
      amers have them dumb wink


      Then do not forget to assign to the amers their satellites, which are sure to "climb" in the case of BP: Japanese, Australian, South Korean, Canadian submarine fleets.
      Also fleets of submarines of NATO countries.

      I wrote that "if there is a comparison of current with amers" wink


      Amer can not be considered separately from their allies. They have a "cooperation".
      Without understanding this, we get a spherical horse in a vacuum.
  9. Vladimir1155
    Vladimir1155 20 September 2017 14: 43
    0
    instead of idiotic aircraft carriers, super-destroyers (battleships), landing ships, super-frigates the size of a cruiser and super-corvettes .... the size of a frigate ..... you just need to repair all the submarines, and actively build new submarines, minesweepers, small ships, but not to the detriment of the Yarsam, Sarmatians, with 400, that 160, etc.
  10. 2534M
    2534M 20 September 2017 17: 26
    0
    Quote: NEXUS
    due to the obsolescence of the project.

    it became obsolete back in the 2000s
  11. kig
    kig 21 September 2017 13: 11
    +3
    http://warfiles.ru/146996-ssha-uhodyat-pod-vodu.h
    tml

    US shipyards can hardly cope with the plans set by the Pentagon to upgrade the submarine fleet - a lack of trained personnel and limited resources of component suppliers are affecting it. Now two Virginia-type submarines are being introduced each year., and soon in parallel with them will be commissioned and submarine missile class "Columbia". At the same time, Donald Trump in the fall proposed to increase the pace of construction of submarines.

    And here we argue, citing as an example the only boat of the 4th generation ...
  12. Blind111
    Blind111 21 September 2017 14: 45
    +2
    Quote: Setrac
    Quote: ZVO
    On January 11, 2017, Raytheon completed the successful completion of testing the latest Tomahawk Block IV rocket.

    How does it refute my words
    Quote: Setrac
    such an option does not exist in nature.

    ??
    While they are not in service, in addition, ship defeat is an additional opportunity for them, and they do it very poorly.

    Actually, the RCC variants of the Tomahawks and the states were 30 years ago ... they were removed and drank from weapons. They hit the targets quite confidently .. By the way, the RCC version of the Caliber is still not in service .. at best on paper. Granites - the remains are protected, production has long been lost. Half of the granite carriers have long been floating with empty mines. Onyx is also far from being a child prodigy .. development of the late 70s by the way)