Results of the week. “Russia is rattling weapons”
Often on the pages of our information and analytical portal, proposals were made to reduce the percentage of demonstration of the Hollywood "meter" in cinemas and on television screens of the country. The premise is this: you need to give the opportunity to realize yourself to domestic young directors, you need to shoot a patriotic, truly historical, a civilly significant movie.
While Hollywood gloriously defeats "Godzilla", "Aliens" and other "Predators", in the Russian Ministry of Culture decided to start winning Hollywood itself. Rumor has it, the Knights of the Ministry of Culture are ready to strike at enemy advanced units with both sword and ruble. And this blow is positioned as an indispensable help to the Russian cinema - they say, Hollywood tapes will make room for our film market, and Russian directors will become like, how they will, you know, make high-quality films - for the heart, soul, mind and body ...
Hollywood still considers how much the daily salary of Bruce Willis will cost him a strike from the Russian Ministry of Culture ...
Comments from our readers:
Alone
Sinbad
Midshipman
President Tour
Mishiko Saakashvili has a lot of experience in border violations. A few months after he came to power (with the help of the “color revolution” and with the support of the United States), he famously demolished a border checkpoint at the border that divided Georgia and Ajaria. Thus, he abolished the Ajarian autonomy.
President of the tour, the president of the legionary. Updated role in world politics. As the first owner of such a resume - our old "friend" Mishiko. He left the territory of Ukraine with his head slightly down, but entered back into the hands of the “electorate” - inspired to the point of madness. Considering that Poland had a hand in the matter, only one thing is strange - why Mishiko did not declare himself a neubienny Tsarevich Dimitri, ready to “poknyazhit” while in Kiev ...
Comments from our readers:
igordok
Plombir
Uma palata
The riot against Parasha is most likely paid by Kolomoisky. That is, the Americans solve their problem by hand and at the expense of Aboriginal people. There probably will not be a civil war, they will fight at the top. But what is really very bad is that under such a quiet rule it is extremely convenient to gash a terrorist act, for example, at a nuclear power plant, to spoil it against Russia, that the nuclear power plant for the brothers was badly built. For Russia, such garbage will be oh ... what a hemorrhoid. How much money will fly away for liquidation not from humanism, but due to the fact that all this will break on us.
To the parasha, apparently, they are flooding theirs — for the same purpose — to have time to rob unhappy this Ukraine. Miho, as befits a goat-provocateur, who has completed the work of preparing for slaughter, will peacefully unscrew to some Miami.
And we will get the ruins that were once the beautiful South Russian land. Plus an embittered population with huge problems FOR ALL. Actually, this is Miho's ultimate goal - to present us an unthinkably difficult problem - non-brethren in the crap.
“Hands off Vashnorii!”
Exercises “Zapad-2017” began in Belarus. They will answer the question of how Russia will respond to the NATO aggression.
The invasion of NATO troops in Belarus and Russia: their response to the "West-2017"
And what have we not heard lately about Russian-Belarusian exercises from Western and Russian liberal partners. The smallest - “Russia is rattling weapons". The most fervent - Russia invented the terrorist Weishnoru, to carry out a sweep of the Polish population in the west of Belarus. Especially outstanding "military experts" suggested that the 12,7 of thousands of Russian and Belarusian soldiers are only the tip of the "iceberg of aggression", and hundreds of thousands more were caged in Belarusian forests and swamps and meanly threaten from there all of progressive mankind represented by Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and, of course, Ukraine. With the theses “Hands off Vashnorii!”, The report of the US State Department specialists on the problems of Eurasian democracy has, of course, already been prepared.
Comments from our readers:
vladimirZ
At the same time, the strike will be delivered from the Baltic states towards the Leningrad Region and its center, on the Kaliningrad Region, essentially blocked. Well, of course, Ukraine will not stand aside, along with NATO in the Crimea, in the direction of the Belgorod and Kursk regions, and in the Rostov region.
Are these areas planning to cover? And the defense strategy itself, what will it envisage? Or how in the 1941 year, "rattling fire, flashing with glitter of steel, will the cars go on a furious campaign"? Without proper intelligence, without the necessary training on the signal "Alarm" forward to the foe? 1941 year did not teach anything?
34 region
rotmistr60
About grandfathers scooters
Despite the massive reductions in the army and the full-scale programs of the decommissioning of equipment, which were carried out in the past, significant stocks of materiel remain in storage in the Russian armed forces.
Classic situation. Everyone who keeps in the garage something from the “old-fashioned motor scooter” series will understand - it’s a pity to throw out, to sell — somehow doubtful, to sell for parts — even more doubtful, given that they barely found parts for repair. Here and continues to occupy a place and torment the owner with doubts about future fate. And at the Ministry of Defense such “grandfathers scooters” - not one hundred. As gifts for those who drive into the sand "bearded boys" - quite ...
Comments from our readers:
Lopatov
Firstly, the process of cutting armored vehicles is not a trivial operation.
Secondly, the metal. Now, the absolute majority of consumers need steel with absolutely certain properties, and it will be very difficult to “attach” what will be obtained during the remelting. Unless, of course, the goal is set at least to recoup the recycling.
After all, it was not for nothing that the Americans found the option of free transfer to Iraq of hundreds of armored troop-carrier МХNUMX economically viable. They can count.
Strashila
English Channel Tank and Kalmius Question
It is interesting to consider the combat potential of the modernized "reactive" main combat tank T-80BVM, a prototype of which was presented during a demonstration at the 33rd combined arms range near Luga. The history of the early versions of these unique vehicles (T-80 / B / BV), called the English Tanks for their alleged ability to reach the coast of the Celtic Sea in just 2 weeks, began back in 1976, when modification vehicles began to arrive at combat units " Object 219 SP 2 ".
Of course, it is possible to discuss the tank of the English Channel and in general it is even necessary. True, there is one "but." Before “getting” to the English Channel, we would have to decide the question of our attitude to the problem, for example, Kalmius and Seversky Donets. And then in the week there have already been injections from that series, how will the population relate to the publication about the termination of the provision of humanitarian aid to Donbas from 2019 of the year. Although the Kremlin has denied, but, as they say, the sediment remained ...
Comments from our readers:
Seos
Chances to meet the enemy tank armada (due to the lack of these armadas) are almost zero ... The main enemy of these tanks will be infantry and medium armored vehicles, with which the tank will cope without problems ...
113262a
Lex.
And the fleet, and bread
Delays in building a domestic aircraft carrier fleet are only a small part of the complex of problems that has been outlined recently with the pace of serial production of other types of warships of the main classes.
The problem of lagging behind in the Pacific Fleet is, in principle, solved “easily”: the economy can be completely transferred to military rails and the construction of destroyers, frigates and aircraft carriers go to the top. Then we, as they say, catch up and overtake.
But how ready is the population for such a step? It seems that the readiness of the kitchen-sofa does not always coincide with the readiness of the real.
Comments from our readers:
Same lech
Shurik70
hohol95
The Baltic Fleet was locked up with mines and nets; the Black Sea lost its base in Sevastopol; it was essentially bombed by the German aviation!
Only the Northern Fleet had room for maneuver and acted to the best of its modest forces, but could not even catch the lonely "Admiral Scheer" in its rear waters!
WapentakeLokki
Trap from Putin
An incredibly large amount of “dirt” and criticism in the last week was directed towards the draft resolution on placing peacekeepers on the contact line in the Donbass, which Moscow submitted to the UN Security Council 5 September 2017. Thus, in the half-million community "Reports from the militia of Novorossia" about a dozen war correspondents and front-line journalists from Donbass managed to christen the draft resolution "full discharge of the" Novorossiya "project from Moscow, which supposedly should stop the" sanction shaft "launched by Washington.
In the US, meanwhile, it has already been announced that the initiative to bring peacekeepers to the Donbass, voiced by Vladimir Putin, "may turn out to be a trap." Such a statement was made by the former head of American diplomacy (something.? ..) John Kerry. The man, although retired, continues to make fun of the Donbass ... He says: today Putin will introduce peacekeepers, and tomorrow he will recognize the independence of the LDNR.
Recognize LDNR? .. And what ... What if ...
Comments from our readers:
Nesvobodnye
mac789
Alexsin
"Terminator" to whom? To "Terminator"? ..
One of the most interesting domestic developments in the field of armored vehicles is the so-called. tank support combat vehicle (BMPT). Russian designers have developed and offered customers several projects of this kind of equipment, but for some time BMPT remained exclusively exhibition samples with no real prospects. However, a few years ago the situation changed, and the tank support vehicles were still able to become the subject of new supply contracts.
In fact, the situation looks a bit strange. At first - development and creation, then attempts to explain to potential customers that the equipment is very, very effective and significant. Usually, the opposite is true - when the significance of technology is not disputed a priori by most potential customers, production begins for contacts that are on the verge of conclusion. I would like to hope that the Syrian theater will certainly help the Terminator to advance.
Comments from our readers:
Starover_Z
Well, maybe running in Syria will push officials from the Ministry of Defense to look more closely at the product, ahead of time ?!
max702
Nix1986
AM-17 - American "Kalash" or Kalashnikovsky "American"?
In recent years, the domestic defense industry has presented a number of promising models of small arms. So, last year the small-sized MA was shown for the first time. The development of this project was continued, and on its basis two new samples were created. During the recent international military-technical forum "Army-2017" the first copies of the AM-17 and AMB-17 submachine guns were presented.
The fact that the Kalashnikov concern uses in AM-17 a layout of American rifles of the AR-15 / M16 family with a receiver box of two articulated halves, says that not only they have ... we have them - if for the good of the cause, of course. And, by and large, a reliable compact automatic weapon of the army will not interfere. There are divisions in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation for which the same AM-17 is more than the actual shooting.
Comments from our readers:
vkl.47
otto meer
Bronevick
Under pressure from Putin
The New York Times criticizes the decision of the US military command to recall a reconnaissance aircraft from Syria’s airspace over Deir ez-Zor. It is reported that for several days in early September, the American intelligence board monitored the movements of the IG convoys of terrorists (prohibited in the Russian Federation). The US Air Force plane was forced to leave the zone of its former route in connection with the appearance of numerous Russian military aircraft over Deir ez-Zor.
And another message. Two Western diplomats admitted on condition of anonymity to Bloomberg that “the United States and its European allies, along with Saudi Arabia and Turkey, had to change their position on Assad. Currently, they largely agree that he remains (the head of Syria) in transition. "
Syria: the enemy at the gate is at a loss
Russian Space Forces forced US Air Force aircraft to retire from the Deir ez-Zor area?
The American press admits that Washington, under pressure from the Russians, has begun a retreat. The same newspaper, The New York Times, reports that with the advent of Russian military aircraft, the command of the American coalition over Deir ez-Zor turned off its air operation.
Some American experts explain this situation with the agreements reached by Russia and the United States earlier. Others say the United States "took another step back in Syria under pressure from Putin."
Comments from our readers:
210ox
oleg-gr
Topotun
Americans lost to Russians
Russians are everywhere. In Afghanistan and in Pakistan. Something is up in Iraq. Fly towards the Korean Peninsula. Do not lose sight of Ukraine. Strengthen ties with South America. At the same time, the weight of BRICS, the union that creates a buffer against US financial domination, is growing.
Western analysts are convinced: the United States is no longer a superpower. This state again and again makes concessions to its opponents in world politics. Washington did not want to dance to the American tune, Washington used to talk differently. But that time is gone!
West says and shows: the United States is no longer a superpower
Politics, accompanied by concessions and failures, really points to the deviation of the United States from former world hegemony. Washington’s misfortune is that it shoulders too heavy a burden. Being a hegemon in the "brave new world" has become very difficult. Washington is not in a position to dictate at the same time the DPRK, China, Syria, Russia, Iran and other states that dictate it is not acceptable. The game of hegemon inevitably leads to a fiasco.
Comments from our readers:
Shurik70
The effectiveness of states is measured not in abstract happiness, not in the life expectancy of people, not in relation to the hungry / well-fed, not in the ratio of pension / minimum food set. No, efficiency is measured in the "gross product", in coins. The human concept of good and evil is highly distorted.
The US dollar is the most common world currency. They now dictate what is true and what is false. That is, it is the United States that is the main springboard for the distortion of the normal human psyche.
Do not be worth believing "experts" from the United States. All their revelations are for the internal consumption of the duped part of humanity. You can not believe, you need to know. The cry "Russians are coming!" - an old cry. It merely means that the CIA (and similar services) will increase the cost of espionage and the organization of terrorist attacks.
Hurricane70
“Do not hope that, once taking advantage of Russia's weakness, you will receive dividends forever.
Russians always come for their money.
And when they come, do not rely on the Jesuit agreements you have signed that supposedly justify you. They are not worth the paper they are written on. Therefore, it is worth playing with Russians either playing honestly or not playing at all. ”
Otto von Bismarck.
And it pleases!
Starik72
Altona
Mainland state Japan
Many readers at least vaguely heard about Vladimir Putin’s proposals to the Japanese side on joint economic activities on the islands of the Far East. Putin’s proposals, writes military expert A. Staver, were so global that even the beginning of their implementation “will completely reverse the situation in eastern Russia.” “Think about it: Vladimir Vladimirovich proposed Japan to become a mainland state! - the author writes. - No more, no less. All other proposals are trivial compared to this. I will not hide, the scale of the project, to put it mildly, excited me. Yes, and Putin’s words confirmed my excitement: “This is a planetary project.”
The essence of the project: Moscow proposes to build two bridges between the mainland and Sakhalin and between Sakhalin and the island of Hokkaido. Road and rail. According to experts, the project cost is approximately 600 billion rubles.
Now it's Japan.
Comments from our readers:
Thunderbolt
In conversation with Ulyukaev, Sechin has already let it slip that Japanese investment is being hampered by the question of the "northern territories." This is very eloquently expressed by the fact that with this, the bridge project (or similar initiatives) is only our side, and the Japanese are only considering the incoming proposals, and their position on the islands remains unchanged. So what are these dances for?
“Everyone understands that the Kremlin gives a chance to the Japanese. Talk about returning the islands, especially today, is hopeless. Moreover, many countries are already looking at Far Eastern projects with interest. The economy is developing. And it should develop further. Otherwise, stagnation and death. So, money needs to be invested somewhere. ”
I will say a blasphemous phrase, but maybe invest money in Russia? Or do we have all the bridges built? Already not some, but crystal ones?
domokl
Then it turns out, we will give the region? Well, I could not, could not?
cariperpaint
domokl
Welcome BRICS plus!
It cannot be said that the BRICS summit in Xiamen caused a lot of noise in the world press. Summit topics were predictable. On the other hand, some analysts declared the summit a sensation. For several years, Western experts have been predicting the decay and collapse of the top five BRICS states, but instead there has been a “BRICS plus” trend!
On the world stage, BRICS is a “serious nuisance” for a unipolar world order, analyst P. Escobar believes. The Chinese leader, comrade Xi, not without reason noted delicately in Xiamen that "we, the five countries, must play a more active role in global governance." And then Beijing presented a “conceptualization” for the expansion of partnership and cooperation. In Xiamen, proposals were made to launch a “dialogue” with Mexico, Egypt, Thailand, Guinea and Tajikistan. These countries are included in the block "BRICS-plus", and rapprochement with them is "part of the road map."
Another example of "BRICS-plus" Escobar saw in the possible launch before the end of the year of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). In this partnership, by the way, China is “not leading.” But then there are Japan, India and Australia - along with 10 members of ASEAN.
If Escobar’s optimistic forecasts, including on BRICS-plus and the decline in the role of the dollar in the world, had come true, the Washington hawks would have been a big disappointment. A reduction in the US dollar in international settlements, especially in the oil trade, would be a truly historic event. But it’s too early to talk about something like that. Forty-two percent of the world's population (BRICS) have not yet created a new world order.
By the way, experts they say about the decline in the share of the total population of the BRICS countries. By 2025, this share in the world's population will decrease to 41%, and by 2050, to 36%. However, these are only forecasts.
Comments from our readers:
Boris55
solovald
Normal ok
Akkypamucm
Is the sixth generation on the horizon?
Today we can say that that terrible decline, in which our air forces found themselves after the collapse of the USSR, was left behind. “And for the last 5-7 years, we are seeing steady progress, if not further development, then at least catching up,” writes R. Skomorokhov. “Speaking about the far horizons, we mean the development programs of aviation: the promising complexes PAK FA, PAK DA and PAK TA. The main successes we have in creating the fifth generation fighter, the Su-57 has acquired a complete form and content, ”explains the author.
The analyst believes that if work on the 6 fighter generation begins in Russia, it will happen “very soon.” However, “unlike the Americans,” Russia has “time to do it.”
Comments from our readers:
g1v2
In my opinion, the 6th generation will be distinguished by strong robotization. It will not necessarily be a drone, although it may be such a mode. But what will happen for sure, maximum robotization of systems, constant communication with intelligence drones and satellites. It is even possible that the aircraft will be part of a cybernetic system, including, for example, a swarm of small drones. Possibly hypersonic weapons. In general, the 6th generation will be characterized by increased robotization and communication with other systems. And, perhaps, the 6th generation fighter will become unmanned.
viktorch
F-22 flies, goes through modernization, eliminates flaws, there are many hundreds of them in the sky.
F-35 flies, dopilivaetsya (the budget, of course, sawn, but as a percentage of the total real amount spent on the plane, I think, the cutting power times in 5 less than in the "Dry"), the shortcomings are eliminated, the sky will soon be completely indecent many hundreds of pieces, not only among penguins, but also among their allies.
T-50 - mega super-dry mega super aircraft, glider flies, unfinished bro, unfinished engines, unfinished weapons, achieving raptor performance without upgrades is not clear when it’s finished, it’s not clear how many will be bought into the army.
In short, what to shout Urya-Urya is not clear,
In general, I don’t understand what to rejoice here: the situation with the T-50 more than vividly shows that if the key parts of the project were not worked out during the USSR, then at the output we get a time-stretched file and cries about “urya-urya, we have there will be no analogies in the world. "
Well, at least, the replacement of T-72 and T-80 was actively developed under the Soviets - they were still able to finish the Armat.
In general, we have the very best, which is not very clear, but probably the “effective managers” are the best, we are waiting for the fall in oil-gas prices and “effective optimizations” in the weapons procurement program.
A. Privalov
Conclusion: the possible time of adopting a fighter into service is the beginning of the 2020's, although it cannot be excluded that it will be moved closer to the middle of the next decade. In other words, a good Su-57 will appear in the troops through this 5, and then all 7 years.
This is despite the fact that the bad F-35 has been flying confidently for almost two and a half hundreds, they are already running around in the troops and have flown more than 100 thousand hours. It was during these flights that its shortcomings came to light, which are carefully studied and gradually eliminated.
By the way, no one will give a guarantee that during the flight tests of the Su-57 will not come to light, and only for scrapers and needle files will take a lot of money. I'm not saying that a lot of time and effort is spent on scraping and grinding ...
I suggest everyone to be patient and wait for visible practical results, leaving aside empty disputes like "Who is stronger: an elephant or a whale?"
“Triumphs” for Turkey
For the first time since 2008, Russia and Turkey have signed a contract for the supply of military products, recalls columnist K. Ryabov. Previously, Russian enterprises have repeatedly supplied the Turkish army with certain systems, but over the past few years, such contracts have not been signed. In addition, in the autumn of 2015, in response to the perfidious attack of the Turkish Air Force, Russia temporarily ceased any cooperation in the military sphere. The situation gradually stabilized, and now the two countries are ready to resume cooperation. This was confirmed by the appearance of a new contract.
12 September first press appeared in the context of the new agreement. The media quoted Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who said that he had recently signed a contract to supply Triumph C-400 anti-aircraft missile systems. Also, the head of state noted that the first installment had already been made on this contract. In the future, according to the Turkish president, Russia will have to issue a loan to the partner.
As noted by the Russian Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation, the signed contract fully meets the interests of Russia. This means that even before the start of negotiations, the Russian side assessed all the consequences of a possible deal and made conclusions. The Turkish authorities did not receive a refusal, which indicates that there are no risks for Russian interests.
The prerequisites for the emergence of a new Russian-Turkish contract and its consequences will long be a topic of discussion and dispute. You should also expect different assessments and assumptions in the context of the timing of the order, its technical aspects, etc. Only one fact, directly resulting from the presence of the Turkish order, is not in doubt: Russia maintains a leading position in the international market for air defense systems and is not going to take their positions. The next order, especially received from the NATO country, will only strengthen the position of the Russian industry, as well as serve as an advertisement addressed to potential customers.
Comments from our readers:
NEXUS
At the same time, it should be understood that Triumphs are long-range interception systems. And the most effective "Triumph" in conjunction with the "Torah" and "Beeches", because with a massive rocket attack it is the "Torah" and "Buki" that will be intercepted by low-flying KR. Opposition to a massive attack of cruise missiles is not a zonal, but a regional air defense system with massive use of dispersed short-range air defense missile systems, like “Buk” and “Thor”.
Yes, and cover the "Triumphs" on the nearest approaches with something you need, for example, the same "armor". But the Turks purchased only Triumphs, and it is unclear how they are without covering the mid-range and short-range air defense systems.
Romario_Argo
Accordingly, for export are only: ZUR 48N6EX2 - 200 km; 9М96Е2 - 120 km; 9М100 - 15 km (here you have three echelons).
+ KP ACS "Baikal-E".
Msta
Depth of controversy
According to the bmpd blog, the French Internet portal Intelligence online reports a serious disagreement between Moscow and Tehran that emerged at the end of August of this year regarding further strategy in the Syrian campaign. We are talking about a meeting held on 28 in August 2017 in the SAR military department, in which, apart from the Syrian military itself, who were represented, including Maher Asad (brother of Syrian President Bashar Assad), who led the Republican Guard, and Chief of the General Staff Ali Abdullah Ayub, participation of the commanders of the Russian and Iranian contingents.
It is alleged that the head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), Kassem Suleymani, “fiercely insisted on a change of strategy”, which he has been striving for since 2016. In his opinion, it is necessary to create a numerous militarized structure “Guardians of the Republic”, the Syrian counterpart of the IRGC. Suleymani expects to replenish its composition at the expense of the army units. Iraqi Shiites, Afghan Hazaras and members of the Lebanese Hezbollah movement are expected to enter this militia.
Lieutenant-General Sergei Rudskoy, who represented the Russian side, categorically disagreed with the Iranian proposal. He defended the need to preserve the existing organization of troops, the backbone of which is the army corps. At the same time, the general stated the need to re-equip a number of buildings with new equipment, expand the composition of elite troops and involve private military companies of Russian origin to protect strategic facilities in Syrian territory. The latter would give the opportunity to concentrate the troops of the Russian Federation on more important theaters.
Comments from our readers:
DEfindER
donavi49
GSH focuses on "academic" foundations.
Suleymani focuses more on the local mentality.
And what works better is far from clear. For example, the academically built army of Iraq at one time arranged a record-breaking race, dropping everything. And the situation was saved only by the ersatz “Basiji”, who, on the other hand, were very much bent on the ground, which is why in the IS and the Sunni anti-government factions, the Sunnis ran in droves.
At the same time, Iranian militiamen showed poor results in defensive battles in the province of Aleppo. Often throwing positions on your own.
voyaka uh
Such friction was already taking the city of Aleppo. The Russians believe that it is their merit, and the Iranians, that it is theirs.
What is independence?
The United States has placed another demand on the Russian Federation. It consists in the “necessity” of withdrawing the Russian contingent from such Caucasian republics as Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Washington expressed strong concern at the ongoing "demarcation work" and the closure of the crossings. There were repeated calls for Russia to withdraw the military from the “Georgian-owned” regions in accordance with the cease-fire agreement of 2008.
Washington, apparently, is unable to understand that these republics gained independence in 2008, and their people and leadership without prompting from overseas are able to decide how and from whom to defend their borders.
As for the definition of “belonging to Georgia,” Georgia itself ceased to belong: after all, representatives of official Tbilisi cannot take a step without consulting with Washington.
Comments from our readers:
Titsen
Thugs universal scale mattress appearance!
Stas157
The Kremlin’s policy towards the United States cannot be called harsh, it is rather smoothing, conciliatory, compromise, conciliatory. Well, as is usually the case with partners.
The USA is so arrogant with Russia only because Russia's behavior and non-aggressiveness made it possible. Therefore, they will continue to become impudent until they meet a harsh response.
Herculesic
Let's buy Russia. Inexpensively
Doctor of Economics and sociologist Vladislav Inozemtsev proposed that the United States buy Russia from the “gang of kleptocrats.” In an article for The American Interest, he expressed the following thought: “The existential threat to the United States” can be eliminated inexpensively.
Russia, in his opinion, is ruled not by a leader like Stalin, but rather “a gang of kleptocrats who keep their money in Western banks, buy Western real estate, train their children abroad and have foreign passports or a residence permit.” Such people "do not rule Russia as if they were really eager for global or at least regional domination." Rather, the author believes, they “rule in such a way as to benefit from their property” - from the firm “Russia, Inc.” (“Russia, Inc.”). If you understand all this, then an “unconventional solution” of the impending problems of the West with respect to Russia will open, the expert believes. In the corporate world, the best possible step toward a small but aggressive company is to try to redeem it and merge it with a larger business conglomerate, reminds Inozemtsev the basics of economic theory.
Doctorate does not offer to buy the Russian people, its territory and natural wealth. We are talking about the repurchase of assets that "the ruling bureaucracy considers its property." All Russian companies whose securities are traded on the Moscow stock exchange, on 1 August 2017, were estimated at only 33,6 trillion. rubles (559 billion dollars). Even if you double this amount, it will be approximately 1,1-1,2 trillion dollars.
What happens if the business elite in Russia is offered a “fair” price for its property - say, a trillion dollars 2? It is unlikely that this elite, having lost faith in stability and fearing losing its assets in Russia, will desperately bargain if it is offered such a sum ...
Probably, the theses of the doctor of economic sciences about the "redemption" of Russia are the direct "signal" to the White House. The idea was thrown at the most appropriate time: instead of the Harvard Obama lawyer, the hard-boiled Trump businessman came to the Oval Office. A businessman who understands money making and even speaks in the language of interest and deductions with NATO countries. In addition, Mr. Trump is suspected of having links with Russians. So why not Donald to implement a "non-traditional" deal? Such an agreement with the Russians would bring him unfading glory for centuries, and the critic McCain would stand still with his mouth open.
But still, before that, one should ask something not from Trump, but from the Russians. Is Russia's “political and business elite” ready for sale? The success of Operation Inozemtsev depends on this answer.
Comments from our readers:
iouris
Alex66
San Sanych
Evdokim
34 region
lewerlin53rus
Information