The 11 th An-148 for the RF MOD

27
According to the blog information bmpd, 13 September on flight tests set aside another An-148-100 passenger aircraft (serial number 43-08), manufactured by Voronezh Joint-Stock Aircraft Building Company JSC (VASO, as part of the UAC) for the needs of the military department of the country. Earlier this year, the An-148 buildings of VASO did not rise in the air.


An-148-100E (fx 43-08). Voronezh, 13.09.2017 (c) Alexey Filatov / VKontakte


This machine is an 11 th representative of its type, built as part of the 7 state contract execution in May 2013 year worth 18,43799 billion rubles, providing for the transfer of X-NUMX aircraft An-15-148 during 100-2013 years. This year, the Defense Ministry of the Russian Federation expects to get 2017 machines, in the 3 year - two. In the summer of 2018, VASO from Ukraine delivered the F-2017 fuselage section of the An-2 aircraft and the caulons of the ranged right and left (caisson wing), intended for the construction of the last X-NUMX of the An-148-15Е. After the contract is closed, the construction of An-148 on VASO is planned to be frozen.

An-148 entered service in 2009 year. “Russia is our main strategic partner for this program,” stated the then head of the Antonov firm, Dmitry Kiva. The market was estimated by him in 590 machines up to 2020 of the year, including 280 in the CIS countries.
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    14 September 2017 08: 16
    Honestly, the plane is handsome. Only this plane was born, at the wrong time and place laughing
    1. +3
      14 September 2017 09: 41
      Yes, the plane is beautiful, but it infuriates even more - that Antonov Design Bureau is covered by a basin. Such a school about ..... generally lost ....
  2. FID
    +5
    14 September 2017 08: 20
    You don’t have to write a “passenger” plane for the needs of Moscow Region ... But, unfortunately, the EXCELLENT plane is a thing of the past ..... And, God forbid, if there are now frenzied adherents ... yes SSJ is better, yes them built more .... Why None of the Russian A / C does not stand in the queue for the receipt of this product !!!!
    1. +2
      14 September 2017 08: 25
      because they like prize money beyond the hill, and there apples ...
    2. +1
      14 September 2017 08: 33
      And what about our cars, do many airlines stand in line?
      Quote: SSI
      You don’t have to write a “passenger” plane for the needs of Moscow Region ... But, unfortunately, the EXCELLENT plane is a thing of the past ..... And, God forbid, if there are now frenzied adherents ... yes SSJ is better, yes them built more .... Why None of the Russian A / C does not stand in the queue for the receipt of this product !!!!
      1. +1
        14 September 2017 12: 48
        Well, Aeroflot, Yamal, IrAero and Azimut are in line for SSJ in the queue.
    3. +1
      14 September 2017 08: 34
      Quote: SSI
      Here is no need to write

      they themselves justified ... they themselves proved ... they themselves asked the question with reproach ... they answered it themselves ....
      could be simple - a dream-reliable-beautiful-needed airplane!
    4. +1
      14 September 2017 08: 43
      Quote: SSI
      You don’t have to write a “passenger” plane for the needs of Moscow Region ... But, unfortunately, the EXCELLENT plane is a thing of the past ..... And, God forbid, if there are now frenzied adherents ... yes SSJ is better, yes them built more .... Why None of the Russian A / C does not stand in the queue for the receipt of this product !!!!

      And how many airlines are in line for the An-148? What is the order for these machines? Or do you think that Mexico has forcibly coached the SCJ? Or Ireland or whoever I do not remember exactly.
    5. 0
      14 September 2017 08: 58
      Quote: SSI
      You don’t have to write a “passenger” plane for the needs of Moscow Region ... But, unfortunately, the EXCELLENT plane is a thing of the past ..... And, God forbid, if there are now frenzied adherents ... yes SSJ is better, yes them built more .... Why None of the Russian A / C does not stand in the queue for the receipt of this product !!!!

      I don’t quite understand: is not in line for ssj or An? About a year and a half ago, out of curiosity after the next report on our achievements, I searched the network for statistics on the flight in the GA of domestic aircraft. The impression was that the most working An-24s, and the remake from An-148 and SSJ are rare guests in the sky, the latter flying in Mexico, and we also fly, but very rarely. On the other hand, somewhere there is the An-148, but the statements were classified or the operators did not file, in short, found nothing. It seems that neither one nor the other is needed in Russia. Unless to the Mexicans, they pass ssj for Italian.
      1. +3
        14 September 2017 09: 39
        Quote: samoletil18
        and we also fly, but very rarely

        Oh well, Aeroflot ssj operates in full, specifically Moscow-Volgograd, personally flew on it, two flights a day.
      2. +3
        14 September 2017 11: 45
        or maybe, after all, they were looking there ?, although of course 148, about 4 dozens were released, 29 of them were issued by VASO, and SSJ - a little less than one and a half hundred, for Boeing it is seeds, and for us, given the nineties and zero, maintaining competence. Raid on civilian ships now - average above 300 hours a month on An-148, maximum over 400, and slightly less on SSJ, pretty decent, as they say no worse than analogs, now Samara Airlines and Angara are catching up with average over 400 on the an-148.
        1. 0
          15 September 2017 09: 01
          Well, if so, then wonderful. Once Transaero flew from Saturday to Sunday from Moscow to Yekaterinburg. The B-737 was 1/3 full, if not less. And An-148 or SSZh in such occupancy would be more profitable. Apparently, in terms of service, some issues are being resolved.
  3. +1
    14 September 2017 08: 45
    Why do MO passenger planes?
    It seems that military transport is more suitable? recourse
    1. 0
      14 September 2017 09: 32
      If outsourcing was introduced in the Moscow Region, then why not introduce a lease? Or you can organize your own AK. In Crimea, passengers carry during the peak season on aircraft of Ukrainian origin.
    2. +5
      14 September 2017 09: 35
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Why do MO passenger planes?
      It seems that military transport is more suitable?

      So they do not always leave the plane by parachute, sometimes it is necessary (for solidity) to go down the ramp smiling at all 32 teeth, casually adjusting the AK on the shoulder. laughing
    3. +2
      14 September 2017 09: 43
      Well, passengers are also needed, It’s not always the same to carry loads or paratroopers. Sometimes and just l / s to transfer. The generals are the same ... Why are they sitting in benches in a transport IL?
      1. 0
        14 September 2017 09: 54
        Yes, but 11 pieces? belay
        1. +2
          14 September 2017 09: 55
          And we have a large army - there are many generals .....
          :-)
          1. +3
            14 September 2017 09: 59
            C'mon, the plane is good. I would take a dozen for the IDF -
            we would have climbed half the army. smile
            1. +1
              14 September 2017 10: 00
              Hmm, I'm afraid of everything. Orders are more dumb. Like the Antonov Design Bureau .... However, I suspect Ukraine with PLEASURE your order will be accepted. But when there will be airplanes .... hell knows.
              1. +3
                14 September 2017 10: 11
                Here is a beautiful photo:
    4. +2
      14 September 2017 09: 49
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Why do MO passenger planes?

      And why were the Tu-154/134 needed? Transportation of personnel, families to a new duty station, and not all of them are passenger and there is a cargo option.
    5. Maz
      +2
      14 September 2017 21: 48
      Have you ever been to Mo RF, Voykus? And why argue so lightly, everything is interchangeable here. I had five professions in the army: tractor driver, driver, BMP driver, gunner gunner, sniper, machine gunner, company commander, not counting the cook, signalman, electrician, and teacher. Do you really think that we will not turn civilian planes into military aircraft in a day or two? I completely forgot about the driver of the 3rd class irrigation systems and systems. Well, we all jump with a parachute. This is not even a profession, a hobby. Even for btt
  4. +1
    14 September 2017 09: 36
    Dead end branch of aircraft construction.
  5. +4
    14 September 2017 09: 39
    I don’t understand, do we have any cooperation with Ukraine on the aircraft industry?
    In the summer of 2017, VASO from Ukraine delivered the F-2 fuselage compartment of the An-148 aircraft and the right and left KCHK caissons (wing section) intended for the construction of the extreme 15th An-148-100E side.
    1. +1
      15 September 2017 09: 04
      Quote: NEXUS
      I don’t understand, do we have any cooperation with Ukraine on the aircraft industry?
      In the summer of 2017, VASO from Ukraine delivered the F-2 fuselage compartment of the An-148 aircraft and the right and left KCHK caissons (wing section) intended for the construction of the extreme 15th An-148-100E side.

      And money? So, they decided there that he was a civilian.
    2. 0
      15 September 2017 12: 31
      I think that a factory in the form of a hangar, with entry and exit, somewhere in Belarus, can produce everything that is needed from the outskirts