Military Review

In the US, found new use of old missiles

35
The HYDRA 70 missiles, which entered service with the American army as early as 1948, found a new use. According to the portal defensenews.com, Arnold Defense (a manufacturer of missiles), Nammo (a manufacturer of warheads), Supacat (a manufacturer of military vehicles) and the Military Systems Group (a manufacturer of weapon assembly systems) have announced joint work on the Fletcher project.


As part of the Fletcher project, it is planned to create a universal military vehicle, the main armament of which will be APKWS guided missiles - a laser-guided modification of the HYDRA 70. The initiator of the project, the company Arnold Defense, announced that the demonstration of the Fletcher machine will be held for the first time at the exhibition Defense and Security Equipment International (DSEI), which will be held from 12 to 15 in September in London.

In the US, found new use of old missiles

Fletcher project visualization


APKWS (Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System) is a modernized version of the HYDRA 70 unguided rocket. In the course of modernization, the ammunition received a module with laser sensors and rotary blades for precise targeting. The process of upgrading HYDRA 70 to APKWS is as follows: the HYDRA 70 rocket is disassembled into two parts (the warhead and the rocket engine), between which a new unit with blades and sensors is screwed.

The modernization of the HYDRA 70 missiles took place in two stages: in 1996, the US Department of Defense ordered General Dynamics to the system to convert unguided missiles into guided ones, but in 2005, the program was minimized due to the inadequacy of the prototype to the army requirements. Later, the project was resumed with a new contractor - BAE Systems, which created the APKWS rocket. In 2012, the upgraded missile entered service with the US Navy, and later other military structures. With the advent of APKWS, the US armed forces got what they lacked for a long time - inexpensive small-caliber guided missiles (the cost of a rocket is about $ 10 000), reports "Warspot".

Photos used:
http://www.defensenews.com/
35 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Per se
    Per se 12 September 2017 12: 27
    +4
    Yes, in Syria, throw at your friends, as ours do ... Disposal, you understand ... And those and these ...
    1. enot73
      enot73 12 September 2017 12: 39
      +3
      Quote: By itself
      Yes, in Syria, throw at your friends, as ours do ..
      Most likely they will be handed over to these same friends. There are still candidates for acquisition, lovers of different Western junk - APU (God forbid, of course)
      1. Grach-25sm
        Grach-25sm 12 September 2017 20: 17
        0
        Yeah ... Although nothing prevents the Americans from transferring technology through the same Poles to modernize the domestic S-8 NURS
    2. Lopatov
      Lopatov 12 September 2017 18: 52
      +4
      This is not recycling.
      Pretty effective device. On the other hand, the version presented on visualization loses significantly to its Arab-American counterpart, already made in metal.

      16 Raytheon Guided Guides, 2 Helfaires just in case, plus 28 missiles stacked in the rear of the car. Plus a reconnaissance / highlighting station on the lifting rod, allowing the use of missiles from behind the crest of the shelter.
  2. Evdokim
    Evdokim 12 September 2017 12: 28
    +1
    Do these missiles have expired by chance? And then doubts do not take a scam. hi
    1. avdkrd
      avdkrd 12 September 2017 12: 52
      +5
      what's the difference? Corrected missiles for 10 000 $ is beyond good and evil. Inexpensive? The corrective device can cost 200 $, well, 1000 $ and that 70mm rocket costs 10 000 ??? Yes, the Yankees themselves will be driven into the coffin with such prices.
      1. Normal ok
        Normal ok 12 September 2017 14: 00
        +3
        Quote: avdkrd
        what's the difference? Corrected missiles for 10 000 $ is beyond good and evil. Inexpensive? The corrective device can cost 200 $, well, 1000 $ and that 70mm rocket costs 10 000 ??? Yes, the Yankees themselves will be driven into the coffin with such prices.

        Learn materiel before writing nonsense. When I served in the Soviet Army in the 80's, guided anti-tank missiles cost like a Lada. And now they are clearly not cheaper. So that 10ty cu - quite normal.
        1. NIKNN
          NIKNN 12 September 2017 14: 57
          +2
          Quote: Normal ok
          When I served in the Soviet army in the 80s, guided anti-tank missiles cost like a Zhiguli. And now they are clearly not cheaper. So that 10 thousand cu - quite normal.
          Well, the materiel took place ..., it is not worth confusing the ATGM and NUR ..., I did not find the cost of our S-8 (an approximate analogue uncontrollable), therefore, without any evidence, the dispute is about anything ...., but I think (I clarify this I think it’s not a fact that this is so), at the cost of the manufacturer (with modern countermeasures) a volley of 2 S-8 blocks will be more effective than this device and the damage will also be comparable to the volley of this miracle, but consider that it must apparently be accompanied target designation, so the danger of losing the medium is two orders of magnitude higher ..., well, like that .. hi
          1. Young_Communist
            Young_Communist 12 September 2017 16: 21
            +4
            However, I think that at the cost of the manufacturer (with modern countermeasures) a volley of 2 S-8 blocks will be more effective than this device

            And if instead of 2x S-8 blocks, you can fill the target with several dump trucks of stones, it will be even cheaper, but stupid Americans did not guess wassat
            1. Mih1974
              Mih1974 13 September 2017 04: 51
              +1
              tongue Your "not stupid" Americans so boasted of their "not expensive" UR and believed them all. And then they locked up the “Russian laponnye” and showed the SVP-24 Hephaestus system in action. bully good And the Americans immediately began to look like "drowning bills." Whatever they say, but the hail “package” is much more effective than the same amount of “half-life” in price. tongue
          2. Normal ok
            Normal ok 12 September 2017 17: 19
            +1
            Quote: NIKNN
            do not confuse ATGM and NUR

            The article is about the fact that NUR is redone in UR! For 10tys cu - quite acceptable.
          3. Normal ok
            Normal ok 12 September 2017 17: 24
            +1
            Quote: NIKNN
            volley from 2x blocks of C-8 will be more effective than this device

            As shown by the fighting in the Donbass, helicopters, in order to defeat the enemy NUR themselves, you need to enter the affected area sufficiently effective MANPADS. At the same time, it’s problematic to work out exactly on purpose. For amers, the specified upgraded device pounds on 10km !!!
        2. fyvaprold
          fyvaprold 12 September 2017 20: 50
          +1
          Quote: Normal ok
          Quote: avdkrd
          what's the difference? Corrected missiles for 10 000 $ is beyond good and evil. Inexpensive? The corrective device can cost 200 $, well, 1000 $ and that 70mm rocket costs 10 000 ??? Yes, the Yankees themselves will be driven into the coffin with such prices.

          Learn materiel before writing nonsense. When I served in the Soviet Army in the 80's, guided anti-tank missiles cost like a Lada. And now they are clearly not cheaper. So that 10ty cu - quite normal.

          Learn materiel ©, the X-29 rocket, in 1992, cost 6500 US dollars, which clearly exceeded the price of the Lada, and the Hydra, clearly not the X-29, the analogue of which (with twice the worst parameters) is the AGM-65. By the way, a similar modernization project for S-8 (laser correction) has existed for a long time in Russia. Something like this. Sincerely.
        3. Berber
          Berber 13 September 2017 13: 53
          +1
          I agree. $ 10000 is really inexpensive. And the Arab-American version was impressive, especially the reconnaissance-backlight station.
      2. Zaurbek
        Zaurbek 12 September 2017 15: 53
        +2
        The difference is:
        Apache has the main Halfier rocket (powerful and expensive)
        NURS - Hydra 70mm, and Guided HYDRA, which is cheaper than ATGM and not so excessive in power ... to destroy non-tanks.
      3. opus
        opus 12 September 2017 23: 34
        +2
        Quote: avdkrd
        $ 10 corrected missiles are beyond good and evil. Inexpensive?

        Yes.
        This is cheap.
        BOPS Merkava 4 costs from $ 10-11000 (about the same about Abrams, Leo, and we are close)


        AGM-114 Hellfire



        Cost for 2012 - 68-98 thousand dollars, AGM-114R - 94 thousand dollars
        Quote: avdkrd
        A corrective device can cost $ 200, well, $ 1000

        can't, another 30 years.

        Quote: avdkrd
        Yes, the Yankees themselves will be driven into the coffin with such prices.

        not


        what to them?
        US Government Debt Crosses $ 20 Trillion Historic


        Due to the effects of Hurricane Harvey, the incumbent US President Donald Trump had to sign a decree to increase the amount. The document will be valid until December 8th. Thus, the national debt of the country increased to 20,164 trillion dollars and continues to grow rapidly.
        1. Uryukc
          Uryukc 13 September 2017 02: 50
          0
          It’s good that there are those who are not too lazy to cut comments with plates of links and photos. Everything specifically and specifically is curious.
          1. Berber
            Berber 13 September 2017 13: 55
            +1
            The basis of the strategic dominance of the States is not a weapon, but their printing press.
  3. Siberia55
    Siberia55 12 September 2017 12: 32
    +2
    It is planned to create a universal military vehicle, the main weapon of which will be APKWS guided missiles - a laser-guided modification of the HYDRA 70.

    Now barmaley in tandem to the memory on Toyota "accidentally" get these little animals with missiles.
  4. bagr69
    bagr69 12 September 2017 12: 43
    +2
    Have they developed something for the terrorists of Syria and Iraq? "Upgrade" combat pickup?
    Or they will sell it to Ukraine for loans issued to them, help is approved ...
  5. bogart047
    bogart047 12 September 2017 12: 55
    +5
    Pramatic approach, it’s nice to learn from such an experience. Even if the Yankees save on their budget ...
    1. Siberia55
      Siberia55 12 September 2017 13: 03
      +1
      Offer to send our old stuff to Charlottesville?
      1. bagr69
        bagr69 12 September 2017 13: 33
        +1
        You can send to Kabul.
        1. Siberia55
          Siberia55 12 September 2017 14: 03
          0
          good Identity option.
  6. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 12 September 2017 13: 17
    +2
    The same alteration as with air bombs: from uncontrollable
    in managed.
    1. Normal ok
      Normal ok 12 September 2017 14: 47
      +1
      Quote: voyaka uh
      The same alteration as with air bombs: from uncontrollable to controlled.

      By the way, with the air bombs, they succeeded in the test.
  7. minus
    minus 12 September 2017 13: 35
    +2
    The article was already in two months ago!
    https://topwar.ru/117923-v-ssha-modernizirovali-n
    eupravlyaemuyu-raketu-hydra-70-prinyatuyu-na-voor
    uzhenie-v-1948-godu.html
    1. mvg
      mvg 12 September 2017 16: 01
      0
      I will say more. Article December 17, 2014. Kirill Ryabov. Army Herald.
    2. Professor
      Professor 12 September 2017 17: 35
      +2
      Quote: Minus
      The article was already in two months ago!

      Is it just 2 months ago? For example, the 2014 year.
      https://topwar.ru/64133-upravlyaemaya-raketa-apkw
      s-ii-ssha.html
  8. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 12 September 2017 13: 37
    +4
    And where does the "old"? These RSs are still being produced and applied. And the idea is very interesting, it would be worthwhile to look at such control units on our C-8.
  9. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 12 September 2017 15: 07
    +1
    At least overpower the S-12 ...
  10. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 12 September 2017 15: 47
    0
    In the USSR, they went in this direction:
    S-25L - 1979, an adjustable version of the S-25-OFM projectile with a semi-active laser 24H1 GOS, launch range 3-7 km.
    S-25LD - 1984, adjustable, with a launch range increased to 10 km.

    And that's all in the 80s ...
  11. faiver
    faiver 12 September 2017 16: 08
    +1
    Well, a good revision
  12. Olegovi4
    Olegovi4 12 September 2017 16: 17
    0
    there this module will cost like a rocket itself
  13. corporal
    corporal 12 September 2017 17: 29
    0
    It’s good that we are “partners”, and they won’t shoot at us.
    But Rogozin shoot a desire appeared.