Military Review

"This is passion!" British parliamentarians discuss repeal of EU laws

37
The British House of Commons, having considered the bill on the refusal of Britain from EU legislation, came to the conclusion that it was necessary to approve it. As a result, by a majority of votes, the lower house of the Parliament of the United Kingdom adopted the so-called annulment law. This is not to say that passing laws was easy for British deputies. The meeting began the day before and lasted more than 13 hours, ending after midnight.

Opinions in the end were significantly divided. 290 deputies did not support the initiative. For the abolition of the laws of the EU in the UK spoke 326 parliamentarians.

"This is passion!" British parliamentarians discuss repeal of EU laws


Comments of deputies in social networks:
They went all hot and dead tired. The law was adopted in such a way that the passions were felt even on the sidelines. This is passion!


The new law passed in London is crossed history integration of British and European legislation. On the territory of Britain, the European Societies Act of 1972 of the year ceases to operate. This year, in the EU, the 45 anniversary of the document was solemnly celebrated.
The repeal law provides for the abolition of the need to make decisions of the European Court for British individuals and legal entities.

Representatives of the House of Lords, and then the British Queen, must approve it for the final entry into force of the annulment of the European laws in Britain.

British political analysts are inclined to believe that the law will be approved by both the upper house of parliament and Elizabeth II, which will further exacerbate London’s relations with Belfast (Northern Ireland) and Edinburgh (Scotland). In these parts of the United Kingdom are protesting against Brexit.
Photos used:
Wikipedia
37 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The black
    The black 12 September 2017 10: 15
    +1
    The Moor has done his job, the Moor can leave ... safely fulfilling the task of the collapse of the EU to please the United States, the British decided to leave purely in English, without saying goodbye
    1. Finches
      Finches 12 September 2017 10: 25
      +5
      What the Anglo-Saxons conceived, I just can not understand that ....
      1. Topotun
        Topotun 12 September 2017 10: 28
        +3
        Yes, they made porridge - now they want to screw. Naturally, they do not need EU laws. As well as responsibility for everything that the EU has done ...
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 12 September 2017 10: 35
          +4
          Ha! Europe has waited! laughing Masonic Britain lowers its European "partners" like its own poop into the toilet! feel
          1. Masya masya
            Masya masya 12 September 2017 11: 04
            +7
            All laws were washed away ... wink
        2. dik-nsk
          dik-nsk 12 September 2017 10: 36
          +4
          The cancellation law provides for the abolition of the need to make court decisions for British individuals and legal entities
          but ours, not having any relation to the EU, are fulfilling, they also stopped paying contributions to PACE only when they not only spat in their faces, but also wiped their legs
          1. Tatyana
            Tatyana 12 September 2017 11: 07
            +2
            dik-nsk
            but ours, not having any relation to the EU, are fulfilling, they also stopped paying contributions to PACE only when they not only spat in their faces, but also wiped their legs

            Ha! So, after all, our Russian liberals were created for centuries by the British special services in the power of Russia, so that in history Russia always always “catches up” the “good” good England, and does not run ahead of it!
      2. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 12 September 2017 10: 36
        +1
        The British are seriously scared that immigration to the country is NOT
        controlled by their own parliament (and their laws).
        This led to Brexit.
        From an economic point of view, they sharply lost: in London
        spinning all the major financial transactions of the European Union. What gave
        colossal commission. Now many banks are leaving London.
        1. Finches
          Finches 12 September 2017 10: 38
          +6
          I do not think that the Anglo-Saxons did not calculate their losses ... that there should be more ...
          1. LSA57
            LSA57 12 September 2017 10: 47
            +6
            Quote: Finches
            something else has to be ...

            sasha feed green candy wrappers
            1. Tatyana
              Tatyana 12 September 2017 11: 27
              +2
              Finches
              I do not think that the Anglo-Saxons did not calculate their losses ... that there should be more ...
              Of course, the Anglo-Saxons have calculated everything!
              At first, England ceases to be a white race country due to the ethnically loose migrant policies of Brussels (Germany) - mainly an influx of migrants from North Africa and BV. And the white British really do not like this - they are simply life-threatening. Colored citizens in England, as elsewhere, in practice do not mix with white aborigines and live according to their tribal laws and close ties with their relatives in the country of origin.
              And secondly, the provocative pre-war situation in Europe has become very tense. England itself does not want to do war with Russia on TMV with its own hands. Great Britain (USA) is preparing the ground for itself so that it does not participate directly in the war. And rightly so!
              therefore The next move of Masonic England (USA) will be the official exit of Great Britain from NATO. But only official!
              With the indirect participation of England in TMV for the UK, losses will be less than from Brexit. On the contrary, for her from Brexitis in TMV there will be only profits!
          2. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 12 September 2017 10: 50
            +2
            “I don’t think that the Anglo-Saxons didn’t calculate their losses ... that there should be something else” ///
            ---------------
            It was the most real popular democratic vote.
            All the financial and political elite of Britain, the City, all the billionaires,
            The BBC, the press, were unanimously opposed to leaving the EU.
            I understand that in Russia they do not believe in democracy, but it exists in developed countries
            - and working. good
            The second example is Trump. Most of the billionaires, Silicon Valley, almost all the press were against him. Soros lost his personal billion on Trump.
            But Trump is president.
            1. Finches
              Finches 12 September 2017 10: 55
              +3
              No, democracy is just an instrument veiled by a beautiful definition! Where it is profitable - it is covered up, as in Britain, and where it is contrary to interests, it is ignored - as in the Crimea! Or simply rests on the opinion of the people, as in the Netherlands ... hi
              1. voyaka uh
                voyaka uh 12 September 2017 11: 00
                +1
                "and where it contradicts interests" ///

                The interests of whom? In Britain, ALL elites - political and financial - were against
                Brexit - but he did.
                But this, of course, destroys your templates. wink
                1. Finches
                  Finches 12 September 2017 11: 04
                  +2
                  It doesn’t ruin anything! I just don’t know everything ... And about the double standards of referenda, you decided to keep quiet modestly ... wink
                2. Nasrat
                  Nasrat 12 September 2017 11: 07
                  +7
                  Funny democracy that operates in the West:



                  The same newspaper, the same date (September 1, 2016), the same picture - sold in different regions of the United States with the opposite heading of the article, depending on the political preferences of the inhabitants. That's all you need to know about brainwashing in the citadel of democracy and good. "
                  Heading left: "Trump softens his tone." Title on the right: "Trump is talking hard on the wall [on the border with Mexico]."

                  wassat wassat wassat
                3. Shadow of darkness
                  Shadow of darkness 12 September 2017 11: 29
                  +3
                  Britain ALL elites - political and financial - were against

                  Oh, stop telling fairy tales! The whole show, if the elites were against it, how did it happen that they even talked about it, who allocated money for brexit advertising, who paid for the activists' trips? If the elites would have been completely against it, even a conversation at the official level on this topic would not have arisen! In the meantime, this is just a well-set show!
                  Yes! Trump came only thanks to tricks in the electoral system, and he was not on his own, behind him a large part of the American elite, which before that was simply in the shadows. Most of the Americans who voted were against Trump, but the electors chose Trump.
            2. sir_obs
              sir_obs 12 September 2017 11: 04
              +3
              About democracy, complete nonsense. Day rules the world and not just money, but big money. A "democoatia" is a carrot for a stupid donkey.
              And especially with the electoral system of the United States, the non-people are voting somewhere, and the electoral college.
              In addition, the Americans themselves openly say that if you do not have a lot of money, then don’t even go to the polls, you will definitely lose. But what about the will of the people and other myths?
              Democracy is a fiction in which some foolishly holy believe.
              Democracy is almost akin to religion, and religious fans uselessly call for reason. Well, do you really not know.
              If democracy came precisely from the people, they would not be imposed by force of arms.

              Well, the final part, the elections were held, it would seem that democracy has triumphed. But no, it turns out that everything is just beginning.
              1. voyaka uh
                voyaka uh 12 September 2017 12: 50
                0
                Very significant post good . In a hundred years you will understand the benefits
                democracy when you try other ways.
                1. Shadow of darkness
                  Shadow of darkness 12 September 2017 14: 13
                  +2
                  Do you really believe in democracy as the pure will of the plebs? And which of us is zombified more? “Expression of will” is only a product of the struggle of elites within the framework of the law, with the removal of possible tension in society by voting, that is, shifting responsibility for the “choice” to the population itself. Advertising, propaganda, and the preparation of candidates convenient for the elite take place even at the stage of the appearance of these same "candidates." Without the support of “old-timers” and financial sponsors, not a single activist will even get close to the election campaign, and at the stage of the company itself other levers will always turn on, which prepare voters for the “right” choice. In general, for the plebs of the show, for the elites, finding out who is stronger and who will set the main tone in management and, accordingly, in nishtyak.
            3. Speak out
              Speak out 12 September 2017 12: 02
              +1
              Do you really think that the will of the people brings the will of the people in the Red Royal Box?
              Ha! There is a progress report that the queen asked. She simply endorses the documents and puts approval.
            4. Dry_T-50
              Dry_T-50 13 September 2017 08: 55
              0
              Quote: voyaka uh
              “I don’t think that the Anglo-Saxons didn’t calculate their losses ... that there should be something else” ///
              ---------------
              It was the most real popular democratic vote.
              All the financial and political elite of Britain, the City, all the billionaires,
              The BBC, the press, were unanimously opposed to leaving the EU.
              I understand that in Russia they do not believe in democracy, but it exists in developed countries
              - and working. good
              The second example is Trump. Most of the billionaires, Silicon Valley, almost all the press were against him. Soros lost his personal billion on Trump.
              But Trump is president.

              So what? I paraphrase: all the regional communists, the whole Politburo was against the collapse of the USSR and privatization, but they took place
        2. stalkerwalker
          stalkerwalker 12 September 2017 10: 50
          +6
          Quote: voyaka uh
          The British are seriously scared that immigration to the country is NOT
          controlled by their own parliament (and their laws).
          This led to Brexit.

          Absolutely.
          Quote: voyaka uh
          From an economic point of view, they sharply lost: in London
          all major financial transactions of the European Union were spinning

          Britain has serious plans for trade deals with the United States in the spirit of the Trans-Atlantic Treaty proposed by Obama.
          With the arrival of Trump, the situation has changed, but has not changed. For the UK, trade with the United States is historical and permanent.
          1. Dry_T-50
            Dry_T-50 13 September 2017 08: 56
            0
            Quote: stalkerwalker
            Quote: voyaka uh
            The British are seriously scared that immigration to the country is NOT
            controlled by their own parliament (and their laws).
            This led to Brexit.

            Absolutely.
            Quote: voyaka uh
            From an economic point of view, they sharply lost: in London
            all major financial transactions of the European Union were spinning

            Britain has serious plans for trade deals with the United States in the spirit of the Trans-Atlantic Treaty proposed by Obama.
            With the arrival of Trump, the situation has changed, but has not changed. For the UK, trade with the United States is historical and permanent.

            This contract was losing for the EU, and especially for the UK
        3. den3080
          den3080 12 September 2017 11: 58
          +2
          Quote: voyaka uh
          From an economic point of view, they sharply lost: in London
          spinning all the major financial transactions of the European Union. What gave
          colossal commission. Now many banks are leaving London.

          I wonder where they go? The Poles jumped out about a year ago with the idea that all the banks would now be with them. The British and the Americans did like this - lol
          I imagine a deserted London city and a queen, coupled with lords and financiers in some Katowice.
          Funny at least. And so ... unrealistic.
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 12 September 2017 12: 47
            0
            "I wonder where to go?" ////

            Paris began to fuss ... The Netherlands has traditionally a good financial reputation.
            Frankfurt am Main or Hamburg in Germany.
            1. Dry_T-50
              Dry_T-50 13 September 2017 08: 57
              0
              Quote: voyaka uh
              "I wonder where to go?" ////

              Paris began to fuss ... The Netherlands has traditionally a good financial reputation.
              Frankfurt am Main or Hamburg in Germany.

              And Cho is not in Brussels at once? All institutions at once, so also finances will be
        4. Topotun
          Topotun 12 September 2017 14: 28
          +2
          It is not a fact that not to return. Banks need stability guarantees. And after what begins in the EU (Polish demarches for example), such a guarantee becomes less and less. But the British, having left under their jurisdiction, will already be able to guarantee such stability. So that it seems to me it is far from evening ....
      3. LSA57
        LSA57 12 September 2017 10: 45
        +7
        Quote: Finches
        What the Anglo-Saxons conceived, I just can not understand that ....

        as always a world dirty trick
      4. Dry_T-50
        Dry_T-50 12 September 2017 12: 36
        +1
        Quote: Finches
        What the Anglo-Saxons conceived, I just can not understand that ....

        It is clear that after the Brexit the role of France has intensified, and this is a rival of the USA. So they decided to put their heads together
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 12 September 2017 10: 56
      0
      So, we also have all the laws on the division of the USSR are illegal, so what? belay
  2. Per se
    Per se 12 September 2017 10: 17
    +5
    Because the times are coming, each for itself ... It’s easier on the island ... And on the continent the Magyars are handsome ...
  3. LAWNER
    LAWNER 12 September 2017 10: 30
    +1
    Not everything is so simple there. England, after Brexit, spoke in favor of leaving the EU. But supporters of European integration won in Ireland. Under the Belfast Treaty, Ireland has the right to a referendum on secession from England. Moreover, it clearly says that Ireland is the whole island with adjacent small islands and internal sea borders. A new round of aggravation is possible, and if the Islamists are terrorizing in parallel with the IRA, then the Old Lady of England will have a hard time.
  4. Moryarty
    Moryarty 12 September 2017 11: 16
    +1
    Well, England, as always, proves its tradition: "We have no permanent enemies, and no permanent allies" ...
    Yes, they suffered economic losses, but I believe that this will be justified over time.
  5. Altona
    Altona 12 September 2017 11: 32
    0
    Quote: voyaka uh
    From an economic point of view, they sharply lost: in London
    spinning all the major financial transactions of the European Union.

    -------------------------------
    Well, yes, everything that used to be in London goes to Frankfurt.
  6. anjey
    anjey 12 September 2017 11: 48
    +3
    Poland, eyes on the forehead, for European integration, so that the wealthy members saw the money, and the British laid down on such unity ...
  7. ver_
    ver_ 12 September 2017 14: 07
    0
    Quote: Finches
    I do not think that the Anglo-Saxons did not calculate their losses ... that there should be more ...

    ... but they could have figured out that the little green bast shoes would soon be thrown away and the Yankees would be in a deep ..khe depression with all the ensuing consequences .. and it's time * to chop ends *