Next two armored boats of the Navy of the Armed Forces of Ukraine arrived in Odessa

53
As the press office of the military department of Ukraine, two newly built small armored artillery boats of the 58155 avenue arrived in OdessaGyurza-M".



U-176 and U-179 were launched in June of the current year at PJSC "Forge on Rybalsky" (former "Leninskaya forge"). The price of each boat was approximately 325 mln. It is stated that the voyage went according to schedule, the assigned tasks were completed, the nodes and mechanisms were normal. It is assumed that at the current stage the boats will be tested, after which they will be included in the Navy.



This autumn, we are expecting the arrival of two more new boats [apparently, Vyshgorod and Glukhov], which will have to pass state tests with subsequent incorporation into the Naval Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. New boats at our quays are evidence of the successful implementation of the State Program for the Development of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

- said First Deputy Commander of the Navy of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Rear Admiral Andrei Tarasov.

In 2016, small armored artillery boats Akkerman and Berdyansk entered the Navy of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
  • http://www.mil.gov.ua/news/2017/09/09/do-odesi-pribuli-chergovi-dva-novozbudovani-dlya-vms-zs-ukraini-mali-bronovani-artilerijski-kateri/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    11 September 2017 10: 21
    When I saw the figures of people in the photo. ...... something thought - they inflatable boats sheathed with iron?
    1. +6
      11 September 2017 10: 25
      Yes, no, these are not Gyurza inflatable boats ... The Uzbeks seem to be satisfied, on the Amu Darya they fish from them, such steamers are normal ...
      1. +12
        11 September 2017 10: 34
        Admittedly, Ukrainians are realistically and pragmatically approaching the issue of maintaining their Navy. They can’t pull much more, but to indicate their presence in the Black Sea, this is enough.
        1. +8
          11 September 2017 10: 59
          It must be admitted that Ukrainians dominate the Russian lands. On the Russian Black Sea coast. And we just have to laugh and giggle at the fleet and the army of the Ukrainians, at a time when these Ukrainians are surviving Russians from Russian lands.
          Ukrainians do not need an army at all. The police are enough for them to control the Russian lands. So who is stronger than the Russian army or Ukrainian politicians?
          1. +8
            11 September 2017 11: 25
            Quote: Vladimir16
            stronger Russian army or Ukrainian politicians?

            Saakashvilli is definitely stronger than the Russian army, Ukraine has held back the hordes of Mordor for more than a year and has covered Europe with its mighty breasts, and Georgia could not hold back just one - he broke through the state border in just one day and occupied Lviv.
          2. +5
            11 September 2017 12: 06
            Ukrainians survive Russians from Russian lands.

            Have you ever seen an assault on a city? With artillery, aviation, with aimless fire from tanks on the upper floors of buildings, with assault groups operating according to the “see a hole - throw a grenade” scheme? Have you seen what remains of him then ?.
            Do you really want the Russian army to come in and start killing Russians who, by any means, can’t get away from the batch?
            Let's kill their relatives, destroy their houses - oh, how glad they will be, they will meet us with flowers, waving flags and shouting "RUSSIA !!! RUSSIA !!!"
          3. +1
            11 September 2017 12: 50
            Quote: Vladimir16
            at the moment when these Ukrainians are surviving Russians from Russian lands.

            Most of the l \ s of the "Azov" are ethnic Russians. So who survives someone?
            1. +1
              11 September 2017 21: 54
              Remember there was such a man - chikatilo? It seemed the same was Russian. And remember, there were such "policemen" in the service of the German fascists and "Vlasovites"? There were also many, many Russians. So the “native Russian” is not an indulgence if you are not a person. And if a lot of ethnic Russians have gathered in the “basics” (not worthy of a capital letter), then it is necessary to exterminate this scum quickly and categorically, so that then the venal lawyers will not pay them short terms like “I was just a cook”!
        2. +3
          11 September 2017 11: 04
          What kind of programmatism .... The fact of the matter is that you can not pull. And to indicate their presence with an artillery boat is the same as if the DPRK boats tried to stop the US aircraft carrier group .....
        3. +4
          11 September 2017 11: 59
          Quote: Monos
          Admittedly, Ukrainians are realistically and pragmatically approaching the issue of maintaining their Navy. They can’t pull much more, but to indicate their presence in the Black Sea, this is enough.


          Monos, these boats are not for the sea, more for the river (Danube, Dnieper), seaworthiness is not what, its wave in 3 score may turn upside down.
          1. +5
            11 September 2017 12: 13
            Quote: juborg
            Monos, these boats are not for the sea, more for the river (Danube, Dnieper), seaworthiness is not what, its wave in 3 score may turn upside down.

            I agree. They may very well hold the defense along the Dnieper. Not long for the truth, but it is obvious that we are preparing for this. And about the sea ... Why should they go far from the coast? They only need to indicate their presence.
            1. BAI
              +5
              11 September 2017 13: 13
              They can very well hold the defense along the Dnieper

              What kind of defense? Their destiny is patrolling, combating smugglers and poachers. In the event of hostilities, any tank from the shore will instantly drown them with impunity (RPGs and towed guns will also be drowned, but their calculations may suffer losses).
            2. 0
              11 September 2017 15: 52
              They can’t. I'm talking about defense. Not for long.
            3. 0
              11 September 2017 23: 05
              Remind me how, in the year 14, a couple of Ukrovermacht boats - “self-sunk” in the Sea of ​​Azov? laughing
          2. +1
            11 September 2017 18: 58
            No, for the Danube they are weak enough to just keep an eye on the border guards, and against the Romanian monitors it’s zilch. Even Bumblebees are even more powerful, 76mm bow, stern 25mm, 4 grenade launchers 30mm, 17 RS barrels, and this is so, about nothing.
        4. +4
          11 September 2017 12: 22
          Quote: Monos
          They can’t pull more, but to indicate their presence in the Black Sea, this is enough.

          A couple of boats with fishermen and fishing rods will be enough to indicate their presence ... and what is this device for? Turks scare or us?
          1. +4
            11 September 2017 12: 31
            Andrey, my respect hi
            Quote: NEXUS
            A couple of boats with fishermen and fishing rods will be enough to indicate their presence ... and what is this device for? Turks scare or us?

            smile What is there to scare. They themselves are afraid of everything. They simply puff out their cheeks and retain captain positions.
    2. +7
      11 September 2017 11: 02
      PJSC "Forge on Rybalsky" (former "Lenin Forge"). The price of each boat was approximately 325 million UAH

      Total Petrushka Poroshenko welded on a few million dollars more. laughing
    3. vch
      0
      11 September 2017 11: 26
      Something they are more resembling river armored boats ......
      1. +2
        11 September 2017 11: 42
        Quote: vch
        Something they are more resembling river armored boats ......

        I worry whether they will pass under the Kerch bridge?
        1. +1
          11 September 2017 17: 34
          With a good wind, they will pass over. laughing laughing
      2. +1
        11 September 2017 12: 51
        Quote: vch
        Something they are more resembling river armored boats ......

        So they are. For the Danube to scare Romanians.
        1. 0
          11 September 2017 13: 05
          Quote: Normal ok
          Quote: vch
          Something they are more resembling river armored boats ......

          So they are. For the Danube to scare Romanians.

          More precisely, the river-sea.
          1. +1
            11 September 2017 19: 14
            Quote: Topotun
            And to indicate their presence with an artillery boat is the same as if the DPRK boats tried to stop the US aircraft carrier group .....

            If the Chinese fleet and missiles are behind Korean boats, it will easily stop many, many AUGs. So, actually, it has been all decades --- DPRK was as if alone, but its "senior comrades" always stood behind it. Let not so obviously in the form of military bases, but this was not required --- the Yankees have everything overseas and they have to decently fortify themselves for a thousand miles from home. And here we have the Chinese here.
            That's what I mean --- behind the Ukrainian armored bombs, the NATO fleet is more and more clearly emerging, which is very actively “developing” its southern flank in the east direction (although the same picture is in the north as well). Therefore, Ukrainian opportunities in the near coastal zone are not so harmless taking into account their interaction with NATO.
      3. 0
        11 September 2017 19: 00
        Yes, they are half smaller than Bumblebees.
  2. +6
    11 September 2017 10: 21
    Wow .. Two more caperans have a chance to become admirals of the great and invincible Ukrainian armada wassat
  3. +3
    11 September 2017 10: 22
    Well, get started! Yes, so that Petrosyan grimaced with envy! ... And by the way, our Russian fleet once started with Botik ....
  4. +6
    11 September 2017 10: 22
    The pace of shipbuilding is quite comparable with the capabilities of the state ... Better so than not at all ...
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. +3
    11 September 2017 10: 31
    Has the admiral been assigned to this fleet?

    okay, except for jokes it’s clear that all this is very curious, and the guys still sponsor, and are all focused on war, and this is also sad, but when it comes to the ships of Ukraine, unfortunately, unfortunately, because this country was built by aircraft carriers, but now - only laughter .................

  7. +2
    11 September 2017 10: 33
    And when the aircraft carriers were building. And heavy cruisers. And where is all this? As my wife says to me - "Maybe they don’t need to ...."
  8. +5
    11 September 2017 10: 33
    PJSC "Forge on Rybalsky" (former "Lenin Forge").


    really renamed? it happened !!! how is it there? uniquely ... laughing
  9. +1
    11 September 2017 10: 35
    Tepericha in the Ukrainian fleet are almost ships of the first rank ...
    1. +1
      11 September 2017 10: 51
      Quote: Berkut24
      Tepericha in the Ukrainian fleet are almost ships of the first rank ...
      Outside Ukraine, once upon a time. were going to build a series of the "best in the world" corvettes. This project has stalled, at the discussion stage. Although they even hinted at the resumption of work in 2017 (but something has not yet appeared) The photo shows one of the design options for the Ukrainian corvette. So now it is necessary to use river BKA in the Navy.
      River armored boats of the 58150 project are a type of river artillery boats (AKA) of Ukrainian design. The design code is Gyurza.
      Armored boats are designed to maintain a combat watch on border rivers, lakes, as well as in the coastal sea zone.
      1. +1
        11 September 2017 11: 49
        Then they will move to RTOs with Harpoons or Axes (even good for export). The “partners” of anti-Russia will not allow to bend.
      2. +1
        11 September 2017 13: 00
        Quote: enot73
        Quote: Berkut24
        Tepericha in the Ukrainian fleet are almost ships of the first rank ...
        Outside Ukraine, once upon a time. were going to build a series of the "best in the world" corvettes. This project has stalled, at the discussion stage. Although they even hinted at the resumption of work in 2017 (but something has not yet appeared) The photo shows one of the design options for the Ukrainian corvette. So now it is necessary to use river BKA in the Navy.
        River armored boats of the 58150 project are a type of river artillery boats (AKA) of Ukrainian design. The design code is Gyurza.
        Armored boats are designed to maintain a combat watch on border rivers, lakes, as well as in the coastal sea zone.

        The lead ship, Vladimir the Great, is ready at 32-43% (according to various estimates). He stands on the slipways of PJSC "Black Sea Shipbuilding Plant" (ChSZ, Nikolaev), a member of the shipbuilding subholding SMG "Smart Holding" businessman Vadim Novinsky. Further construction rested on the fact that Novinsky was on knives with the modern Ukrainian authorities — no one would give him money. In this regard, the intention was recently voiced to nationalize ChSZ and continue the program.
        1. +2
          11 September 2017 14: 33
          Further construction rested on the fact that Novinsky was on knives with modern Ukrainian authorities - no one would give him money.

          This is the political and economic side of the issue. The main plug is on the technical side. The ship was designed without understanding what weapons they would put on it. Even if money were found, one would have to go around the world in search of weapons systems that would have to be pushed into the building that was welded on the slipway. Therefore, when they say “project design” in Ukraine or Poland, it means that it is the designers who are working on it, and the engineers will probably be involved at the very end in order to cram the box into the box.
          Ukraine cooks the hull of the vessel absolutely not knowing where and what will eventually be located. But this is a matter of energy, and cable lines, and the coordination of radio emissions of equipment among themselves. Next, the question arises of the combat control system of all this disparate iron.
          So while the construction of the iron combat plow is underway, where the engineering design and the lion's share of the costs are yet to come.
          But one problem has already been solved - there are already "stealth". Those. no one already sees the ship in any wavelength range ...
          1. 0
            11 September 2017 16: 38
            Quote: Berkut24
            The ship was designed without an understanding of what weapons they will put on it

            I read about it. This is nothing more than an official excuse. In the original draft, weapons systems were prescribed. Look at the VO archive, there were articles on this topic. In real life, everything depends on money. Nobody will give a tidbit to the “Alien Oligarch”.
            1. 0
              11 September 2017 18: 15
              I was interested in this project without VO. Ukraine was refused almost all weapons systems from manufacturing countries, because all these weapons, including anti-ship missiles, contain technologies and parameters that could come from the Ukrainians for study into the hands of Russia. Well, money, yes.
      3. +1
        11 September 2017 13: 21
        Corvettes of this type are equipped with automatic artillery guns of 76 or 100 mm caliber, short-range air defense systems, helicopters, and (perhaps, although more urgently needed) short-range and, better, medium-range ground-to-ground missiles. Ukraine does not know how to do all this on its own. Here's the answer to why the project stalled.
        So boats equipped with a 30 mm cannon and old ATGMs are their current ceiling.
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. 0
    11 September 2017 10: 42
    So zrada Th overpower?
  12. +3
    11 September 2017 10: 46
    U-176, U-179, Kriegsmarine or something, a submerge?
    1. +2
      11 September 2017 11: 00
      :
      Quote: andrewkor
      U-176, U-179, Kriegsmarine or something, a submerge?
      Apparently there is every chance to get to the bottom during a small storm .. bully
    2. +3
      11 September 2017 11: 01
      Yes, not ...... More likely in the English manner, short for =
      Ukraine

      They try to imitate the older brother in everything.
  13. 0
    11 September 2017 11: 25
    What are they ugly. But didn’t have enough money for the trainer, or know-how?
  14. +2
    11 September 2017 11: 55
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQySSOVGMwE это лучше ,чем вообще ничего
  15. +2
    11 September 2017 12: 02
    Honestly, I expected them to appear in the Sea of ​​Azov. This is where they can act perfectly. And they were driven to Odessa to “threaten” Crimea, the Krymneftegaz towers, and our possible landing operation in the Danube flood plain ...
  16. 0
    11 September 2017 12: 11
    Flagships of the Ukrainian fleet, almost the only ones on the go.
  17. 0
    11 September 2017 12: 36
    Why would they give them ..... marines?
  18. +1
    11 September 2017 12: 49
    Hooray, hooray! The Lenin Forge Plant, owned by Petya Parashenka. So cynically continues to earn hryvnia in his wallet! For someone, this is such a "field of miracles" in the "country of fools"!
  19. +1
    11 September 2017 13: 06
    What do you actually want from Ukraine at the moment? Yes, in theory, she doesn’t need these armored boats, but ships of the near sea zone - RTOs like Karakurt (project 22800), or slightly larger corvettes of project 20380. But for their construction, it’s necessary to have your own missiles of at least short range in the state’s arsenal (although for me such a range is no longer sufficient for the ground-to-air and ground-to-ground classes, without which it is not possible to begin designing and manufacturing such ships.
    Does Ukraine have medium- and short-range missiles? Not. They don’t even have their own artillery ship systems, not to mention the helicopters that need to be equipped with corvettes. So do not judge strictly. They build the type of ships that can equip with weapons of their own production. And today it is a maximum of artillery boats.
    What are the possible solutions? Either develop it yourself or buy these elements, or buy fully-made ships on the side. I will leave the question of independent development to the conscience of Ukraine, but so far there has been no news, not only about missiles but also about much simpler artillery systems. To buy individual elements on the side (after all, they also come up with different sources) and design your ship around them - this is a crap combined with delirium tremens. And today Ukraine simply does not have money to buy ships.
  20. 0
    11 September 2017 13: 33
    fl that poachers to drive?
  21. 0
    11 September 2017 17: 19
    when along Ussuri the forest was rafted a little bit of the displacement there were crease boats and topliki to pull, and then the Ukrainian fleet !!!
  22. 0
    11 September 2017 17: 25
    Everything is very similar! We built a new Small missile boat, comparable in power with two Ukrainian kids.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"