Russia annexed the Crimea, but lost Ukraine, we are told by Western propagandists and our liberal column. Is it a piece of stupidity? No, this is a sample of lies on which its fans then build "objective theories" about the inevitable tragic consequences for Russia. They announce about the inevitable collapse of Russia under the pressure of "the entire civilized world" ... New fascists, or what?
Likewise, falsehood was fabricated around the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, which allegedly led to World War II. But not at all the plans of Hitler for world domination, and the policy of "appeasing Hitler" by the then West, crowned by the Munich division of Czechoslovakia between Hitler and Poland.
The thesis about the “loss of Ukraine by Russia” by the pro-Western leaders would like to remove from the discussion an inconvenient fact for them: Bandera was brought to power in Kiev, through the armed coup of February 22 February 2014, Western politicians headed by the deputy. US Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and special services led by the CIA. “The SS division“ Galichina ”occupied the city of Kiev,” the independent expert Yevgeny Satanovsky said figuratively. It cost the US treasury 5 billion dollars, issued a state secret Nuland.
And Western political scientists lay a lie: the West did not tear Ukraine from Russia, it was Russia that allegedly lost it, annexing the Crimea. Here are just Russia annexed the Crimea after the West tore Ukraine Ukraine Bandera coup.
Western propagandists are trying to strike out stories the fact that Bandera was created, with the help of our western neighbors, as the enemies of Russia, and were always ardent enemies of Russia and the Russian people. And they still lie that there are almost no Bandera in Ukraine. Prospect Bandera in Kiev there, but almost no Bandera. Why lie?
To give Ukraine a Bandera for just Ukraine, as it were the successor of post-Soviet Ukraine, although Bandera is now violently destroying it - “decommunizing”.
Russia cannot, in principle, lose the Bandera Ukraine, which declares it a "historical enemy", but Russia has lost the post-Soviet Ukraine. I was able to save only the Russian-speaking population of the Crimea and part of the Donbass from the Bandera genocide.
The West has acquired not Ukraine, as it is lying to itself sweetly, but a Bandera neo-Nazi Ukraine, and this all-European hemorrhoids is already seen by the shrewd French Le Mond: "The Maidan brought Ukraine corruption, nationalism and human rights violations." In the twentieth century, Europe acquired Hitler in much the same way: he shouted most loudly about the “campaign to the East”, but before this campaign he had bitten Europe first, as an easier and more comfortable booty.
A similar story can happen with Bandera Ukraine. “Europe will not have a more terrible enemy than Ukraine,” the billionaire oligarch Dmitry Firtash, from Galicia, predicts the European future. When Bandera is fully aware of its status as an “agrarian superpower” and its consequences.
Looking at the vicissitudes of the reunification of the Crimea with Russia, you understand that the meaning of history is completely beyond our control. How much they have blamed Khrushchev, that he illegally gave the Crimea to the Soviet Ukrainian Republic, and today it turns out that this was the point: he gave it for good reason!
Reunited with Russia, Crimea today became a wedge that politically separates Russia from the West: if it were not for the Crimea, it was necessary to find some other wedge to tear Russia away from the West, from its suffocating sodomist embraces. However, our pro-Western liberal column cannot do anything about such a wedge: too obvious, visible and huge is the Crimea in the minds of all of Russia!
It can be said that the Crimea politically “stitches” Russia, takes it away from the West, making it post-Crimean. Russia, as it were, is being cleared of Western influence on specific events that occurred before our eyes in the Crimea, in the Donbas, and in all of Ukraine.
Ignoring the will of the population of Crimea expressed at the referendum by the West and willingness to give it to the mercy of Bandera neo-Nazis like Dmytro Yarosh showed the whole of Russia and the non-Western world that in the West there is no democracy, no humanity, no justice, but only selfish interests. All this revealed a referendum in the Crimea.
The West, since he brought Bandera to power, does not admit his guilt in the events in Ukraine, the fate of the population is neither the Crimea, nor the Donbass, nor the Ukraine, after all, in fact, he doesn’t care at all, he sheds tears on his crocodile, as well as around the world . But today's West is not forever, and neo-Nazism from Bandera’s Ukraine brings more and more to Europe.
So Nikita Khrushchev, on reflection, will have to say thanks for his voluntarism with the Crimea: there was no happiness, yes, misfortune helped! It helped Russia to escape from the Western charm and hypocrisy. The history of the Crimea opened the truth about the West for all of Russia, and post-Crimean Russia was born, consolidating the people, becoming on the development paths independent of the West.