Russian diplomat called fake report of the UN Commission on Syria

51
Russia's Permanent Representative to the UN Office and other international organizations in Geneva, Alexei Borodavkin, called the “report of the Independent Commission to Investigate Human Rights Violations in Syria, concerning the operation of the Russian videoconferencing and Syrian armed forces,“ politically biased fake ”. The diplomat reported this on Saturday to Russian journalists in Geneva.

This report, to the extent that it concerns Russia and the use of chemical weapons by the armed forces of the SAR, is an example of a politically biased fake, moreover a crudely fabricated
said Wartkin. -
I think that it makes no sense for us to pay attention to these accusations.


Russian diplomat called fake report of the UN Commission on Syria


The diplomat remarked that "some time ago, it became fashionable to trade Russophobic lies in some political and diplomatic circles."

But the situation is gradually changing. Even where such fabrications are still in demand, the political price of them is rapidly falling.
- concluded the head of the Russian dimpmission.

We remind you that the report of the Independent Commission of Inquiry in Syria, published on the eve of the 11 session of the UN Human Rights Council, starting in Geneva on September 9, in particular, states that Syrian and Russian forces attacked hospitals and medical personnel, and Syrian troops besides used chemical weapon, transmits TASS

You can read about the accusations in the article "Military Outlook" HERE
  • © Mikhail Pochuev / TASS
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    9 September 2017 16: 50
    Yes, in general, no one doubted that this was a fake. we made this verdict at the last meeting of VO. wink
    1. +23
      9 September 2017 16: 56
      Quote: newbie
      Yes, in general, no one doubted that this was a fake. we made this verdict at the last meeting of VO. wink


      Along the way, Yes!
      And for a long time ...
      1. +9
        9 September 2017 16: 59
        quite rightly. only we stand for truth at the UN.
        1. +5
          9 September 2017 17: 07
          Very lacking Khrushchev's boot. He, too, is for the truth.
          1. +19
            9 September 2017 17: 12
            Quote: Fei_Wong
            Very lacking Khrushchev's boot. He, too, is for the truth.

            1. +3
              9 September 2017 18: 09
              All the power of the USSR was then attached to this boot, while we have to do without a boot ... for now ...
              1. +15
                9 September 2017 20: 13
                Maybe for now try mmm ...
                Slipper?
                1. +3
                  9 September 2017 20: 48
                  Fei_Wong
                  Very lacking Khrushchev's boot.

                  Ha! Khrushchev, not only indignant at the actions of Americans against the USSR, kicked his boot on the podium, publicly speaking to the whole world with radio and television broadcasts to the US leadership, but also promised to show them “Kuzkin’s mother”! am
                  The Americans thought for a long time and then discussed in the media what Kuzkin’s mother is. belay
                  And also Nikita Sergeyevich gave them from the rostrum without diplomacy in Khrushchev's way: "They stink !!! You smell it yourself !!!" good
      2. +15
        9 September 2017 17: 47
        Quote: Logall
        And for a long time ...

        And as long as we will bashfully justify ourselves, such libel will be repeated with an enviable periodicity. But it would be nice to recall other times. hi
        1. +8
          9 September 2017 18: 10
          E-eh, our American and Western European “friends”, as well as the UN High Commissioner, if you want to get rid of it, you need to do it correctly, with summing up the evidence base, with incontrovertible facts so that the “mosquito does not undermine the nose” ... And so all this is a talking room! negative
        2. +15
          9 September 2017 20: 23
          Quote: 79807420129
          Quote: Logall
          And for a long time ...

          And as long as we will bashfully justify ourselves, such libel will be repeated with an enviable periodicity. But it would be nice to recall other times. hi

          We have all hope for someone for whom there is little hope lately ...
          hi
          1. +6
            9 September 2017 20: 35
            Quote: Logall
            We have all hope for someone for whom there is little hope lately ...

            Ah Alexander drinks hi Here I regret that Zhirik is not standing behind Putin and does not suggest that the GDP should be spoken, only remove glasses and decanters with water from Zhirik. Yes But it’s just that Zhirik stayed, so it’s dangerous to admit a clown to power. drinks hi
            1. +1
              9 September 2017 22: 20
              Quote: 79807420129
              Here I regret that Zhirik is not standing behind Putin

              The same thought visited. Just not behind him, but let him speak from the rostrum. I think the result would be overwhelming. Maybe half would be done, and the other thoughtful ... laughing
    2. Maz
      0
      9 September 2017 17: 19
      Who pays the lion's money to the UN, he orders the music, reports, resolutions .... usa
      1. +2
        9 September 2017 17: 44
        It might be all right .... The UN is not right. But what about UNESCO’s decisions against Israel, judging by the opinion of many here, Israel is supported by the states so that the UN went against the states. That is, the UN acts independently. But if the UN is independent, why are decisions against Russia a lie and a provocation and international opinion against other countries? And why when a large number of countries calls some things white, Russia stubbornly repeats, they black prove that white.
        1. +4
          9 September 2017 18: 06
          Quote: Shahno
          so what did the UN go against states

          Are you sure you are against it?
          "Therefore, I argue that it is shortsighted to consider a country as an invariable ally or an eternal enemy of England. We do not have invariable allies, we have no eternal enemies. Only our interests are invariable and eternal, and our duty is to follow them."
          (Henry John Temple Palmerston, speech in the House of Commons March 1, 1848)
          1. +1
            9 September 2017 18: 11
            The UN goes where it is sent, and we can also send it.
          2. +1
            9 September 2017 19: 25
            In principle, I agree there is no support for Israel. There are simply temporarily overlapping interests.
        2. 0
          9 September 2017 19: 02
          Quote: Shahno
          But what about UNESCO’s decisions against Israel, judging by the opinion of many here, Israel is supported by states

          When was this? Under Obama? And how did he feel about your prime minister? And the UN also "acted independently."
        3. +3
          9 September 2017 19: 11
          Quote: Shahno
          It might be all right .... The UN is not right. But what about UNESCO’s decisions against Israel, judging by the opinion of many here, Israel is supported by the states so that the UN went against the states. That is, the UN acts independently. But if the UN is independent, why are decisions against Russia a lie and a provocation and international opinion against other countries? And why when a large number of countries calls some things white, Russia stubbornly repeats, they black prove that white.

          Well, you are bent!
          Compare UNESCO (from the English UNESCO - United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) - a specialized agency of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, in violation of the rules of warfare and the use of chemical weapons against civilians! Namely, this is what Russia is accused of.
          UNESCO did not allow you to rob monuments or builds on the Temple Mount
          1. +1
            9 September 2017 19: 32
            It is clear that the nature of the charges is significantly different. And it’s hard to say which is more serious, many wars began on a religious basis. But this does not change the approach. UN agencies evaluate many things not professionally and superficially. What is in your question, what is in ours.
      2. 0
        10 September 2017 15: 44
        And who is the biggest debtor in our world?
    3. 0
      9 September 2017 17: 21
      And in politics, just do someone ever tell the truth ??? absurdity and just want the truth read the newspaper True
      1. +2
        9 September 2017 18: 10
        Quote: correct passenger
        And in politics, does anyone ever tell the truth?

        Since the 18th century, as Anglo-Saxons began to dominate politics, there is no truth.
    4. +3
      9 September 2017 17: 41
      Generally not a topic, I apologize: yesterday we launched the K-3 “Leninsky Komsomol” - our first nuclear submarine, though with a built-in mock-up of the RO, then we will go to St. Petersburg (in tows of course) A beautiful museum will be built.
      It’s just that the media don’t cover it at all, and the event seems to be significant.
      1. +7
        9 September 2017 17: 45
        thanks for the news. I must admit that today KRO was not anywhere. you should run around the news.
        1. +1
          9 September 2017 18: 01
          Yes, not for that. I just don’t know if there is funding for the continuation of work. 12 years, order No. 254, occupied a very necessary station. Moreover, only on the initiative of P.G. Steblin he was not put up with needles. One of The streets of our ZATO bears his name. The Director was good.
          1. +4
            9 September 2017 18: 22
            Well, once launched, we hope the case will be completed.
  2. +3
    9 September 2017 16: 52
    But who, after spending dozens of “axes”, now admits that it was not justified ...
  3. +1
    9 September 2017 16: 57
    I think that it makes no sense to pay attention to these charges
    attention must be paid, sharpened and protested to false accusations of the UN sales bureaucrats ....
    1. +16
      9 September 2017 17: 23
      Useless!
      Everyone knows everything! But this farce is arranged, reminiscent of a cheap theater ... In which Stanislavsky is sorely missed!
  4. +2
    9 September 2017 17: 11
    Well, everything is correctly said, only there the other side should be registered. ISIS, and the US with moderate opposition. These ..... do not even know how to lose.
  5. +5
    9 September 2017 17: 25
    The report of the Independent Investigation Commission in Syria, published on the eve of the 11 session of the United Nations Human Rights Council beginning in Geneva on September 9, specifically states that Syrian and Russian forces attacked hospitals and medical personnel, and Syrian troops, moreover , used chemical weapons.

    Fuck it all. The Russian Federation and Syria beat babai like a squirrel - only in the eye. And in hospitals and schools - only staff members. About chemistry in general, there is nothing to say, this is a fake from the beginning.
  6. 0
    9 September 2017 17: 25
    This is probably the same one - the Independent Commission for the Investigation of Human Rights Violations in Syria, in which one of the leaders was Carla del Ponte, who became famous for accusations of genocide of Serb leaders, most of which then suddenly died in the Hague prison. That's right, our fabricated fake said.
  7. +1
    9 September 2017 17: 36
    The worst thing is that years will pass, and many countries will forget about their vile lies against Russia, and as if nothing had happened would restore normal trade relations with us! fool But God forbid that we ourselves forget those who are poisoning our lives right now, and tomorrow, for the sake of commercial gain, they will begin to fill up as friends! !! am
    1. +2
      9 September 2017 17: 48
      Quote: Herkulesich
      But God forbid that we ourselves forget those who are poisoning our lives right now, and tomorrow, for the sake of commercial gain, they will begin to fill up as friends!

      Our GDP has a very good memory. Yes . And excellent health. good so our "partners" will have to endure it for another 15 years. lol He and his team will remember everything to them.
      Hello to the epic heroes from the humble toilers of the sawn-off shotgun and the Bikford cord! drinks
      1. +2
        9 September 2017 18: 03
        The best partisans of the site, my fiery greetings drinks hi
      2. 0
        10 September 2017 13: 05
        Quote: Angry Guerrilla
        и bickford cord! drinks

        Fireproof !!! Gray 1cm per second! Will heal your along through the rocker! Two orders out of turn, according to performance report!
        angry laughing
    2. 0
      9 September 2017 17: 54
      They don’t lie countries, people lie. If they come who don’t lie so frantically as our current sworn partners and say that they — the others, told an untruth earlier, then why not restore relations.
  8. +5
    9 September 2017 17: 49
    I think that it makes no sense for us to pay attention to these accusations.

    Gold words!!! good
  9. +1
    9 September 2017 18: 39
    Another GA UN libel laughing in our direction. What else can you expect from these people if they receive four-fifths of the salary at the American embassy.
    And in general, I always wondered why the UN is not located on the Eurasian continent, where 80% of the planet’s population lives, but in a country that profited from two world wars, hid Nazi criminals and robbed half the world request
  10. +1
    9 September 2017 18: 46
    When for the first time after the fogs it smelled of fire,
    He stood outside the outskirts and saw his house.
    Potatoes in the garden and meadow by the river.
    He wiped his tear and clenched his fists.
    Put a machine gun in a high attic
    And he wrote in his diary: "No one will enter here."
  11. Hog
    0
    9 September 2017 18: 49
    Those guys from the commission at least once saw how chemical weapons are used and their effect in reality.
    If sarin were used there, one would immediately see about Ipritus in general I am silent.
    PS: On March 16-17, 1988, Iraqi aviation subjected the city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan to a gas attack using various toxic substances: mustard gas, sarin, herd, gas VX. The number of victims, almost exclusively belonging to the civilian population, ranged, according to various estimates, from several hundred to 7000; usually given the number of 5000 dead and 20000 injured. Among the dead there were many children, as gas creeped on the ground.
  12. 0
    9 September 2017 18: 52
    UN dig Stalin and kiss in a duphole, he is your creator.
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. 0
    9 September 2017 18: 58
    NY? Do you feel ashamed of the Dutch? Tulips
  15. 0
    9 September 2017 19: 11
    Whenever you read such news, one wonders: “How are UN commissions formed?” Not so much as to immediately understand the intricacies of the UN bureaucracy. In principle, the answer is clear: "Who is dancing ....", I.e. whose money .... And the news is always faceless about the composition of such commissions.
  16. +6
    9 September 2017 19: 55
    They would have told better how the undeveloped Western "coalition" fought in Mosul and fights in Raqqa. The righteous are holy fools. How does the earth carry such creatures?
  17. 0
    9 September 2017 23: 07
    Nuclear weapons and membership in the UN Security Council - everything went from past power ... We will cling to the UN in its current form with all our might!
  18. +1
    10 September 2017 01: 54
    Why are they lying? What is Assad on such a short leash that Russia can control literally all his steps? You can talk a lot, along with a report at the UN they provided evidence, but did Alexey Borodavkin show anything besides the words? Again, "Eye to watch" and "give a tooth"?
  19. 0
    10 September 2017 03: 12
    And where is your favorite - "expressed concern" !!! Things should be called by their proper names, who composed this report and on what documents? then it becomes clear "where the legs grow from."
  20. 0
    10 September 2017 07: 58
    Ours are constantly late, and therefore always are in the role of making excuses. Could it not have been a preventive information strike with a detailed list of the crimes of the US Army and its allies in Asia and brought to public discussion? Moreover, you do not need to invent anything, unlike this commission purchased. Such inaction does not win the information war. Are our responsible people so blind?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"