Military Review

Syria and Israel have shown interest in the Russian "Terminators"

119
According to the head of the Main Armored Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Alexander Shevchenko, Syria and Israel at the same time showed interest in combat support vehicles tanks (BMPT) type "Terminator".


Syria and Israel have shown interest in the Russian "Terminators"


Earlier, during the Army-2017 forum, the Russian Ministry of Defense signed a contract with UVZ for the supply of a consignment of these cars to the Russian army, before that BMPT was made exclusively for export.

This year, a fundamentally new class machine will be put into service with the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation - a tank support combat vehicle, in which many countries have already shown interest, first of all Israel and Syria,
quotes Shevchenko RIA News.

The Terminator BMPT is armed with two 30-mm 2-42 automatic cannons with a firing range of up to four kilometers and an 850 rounds of ammunition. In addition, the machine is equipped with four supersonic guided missiles of the Ataka-T complex, two 30-mm AG-17D automatic grenade launchers and an 7,62-mm machine gun paired with guns.

The Terminator is also equipped with an all-round ballistic protection against weapons of destruction, highly effective means of detecting targets, and an automated fire control system.
Photos used:
RIA Novosti / Mikhail Voskresensky
119 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Msta
    Msta 8 September 2017 08: 31
    +10
    And when will we arm our army with such equipment ?!
    1. INVESTOR
      INVESTOR 8 September 2017 08: 37
      +1
      before that BMPT was made exclusively for export

      Amekosy are shocked by us .. feel
      1. oldseaman1957
        oldseaman1957 8 September 2017 08: 40
        +4
        Syria and Israel have shown interest in the Russian "Terminators"
        “Well, the Jews understand - they will pay, and Assad what is he counting on?” Or, in fact, I saw - and really wanted to?
        1. Thrall
          Thrall 8 September 2017 08: 59
          +9
          Quote: oldseaman1957
          what does Assad count on?

          Well, obviously not for you.
          1. oldseaman1957
            oldseaman1957 8 September 2017 09: 51
            +6
            Quote: Thrall
            ... and what is Assad counting on? ... Well, obviously not for you.
            - Rudeness is a deliberate causing trouble with your opinion, which no one asked.
        2. irazum
          irazum 8 September 2017 09: 08
          +4
          Assad is counting on a loan from the Russian Federation, which will NEVER repay! Well, or for offsetting the rental base.
          1. Sirocco
            Sirocco 8 September 2017 09: 58
            +6
            Do you have to pay for renting a garage in the city center, or don't you think so? The bases in the Mediterranean are worth a lot, so you can pay for security, if you do not agree with this, then remove the locks from the apartment’s doors, sell the signal from the car, you need such expenses))))))
            1. DMoroz
              DMoroz 8 September 2017 10: 09
              +3
              In fact, both Khmeimim and Tartus were leased by Syria for free. Tatrtus from 2017 to 49 years, Hmeimim from 2015 - indefinitely ...
              1. Thrall
                Thrall 8 September 2017 10: 29
                +3
                Quote: DMoroz
                In fact, both Khmeimim and Tartus were leased by Syria for free. Tatrtus from 2017 to 49 years, Hmeimim from 2015 - indefinitely ...

                And why Russia? (leading question)
                1. DMoroz
                  DMoroz 8 September 2017 11: 22
                  +1
                  And which of the allies - Iran? Does he need it? there is also a fireman in the Gulf of Oman, and we should not forget about the Bosphorus, and the base in Tartus since 1971 ...
              2. Sirocco
                Sirocco 8 September 2017 15: 01
                +3
                Quote: DMoroz
                In fact, both Khmeimim and Tartus were leased by Syria for free. Tatrtus from 2017 to 49 years, Hmeimim from 2015 - indefinitely ...

                This is indefinitely ... and we have to pay, and we pay. I will say it easier and without hidden text, it was, is, and will be. Whoever pays for the girl dances her. something like this))))
            2. Msta
              Msta 11 September 2017 13: 14
              0
              These bases are not expensive in the Mediterranean, for two reasons. 1) At any time they may be asked to leave these bases, this is not the territory of the Russian Federation, and Russia will spend money on their improvement, including to the detriment of equipping the bases on its territory. And do not write to me that this is not so, it was exactly like that during the Soviet era, when the bases on the territory of Russia were neither the most modern nor the most equipped, and they had to leave foreign bases and now the GDP is repeating the mistakes of the USSR Politburo, which is not very smart .. .2) The Russian fleet is experiencing an acute shortage of modern large warships and sending a small number of warships to the Mediterranean Sea, in case of conflict, will not be significant, because the US fleet alone has more than 80 destroyers, while the Russian Federation does not have 20 .
          2. HEATHER
            HEATHER 8 September 2017 14: 20
            +3
            Offset for the rental base. The bases were handed over to Russia free of charge, along with the condition of their expansion and increase in combat potential.
    2. vkl.47
      vkl.47 8 September 2017 08: 41
      +2
      Once again I will repeat with this module this is not a terminator but an electronic. One gun should be paired with 57mm with a thirty. And 8 ATGMs and not 4
      1. Gray brother
        Gray brother 8 September 2017 08: 51
        +5
        Quote: vkl.47
        One gun should be paired with 57mm with a thirty. And 8 ATGMs and not 4

        Ammunition will be less, much. But he needs to fight with the infantry, suppression fire must be kept so that there are no people who want to get out - a lot of shells are needed.
        For more serious purposes, there are tanks that this machine accompanies.
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 8 September 2017 09: 45
          +4
          Quote: Gray Brother
          Ammunition will become smaller, much

          Looking at what base will be done ... if on the base of Almaty, in the form of Terminator-3, then the BC will be normal ... and for export, Terminator-2 will do well ...
          1. Tusv
            Tusv 8 September 2017 10: 33
            +2
            Quote: NEXUS
            Looking at what base will be done ... if on the base of Almaty, in the form of Terminator-3, then the BC will be normal ... and for export, Terminator-2 will do well ...

            So far, the Terminator has been unified with the T-90. A ammunition 600 OFS, 600 BS, 600 grenades ...
            1. Gray brother
              Gray brother 8 September 2017 11: 24
              +1
              Quote: Tusv
              So far, the Terminator has been unified with the T-90. A ammunition 600 OFS, 600 BS,

              And by the way, there is one fluff shoots armor-piercing, and the second fragmentation. I can’t imagine what kind of AZ would have to be cut in order to ensure a quick change in the type of ammunition in two DIFFERENT guns.
              1. ProkletyiPirat
                ProkletyiPirat 8 September 2017 17: 17
                +1
                Quote: Gray Brother
                I can’t imagine what kind of AZ would have to be cut in order to ensure a quick change in the type of ammunition in two DIFFERENT guns.

                Nothing complicated, the same eggs only in profile, all you need to do is add a buffer selector.
                1. Gray brother
                  Gray brother 8 September 2017 19: 44
                  +1
                  Quote: ProkletyiPirat
                  the same eggs only in profile, just add a buffer selector

                  57 mm. the shell is big, it’s already something like “Bahce”. Che there is little things, it’s easier to immediately make another ordinary tank, with 125mm. gun)))
                  1. ProkletyiPirat
                    ProkletyiPirat 8 September 2017 20: 19
                    0
                    Then I agree, Bahcha Forever lol But there is one small nuance, although there are several of them, but the main one is the destruction of UAVs (platoon-company level), and here, the missiles are too expensive, the armor cannons are too expensive for the battlefield, and he can’t fight at the front. But a quick-firing gun from 50mm and even with a radar for firing correction and even with a controlled detonation can be much more effective. On the other hand, for the sake of UAVs alone, it will be bold to put this gun, and the same can be achieved in a projectile 125-152 if it is made firing, and not fragmentation (throwing fragments forward, not sideways). On the other hand, 57mm (or so) can be made into a hybrid (cannon \ howitzer \ grenade launcher), cram it into the overhead combat module and put on equipment designed for transporting infantry (BTR \ BMP \ BMD).
                    1. Gray brother
                      Gray brother 8 September 2017 20: 37
                      0
                      Quote: ProkletyiPirat
                      (BTR \ BMP \ BMD).

                      Horseradish of them air defense with such a caliber will turn out, the chassis is too light, swing will return.
                      Here, in practice, is the standard (for its time, of course).

                      But 30mm. plus rockets can be put anywhere.

                      1. ProkletyiPirat
                        ProkletyiPirat 8 September 2017 21: 02
                        0
                        no, this is not a standard, what can be thrown out on the video because there is an MRSI automatic loader that provides the same rate of fire with one barrel. And the fact that the photo does not send to the forefront. And again, neither there nor there is no correction of the shooting, namely it is what is needed.
      2. andranick
        andranick 8 September 2017 09: 13
        +1
        Quote: vkl.47
        One gun should be with 57mm

        It’s already not a fighting vehicle. tank support, but quite an independent combat unit comparable to a tank. For purposes that do not take a 30mm gun, there are tanks that work in conjunction with BMPT and Attack.
        1. Topotun
          Topotun 8 September 2017 09: 23
          +3
          Yes, and ATGM on BMP. So it makes no sense, but they correctly said here - switching to 57 mm will greatly reduce the amount of ammunition ....
          1. Svarog51
            Svarog51 8 September 2017 11: 20
            +9
            Welcome hi But at the same time, firepower will increase. Shell consumption will decrease.
            1. ProkletyiPirat
              ProkletyiPirat 8 September 2017 17: 18
              +2
              at 125 he will have even less hi
      3. AVGUST
        AVGUST 8 September 2017 09: 15
        +3
        I do not agree, it will already be a megamonster, separate food is not a gut at all, and a paired cannon can synchronize, unlike a paired 57mm * 30 mm. ........, and if the ammunition of one unit ends faster, what should I do? It’s better to unify, but to take more ammunition (of the same type) on board than to load all kinds of calibers on it, and to put ZUShka on top, and back, like on a military cart, a slingshot with a ballistic calculator, like shoot whatever you want ... ..... this "crocodile" still has on board the course grenade launchers
      4. Bronevick
        Bronevick 8 September 2017 09: 56
        +8
        And tighten 125 mm near, well, for greater certainty, also 152 mm nearby. Well, put a couple of iskanders on the roof. And in the trailer, Yars will carry.
      5. raf
        raf 8 September 2017 12: 52
        +2
        Quote: vkl.47
        Once again I will repeat with this module this is not a terminator but an electronic. One gun should be paired with 57mm with a thirty. And 8 ATGMs and not 4

        And the rays 305mm and stopitsot ATGMs! laughing
    3. Gray brother
      Gray brother 8 September 2017 08: 47
      +6
      Quote: Msta
      And when will we arm our army with such equipment ?!

      Already started.
    4. Stas157
      Stas157 8 September 2017 09: 07
      +7
      Quote: Msta
      And when will we arm our army with such equipment ?!

      Our army does not need a Terminator, do not order. I would like comments from the military, do we need or do not need a Terminator? And of course I would like to see its military use in Syria. And it advertises it well. A lot of money was spent on development, but it’s not being used.
      1. Gray brother
        Gray brother 8 September 2017 09: 15
        +2
        Quote: Stas157
        Our army does not need a Terminator, do not order.

        For the first time, the Russian army will purchase Terminator tanker fighting vehicles (BMPT) and upgraded BMP-3 with the Epoch combat module, Deputy Defense Minister Yury Borisov said on Thursday during the signing of the treaties.

        https://topwar.ru/123357-minoborony-rf-soobschilo
        -o-zakupke-bmpt-terminator.html
        1. Stas157
          Stas157 8 September 2017 10: 31
          +4
          Nevertheless, they made an order this year, for 24 billion rubles. Haven't seen this news before.
      2. mac789
        mac789 8 September 2017 11: 52
        +1
        Situation: the tank moves along with the infantry squad, they say so, cover each other. A Tou or RPG flies into the tank, dynamic protection is triggered. Question: how many foot soldiers will suffer when the DZ is triggered? I think that if BMPT goes in tandem with the tank, infantry losses from their own DZ and even from enemy fire will be much less. Plus a significant increase in speed.
    5. BAI
      BAI 8 September 2017 09: 42
      +2
      And when will we arm our army with such equipment ?!

      Deliveries are planned in 2019.
      The most interesting thing is that the car was more than 10 years old, the Ministry of Defense rejected it at first, the developers worked on the same enthusiasm, and only Syria put everything in its place.
      1. Lopatov
        Lopatov 8 September 2017 10: 19
        +7
        Quote: BAI
        and only Syria put everything in its place.

        ?
        Rather, the "effective" from the leadership of UVZ did the same to finish off the Ministry of Defense. Now they will receive income from deliveries to the troops of an unnecessary machine. And Mr. Shevchenko will be forced to justify the purchase of unnecessary tales of "Israeli interest"

        And Syria showed that they continue to expel almost defenseless 2C1 Gvozdika on a direct fire. Apparently, the Syrians are not aware that a 30-mm gun is much better than a 122-mm howitzer.
  2. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 8 September 2017 08: 34
    +1
    Krasava! Reminds a transformer from fantastic cartoons.
    1. novel66
      novel66 8 September 2017 09: 26
      +12
      Nah!
      that's what reminds! laughing
      1. Gray brother
        Gray brother 8 September 2017 09: 48
        +2
        Quote: novel xnumx
        that's what reminds!

        In the 1st part of "Terminator" there was such a thing:
  3. Vitas
    Vitas 8 September 2017 08: 35
    +2
    Russian Deputy Prime Minister for Defense Industry Dmitry Rogozin was surprised at the late interest of Syria and Israel in the Russian Terminator combat vehicles, emphasizing the uniqueness of this type of armored vehicles.

    We are also surprised that the Russian Ministry of Defense showed a late interest in these machines, ordering them only in 2017 ... as they say 10 years is not a deadline ...
  4. Aaron Zawi
    Aaron Zawi 8 September 2017 08: 37
    +15
    Syria is quite possible. About Israel, these are unequivocal tales. Firstly, our army logistics has so long sought to unify the transmissions and platforms of tracked vehicles that there can be no talk of any purchase of another tracked model for our army. And I don’t see a place for “Terminator” in our army. We still have debates or to put a tower with a gun on the "Namer", and the "Terminator" has nowhere to write.
    1. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter 8 September 2017 08: 43
      +4
      Aron, good day! hi So this is what happens: Shevchenko is brazenly lying for advertising purposes? Or do your specialists in armored vehicles still want to order the Terminator partake for study?
      1. Aaron Zawi
        Aaron Zawi 8 September 2017 08: 47
        +7
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        Aron, good day! hi So this is what happens: Shevchenko is brazenly lying for advertising purposes? Or do your specialists in armored vehicles still want to order the Terminator partake for study?

        Well, for study it is always interesting to get other people's samples, but I doubt that someone will sell a small batch, but we simply have nothing to do with a large one.
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 8 September 2017 08: 53
          +6
          It is common practice to study. Why not study what your army may face in the event of a possible (probable) clash in Syria? In this regard, mattresses always count on trophies. But the Israelis will be more cunning.
        2. BARHAN
          BARHAN 8 September 2017 09: 11
          +1
          They will conquer the Syrians))
        3. Lex.
          Lex. 8 September 2017 09: 24
          +2
          Why not a chassis, maybe on a merkava this device was tested in Syria and Israel knows about the results
      2. newcomer
        newcomer 8 September 2017 08: 53
        +5
        Pasha, with a cheerful morning! Pasha, so they have trophy 72s idle in the museum. here you have the unification, the museum will be donors of the “Terminators". so the question is not so straightforward.
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 8 September 2017 08: 59
          +2
          Hello to you, Garik! hi Read my koment a little higher. wink
          Didn’t look at mail?
          1. newcomer
            newcomer 8 September 2017 09: 09
            +4
            just a minute, I’ll take a look right now.
          2. newcomer
            newcomer 8 September 2017 09: 23
            +5
            Pasha, this bastard is badly buggy, you have to wait.
        2. Aaron Zawi
          Aaron Zawi 8 September 2017 09: 26
          +1
          Quote: newbie
          Pasha, with a cheerful morning! Pasha, so they have trophy 72s idle in the museum. here you have the unification, the museum will be donors of the “Terminators". so the question is not so straightforward.

          We do not have trophy 72ek. The museum has one of the samples bought in Eastern Europe. The only clash with the T-72 recorded in the military history of the IDF was on the last day of the First Lebanon War, when the tank battalion of the Republican Guard division was ambushed by an anti-tank company of the landing brigade. Then the Syrians irrevocably lost two cars and six more were damaged and evacuated by the Syrians after the ceasefire.
          1. newcomer
            newcomer 8 September 2017 11: 09
            +5
            wait, but after all, when there was an epic with the return of the Amer’s tank to you, I watched the program on TV where your former military man (was somehow a hill), said that you had a museum of Soviet tanks, from T55 to T80. separately mentioned several T72, both captured and picked up on the battlefield and repaired.
            1. Aaron Zawi
              Aaron Zawi 8 September 2017 11: 55
              +3
              Quote: newbie
              wait, but after all, when there was an epic with the return of the Amer’s tank to you, I watched the program on TV where your former military man (was somehow a hill), said that you had a museum of Soviet tanks, from T55 to T80. separately mentioned several T72, both captured and picked up on the battlefield and repaired.

              We have no T-80 at all. And the T-72 is because they fought a bit with him, but he wasn’t from the trophy ones, but from those acquired in Eastern Europe.
          2. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 8 September 2017 11: 38
            +2
            The ambush was specifically on the T-72. To capture the tank. There is debate about whether they managed to drag one off and then transport it to the States. Or just took a picture, measured armor, etc.
    2. Meliodous
      Meliodous 8 September 2017 08: 51
      0
      Well, everything is clear with thermoses: even ours themselves don’t know where to write them.
      What is wrong with Namer? It seems that the tower is already ready, and the prototypes, too, what is everyone arguing there?
      1. Aaron Zawi
        Aaron Zawi 8 September 2017 09: 31
        +2
        Quote: Meliodous
        Well, everything is clear with thermoses: even ours themselves don’t know where to write them.
        What is wrong with Namer? It seems that the tower is already ready, and the prototypes, too, what is everyone arguing there?

        It is necessary to significantly change the infantry training system. Our infantry never worked with a BMP, and the "Namer" with a tower is TBMP. So there are enough opponents.
    3. Per se.
      Per se. 8 September 2017 08: 54
      +3
      Well, you can buy at least for study. The rest, to your words about the "Intention", it does not matter what they put on it, it is important that the car retains the status of an APC, and does not become an IFV. In my humble opinion, to a heavy armored personnel carrier (transport function), BMPT (specialized fire support) is needed, in the complex this tandem (BTR + BMPT) will be a "heavy armored personnel carrier", surpassing it in its specialization in all respects. In general, a heavy BMP is stupid when the whole essence of the concept of this universal machine is lost, and in terms of functionality in specialization it will be a flawed APC and a flawed BMPT. The only exception is the Merkava tank itself, capable of taking paratroopers, that is, in a sense, it can be a heavy infantry fighting vehicle. For Israel, with your troubles, the BMPT, as a new type of equipment, for supporting tanks and replacing infantry assault groups (where this is promising), is probably also a relevant solution. You can make your BMPT on the basis of Merkava, get a triplex platform, tank, heavy armored personnel carrier, BMPT.
    4. BAI
      BAI 8 September 2017 09: 48
      +1
      About Israel, these are unambiguous tales

      The machine itself is most likely not needed. But anti-tank missiles may be of interest: both for their intended use and for the development of means of protection against them.
    5. Tusv
      Tusv 8 September 2017 10: 51
      +2
      Quote: Aaron Zawi
      And I don’t see a place for “Terminator” in our army. We still have debates or to put a tower with a gun on the "Namer", and the "Terminator" has nowhere to write.

      Well, five Jews in one car is not kosher.
      You don’t see, yet I see hi . There all the weapons are remote: Missiles, Guns, Machine guns, Granotomet. Yes, and solid weapons for air purposes. Can a literate Jew not add a remote control for controlling this device? bully
      1. Paranoid50
        Paranoid50 8 September 2017 11: 14
        +2
        Quote: Tusv
        Well, five Jews in one car is not kosher.

        So, it’s not the fact that five, maybe three .. It is not known which option was of interest.
  5. kasatky
    kasatky 8 September 2017 08: 38
    +1
    "The interest in which has already been shown by many countries, primarily Israel and Syria"
    Is Israel and Syria the most influential and solvent of the many countries mentioned?
    That’s how journalists and various “representatives” give information that they can even turn good news into dubious? Maybe enough to inflate elephants and write as is?
  6. newcomer
    newcomer 8 September 2017 08: 38
    +5
    Well, if Israel showed interest, it means a luxury car. (here TVK always, do not value our own, until someone else’s uncle appreciates).
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 8 September 2017 11: 39
      +4
      This is according to Shevchenko. He bluffs without blinking an eye.
  7. AKsvlad047
    AKsvlad047 8 September 2017 08: 39
    +2
    I think that this weapons complex will harmoniously complement tank battalions and divisions, giving them a new look and opportunity! Good and necessary car!
  8. vkl.47
    vkl.47 8 September 2017 08: 42
    0
    Quote: Msta
    And when will we arm our army with such equipment ?!

    Ude signed a supply contract. You overslept
  9. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 8 September 2017 08: 52
    0
    Good topic, Israel knows good technique. But first, everything is needed in our Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.
  10. 5:0
    5:0 8 September 2017 08: 57
    +5
    This is nothing more than Shevchenko’s fantasies. In the IDF logistics, he is absolutely not needed. And you can only give Syria (give an irrevocable loan).
    1. dvvv
      dvvv 8 September 2017 09: 05
      +4
      I think Russia will take a good step if it gives Assad 10 such Terminators, all the more so since there is nothing unique there and the chassis from storage can always be taken and changed the tower. If the car is successful, then 10pcs will pay off and you can write off advertising costs). Israel doesn’t need it, because they themselves blind what they find interesting, if only to study the conceptual direction then 2-3 pieces
      1. 5:0
        5:0 8 September 2017 09: 15
        +1
        Well, if there is a lot of money, let them give it. True, it is not very clear how they will pay off.
    2. XXXIII
      XXXIII 8 September 2017 09: 14
      +1
      And Syria can only be donated (give an irrevocable loan).
      Do you think that in Syria there is no money, but no dollars, but there is gold, diamonds! wassat
      1. 5:0
        5:0 8 September 2017 09: 46
        +2
        Where do they come from?
        1. XXXIII
          XXXIII 8 September 2017 11: 22
          +3
          In your opinion, they can’t pay for anything at all? How low is that !!!
          1. 5:0
            5:0 8 September 2017 11: 26
            +2
            Today Assad is poor as a church. mouse.
            1. XXXIII
              XXXIII 8 September 2017 11: 33
              +1
              By the way, is there no Israel on this list, does it have no gold at all?
      2. irazum
        irazum 8 September 2017 10: 42
        +1
        Yes, there is enough junk in personal use of the Asad family! Plus accounts in some Switzerland. Like Hussein or Arafat.
        1. XXXIII
          XXXIII 8 September 2017 11: 30
          +1
          Well, yes, I did not see that the United States executed poor dictators!
    3. Tusv
      Tusv 8 September 2017 11: 31
      +1
      Quote: 5: 0
      In the IDF logistics, it is absolutely not needed

      Both on. You have to go nuts what percentage of foreign equipment and accessories and somehow fit into the logistics. And here only the Syrian express will give a small hook laughing
      1. MadCat
        MadCat 8 September 2017 12: 07
        +1
        Quote: Tusv
        Both on. You have to go nuts what percentage of foreign equipment and accessories and somehow fit into the logistics. And here only the Syrian express will give a small hook laughing

        "alien" equipment also happens to be different, the one that is already fully studied and provided with repair crews, and this terminator is like tailing a mare.
        1. Tusv
          Tusv 8 September 2017 12: 35
          0
          Quote: MadCat
          and this terminator is like a mare’s tail.

          So then T is for all so far "not sew." New technology - new tactics. But seriously. What seems to me that to fight in Syria was not a spontaneous decision. It hurts a lot of armored vehicles with new performance characteristics showed at the 2015 parade hi
          But the Syrians are coping, otherwise all our fighters would have experienced all this new
  11. Swed
    Swed 8 September 2017 08: 58
    0
    Showing interest and buying are two completely different concepts.
  12. Utlan
    Utlan 8 September 2017 09: 00
    +1
    Do not sell to Israel!
    1. XXXIII
      XXXIII 8 September 2017 09: 05
      +2
      Why can I sell, disassembled current, let them try to assemble it back! tongue
      1. Paranoid50
        Paranoid50 9 September 2017 02: 07
        +2
        Quote: XXXIII
        let them try to collect back!

        So, again Merkava will turn out ... "fifth". wassat
  13. forcecom
    forcecom 8 September 2017 09: 05
    +5
    I am also very surprised that in the news Israel flashed, in the presence of its very, very sensible engineering and scientific potential, making their analogue (if suddenly needed) on their platform and weapons should not be a problem for them.
    1. 5:0
      5:0 8 September 2017 09: 21
      +1
      Yes, no one was going to buy here. He simply is absolutely not needed in the structure of the IDF. Mr. Shevchenko’s fantasies, no more.
      1. _Ugene_
        _Ugene_ 8 September 2017 10: 47
        0
        Even if these machines were of interest to the IDF, the pope will still not allow Russia to buy anything, and without his permission you cannot even pick it up.
        1. MadCat
          MadCat 8 September 2017 12: 10
          +3
          Quote: _Ugene_
          Even if these machines were of interest to the IDF, the pope will still not allow Russia to buy anything, and without his permission you cannot even pick it up.

          think for yourself why buy it if you have enough of your junk, Israel built rocket tanks under the reign of peas ...
          https://topwar.ru/90298-izrailskiy-raketnyy-tank-
          pereh.html
          1. _Ugene_
            _Ugene_ 8 September 2017 12: 15
            0
            Yes, I don’t argue with that. I say that without the permission of the United States you cannot buy anything from Russia, even if something is needed. And they will never allow you to do this, so from which side do not look - the news is fake.
  14. AVGUST
    AVGUST 8 September 2017 09: 17
    +1
    Quote: Gray Brother
    Quote: vkl.47
    One gun should be paired with 57mm with a thirty. And 8 ATGMs and not 4

    Ammunition will be less, much. But he needs to fight with the infantry, suppression fire must be kept so that there are no people who want to get out - a lot of shells are needed.
    For more serious purposes, there are tanks that this machine accompanies.

    I fully support it, this is not a tank, but a machine of their (tanks) support, in order to create a greater density of fire per square meter. meter of cultivated area
  15. Altona
    Altona 8 September 2017 09: 33
    0
    Quote: irazum
    Assad is counting on a loan from the Russian Federation, which will NEVER repay! Well, or for offsetting the rental base.

    ----------------------------
    Rent a base indefinitely and for free, like for now. And Assad may well pay. Oil fields we beat him for free chtoli? And economic recovery after the war is also possible with the participation of our firms, if there are preferences for business. Iran has already agreed on such preferences with Assad; for some reason, Lavrov is still crushing boobs.
  16. JonnyT
    JonnyT 8 September 2017 09: 59
    +1
    Israel has developed its defense industry, if they want to make an analogue of their own. Israeli specialists are primarily interested in the concept and tactics of using this technique. How to apply it in urban battles. Now they are faced with the question of whether they can find a niche for the terminator in their armed forces.
    I remember our Defense Ministry, too, was tormented by the question - why is it needed. The car is good, no doubt. but only against irregular formations or armies of the countries of the 3 world.

    Jews will improve it - robotic, make it completely unmanned - an excellent technique for protecting the border from the penetration of light infantry
    1. Lopatov
      Lopatov 8 September 2017 10: 24
      +3
      Quote: JonnyT
      Israel has developed its defense industry, if they want to make an analogue of their own.

      Not an analog, but a car much better
      1. Michael newage
        Michael newage 8 September 2017 17: 15
        0
        And how will it be better? Dry kosher rations included?
        1. Lopatov
          Lopatov 8 September 2017 17: 26
          +1
          First of all, "Spikes." Further, the presence of a working KAZ. Further, the ability to install a normal gun (s) with normal shells
          1. Michael newage
            Michael newage 8 September 2017 17: 30
            0
            When they do all this, we will already build the BMPT on the platform of the armata and both KAZ and ATGM will be there no worse than Spike and the "normal" guns. Although I do not understand why you did not please 2 thirty graph paper.
            1. Lopatov
              Lopatov 8 September 2017 17: 39
              +1
              Quote: Michael Newage
              When they do all this, we will already build BMPT

              They already have it. And the normal anti-tank system, by the way, has recently been modernized, and the working KAZ, which has been tested in combat conditions, and the opportunity right now to get normal 30-mm or 40-mm guns.
              But we have nothing listed.
              1. Michael newage
                Michael newage 8 September 2017 18: 10
                0
                KAZ is on the armature. Yes, and the arena system. ATGM is not difficult to do. There is a backlog. Our guns are 30 mm worse than Jewish? No, I'm not seriously in the know. In the meantime, they have BMPTs on the chassis 72 and 90. And they? On any.
                1. Lopatov
                  Lopatov 8 September 2017 18: 41
                  +1
                  Quote: Michael Newage
                  KAZ is on the armature.

                  It is not mass-produced; it was not tested in combat conditions. Like the Arena
                  Quote: Michael Newage
                  ATGM is not difficult to do.

                  The stump is clear. However. and laughter and sin. but even the Serbs overtook us in this area. Not to mention the Chinese ...
                  Quote: Michael Newage
                  Our guns are 30 mm worse than Jewish?

                  Jews do not rivet small-caliber. However, they can easily get them from Europeans or Americans. And we have a big lag in this area, especially ammunition.

                  So the fact is clear that the "Terminator" to the Israelis as a dog needs a fifth leg
                  1. Michael newage
                    Michael newage 8 September 2017 18: 48
                    +1
                    Well, this does not mean that it does not work. If not produced right? The arena was tested and it was ready. They did not accept because of the time and the fact that she left a gap in the upper hemisphere (as far as I heard). Now KAZ is being tested on armature. I think it will work, no? And what is bad about our 30 mm, unlike the western ones, I did not understand. What do their ammunition give? Is there 2 times more penetration?
                    1. Lopatov
                      Lopatov 8 September 2017 19: 25
                      +1
                      Quote: Michael Newage
                      And what is bad about our 30 mm, unlike the western ones, I did not understand. What do their ammunition give? Is there 2 times more penetration?

                      You will laugh, but yes.
                      The Swedes for the Finnish BMP-2 made an armor-piercing projectile with armor penetration twice the standard.
                      1. Michael newage
                        Michael newage 8 September 2017 19: 55
                        0
                        If they did it on our gun, I don’t think there is any know-how. It’s just 4 times more expensive.
                    2. Lopatov
                      Lopatov 8 September 2017 20: 01
                      0
                      Quote: Michael Newage
                      It’s just 4 times more expensive.

                      More expensive than tank BOPS or ATGM, which will have to be applied?
                      1. Michael newage
                        Michael newage 8 September 2017 20: 04
                        +1
                        Well, one is not enough for the norm. Etozh pukalka 30 mm. There, due to the queue, all the profit.
  17. AVGUST
    AVGUST 8 September 2017 11: 02
    0
    Quote: Bronevick
    And tighten 125 mm near, well, for greater certainty, also 152 mm nearby. Well, put a couple of iskanders on the roof. And in the trailer, Yars will carry.

    Yes, and under the bottom there is a container with anti-tank mines, a deep bed, plus a launch pad for drones - drones, stick an electronic warfare system and radar on the roof, though you still have to put an atomic rector in place to make it spin and work ..... laughing
  18. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 8 September 2017 11: 49
    +2
    interest in which has already been shown by many countries, primarily Israel and Syria
    The Syrians do not have money, but now they need any armored vehicles, and the newest "Terminator" will be even more happy to accept. Everything is clear.
    And in Israel it is not clear how he showed interest. They have their own military-industrial complex, and in cooperation with the American they can produce machines with similar characteristics (if such a need arises from IDF). Besides, Israel did not buy from us before, but what happened now? Maybe the Israeli military attache looked into the barrel on the observation deck and asked how much it costs, I suspect that this is all the interest on their part. This deal will look very unusual if their brigades begin to equip Russian armored vehicles))).
    Instead of the “T,” it would be better to create a well-protected 152 mm assault gun to demolish the enemy at once during the battles in the city.
    1. Tusv
      Tusv 8 September 2017 12: 17
      +1
      Quote: Thunderbolt
      Instead of the “T,” it would be better to create a well-protected 152 mm assault gun to demolish the enemy at once during the battles in the city.

      Assault gun 152 in battles in the city? Bam and no building. Whether figs are trifling then. Only this tool will need special devices for self-digging. Fill nafig
      1. Thunderbolt
        Thunderbolt 8 September 2017 12: 45
        +1
        Quote: Tusv
        Fill nafig
        It will not fail, direct fire is not here, “point blank”, but with a safe distance calculation.
        As stated in the report on the artillery operations of the 1st Belorussian Front, “in the battles for the Poznan fortress and in the Berlin operation, both during the operation itself and especially in the battles for the city of Berlin, artillery of great and special power was crucial”. In total, during the assault on the German capital, 38 high-power guns were put up for direct fire, that is, 203-mm B-4 howitzers of the 1931 model. These powerful crawler-mounted guns often appear in the newsreel dedicated to the battles for the German capital. B-4 calculations acted boldly, even boldly. For example, one of the guns was installed at the intersection of Lieden-Strasse and Ritter-Strasse. 100-150 m from the enemy. Six shells fired enough to destroy a house prepared for defense. Completing the gun, the battery commander destroyed three more stone buildings.
        In Berlin, there was only one structure that withstood the B-4 strike - it was the Flakturm am Zoo anti-aircraft defense tower, also known as Flakturm I.https: //www.popmech.ru/weapon/10273-tekhnika-v-
        boyakh-za-berlin-shturm-berlina /
        Howitzer B-4, attached to the 1st Infantry Battalion of the 756th Infantry Regiment of the 150th Infantry Division of the 79th Infantry Corps of the 3rd Attack Army of the 1st Belorussian Front, during the Berlin offensive operation.
        1. Tusv
          Tusv 8 September 2017 12: 55
          0
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          It will not fail, direct fire is not here, “point blank”, but with a safe distance calculation.

          So with such calibers and so tinkered from a safe distance. Msta up to 45 km, Coalition up to 70. RZSO can continue to sweep away everything. Immediately urban battle. Light the OFS and grenades with machine guns hi
          And from the Terminator of the robot to do how to reset two bits
          1. Thunderbolt
            Thunderbolt 8 September 2017 13: 13
            +1
            Quote: Tusv
            So with such calibers and so tinkered from a safe distance. Msta up to 45 km, Coalition up to 70. RZSO can continue to sweep away everything. Immediately urban battle. Light the OFS and grenades with machine guns
            The fact of the matter is that the assault gun will be able to very quickly support the advancing groups, and the heavy artillery from positions outside the city will still think --- to shoot or can be hurt in its own way due to the inevitable dispersal of shells in such cases.
            And the work for the “Terminator” can be easily performed by the DBM on the tower, insuring the second tank and attached infantry on its armored vehicles. Why make a discord in this harmonious choir?
            1. Tusv
              Tusv 8 September 2017 13: 19
              +1
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              Why make a discord in this slender choir?

              Well, if we talk about the choir, then an extra voice with an unusual timbre will not hurt hi
              1. Thunderbolt
                Thunderbolt 8 September 2017 13: 58
                0
                It’s true that there isn’t much fire support, but our military budget is not rubber and the money invested in this machine could be spent more rationally:
                -improve the modernization of our large T-72 fleet.
                -develop and put into the troops support vehicles on the basis of the tank for a more effective REP of the entire complex of modern and promising means of destruction of armored vehicles and military vehicles directly on the battlefield.
                1. Tusv
                  Tusv 8 September 2017 14: 34
                  0
                  Quote: Thunderbolt
                  money invested in this machine could be spent more rationally:

                  Which is more expensive. This T or Ka 52? Both columns of jihad mobiles alone can crumble into cabbage. Where is the rationality of using funds?
                  As you rightly noted, the whole point is in a sung collective called the Chorus. Do you need losses? no. Extra money to cause a spinner when there is T it makes no sense
          2. Lopatov
            Lopatov 8 September 2017 17: 31
            0
            Quote: Tusv
            Immediately urban battle. Start up OFS

            It is very difficult to work with artillery with PDO in the city. Jet artillery is completely impossible. Only managed, or terrorize populations
      2. dep071
        dep071 11 September 2017 10: 36
        0
        In the city and the BMP is useless, trunks on all windows are not enough.
    2. Lopatov
      Lopatov 8 September 2017 17: 28
      0
      Quote: Thunderbolt
      Instead of the “T,” it would be better to create a well-protected 152 mm assault gun to demolish the enemy at once during the battles in the city.

      Too much.
      120/122 is enough for the eyes
      It, in fact, already exists, "Vienna" is called. Strengthen protection, put KAZ. And that’s it.
    3. dep071
      dep071 11 September 2017 10: 43
      +1
      I want to add, it would be better instead of the “T” to equip the army of the Russian Federation T-90S and accordingly the crews trained, since the armor is quickly exhausted.
  19. padded jacket
    padded jacket 8 September 2017 19: 38
    0
    Syria can be delivered, but not in any way to Israel, firstly they will copy it and secondly the next day our "Terminator" will be studied in detail by the sponsors of the Tel Aviv regime from the USA.
  20. Radikal
    Radikal 8 September 2017 22: 36
    0
    According to the chief of the Main Automobile and Armored Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Alexander Shevchenko, Syria and Israel simultaneously showed an interest in Terminator-type tank support fighting vehicles.
    Yes, it will be interesting if the Terminators sell at the same time to their eternal opponents - cynically and immorally! However, when it stopped "our" and also "their" capitalists!
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. Hell_bells
    Hell_bells 9 September 2017 17: 52
    0