CNN: The UN found that sarin in Khan-Sheikhun applied Assad

59
The American television channel CNN publishes material on the results of investigations into the use of toxic substances in the Syrian Khan-Sheikhoun. Recall that the investigation was conducted by a UN commission composed of experts of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical weapons. - The very organization that received the Nobel Prize for the export of chemical weapons from Syria.

The statement said that there was a massacre of people. Dead - 83 person.



CNN: The UN found that sarin in Khan-Sheikhun applied Assad


From the material on CNN (translation InoTV):
The UN specialists conducted 43 interviews with victims, witnesses and other people on the scene. The commission also analyzed photographs and satellite images. As a result, the UN came to the conclusion that it was Assad's forces that threw a shell with sarin on the city of Khan-Sheikhun. Then Russia vetoed a UN Security Council resolution, which prevented Assad from being held accountable for the crime.


If everything was as it is claimed by the OPCW Commission, then it also needs to do two main actions. First: to recognize that it did not contribute to the removal of chemical weapons from the territories under the control of official Damascus, and therefore to hand over the Nobel Medal, together with financial resources, to the Nobel Committee. Second: to make a statement about the phenomenal discovery of the following nature: people (representatives of the "White Helmets") have been discovered in Syria, who are so unique that they can work in the affected area without any personal protective equipment, excluding cotton-gauze bandages ...
59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    7 September 2017 06: 46
    Universal human beings cannot day without a new hutspa
    1. +13
      7 September 2017 06: 50
      Am I interested in this, they are paid specially or they do it out of pleasure?
      1. +9
        7 September 2017 06: 52
        they get paid for the pleasure
        1. +8
          7 September 2017 07: 07
          They are paid for the lie! fool
          1. +3
            7 September 2017 07: 21
            Quote: Tolstoevsky
            they get paid for the pleasure

            Quote: Simon
            They are paid for the lie!

            They are paid for the pleasure of telling lies.
            1. +8
              7 September 2017 08: 06
              From anger due to the success of Russia, they still say a lot of things ...
              1. +7
                7 September 2017 08: 41
                Hi Victor! hi This gang of lumberjacks will spoil the blood by virtue of its vile essence. The very fact of the existence of Russia has always been across their throat, is and will be.
                1. +3
                  7 September 2017 08: 44
                  Yes, and we need to be prepared for the flood, I would even say, an avalanche of false accusations.
      2. 0
        7 September 2017 07: 32
        Quote: Alex_Rarog
        Am I interested in this, they are paid specially or they do it out of pleasure?

        As long as we take this to heart so closely, they will try. Ignore like toothless dogs ...
        Quote: siberalt
        To catch one of the "white helmets", but to split properly.

        belay Ax? To the tailbone? lol
        Quote: Anarchist
        When the United States favorably, they refer to the UN, and when not, they spit on the resolution ...

        Not from the rostrum of this "great" organization they shook a test tube from Iraq? belay
      3. +1
        7 September 2017 09: 24
        Quote: Alex_Rarog
        Am I interested in this, they are paid specially or they do it out of pleasure?

        So they are bonded, what Uncle Sam says, they will write. And if the owner throws a bone, then white will be called black. How they want an honest person to slander, from the beginning Hussein, then Gaddafi is a conveyor of slander.
    2. +3
      7 September 2017 06: 53
      To catch one of the "white helmets", but to split properly. belay
      In general, it should conduct a normal investigation within the framework of the criminal legislation of Syria and consider it in a Syrian court.
    3. +9
      7 September 2017 06: 54
      Yes, the UN and other organizations controlled by it have already become an “emptiness”, nothing decisive, about which the mattresses are wiping their feet, and which the “summary” written in the State Department stupidly reads from the stands. Yes
      1. +17
        7 September 2017 07: 02
        He lost his legitimacy! It should be dissolved long ago as an instrument of the USA acting in the interests of an exclusive state ...
        When the United States favorably, they refer to the UN, and when not, they spit on the resolution ...
    4. +8
      7 September 2017 07: 03
      CNN is really fake news, but for most Americans who confuse Austria with Australia, the office is respectful ... However, in America even our AIDS info would be a very respected publication ... laughing
      1. +16
        7 September 2017 07: 09
        All this is paradoxical because the fact that many people in the USA also see Russia today ...
        How do such contradictory information fit into their heads? If the head is not empty, of course ...
        1. +5
          7 September 2017 07: 34
          Quote: Anarchist
          How so contradictory information fits into their heads? If the head is not empty, of course ...

          The advantage of all flat thoughts is that they fit into the head more ... what
    5. +1
      7 September 2017 07: 46
      CNN: The UN found that sarin in Khan-Sheikhun applied Assad


      From the same opera as about yesterday's hospitals.
    6. The comment was deleted.
      1. +6
        7 September 2017 11: 31
        Quote: professor
        Quote: Tolstoevsky
        Universal human beings cannot day without a new hutspa

        how cute

        We know these rabbit bunnies ... white and fluffy ... well, well laughing
        1. +1
          7 September 2017 11: 40
          Quote: Deadush
          We know these rabbit bunnies ... white and fluffy ... well, well

    7. +2
      7 September 2017 10: 54
      Quote: Tolstoevsky
      Universal human beings cannot day without a new hutspa

      Something like this ... am am am
      In Syria, they announced the shelling of the object of government troops by the Israeli Air Force, local media write.

      The Syrian side reports two dead servicemen. As a result of the airstrike, government troops also suffered material damage.

      According to media reports, we are talking about rocket fire. Missiles were fired from Lebanese airspace at 2:42 a.m. at Syrian military sites.

      Israeli officials have not yet commented on this information.
  2. +3
    7 September 2017 06: 51
    What a serious commission. She strictly asked who she needed and she was truthfully told what she needed. And to go to a dusty Sheikhun, to take tests, it’s not a royal thing! The UN is already completely in the dark.
  3. +3
    7 September 2017 07: 01
    American CNN publishes material on the results of an investigation into the use of toxic substances in Syrian Khan Sheikhun.

    ... you can not read further ...
    1. +1
      7 September 2017 07: 50
      Even shorter: "American CNN publishes ...." - skip on the machine
  4. 0
    7 September 2017 07: 01
    Quote: Alex_Rarog
    Am I interested in this, they are paid specially or they do it out of pleasure?

    --- Of course on purpose! They made a tricky move, grabbed the Nobel Prize, and now they want to grab a bribe for a lie! fool
  5. +1
    7 September 2017 07: 05
    Quote: Cutter
    Yes, the UN and other organizations controlled by it have already become an “emptiness”, nothing decisive, about which the mattresses are wiping their feet, and which the “summary” written in the State Department stupidly reads from the stands. Yes

    All right! The UN now does not mean anything, this organization is controlled by America. bully
  6. +2
    7 September 2017 07: 08
    UN experts conducted 43 interviews with victims, witnesses, and others at the scene. Commission also
    analyzed photographs and satellite images.
    what is this nonsense? !!!!!
    geniuses have appeared in our UN - do you determine the chemical composition of the soil by satellite image ?!
    So can these "geniuses" be driven into orbit, may they bring benefit to humanity
  7. +3
    7 September 2017 07: 12
    And how can you see sarin in the photo?
    1. 0
      7 September 2017 09: 57
      Okay to see (maybe it’s possible), but how to determine the place of production without chemical analysis from the photograph?
      For this, one more Nobel should be given, but in chemistry or physics.
  8. 0
    7 September 2017 07: 14
    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
    UN experts conducted 43 interviews with victims, witnesses, and others at the scene. Commission also
    analyzed photographs and satellite images.
    what is this nonsense? !!!!!
    geniuses have appeared in our UN - do you determine the chemical composition of the soil by satellite image ?!
    So can these "geniuses" be driven into orbit, may they bring benefit to humanity

    sarin smelled of Assad socks ... I propose a new trend "the smell of Assad" and scares, and attracts bully
  9. +1
    7 September 2017 07: 16
    In this case, it was this very commission of the United Nations that used sarin in Syria! am
  10. +1
    7 September 2017 07: 18
    The UN Commission - you need to read how the commission of the US State Department and the Pentagon? fool
  11. +1
    7 September 2017 07: 24
    The UN discredits itself to this end by positioning itself as a politically dependent, deceitful and unprofessional organization-"provocateur"
    1. +1
      7 September 2017 07: 36
      Discrediting the work of this organization is carried out purposefully. With its dissolution, the hands of all kinds of mattresses will be untied ... belay
  12. Ren
    +2
    7 September 2017 07: 45
    The UN specialists conducted 43 interviews with victims, witnesses and other people on the scene. The commission also analyzed photographs and satellite images. As a result, the UN came to the conclusion that it was Assad's forces that threw a shell with sarin on the city of Khan-Sheikhun. Then Russia vetoed a UN Security Council resolution, which prevented Assad from being held accountable for the crime.

    Cool, i.e. it is enough to conduct interviews and analyze photos to conclude on the use of a specific chemical substance ... belay No chem. analysis, research - our experts note feel
    And the most interesting thing is the questioning of the victims, the OPCW should share knowledge and skills, how, without being in place, you can question the corpses. what
  13. +1
    7 September 2017 07: 48
    And CNN and the UN and the OSCE and the ECHR and the rest of the crap have already shown their impartial and independent work.
  14. +2
    7 September 2017 07: 52
    And only on the third day, being held captive by the pale-faced, the Zorkiy Sokol saw that there was no fourth wall in the cell!
  15. +2
    7 September 2017 07: 53
    Have you come to a conclusion after talking and analyzing satellite imagery? Seriously? Identified chemicals without sample testing? Well, wizards are simple.
    1. +1
      7 September 2017 08: 23
      Psychics are self-taught, CNN generally fell below the plinth.
  16. +2
    7 September 2017 08: 01
    The UN specialists conducted 43 interviews with victims, witnesses and other people on the scene. The commission also analyzed photographs and satellite images. As a result, the UN came to the conclusion that it was Assad's forces that threw a shell with sarin on the city of Khan-Sheikhun. Then Russia vetoed a UN Security Council resolution, which prevented Assad from being held accountable for the crime.
    But to come to the place and take soil samples, it didn’t grow together ... Well, it’s clear how the Tomahawks need to explain the same thing ... That’s scary, the culprit is appointed IN ADVANCE and then facts, evidence and explanations of "witnesses"
  17. +1
    7 September 2017 08: 27
    The UN should not be reformed, but closed. They already clearly speak the American language, do what the United States will say. For the money of the whole world, they are very comfortable.
  18. +1
    7 September 2017 08: 29
    I want to intercede for CNN. Lavrov asked Kerry: “John, why doesn't he show CNN about the Russian troops in the Donbass?” He mumbled “Nah, I know.” It was on the air, I saw it myself. It means they can let fake somewhere but somewhere weak.
  19. 0
    7 September 2017 08: 43
    UN experts conducted 43 interviews with victims, witnesses, and OTHER people at the scene
    Then the truth is, these "others" will not lie laughing I immediately remembered the tears of a nurse from Kuwait good
  20. 0
    7 September 2017 08: 46
    Quote: Belimbai
    And how can you see sarin in the photo?

    They can wink Wait and find the same test tube Yes
  21. 0
    7 September 2017 08: 51
    In general, they could not come up with anything new ...
  22. 0
    7 September 2017 08: 56
    CNN / West to believe - do not respect yourself
  23. 0
    7 September 2017 09: 08
    When will Obama and Trump be attracted for the bombing of civilians?
  24. +2
    7 September 2017 09: 10
    It has long been necessary to tie with this structure. How is it possible to determine from satellite imagery who applied OB? And most importantly, where did this OM come from? And how many people who fell under the cloud of sarin (including the "rescuers") calmly touch the victims with their bare hands (as far as I remember from school, sarin is a nerve agent and acts through the pores of the skin, too)?
  25. 0
    7 September 2017 09: 39
    What is called - from empty to empty. And who needs logical calculations?
  26. +1
    7 September 2017 10: 49
    This is the very commission that refused to go to the place of the alleged chemical attack and take samples there, and instead accepted the reports of the “white helmets” on faith.
  27. +5
    7 September 2017 10: 56
    Insanity in action.
  28. +1
    7 September 2017 11: 11
    on the fragments of shells found fingerprints of Assad himself?)
  29. +2
    7 September 2017 12: 11
    1. Assad destroyed all stockpiles of chemical weapons with the help of Russia.
    2. What is the use of chemical weapons Assad? A positive answer will come only to the head of the idiot.
    3. Chemical weapons were captured by militants.
    4. In any case, the chemical weapons used (if this is not a provocation or forgery) were stolen i.e. committed a crime against legal authority.
  30. 0
    7 September 2017 12: 46
    Shaw, again? how can laughing
  31. 0
    7 September 2017 12: 57
    During this time, sarin has not yet lost its properties, stored in warehouses?
    1. 0
      7 September 2017 19: 17
      No, America has very good warehouses.
  32. Dot
    0
    7 September 2017 14: 45
    This has long been known.
    1. +3
      7 September 2017 14: 52
      In the same way, as it has long been known about the attack of the Polish military on a radio station in the peaceful German town of Gleivitz.
  33. +2
    7 September 2017 15: 27
    When Sarin was used in Khan Sheikhun and innocent people died, it was immediately clear to all people from the UN who was behind this, who was guilty of this tragedy. Only one thing was unclear - who personally ordered the use of sarin - Putin personally or Assad personally. Five minutes later, they decided that it was Assad. "White Helmets" made an exceptionally truthful film, shot at the site of the use of Sarin immediately after the commission of the terrible crime by the Assad regime.
    The film is called "Zarin! I finally can not breathe!"
  34. +2
    8 September 2017 06: 05
    "UN experts conducted 43 interviews with victims, witnesses and other people who were at the scene. The commission also analyzed photographs and satellite images." !!!! - It remains only to laugh at the "work" of these experts ... and the analyzes, the exhumation of corpses? and indeed, I doubt that these are specialists. What is there yellow-green cloud from sarin? What is the smell in the air? Who would approach the hearth in gauze bandages and come out alive? What fool would wash those affected by water from a hose? Anyway, why gas attack on the rear city? Let them at least ask experts in chemical weapons how and why it is used by the army !!! Army, not bandits !!!