Military Review

US State Department: "Inspection" of the building of the Russian consulate was legal

60
The US Department of State, which has no relation to Russia's private property in the United States, announced that the “inspection” of Russia's diplomatic real estate was carried out in accordance with the law. At the same time, it was announced that employees of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) did not participate in actual searches. In that case, who did the “inspection”? And spent on what grounds?

US State Department: "Inspection" of the building of the Russian consulate was legal


RIA News cites a statement by an employee of the US Foreign Service:
The accusations by the Russian government that US officials broke down the door of the property or that the FBI searched the premises is not true. Over the weekend, Russian embassy staff were invited to join State Department officials and walk through three buildings in San Francisco, New York, and Washington, which the United States demanded that the Russian government close. This tour did not take place when these buildings were still considered premises of the embassy or consulate. These inspections were carried out to ensure the safety and security of buildings and to confirm that the Russian government vacated the premises. The United States fully complies with the Vienna Convention, US laws and bilateral agreements in these actions, as well as in its demands for Russia to close these diplomatic and consular premises.


Apparently, the employee who tried to break the ceiling in the building of the Russian consulate also did not violate the law ... Here is the law in the USA: hacks and searches are called “inspections”, and a raider seizure of property of another state is not considered a crime.

Recall that Russia will sue the US court to establish the "legality" of the weaning of property by the American authorities.
Photos used:
https://ru.wikipedia.org
60 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. dik-nsk
    dik-nsk 6 September 2017 06: 37
    +15
    Russia will file with a US court to establish the "legality" of the seizure of property by US authorities
    and lose, because playing with a sharpie on his territory and conditions is pointless .. but an answer is needed
    1. Anarchist
      Anarchist 6 September 2017 06: 44
      +24
      Not the fact that he will lose. But the process will drag on for a long time. Of course it’s worth suing. But you need to look for other leverage too!
      To beat a sharpie is a matter of principle ...
      But in general, at the card table, the cheater is breaking fingers!
      1. Alex777
        Alex777 6 September 2017 07: 16
        +5
        Not the fact that he will lose. Especially if you agreed on this in advance ... lol
        As for the other answers. All summer, all the special services, the Pentagon and the State Department, butted whose people would stay in Russia by September 1. They quarreled. somehow agreed, and here again - 155 people can additionally drive off. laughing
        Everything now needs to be renegotiated in a new way. There is no time to work at all. And it doesn’t matter what Putin said - until we drive. All the same, they need to prepare for this. That's what life has gone ... hi
    2. Finches
      Finches 6 September 2017 06: 46
      +17
      Only naive fools from the liberal stratum think that in the USA the rule of law ... laughing
      In the US, even presidents are elected with the support of the godfathers! In countries with "totalitarian" regimes, human rights are observed many times more and there are more democracies than in the United States! So it’s not surprising ... Why the United States doesn’t like these regimes - because against the background they can clearly see all the chaos created by the mournful mantras about mythical democratic foundations!
      1. Anarchist
        Anarchist 6 September 2017 06: 51
        +19
        Why are you so right away? The rule of law in the USA! Money Market Law. Who has more money is the most important thing. That's the law!
      2. oldseaman1957
        oldseaman1957 6 September 2017 07: 10
        +5
        Quote: Finches
        Only naive fools from the liberal stratum think that in the USA the rule of law ...
        - The lawlessness of Fushington rolls over. Not afraid to break your main pillar: Property Law. And they start to visit thoughts like: Isn’t it time for us to dig out Kuzkin’s mother? Is there really nothing SUCH Uncle Shoigu?
        1. bolkodav68
          bolkodav68 6 September 2017 08: 27
          +1
          the more Americans have military bases the better for us. we have something to bomb and destroy. and they will have to hit the territory of Russia and this is a nuclear war. Americans need it?
      3. analgin
        analgin 6 September 2017 07: 13
        0
        Quote: Finches
        Only naive fools from the liberal stratum think that in the USA the rule of law ... laughing

        ... but you now convince these fools with arguments and facts, right?

        Quote: Finches

        In the US, even presidents are elected with the support of the godfathers!

        And therefore, the "experts" in the election of American presidents, starting from this site and ending with all state media, told people that: "Trump will never win the election. He will simply not be" allowed "to do this." "Obama uses the entire administrative resource, falsifies the results", etc.?
        Write more!

        Quote: Finches
        In countries with "totalitarian" regimes, human rights are observed many times more and there is more democracy than in the United States!

        Examples, as I understand it, will not be again?
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Finches
          Finches 6 September 2017 09: 10
          +8
          You just read an article - isn't that an example? And arrests around the world of citizens of third countries - is this not an example? The bombing of Yugoslavia and the invasion of Iraq, bypassing the UN resolution, is not an example! The conclusion of the Russian citizen Bout, on very shaky evidence, is this not an example? The unpunished and baseless use of firearms by the police, especially on niggas ... is not an example? And the completely idiotic voting system for the President - when it is chosen by specially appointed people, and not the majority - is this not an example? The strongest tradition of political lobbying and adoption of laws in the interests of individual corporations is not an example. Well, from the story, set by the frank mafia Kennedy and she was removed ...
          While you are a simple citizen, an illusion of freedom is created around you, but as soon as you start interfering in your own business, the Law and Democracy will end for you! The Americans even make films about this, not embarrassed, for example, even if varnished, but reflecting the principles of "democracy" - "Enemy of the state" ... Just don’t write nonsense in response, like accusing me of judging America only by Hollywood movies! If you already started advocating, do it without a cliche, pathos: and nonsense hi:
          1. Tatyana
            Tatyana 6 September 2017 09: 30
            +3
            Finches
            While you are a simple citizen, an illusion of freedom is created around you, but as soon as you start interfering in your own business, the Law and Democracy will end for you!
            Evgeny! Add here Edward Snowdan, Julian Assange and many others with their revealing materials about the politics of the representatives of the US State Department, the CIA, etc.!
            Analgin is still zombified and has not gotten into the true politics of the supranational globalist rulers of the United States and the West.
            1. Finches
              Finches 6 September 2017 10: 05
              +2
              Tatyana love Thank you for the absolutely correct addition! hi
            2. analgin
              analgin 6 September 2017 17: 49
              0
              Quote: Tatiana

              Analgin is still zombified and has not gotten into the true politics of the supranational globalist rulers of the United States and the West.

              Unlike the young lady (this treatment does not offend you, I hope?) From you, I have the opportunity to read and watch to compare - not only Russian news, but also English-language ones. Well, which of us is zombie? good
              1. Tatyana
                Tatyana 6 September 2017 18: 14
                +1
                analgin
                young lady (this treatment does not offend you, I hope?)
                Actually, I have a name. I’m not a good girl by age. Married for a long time.
                Unlike you, I have the opportunity to read and watch to compare - not only Russian news, but also English-language. Well, which of us is zombie? good
                Ha! You, of course! laughing And I don’t even watch TV, so as not to be zombied! yes I use the Internet and analytical materials.
                1. analgin
                  analgin 6 September 2017 21: 40
                  0
                  Quote: Tatiana
                  And I don’t even watch TV, so as not to be zombied! yes I use the Internet and analytical materials.

                  I have no doubt.
                  Which CNN anchor do you like best?

                  By the way, live broadcast.
                  1. Tatyana
                    Tatyana 7 September 2017 01: 23
                    +1
                    Well, as I understand it, these are CNN presenters Kelt Baldwin and Hala Gorani. Am I not mistaken?
                    Do you think CNN is an independent news agency you can trust?

                    For example, I remember very well how the American agency (CNN, in my opinion, and everything in the West after it) attributed the exact airstrikes on ISIS to our Russian air force pilots in Syria, to the US airstrikes on the US Air Force! This was at the very beginning of the presence of the airborne forces in Syria at the request of Assad. And what have American troops been doing there until then?
                    CNN is dependent on the commercial and diplomatic support of the US government abroad, and for this reason most of the news is generated by the television channel based on government press releases and reports. CNN is criticized for its deliberate alliance and symbiosis with the authorities, which leads to the TV channel becoming non-critical media, and the activities of its employees are reduced to covering the “right” press conferences, inviting the relevant guests to the broadcast and saying everything without errors names.
                    1. analgin
                      analgin 7 September 2017 09: 56
                      0
                      Quote: Tatiana
                      Well, as I understand it, these are CNN presenters Kelt Baldwin and Hala Gorani. Am I not mistaken?

                      And Hala Gorani, right?

                      Quote: Tatiana
                      Do you think CNN is an independent news agency you can trust?

                      I believe that 100% can not be trusted to anyone. Everyone needs to be checked. Only some need to be checked more often, while others less often.

                      Quote: Tatiana
                      For example, I remember very well how the American agency (CNN, in my opinion, and everything in the West after it) attributed the exact airstrikes on ISIS to our Russian air force pilots in Syria, to the US airstrikes on the US Air Force!

                      Not CNN, you yourself wrote:

                      Just do not forget that both PBS and France 2 admitted the mistake, apologized to the readers and deleted the stories (on YouTube, the PBS video with apologies remained with PBS). Can you say that the Russian media do the same? About "and after him everything in the West in the West" do not want to get better?
                      PS: Putin has already deleted the movie about the American Apache from the phone and apologized for the mistake? wink
          2. analgin
            analgin 6 September 2017 17: 35
            0
            Quote: Finches
            You just read an article - isn't that an example? And arrests around the world of citizens of third countries - is this not an example? The bombing of Yugoslavia and the invasion of Iraq, bypassing the UN resolution, is not an example! The conclusion of the Russian citizen Bout, on very shaky evidence, is this not an example? The unpunished and baseless use of firearms by the police, especially on niggas ... is not an example? And the completely idiotic voting system for the President - when it is chosen by specially appointed people, and not the majority - is this not an example? The strongest tradition of political lobbying and adoption of laws in the interests of individual corporations is not an example. Well, from the story, set by the frank mafia Kennedy and she was removed ...

            Why are you asking about examples of human rights violations in the United States and "In countries with" totalitarian "regimes" pulled together international law, the "idiotic presidential voting system" and why, in general, the "tradition of political lobbying"? To give solidity?
            Want to specifically discuss
            The unpunished and baseless use of firearms by the police, especially on niggas ...

            and for example, how are champagne bottles in the ass (and a bunch of similar cases) inserted into detainees at Russian police stations?

            Quote: Finches
            Just don’t write nonsense in response, like accusing me of judging only America based on Hollywood films! :

            “Do you really judge by personal visits and experience?” wink
            - Is it really possible to read and watch news from there in the original, and not in the "translation" of INOSMI and Rush Tudey? laughing
            Surprise me with your horizons and knowledge.

            Quote: Finches
            If you have already taken up advocacy, do it without a cliche, pathos: and nonsense hi:

            I'm not a lawyer for America, but to hear the same thing from someone who, in any discussion of the United States, has the same set of “arguments” is at least ridiculous.
        3. petyaivolk
          petyaivolk 6 September 2017 09: 18
          +2
          Quote: analgin
          ... but you now convince these fools with arguments and facts, right?

          -And how many hundreds of people a year die in the USA as a result of police lawlessness?
          The Washington Post reported that it recorded every case of police killings in 2015 during the course of their duties, using telephone calls, police reports, local media reports and other sources.
          The newspaper came to the conclusion that this year the frequency of such killings is almost 2,6 cases per day, which is more than double the official FBI data for the last decade - 1,1 cases per day.
          "Such murders in most cases remain unknown," said former police chief Jim Buermann to the newspaper. "We will never be able to reduce the number of murders committed by police if we fail to establish reliable information."
          http://www.bbc.com/russian/international/2015/05/
          150531_us_police_shootings_data
          -And why in the United States create groups to educate citizens on how to properly talk with the police?
          -And why does the USA lead in the number of prisoners in absolute terms?
          - About 2,2 million people are in jail. This is 25% of all prisoners on the planet (more than in the 35 largest European countries combined, and 40% more than in China), although the US population is only 5% of the world's population. Among these prisoners, about 71 thousand are minors.

          The United States of America also holds the lead in the specific number of citizens in jail: as of 2015, about 700 out of every hundred thousand were serving a term, were detained on suspicion of committing a crime, or were detained pending trial [5].

          -How do these statements relate to each other ?:
          Quote: analgin
          Quote: Finches
          In the US, even presidents are elected with the support of the godfathers!

          Quote: analgin
          And therefore, the "experts" in the election of American presidents ... "Obama uses all the administrative resources, falsifies the results," etc.?

          Quote: analgin
          Examples, as I understand it, will not be again?

          You are a manipulator and a pigeon grandmaster, is this an example that suits you?
          1. Finches
            Finches 6 September 2017 10: 06
            +1
            You also absolutely correctly noticed everything! hi
          2. analgin
            analgin 6 September 2017 17: 46
            0
            Quote: petyaivolk
            The Washington Post reported that it recorded every case of police killings in 2015 during the course of their duties, using telephone calls, police reports, local media reports and other sources.


            Well, let's continue such statistics for Russia. Weak?

            Secret FSB prison in the suburbs, where people are tortured.
            https://zona.media/article/2017/07/24/secret-pirs
            on
            1. petyaivolk
              petyaivolk 9 September 2017 02: 14
              0
              Quote: analgin
              Weak?

              I heard there is being tortured by analgin. Fiends.
        4. Slovak
          Slovak 6 September 2017 10: 48
          +2
          Perhaps I agree with the opinion of doctors. Analgin is harmful.
      4. Amurets
        Amurets 7 September 2017 11: 50
        +1
        Quote: Finches
        In countries with "totalitarian" regimes, human rights are observed many times more and there are more democracies than in the United States! So there is nothing surprising ...

        Right. S. Sukhinov wrote very well on this subject. In the fantastic novel "Worlds from the Future".
        "Ultimately, tyrants care much more about ordinary people than rulers elected by the people. A tyrant knows that his power is unlimited by definition and that it will go to his children and grandchildren. What is the use of robbing people to the last thread or humiliating him provoking riots and revolutions? But the ruler elected by the people is always a temporary worker. He is good or bad, but he is in a hurry to take advantage of the fruits of his short-lived power. Not to mention the tyrant does not owe his power to anyone but his ancestors. Democratic elections, however, inevitably require huge sums of money from each candidate for the election campaign, and then he will have to compensate for these funds at the expense of the same people ... Sorry, host, I got carried away again! ”
        “This time you said sensible things, man. "
    3. user1212
      user1212 6 September 2017 06: 53
      +2
      Quote: dik-nsk
      and lose, because playing with a sharpie on his territory and conditions is pointless .. but an answer is needed

      Here Russia wins for any outcome. Will they return - the question is closed, they will not return - they will seize US property in the Russian Federation (Vtorov’s mansion, cottage in Serebryany Bor and warehouses on Dorozhnaya Street), poking any objections to the decision of their own court
      1. Anarchist
        Anarchist 6 September 2017 06: 56
        +19
        So double standards same. Their broom sweeps only one way. A shovel rakes in another. Garbage in our direction, money in theirs.
        Exclusively in theirs ...
        1. user1212
          user1212 6 September 2017 07: 00
          +3
          Quote: Anarchist
          So double standards

          Yes, but even the Americans will not be able to blame the Russian Federation for the implementation of the decision American vessels laughing
          1. Iaaa
            Iaaa 6 September 2017 07: 06
            +5
            Quote: user1212
            Americans will not be able to blame the implementation of the decision of the American court

            Is not a fact! They say hackers intervened in the trial. lol Scary Russian hackers .... am laughing
            1. user1212
              user1212 6 September 2017 07: 08
              +5
              In general, the story is stupid. The State Department has degraded to the level of the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry
              1. Iaaa
                Iaaa 6 September 2017 07: 12
                +6
                Not, it seems to me, this is a kuev in the person of Chugunkin, studying with the State Department, but ..... he does not always succeed. And in principle, two boots of steam.
                How is GDP expressed there?
                - Confuse Austria with Australia?
                And what do we want?
        2. lance
          lance 6 September 2017 08: 07
          0
          the property is seized and returned according to the laws of the country in which it is located. seized property in the usa may not return to us. on the basis of whose department is withdrawn no one speaks.
      2. AUL
        AUL 6 September 2017 09: 05
        +1
        This bypass took place not when these buildings were still considered premises of the embassy or consulate. These inspections were carried out to ensure the safety and protection of buildings and confirm that the Russian government vacated the premises.
        Here I would like to know more! On what basis were these buildings taken from us? After all, the Americans somehow justified it, but for some reason we have not a word about it! Nevertheless, I would like to know the reason (at least formal) for such actions!
        1. analgin
          analgin 6 September 2017 21: 32
          0
          Quote: AUL
          This bypass took place not when these buildings were still considered premises of the embassy or consulate. These inspections were carried out to ensure the safety and protection of buildings and confirm that the Russian government vacated the premises.
          Here I would like to know more! On what basis were these buildings taken from us? After all, the Americans somehow justified it, but for some reason we have not a word about it! Nevertheless, I would like to know the reason (at least formal) for such actions!

          And you try to ask about it specifically, Tatyana or Zyablitseva. They are not zombie people. They use the Internet and read analytical materials even in hostile languages. They will definitely explain to you. lol
          Well, if they can’t, then I’ll have to, because in the Russian media you are unlikely to find this.
      3. Kurare
        Kurare 6 September 2017 13: 51
        +3
        Quote: user1212
        ... poking at all objections to the decision of their own court

        It is the precedent system of jurisprudence here that will play a very cruel joke against the United States, I absolutely agree with you. Do not return - a precedent. Return - we demand compensation!
    4. siberalt
      siberalt 6 September 2017 08: 08
      +1
      You need to go to court in any case. But with retaliatory measures to pull - do not respect yourself.
    5. Skif83
      Skif83 6 September 2017 08: 19
      +1
      If you feel strong enough, then in response to the cheater’s attempt to “wrap you up” you need to be straight in the jaw, with pushing to the side ...
      Tired of these games of nobility, some kind of international law.
      In the international arena, there is only one right - the right of the strong!
      If you are strong - answer so that no one else has a desire!
      And the courts, especially the US-a divorce for fools!
      1. Paranoid50
        Paranoid50 6 September 2017 12: 37
        +1
        Quote: Skif83
        If you feel strong enough, then in response to the cheater’s attempt to “wrap you up” you need to be straight in the jaw, with pushing to the side ...
        Tired of these games of nobility, some kind of international law.
        In the international arena, there is only one right - the right of the strong!

        There is an option - not to get "direct". The one who is a sharpie, he, because, in addition to aces in his sleeve, he also holds a “colt” under the table. As an option - "call for a smoke on the porch", and, well, there you can ... not even "direct" into the tambourine, but from the "short" into the liver. Not very impressive, but effective. yes
    6. ADmA_RUS
      ADmA_RUS 6 September 2017 09: 57
      +1
      The funniest thing is if he loses, the USA itself will lose the most from this)
    7. Antianglosax
      Antianglosax 6 September 2017 10: 31
      +2
      The court is a delicate trolling, but a long one. It would be necessary at the same time to arrange a bunch of troubles for the Junkers!
  2. Herculesic
    Herculesic 6 September 2017 06: 39
    +8
    I ask our Ministry of Defense to inspect the White House in the United States and the Pentagon by the forces of our Airborne Forces and Special Forces - our fighters will carry out all their actions legally - say, by decision of the Basmanny Court of Moscow am
    1. Karaul73
      Karaul73 6 September 2017 06: 44
      +1
      Wow and you came up with a fairy tale. Already goosebumps on Trump's back. Have you seen a special kind of concern from Lavrov on TV? Nothing coming soon. There was no such consolation after spitting in the face of Russia.
      1. user1212
        user1212 6 September 2017 07: 05
        0
        Quote: Sentry73
        There was no such consolation after spitting in the face of Russia.

        What a horror. Millions of dead, hundreds of millions of refugees !!! But no ... only two buildings were taken from the Foreign Ministry. Universal tragedy crying
        1. mikh-korsakov
          mikh-korsakov 6 September 2017 09: 21
          +1
          Quote: user1212
          Quote: Sentry73
          There was no such consolation after spitting in the face of Russia.

          What a horror. Millions of dead, hundreds of millions of refugees !!! But no ... only two buildings were taken from the Foreign Ministry. Universal tragedy crying

          The fact is that buildings were taken from our Foreign Ministry, and Merkel should take care of hundreds of millions of refugees. she is tolerant, millions of dead appeared due to the fault of the United States and the same tolerant Europe. who decided to teach democracy and for some reason consider themselves entitled to decide whose Crimea and Donbass. References to international law after the bombing of Yugoslavia and the annexation of Kosovo are not considered. There is no international law!
      2. SPACE
        SPACE 6 September 2017 08: 22
        +2
        Quote: Sentry73
        There was no such consolation after spitting in the face of Russia.

        Yes, when you already wipe yourself off at last, ugh spit.
  3. soroKING
    soroKING 6 September 2017 06: 47
    0
    Quote: dik-nsk
    Russia will file with a US court to establish the "legality" of the seizure of property by US authorities
    and lose, because playing with a sharpie on his territory and conditions is pointless .. but an answer is needed

    if you hire expensive luer, then everything is possible ... only business wassat nothing personal, but how long will it take?
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. victorsh
    victorsh 6 September 2017 06: 55
    +3
    That is, if I come to the Amer’s consulate in Yekaterinburg and start “rummaging around” in their rooms, will there be anything illegal? And if I’m also going to “take away” someone’s (from the consulate) beautiful wife (I can hardly believe it), this is normal ? (The last sentence is JOKE) .But neither in the USA, nor in ISRAEL I GO. I do not have a WONDERFUL place for rest in Russia.
    1. user1212
      user1212 6 September 2017 07: 41
      0
      Quote: victorsh
      That is, if I come to the Amerov consulate in Yekaterinburg and start “rummaging around” in their rooms, will there be nothing illegal?

      - Deprive the consulate of consular status. It is legal
      - Start a case (bloody Russian hackers), in which to seize property "on suspicion for clarification." This is also legal
      - ???????
      - PROFIT
  6. igordok
    igordok 6 September 2017 07: 48
    +2
    I can’t get rid of the feeling of similarity between the buildings of the representative office and the book depository in Texas, from which Kennedy was officially killed. Maybe this building will cause Trump's death, in the political sense.
  7. Evil 55
    Evil 55 6 September 2017 07: 54
    0
    And what, in this case, does Russia interfere with regular inspection of offices, diplomatic mail and places of rest for personnel in the buildings of the US diplomatic mission in Russia?
    1. lance
      lance 6 September 2017 08: 10
      0
      Russian laws do not suggest this.
    2. stas-xnumx
      stas-xnumx 6 September 2017 08: 52
      +2
      But Russia is simply stingy ... They kick it, it’s probably only the lazy that it’s not laughing at. We survived in the USSR, I doubt very much that it would come to that.
      1. Kurare
        Kurare 6 September 2017 13: 54
        +2
        Quote: stas-21127
        We survived, in the USSR, I really doubt that it would come to that.

        Russia is not the USSR. Russia may lose this battle, but we need to win the war! But the Soviet Union (cold) war, by the way, and lost.
  8. Will
    Will 6 September 2017 08: 26
    0
    I don’t think that the attempt to sue is so hopeless, and even under the watchful eye of TV cameras, “Beat” them with their own laws - it requires only a very good advocacy.
  9. stas-xnumx
    stas-xnumx 6 September 2017 08: 54
    0
    And we all smile and wave, which is already not just that they put us up with cancer, but simply spread it on the floor simply. Respect is zero, we have only some bazaars about our damn furious bear.
  10. mikh-korsakov
    mikh-korsakov 6 September 2017 09: 10
    0
    An employee of the American foreign service, in some reports, referred to as a representative, although he is a "representative", but lies. Our buildings and the land under them are privately owned by the Russian Federation. In principle, in agreement with the American authorities, the Russian Federation may open there, although the brothel for gays, the authorities, given the tolerance, would not mind, but for our great country this is unacceptable. Another tolerant proposal is to lease the premises to the rare animals protection society, for example in Washington, symbolically, to the gorilla protection society.
  11. LAWNER
    LAWNER 6 September 2017 09: 28
    +1
    If this is our deep property, then why did the guard not work? I wonder how the American marines will behave in a similar situation on the territory of Russia?
    1. Krasnyiy komissar
      Krasnyiy komissar 6 September 2017 10: 31
      0
      If the Marines show resistance, then Alpha will go into action.
  12. pvv113
    pvv113 6 September 2017 10: 32
    +2
    US State Department: "Inspection" of the building of the Russian consulate was legal

    State Department employees in doubt

    In any situation, they make this expression
  13. PValery53
    PValery53 6 September 2017 13: 57
    0
    Next in line is the Russian law, "Whip America's diplomats in market squares without trial." - Response "adequate" measures ...
  14. ljoha_d
    ljoha_d 6 September 2017 18: 58
    0
    ,,,, US Department of State: "Inspecting" the building of the Russian consulate was legal ,,,,,, Yes, who would doubt it. Are you doing something illegal?
  15. LeonidL
    LeonidL 7 September 2017 05: 56
    +2
    The law that draws - where he turned, that is where it turned out. Anyway, the right is not the one who is right, but who has more rights.
  16. Back in USSR
    Back in USSR 7 September 2017 11: 29
    0
    Well, yes, firefighters came to check their readiness for winter ...