Military Review
Sign In Register

The newest IRC Chef "Vyshny Volochyok" first went to sea in the course of factory testing

40
The newest small missile ship (MRK) of the Black Sea fleet Vyshny Volochek, which recently completed the transition by inland waterway from Zelenodolsk to Novorossiysk, first went to sea as part of factory sea trials, reports press office Southern Military District.

On the ship, the process of installation of equipment and structures, taken for a period of towing along river beds, has been fully completed. The crew of the Vyshny Volochk and plant specialists will test the reliability of the systems and mechanisms of interregional communications in various operating modes in the combat training grounds.
- said the head of the department of information support of the Black Sea Fleet Vyacheslav Trukhachev

The newest IRC Chef "Vyshny Volochyok" first went to sea in the course of factory testing


To ensure the actions of the ship at sea, auxiliary fleet vessels from the Novorossiysk Naval Base and naval aircraft are involved aviation BSF.

Small rocket ships of the 21631 project developed by Zelenodolsk Design Bureau OJSC are multipurpose ships equipped with modern artillery, rocket, anti-sabotage, anti-aircraft and radio-technical weapons. "Vyshny Volochyok" is the sixth ship of the modernized series "Buyan-M", which have an increased displacement and are equipped with the latest high-precision rocket weapons long-range - a universal rocket complex "Caliber-NK", designed to destroy marine and coastal targets.
Photos used:
http://stat.mil.ru/index.htm
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Yandex Zen
40 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Magic archer
    Magic archer 5 September 2017 14: 09
    +11
    Our mosquito fleet is more, which is very pleasing!
    1. maxim947
      maxim947 5 September 2017 14: 14
      +4
      Why offend? For the Black Sea, that’s it.
      1. Magic archer
        Magic archer 5 September 2017 14: 18
        +5
        Is this a nasty name) ?! Mosquito is a fleet of small but very dangerous ships! This name has long been used wink
        1. maxim947
          maxim947 5 September 2017 14: 25
          0
          Well, I don’t know ..)) It sounds like a shame, but the composition of the weapons is not that mosquito))
          1. Magic archer
            Magic archer 5 September 2017 14: 38
            +2
            It sounds threatening !!! Mosquito with Caliber! In the west, often even destroyers with weaker weapons! And among the corvettes, we are ahead of the rest soldier
            1. seos
              seos 5 September 2017 14: 57
              +1
              Not in MRK and corvettes power .... they are able to fight only with external target designation because the detection range is very small
              1. Magic archer
                Magic archer 5 September 2017 14: 59
                +1
                Well, this is understandable. The thing is that these are ships of the near coastal zone. Therefore, target designation can be obtained from the ground. There was infa about drones, but this is a matter of the future
          2. Alexey RA
            Alexey RA 5 September 2017 15: 07
            0
            Quote: maxim947
            It sounds like a shame, and the composition of the weapons is not so mosquito

            Sounds normal - this term is more than 100 years old.
            "Mosquito fleet", a term for a combination of high-speed and maneuverable small warships - torpedo, patrol and other boats. The term appeared during the 1st World War

            Against the background of destroyers of 10-20 kilotons, our RTOs are really "mosquito".
      2. Aspid 86
        Aspid 86 6 September 2017 10: 07
        0
        Mosquito from the name used on ships RCC "Mosquito"
    2. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 5 September 2017 14: 30
      +6
      Scheduled 12
      Under construction 4
      In the ranks 6
  2. HEATHER
    HEATHER 5 September 2017 14: 09
    +7
    The sickly "baby."
    1. bk316
      bk316 5 September 2017 14: 30
      +6
      Yeah, baby, when he walked along the GB, and I caught fish there, I was very glad that I went ashore for lunch, he literally squeezed water out of the bank. Nafig boats washed ashore.
      1. HEATHER
        HEATHER 5 September 2017 14: 32
        +2
        So I say, "baby"! hi
    2. Black Colonel
      Black Colonel 5 September 2017 14: 42
      +2
      by video
      Why doesn't water leave the deck? Is that the way it should be? belay
      1. HEATHER
        HEATHER 5 September 2017 15: 23
        +1
        Why doesn't water leave the deck? That's interesting. You can’t cut out the cracks? Well, almost a la submarine.
        1. bk316
          bk316 5 September 2017 15: 33
          +2
          I think it is cut out, it just swallows a lot, the water does not have time to leave.
          I also have a cockpit on a self-draining boat and also without a bow awning in a big wave does not help.
  3. Herculesic
    Herculesic 5 September 2017 14: 13
    +3
    It would not hurt to build destroyers for the fleet!
    1. HEATHER
      HEATHER 5 September 2017 14: 31
      +3
      It seems the project has been approved. But with a displacement with a cruiser. We'll wait.
      1. seos
        seos 5 September 2017 15: 05
        0
        The power of the fleet can be understood much cheaper and without such operating costs that these destroyers will give ...
        I think the fleet needs: 2 destroyer-helicopter carriers and 4 light fuel-efficient helicopter carriers ... it will come out much cheaper and add more power ... Destroyers or cruisers will not give us advantages and will not equal the chances of a naval battle ... and what radars will be installed on these ships? Radar Poliment or Radar Frigate? we produce radars only for frigates and we never made others .... Even on our cruisers there are radarchipusiks from the frigate ...
        And it wouldn’t hurt our defense mines to draw up a plan for the development of the fleet, and then rivet the ships ...
        1. Nehist
          Nehist 5 September 2017 20: 13
          0
          Dear, we have 4 fleets, of which 2 are oceanic so we need full-fledged destroyers and not squalor called helicopter destroyers, although if such as in Japan they will go and not 2 pieces 8
  4. Holoy
    Holoy 5 September 2017 14: 30
    0
    It can enter Europe through the Danube, along the Dnieper and get to Kiev ...
    1. Observer2014
      Observer2014 5 September 2017 14: 38
      +3
      Holoy
      It can enter Europe through the Danube, along the Dnieper and get to Kiev ...
      Is he supposed to deliver weapons there personally? laughing What to get on the Dnieper ??? wassat
      1. Holoy
        Holoy 5 September 2017 14: 42
        0
        You would correct the logic ... and study geography.
        1. Observer2014
          Observer2014 5 September 2017 14: 55
          +5
          Holoy
          You would correct the logic ... and study geography.
          Holoy Where are you and where is the logic in general! wassat A pathological envy and sneak of the West. And even in this article about RTOs with missiles over 2500 km range on board, you manage to print nonsense, with an eye that they will peck at your garbage. Holoy I, I know you not the first year. So we do not need la-la laughing
      2. Paranoid50
        Paranoid50 5 September 2017 14: 45
        +1
        Quote: Observer2014
        What to get on the Dnieper ??? wassat

        Duc, "torpedo people" ... wassat Ooh ...
  5. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 5 September 2017 14: 34
    +1
    Here are the goodies. Good, "toothy" boats, with adequate weapons. Not aircraft carriers - but where do we keep aircraft carriers, if they were? In the face of opposition from the Barents, they simply will not be "released", and why keep quiet why, when basically the European part needs to be defended ...
    1. seos
      seos 5 September 2017 15: 12
      0
      Under the conditions of counteraction, these boats are defenseless .... larger ships should protect them .... and in the conditions of small reservoirs it is necessary to build small submarines with the same caliber, but from them the min.defense turns back ...
      1. bk316
        bk316 5 September 2017 15: 36
        +2
        To build submarines on the Caspian Sea is useless, if you yourself understand.
        And on Black, and so did the series.
      2. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa 5 September 2017 18: 00
        +2
        Quote: seos
        In the face of opposition, these boats are defenseless.

        I’m looking at the photo: at the stern of the SAM from “Verb” we collected optics ... And they promised to put the “Shell-SM” ...
        Or we have in the best Russian traditions: "The promised 3 of the year is waiting!" sad
    2. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 5 September 2017 15: 29
      +3
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Not aircraft carriers - but where do we keep aircraft carriers, if they were? In the face of opposition from the Barents simply “will not be released”,

      And our AB does not need to go “around the corner”. Their task No. 1 is to provide an “air defense umbrella” over our naval groups, covering “at the distant frontiers” (ideally the “corner” —Spitsbergen) of the SSBN’s position areas and the SF base.
      For in those parts of the airport there are no aerodromes at hand, and those that are are far and not large enough.
  6. Hadji Murat
    Hadji Murat 5 September 2017 14: 55
    +1
    with chinese engines? or did it yourself?
  7. afrikanez
    afrikanez 5 September 2017 15: 32
    0
    Small spool but precious! For our non-invasive fleet, just what we need. From any reptile you can beat off, just spit.
  8. venaya
    venaya 5 September 2017 15: 33
    +1
    Small Rocket Ship (RTO) ,,,Vyshny Volochek»

    And I really liked the name of the ship, because it my motherland very distant ancestors! Once the Persians (2600 years ago) built a “canal” between the Nile and the Red Sea in Egypt, because there, too, the ships were dragged along, count from the Indian Ocean to the Mediterranean, and this made it possible for coastal navigation around the entire African continent, which is evident in realities were carried out.
    1. Jaros81
      Jaros81 6 September 2017 09: 17
      +1
      And I live in this city now.
  9. andrewkor
    andrewkor 5 September 2017 15: 35
    0
    Is this the one Duet is standing on?
  10. Aleksandr_2
    Aleksandr_2 5 September 2017 16: 05
    0
    for the black and the Azov Sea, that’s it! Bandera-fascists, to keep in check from the sea is always necessary .....
  11. Music
    Music 5 September 2017 17: 19
    0
    Well, while the Russian Federation cannot build large ships. No engines. But, the Russian Federation with some delay, but it builds boats.
  12. Vladimir1155
    Vladimir1155 5 September 2017 19: 54
    0
    good ship
  13. Andrew
    Andrew 5 September 2017 22: 36
    0
    And those two Black Sea RTOs will remain in the Baltic?
  14. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 6 September 2017 10: 39
    0
    We strengthen the Black Sea Fleet and it pleases. RTOs are in the coastal zone, and any fleet will be able to tie their hands and feet.