Atlantic Council: US should send fleet to the Sea of Azov, stop Russians
Russian edition "Independent newspaper"With reference to the American Atlantic Council, publishes a statement by representatives of this council about the" expediency of sending US Navy ships to the Kerch Strait area. " It is worth noting that the Atlantic Council is, in fact, a group of consultants that is considering the possibilities for carrying out certain NATO operations.
A statement by the foreign policy expert of the Atlantic Council, Stephen Blanca, states that the US "should consider the option of sending its ships to the Sea of Azov." Blank states that "Russia, by building a bridge, blocks traffic for Ukrainian ports." An expert atlantist claims that it will strike at the export of Ukrainian steel.
At the same time, Mr. Blank does not specify which US ships “should send” to the Sea of Azov, and which document generally regulates the passage to this sea of warships of those countries that are geographically unrelated to the Sea of Azov.
Will the Sixth Fleet really go to the Kerch Strait? .. For this, Ukrainians will have to “pick up” shovels again in order to now work on the deepening of the Azov Sea Basin ...
According to Blank, the construction of the Kerch Bridge "threatens the interests of the United States."
Against this background, Ukrainian citizens publish their impressions of the construction of the Kerch (Crimea) bridge. One of such publications was made by the coordinator of the Ukrainian movement “Successful Country” by Pavel Sebastyanovich in Facebook:
Another Ukrainian expert, Andrei Vajra, notes that Ukraine is annoyed by the construction of the Kerch bridge, since the bridge finally disrupts all plans to blockade the Crimea and worsen the economic situation on the peninsula.
A statement by the foreign policy expert of the Atlantic Council, Stephen Blanca, states that the US "should consider the option of sending its ships to the Sea of Azov." Blank states that "Russia, by building a bridge, blocks traffic for Ukrainian ports." An expert atlantist claims that it will strike at the export of Ukrainian steel.
At the same time, Mr. Blank does not specify which US ships “should send” to the Sea of Azov, and which document generally regulates the passage to this sea of warships of those countries that are geographically unrelated to the Sea of Azov.
Will the Sixth Fleet really go to the Kerch Strait? .. For this, Ukrainians will have to “pick up” shovels again in order to now work on the deepening of the Azov Sea Basin ...
According to Blank, the construction of the Kerch Bridge "threatens the interests of the United States."
Against this background, Ukrainian citizens publish their impressions of the construction of the Kerch (Crimea) bridge. One of such publications was made by the coordinator of the Ukrainian movement “Successful Country” by Pavel Sebastyanovich in Facebook:
I want our country to become a solid construction site. So that our businessmen, our investors, investors both from the West and from the East build airports, viaducts, autobahns, skyscrapers, factories for the creation of gadgets, cars, trains, airplanes, rockets.
I want world mining leaders to come here with their technologies, with their equipment, dig everything and start mining oil, gas, metals, amber.
I was not interested in the Kerch crossing, until I saw in the tape joyful posts about some kind of arching on an 2 meter.
Scored in the "Kerch Bridge" and ohrenel. There is a real building of the century. They call the future bridge Crimean. In the network a bunch of infographics and video.
19 km long. 4 strip for cars. 2 railway line. The launch of automobile lanes next year, and the railway in 2019. And the old ferry will continue to work. How so? After all, our hurray-patriots promised that the bridge will fall apart.
I wish I did not look. Russians now fully control access to the ports of the Azov Sea. I do not know how the ports of Mariupol and Berdyansk work now.
What about 2018-2019? Looked at the reform plan of the Cabinet. Groisman promised to introduce control over the incomes of citizens in 2018-2019. What can I say? Also a big infrastructure project.
Me in all this stories depressing the economic backlog of Ukraine. All waiting for Mordor collapse. And we do nothing for their development ...
This is not a post zrady. What we have is bad - hats and urapatriotism. Why post bravura posts about the fact that everything is lost there, when everything is almost finished there?
I want world mining leaders to come here with their technologies, with their equipment, dig everything and start mining oil, gas, metals, amber.
I was not interested in the Kerch crossing, until I saw in the tape joyful posts about some kind of arching on an 2 meter.
Scored in the "Kerch Bridge" and ohrenel. There is a real building of the century. They call the future bridge Crimean. In the network a bunch of infographics and video.
19 km long. 4 strip for cars. 2 railway line. The launch of automobile lanes next year, and the railway in 2019. And the old ferry will continue to work. How so? After all, our hurray-patriots promised that the bridge will fall apart.
I wish I did not look. Russians now fully control access to the ports of the Azov Sea. I do not know how the ports of Mariupol and Berdyansk work now.
What about 2018-2019? Looked at the reform plan of the Cabinet. Groisman promised to introduce control over the incomes of citizens in 2018-2019. What can I say? Also a big infrastructure project.
Me in all this stories depressing the economic backlog of Ukraine. All waiting for Mordor collapse. And we do nothing for their development ...
This is not a post zrady. What we have is bad - hats and urapatriotism. Why post bravura posts about the fact that everything is lost there, when everything is almost finished there?
Photo most.life
Another Ukrainian expert, Andrei Vajra, notes that Ukraine is annoyed by the construction of the Kerch bridge, since the bridge finally disrupts all plans to blockade the Crimea and worsen the economic situation on the peninsula.
Information